EXHITENTRE: EXHIT ENTRE Implementation Trial of High Intensity Versus Low Intensity Strategy
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study is a multi-site, cluster randomized, two group implementation trial comparing a low- versus high-intensity implementation strategy for supporting hospital-based opioid use disorder treatment (HBOT) in community hospital settings where medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment has not been implemented.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
The study will randomize approximately 24 community hospitals meeting defined eligibility requirements, including a desire to address OUD among inpatients through the use of MOUD. Community hospitals will be randomized 1:1 to implement a low- or high-intensity strategy. Hospitals will be randomized with intervention implementation and oversight assigned to one of 3-4 geographically diverse hub academic medical centers with existing clinical and research expertise in HBOT. The randomization will be stratified by site/hub. Participants will be assessed for "engagement with MOUD", measured as the proportion of community hospital OUD discharges engaged with MOUD within 34 days following hospital discharge during months 13-24 of the intervention. Further outcomes will be assessed during the entire 4-year study period.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Low Intensity MOUD training and support through the use of educational materials. |
Other: Low Intensity
Training and education only, a low-intensity strategy inclusive of an HBOT manual, one-time live training on how to use the HBOT manual, and 7 video conference presentations.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: High Intensity MOUD training and support through the use of educational materials in addition to practice facilitation. |
Other: High Intensity
Practice facilitation, a high-intensity strategy inclusive of low-intensity training, plus practice facilitation that is based in part on a program planning model. This study is a hybrid implementation effectiveness design, testing an implementation strategy while observing and gathering information on the clinical intervention's impact on relevant outcomes.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Engagement with MOUD [34 days following hospital discharge]
measured as the proportion of community hospital OUD discharges engaged with MOUD within 34 days following hospital discharge during months 13-24 of the intervention.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Be a community hospital deemed by the lead investigators to be in the region of a site/hub. Region will usually be defined as state unless a compelling case can be made as to geographic feasibility of implementing the intervention and access to relevant Medicaid data.
-
Be willing to identify a site champion to promote and adopt change that can address OUD in hospitalized patients.
-
Have hospital personnel who state that their institution is interested in and would be willing to work to implement MOUD prior to hospital discharge.
-
Commit to having buprenorphine-waivered prescribers willing and able to write prescriptions to bridge discharged patients to post-discharge OUD treatment, or available direct entry into outpatient MOUD with methadone or buprenorphine.
-
Have hospital staff who express willingness to engage with a site/hub team for training and for data collection.
-
Be willing to be randomized to low-intensity or high-intensity implementation support.
-
Provide inpatient general medical care.
-
Have sufficient numbers of Medicaid OUD discharges (any listed diagnosis; sufficient is defined as at least enough such that when added to the other hospitals in the region there are on average 100 discharges per year). Medicaid data must capture at least 3 discharge diagnoses, outpatient MOUD, and be available within no more than 12 months of discharge.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Have an ACS routinely prescribing MOUD at discharge.
-
Have an existing, functioning HBOT program or be imminently starting an HBOT initiative, as confirmed by the investigator team.
-
Be a Veterans Affairs hospital.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Boston University | Boston | Massachusetts | United States | 02119 |
2 | Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute | Minneapolis | Minnesota | United States | 55404 |
3 | New York University | New York | New York | United States | 10016 |
4 | Oregon Health & Science University | Portland | Oregon | United States | 97239 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
- The Emmes Company, LLC
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, Damschroder LJ, Smith JL, Matthieu MM, Proctor EK, Kirchner JE. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015 Feb 12;10:21. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1.
- Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, Griffey R, Hensley M. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.
- Trowbridge P, Weinstein ZM, Kerensky T, Roy P, Regan D, Samet JH, Walley AY. Addiction consultation services - Linking hospitalized patients to outpatient addiction treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Aug;79:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 11.
- NIDA CTN 0098B
- 2UG1DA040316-06