Symptoms Comparison: Suture-stent vs Conventional Double-J Stents After Ureterorenoscopy. A Prospective Randomized Trial

Sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03344120
Collaborator
(none)
84
1
2
11.3
7.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Double J ureteral stents (DJ) are widely used in urological practice and commonly inserted after most of ureteroscopies. Stent-related symptoms (SRS) represent a major issue. Many research lines have been explored with the aim of decreasing SRS: Vogt et al. projected a self-made pigtail suture stent (PSS) replacing the distal pigtail with a 0.3 Fr suture reaching the bladder, showing decreased SRS and good tolerance. To date, these promising results hasn't been confirmed by a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving a marketed PSS. Thus, we designed a prospective single-blind RCT to compare SRS caused by marketed PSS and conventional DJ after uncomplicated URS for stone treatment.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Administration of USSQ Symptoms questionnaire after stent positioning
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
84 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparison Between Symptomps Related to Pigtail Suture Stent Versus Conventional Double J After Ureterorenoscopy for Stone Treatment. A Prospective Randomized Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 8, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Nov 2, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 16, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: suture stent

suture stent positioning after ureteroscopy. Intervention: administration of USSQ questionnaire.

Other: Administration of USSQ Symptoms questionnaire after stent positioning
Administration of USSQ Symptoms questionnaire to patients with two different type of stents after ureteroscopy

Active Comparator: conventional double-J stent

conventional double-J stent positioning after ureteroscopy. Intervention: administration of USSQ questionnaire.

Other: Administration of USSQ Symptoms questionnaire after stent positioning
Administration of USSQ Symptoms questionnaire to patients with two different type of stents after ureteroscopy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Urinary Symptom Index Score [14 days]

    to compare Urinary Symptom Index Score (sum of USSQ Urinary symptoms scores) of suture stent and double J group, 2 weeks after surgery.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. USSQ domains' scores [14 days]

    to compare USSQ domains' scores of suture stent and double J group, 2 weeks after surgery

  2. USSQ domains' scores [2 days]

    to compare USSQ domains' scores of suture stent and double J group, 2 days after surgery

  3. USSQ single answers [14 day]

    to compare USSQ single answers of suture stent and double J group, 2 weeks after surgery

  4. USSQ single answers [2 days]

    to compare USSQ single answers of suture stent and double J group, 2 days after surgery

  5. 2 weeks USSQ domains' subscores adjusted for baseline [6 weeks]

    to compare 2 weeks USSQ domains' subscores adjusted for baseline of suture stent and double J group

  6. complications and adverse events [2 weeks]

    to compare complications and adverse events of suture stent and double J group

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • ureteral or renal stones < 2 cm needing treatment through semirigid or flexible URS and laser lithotripsy

  • stone-free procedure and absence of intraprocedural complications

  • WHO performance status 0-2

Exclusion Criteria:
  • significant residual fragments at the end of the procedure

  • intraprocedural complications (e.g. ureteral damage or stricture)

  • indwelling double J stent

  • acute kidney failure

  • urinary tract infection

  • urinary tract abnormalities

  • pathologies or medications potentially influencing voiding pattern and pain perception

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza Turin Italy 10126

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrea Bosio, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Andrea Bosio, MD Urologist, PhD, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03344120
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • AOUCSSTURAB004
First Posted:
Nov 17, 2017
Last Update Posted:
Dec 30, 2020
Last Verified:
Dec 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Andrea Bosio, MD Urologist, PhD, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Dec 30, 2020