Addiction-focused EMDR in Inpatients Who Use Non-opioid Drugs: a Multiple Baseline Study

Sponsor
IrisZorg (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05923697
Collaborator
Radboud University Medical Center (Other)
9
1
1
18
0.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Rationale: It is well established that Substance Use Disorders (SUD) have severe health consequences. Despite behavioral and pharmacological treatment options, relapse rates remain high. In particular, for non-opioid drugs, such as amphetamines, cocaine, base-coke and cannabis, established, evidence-based pharmacological options to reduce craving, to substitute substance use or to enforce abstinence are lacking. Therefore, there is a need for effective interventions for patients who use non-opioid drugs to reach and maintain long-term abstinence.

A potential interesting intervention is addiction-focused Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (AF-EMDR) therapy. However, the limited research on AF-EMDR therapy and mixed findings thus far prohibit clinical use. Recently, on the basis of diverse findings thus far, an adjusted AF-EMDR therapy protocol has been developed.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: AF-EMDR
N/A

Detailed Description

Objective: to investigate areas of uncertainty about a possible future pilot RCT using AF-EMDR as an add-on intervention in inpatients who use non-opioid drugs and receive regular, inpatient addiction treatment, by determining:

  • Feasibility.

  • Potential clinical efficacy.

Study population: adults with a primary non-opioid use disorder, who are admitted to an inpatient addiction care clinic. A total of nine eligible participants will be allocated (allocation ratio 1:1:1) at random, in a non-concurrent fashion to one of three baseline durations.

Intervention: a total of four 90 min. sessions of AF-EMDR twice per week added to TAU.

Main study parameters/endpoints:
  • Feasibility issues.

  • Changes in daily craving.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
9 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Study design: a non-concurrent multiple baseline design is used in which participants are allocated at random to a baseline period of 7, 10, or 13 days after which they proceed to an intervention phase of two weeks in which they receive four 90 min. sessions of AF-EMDR and a follow-up interview after one month. During both the baseline and the AF-EMDR intervention phase, participants also receive Treatment As Usual (TAU: Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA)), aimed at SUD.Study design: a non-concurrent multiple baseline design is used in which participants are allocated at random to a baseline period of 7, 10, or 13 days after which they proceed to an intervention phase of two weeks in which they receive four 90 min. sessions of AF-EMDR and a follow-up interview after one month. During both the baseline and the AF-EMDR intervention phase, participants also receive Treatment As Usual (TAU: Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA)), aimed at SUD.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
The Feasibility and Potential Efficacy of Adding Addiction-focused EMDR to Regular Addiction Treatment A Multiple Baseline Study in Inpatients Who Use Non-opioid Drugs
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jul 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 31, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: AF-EMDR

Intervention: a total of four 90 min. sessions of AF-EMDR twice per week added to TAU.

Behavioral: AF-EMDR
Investigational treatment All participants receive four 90 min. AF-EMDR sessions within a timeframe of two weeks following the baseline phase. The AF-EMDR treatment will be provided by the principal investigators, a level II EMDR therapist (RvdH) and an EMDR consultant in training who developed the AF-EMDR protocol. The EMDR therapist (RvdH) will be trained by the EMDR consultant (WM), who is available for consultation. Additionally, both participate monthly in peer-supervision whereby videotaped sessions are discussed. See appendix 1 for a detailed understanding of the AF-EMDR protocol.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Recruitment potential [1 year]

    measured by the proportion of patients at the clinic that are potentially eligible and are included versus those that are excluded. A higher amount of included participants means a better outcome.

  2. Participants acceptability [1 year]

    The acceptability of AF-EMDR to participants in terms of compliance, measured by the total number of sessions attended and the proportion of attended versus non attended (planned) sessions; a higher proportion of attended sessions reflects better compliance.

  3. Therapist acceptability [1 year]

    The acceptability of AF-EMDR to therapists in terms of adherence to the protocol, measured by the score of an independent rater on an a-priori established adherence rating protocol; a higher score reflects better adherence. Minimum=0 ;maximum=100

  4. Study adherence of participants [1 year]

    from randomization until follow-up in terms of completion of tasks. A higher amount of completion means a better outcome.

  5. Experienced (by participants) acceptability and burden [1 year]

    facilitators and barriers and subjective effectiveness of the AF-EMDR intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in: Subjective Units of Distress (SUD) [1 year]

    Within and/or over AF-EMDR sessions change in: Subjective Units of Distress (SUD) (Likert-type scales), a higher score reflects a worse outcome.

  2. Change in craving [1 year]

    Within and/or over AF-EMDR sessions change in: Craving (Likert-type scale), a higher score reflects a worse outcome.

  3. Change in Level of Urge (LoU) [1 year]

    Within and/or over AF-EMDR sessions change in: Change in Level of Urge (LoU), a higher score reflects a worse outcome.

  4. Change in: Level of Positive Affect (LoPA) [1 year]

    Within and/or over AF-EMDR sessions change in: Level of Positive Affect (LoPA), a higher score reflects a better outcome.

  5. changes in: Craving (MATE Q1: OCDS-5) [1 year]

    Baseline to follow-up assessment changes in: Craving (MATE Q1: OCDS-5), a higher score reflects a worse outcome

  6. changes in: Craving-related self-control/self-efficacy (SCCQ) [1 year]

    Baseline to follow-up assessment changes in: Craving-related self-control/self-efficacy (SCCQ), a higher score reflects a worse outcome

  7. changes in: Positive incentive value (SCCQ) [1 year]

    Baseline to follow-up assessment changes in: Positive incentive value (SCCQ), a higher score reflects a worse outcome

  8. changes in: Substance use (past 30 days) (MATE section 1) [1 year]

    Baseline to follow-up assessment changes in: Substance use (past 30 days) (MATE section 1), a higher score reflects a worse outcome

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, patients must meet the following criteria:

Diagnosis of Tobacco Use Disorder according to the DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association, 2013) criteria.

Age ≥ 18 years.

Good Dutch language proficiency (based on clinical judgement).

Smoking, on average, ≥ 10 cigarettes per day pre-admission.

A score of at least 5 on a scale from 0 to 10, for motivation and self-efficacy

A planned inpatient stay of ≥ 4 weeks.

Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

A patient who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

Serious therapy interfering behavior or symptoms that also interfere with TAU, based on clinical judgement (e. g. psychiatric or medical crisis that requires immediate intervention).

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Addiction clinic 'Tiel' IrisZorg Tiel Gelderland Netherlands 4001 AG

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • IrisZorg
  • Radboud University Medical Center

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
IrisZorg
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05923697
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • MBS AF-EMDR NODD
First Posted:
Jun 28, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Jun 28, 2023
Last Verified:
Jun 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by IrisZorg
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 28, 2023