Swallowing Function Before and After Surgery for Thyroid Goiter

Sponsor
University of Wisconsin, Madison (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00205348
Collaborator
(none)
146
81.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

To date, there have been no comprehensive studies on swallowing function in patients undergoing surgery for multinodular goiter. We hypothesize that 1. Multinodular goiter has significant effect on swallowing function in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, which can be demonstrated by a standardized questionnaire and a formal swallowing evaluation and 2. Surgery will improve swallowing function as measured post-operatively by these same parameters. Patients with multinodular goiter will be asked to fill out a validated survey (SWAL-QOL) on swallowing function in addition to undergoing a formal swallowing evaluation before and after surgery for multinodular goiter (subtotal thyroidectomy) and compared to patients undergoing total thyroidectomy for follicular cancer and less extensive thyroid surgery for other benign processes (lobectomy or lobectomy plus isthmusectomy).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Detailed Description

    Detailed description not desired.

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Actual Enrollment :
    146 participants
    Observational Model:
    Case-Only
    Time Perspective:
    Prospective
    Official Title:
    Swallowing Function Before and After Surgery for Thyroid Goiter
    Study Start Date :
    Apr 1, 2002
    Actual Primary Completion Date :
    Jan 1, 2009
    Actual Study Completion Date :
    Jan 1, 2009

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Swallowing Quality of Life [One year]

      The swallowing quality of life (SWAL-QOL) validated outcomes assessment tool will be used before and one year after surgery to measure changes in swallowing-related QOL in patients undergoing thyroid surgery. The SWAL-QOL is a 44 item tool that asks patients to rate several factors about 10 quality-of-life concepts related to swallowing on a 5 point scale.Data were collected on demographic and clinicopathologic variables, and comparisons were made to determine the effect of surgery on patients' perceptions of swallowing function. A score of 0 represents the least favorable state, and 100 the most favorable. It has been validated and has favorable psychometric properties, including high internal-consistency reliability and reproducibility. The scales of the instrument differentiate patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia from normal swallowers and are sensitive to clinically-relevant differences in dysphagia severity in patients with medically and surgically treated conditions.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • thyroidectomy
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • na

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    No locations specified.

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of Wisconsin, Madison

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Herbert Chen, MD, University of Wisconsin Medical School

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    University of Wisconsin, Madison
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00205348
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 2002-093
    First Posted:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Last Update Posted:
    Feb 28, 2018
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2017
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details Patients undergoing thyroid surgery from May 2002 to December 2004 completed the SWAL-QOL questionnaire before and one year after surgery.
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title SWAL-QOL Questionnaire
    Arm/Group Description Patients undergoing thyroid surgery from May 2002 to December 2004 completed the Swallowing Quality Of Life (SWAL-QOL)questionnaire before and one year after surgery. The SWAL-QOL is a 44 item tool that asks patients to rate several factors about 10 quality-of-life concepts related to swallowing on a 5 point scale. Data were collected on demographic and clinicopathologic variables, and comparisons were made to determine the effect of surgery on patients' perceptions of swallowing function.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 146
    COMPLETED 116
    NOT COMPLETED 30

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title SWAL-QOL Questionnaire
    Arm/Group Description Patients undergoing thyroid surgery from May 2002 to December 2004 completed the Swallowing Quality Of Life (SWAL-QOL)questionnaire before and one year after surgery. The SWAL-QOL is a 44 item tool that asks patients to rate several factors about 10 quality-of-life concepts related to swallowing on a 5 point scale. Data were collected on demographic and clinicopathologic variables, and comparisons were made to determine the effect of surgery on patients' perceptions of swallowing function.
    Overall Participants 116
    Age (Count of Participants)
    <=18 years
    0
    0%
    Between 18 and 65 years
    116
    100%
    >=65 years
    0
    0%
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    49
    (13)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    94
    81%
    Male
    22
    19%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    United States
    116
    100%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Swallowing Quality of Life
    Description The swallowing quality of life (SWAL-QOL) validated outcomes assessment tool will be used before and one year after surgery to measure changes in swallowing-related QOL in patients undergoing thyroid surgery. The SWAL-QOL is a 44 item tool that asks patients to rate several factors about 10 quality-of-life concepts related to swallowing on a 5 point scale.Data were collected on demographic and clinicopathologic variables, and comparisons were made to determine the effect of surgery on patients' perceptions of swallowing function. A score of 0 represents the least favorable state, and 100 the most favorable. It has been validated and has favorable psychometric properties, including high internal-consistency reliability and reproducibility. The scales of the instrument differentiate patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia from normal swallowers and are sensitive to clinically-relevant differences in dysphagia severity in patients with medically and surgically treated conditions.
    Time Frame One year

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    All data will be analyzed using standard statistical tools including student T-test and ANOVA.
    Arm/Group Title SWAL-QOL Questionnaire
    Arm/Group Description Patients undergoing thyroid surgery from May 2002 to December 2004 completed the Swallowing Quality Of Life (SWAL-QOL)questionnaire before and one year after surgery. The SWAL-QOL is a 44 item tool that asks patients to rate several factors about 10 quality-of-life concepts related to swallowing on a 5 point scale. Data were collected on demographic and clinicopathologic variables, and comparisons were made to determine the effect of surgery on patients' perceptions of swallowing function. A score of 0 represents the least favorable state, and 100 the most favorable.
    Measure Participants 116
    Burden Score Before Surgery
    84.6
    Burden Score After Surgery
    92.3
    Physical Score Before Surgery
    81.2
    Physical Score After Surgery
    87.1
    Mental Score Before Surgery
    87.0
    Mental Score After Surgery
    93.1
    Fear Score Before Surgery
    87.0
    Fear Score After Surgery
    92.9
    Eating Desire Score Before Surgery
    92.5
    Eating Desire Score After Surgery
    94.5
    Eating Duration Score Before Surgery
    86.2
    Eating Duration Score After Surgery
    88.4
    Food Selection Score Before Surgery
    88.5
    Food Selection Score After Surgery
    93.8
    Sleep Score Before Surgery
    65.0
    Sleep Score After Surgery
    73.6
    Fatigue Score Before Surgery
    63.4
    Fatigue Score After Surgery
    71.5
    Social Score Before Surgery
    94.4
    Social Score After Surgery
    95.6
    Communication Score Before Surgery
    88.9
    Communication Score After Surgery
    91.9
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SWAL-QOL Questionnaire
    Comments The statistical significance of the difference between pre-and post-operative scores for Burden was tested with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0007
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SWAL-QOL Questionnaire
    Comments The statistical significance of the difference between pre-and post-operative scores for Physical was tested with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SWAL-QOL Questionnaire
    Comments The statistical significance of the difference between pre-and post-operative scores for Mental was tested with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0002
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SWAL-QOL Questionnaire
    Comments The statistical significance of the difference between pre-and post-operative scores for Fear was tested with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SWAL-QOL Questionnaire
    Comments The statistical significance of the difference between pre-and post-operative scores for Eating Desire was tested with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0973
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 6
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SWAL-QOL Questionnaire
    Comments The statistical significance of the difference between pre-and post-operative scores for Eating Duration was tested with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1772
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 7
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SWAL-QOL Questionnaire
    Comments The statistical significance of the difference between pre-and post-operative scores for Food Selection was tested with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0062
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 8
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SWAL-QOL Questionnaire
    Comments The statistical significance of the difference between pre-and post-operative scores for Sleep was tested with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 9
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SWAL-QOL Questionnaire
    Comments The statistical significance of the difference between pre-and post-operative scores for Fatigue was tested with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0002
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 10
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SWAL-QOL Questionnaire
    Comments The statistical significance of the difference between pre-and post-operative scores for Social was tested with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2125
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 11
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SWAL-QOL Questionnaire
    Comments The statistical significance of the difference between pre-and post-operative scores for Communication was tested with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0332
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title SWAL-QOL Questionnaire
    Arm/Group Description Patients undergoing thyroid surgery from May 2002 to December 2004 completed the Swallowing Quality Of Life (SWAL-QOL)questionnaire before and one year after surgery. The SWAL-QOL is a 44 item tool that asks patients to rate several factors about 10 quality-of-life concepts related to swallowing on a 5 point scale. Data were collected on demographic and clinicopathologic variables, and comparisons were made to determine the effect of surgery on patients' perceptions of swallowing function.
    All Cause Mortality
    SWAL-QOL Questionnaire
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    SWAL-QOL Questionnaire
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/116 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    SWAL-QOL Questionnaire
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/116 (0%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    There are no limitations or caveats to report.

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Dr. Herbert Chen
    Organization University of Wisconsin-Madison
    Phone 608-263-1387
    Email chen@surgery.wisc.edu
    Responsible Party:
    University of Wisconsin, Madison
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00205348
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 2002-093
    First Posted:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Last Update Posted:
    Feb 28, 2018
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2017