Clinical Study to Investigate the Biological Activity, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of ACT-334441 in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
International trial to evaluate the biological activity and safety of cenerimod (ACT-334441) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 |
Detailed Description
This multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study will have a staggered approach (Part A and B).
In part A, eligible patients will be randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to once daily oral administration of cenerimod (0.5, 1, 2 mg) or placebo. After all patients have completed 4 weeks of treatment during part A, an Independent Data Monitoring Committee will review non-blinded data in an interim analysis to evaluate the safety profile of cenerimod and recommend whether the study could proceed to part B.
In part B, additional patients will be randomized (3:1) to once daily oral administration of cenerimod 4 mg or placebo.
All participants will receive study medication for 12 weeks.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Cenerimod 0.5 mg (Part A) Participants will receive cenerimod 0.5 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. |
Drug: Cenerimod
One capsule of cenerimod to be taken once daily, irrespective of food intake. The capsule is to be swallowed whole. The capsule should be taken each day at approximately the same time (preferably each morning).
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Cenerimod 1 mg (Part A) Participants will receive cenerimod 1 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. |
Drug: Cenerimod
One capsule of cenerimod to be taken once daily, irrespective of food intake. The capsule is to be swallowed whole. The capsule should be taken each day at approximately the same time (preferably each morning).
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Cenerimod 2 mg (Part A) Participants will receive cenerimod 2 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. |
Drug: Cenerimod
One capsule of cenerimod to be taken once daily, irrespective of food intake. The capsule is to be swallowed whole. The capsule should be taken each day at approximately the same time (preferably each morning).
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Cenerimod 4 mg (Part B) Participants will received cenerimod 4 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. This treatment arm will start after all patients in Part A have completed 4 weeks of placebo, 0.5 mg, 1 mg and 2 mg cenerimod treatment. |
Drug: Cenerimod
One capsule of cenerimod to be taken once daily, irrespective of food intake. The capsule is to be swallowed whole. The capsule should be taken each day at approximately the same time (preferably each morning).
Other Names:
|
Placebo Comparator: Matching placebo (Part A and B) Capsules of matching placebo taken orally once daily for 12 weeks. |
Drug: Matching placebo
One capsule of cenerimod to be taken once daily, irrespective of food intake. The capsule is to be swallowed whole. The capsule should be taken each day at approximately the same time (preferably each morning).
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change in Total Lymphocyte Count From Baseline to End-of-treatment (EOT) [Baseline to end-of-treatment (EOT) (up to 12 weeks)]
The primary objective of the clinical study was to asses whether cenerimod could reduce the number of circulating lymphocytes in the bloodstream of people with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The change was defined as: Total lymphocyte count at end-of-treatment (EOT) minus total lymphocyte count at baseline. A negative change over time indicates that the number of peripheral circulating lymphocytes has decreased. The reduction of the total lymphocyte count over a treatment period indicates a pharmacodynamic effect. The value at baseline was defined as the last non-missing value obtained from a sample taken prior to the first study treatment intake. End-of-treatment (EOT) was defined as the last post-baseline value with treatment for at least 21 days up to Week 12.
- Change in Total Lymphocyte Count From Baseline to Each Post-baseline Assessment [Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, end-of-treatment Visit (up to 12 weeks)]
The primary objective of the clinical study was to assess whether cenerimod could reduce the number of circulating lymphocytes in the bloodstream of people with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The change was defined as: Total lymphocyte count at visit minus total lymphocyte count at baseline. A negative change over time indicates that the number of peripheral circulating lymphocytes has decreased. The reduction of the total lymphocyte count over a treatment period indicates a pharmacodynamic effect. The value at baseline was defined as the last non-missing value obtained from a sample taken prior to the first study treatment intake. End-of-treatment (EOT) was defined as the last post-baseline value with treatment for at least 21 days up to Week 12.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Male and female participants aged 18 to 65 years with established SLE. Participants must have active SLE, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score of at least 2 points for musculoskeletal or mucocutaneous manifestations and history or presence at screening of positive anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) or anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies.
-
Enrolled participants must be treated with background SLE medications.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Participants with significant medical conditions or therapies for such conditions (e.g., cardiovascular, pulmonary, immunological, hepatic, ophthalmological, infection and infection risks, history or presence of malignancy, history or presence of bone marrow or solid organ transplantation) or lactating or pregnant women.
-
Participants with severe SLE disease or with clinically relevant medical or surgical conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, would put the subject at risk by participating in the study.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Investigator Site | Anniston | Alabama | United States | 36207 |
2 | Investigator Site | Clearwater | Florida | United States | 33765 |
3 | Investigator Site | Minsk | Belarus | 220116 | |
4 | Investigator Site | Minsk | Belarus | 223041 | |
5 | Investigator Site | Vitebsk | Belarus | 210037 | |
6 | Investigator Site | Plovdiv | Bulgaria | 4000 | |
7 | Investigator Site | Plovdiv | Bulgaria | 4002 | |
8 | Investigator Site | Sofia | Bulgaria | 1612 | |
9 | Investigator Site | Tbilisi | Georgia | 0186 | |
10 | Investigator Site | Kemerovo | Russian Federation | 650066 | |
11 | Investigator Site | Kursk | Russian Federation | 305007 | |
12 | Investigator Site | Omsk | Russian Federation | 644111 | |
13 | Investigator Site | Orenburg | Russian Federation | 460018 | |
14 | Investigator Site | Smolensk | Russian Federation | 214025 | |
15 | Investigator Site | Vladimir | Russian Federation | 600023 | |
16 | Investigator Site | Vinnytsya | Ukraine | 21018 | |
17 | Investigator Site | Vinnytsya | Ukraine | 21029 | |
18 | Investigator Site | Zaporizhia | Ukraine | 69600 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Investigators
- Study Director: Study Director, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
None provided.- AC-064A201
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | This study was conducted at 18 sites in 6 countries between 1 June 2015 and 28 February 2017, 105 patients signed consent and 67 were randomized to a study treatment: 49 in part A (randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive cenerimod 0.5, 1, 2 mg or placebo) and 18 in part B (randomized 3:1 to receive cenerimod 4 mg or placebo). |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | The screening period started when the informed consent was signed (up to 30 days before randomization), and ended with randomization. The period included Visit 1 (screening) and the pre-randomization (pre-dose) assessments at Visit 2 (Day 1). Thirty-two patients did not meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria and 6 patients withdrew from the study. |
Arm/Group Title | Cenerimod 0.5 mg (Part A) | Cenerimod 1 mg (Part A) | Cenerimod 2 mg (Part A) | Cenerimod 4 mg (Part B) | Matching Placebo (Part A and B) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received cenerimod 0.5 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod 1 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod 2 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod 4 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod matching placebo capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. |
Period Title: Overall Study | |||||
STARTED | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 17 |
Pharmacodynamic Set | 12 | 10 | 13 | 13 | 16 |
Modified Pharmacodynamic Analysis Set | 12 | 10 | 13 | 9 | 16 |
COMPLETED | 12 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 14 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Cenerimod 0.5 mg (Part A) | Cenerimod 1 mg (Part A) | Cenerimod 2 mg (Part A) | Cenerimod 4 mg (Part B) | Matching Placebo (Part A and Part B) | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received cenerimod 0.5 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod 1 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod 2 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod 4 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod matching placebo capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 17 | 67 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||||
Full analysis set |
41.4
(13.2)
|
37.0
(6.4)
|
39.2
(11.8)
|
41.7
(8.1)
|
41.0
(9.5)
|
40.1
(9.9)
|
Pharmacodynamic analysis set |
41.4
(13.2)
|
38.1
(5.4)
|
39.2
(11.8)
|
41.7
(8.1)
|
41.8
(9.2)
|
40.6
(9.8)
|
Modified pharmacodynamics analysis set |
41.4
(13.2)
|
38.1
(5.4)
|
39.2
(11.8)
|
41.9
(8.6)
|
41.8
(9.2)
|
40.6
(9.9)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | ||||||
Female |
11
91.7%
|
12
100%
|
12
92.3%
|
10
76.9%
|
16
94.1%
|
61
91%
|
Male |
1
8.3%
|
0
0%
|
1
7.7%
|
3
23.1%
|
1
5.9%
|
6
9%
|
Female |
11
91.7%
|
10
83.3%
|
12
92.3%
|
10
76.9%
|
16
94.1%
|
59
88.1%
|
Male |
1
8.3%
|
0
0%
|
1
7.7%
|
3
23.1%
|
0
0%
|
5
7.5%
|
Female |
11
91.7%
|
10
83.3%
|
12
92.3%
|
7
53.8%
|
16
94.1%
|
56
83.6%
|
Male |
1
8.3%
|
0
0%
|
1
7.7%
|
2
15.4%
|
0
0%
|
4
6%
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | ||||||
Hispanic or Latino |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
12
100%
|
12
100%
|
13
100%
|
13
100%
|
17
100%
|
67
100%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | ||||||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Asian |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
2
11.8%
|
2
3%
|
White |
12
100%
|
12
100%
|
13
100%
|
13
100%
|
15
88.2%
|
65
97%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Asian |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
2
11.8%
|
2
3%
|
White |
12
100%
|
10
83.3%
|
13
100%
|
13
100%
|
14
82.4%
|
62
92.5%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Asian |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
2
11.8%
|
2
3%
|
White |
12
100%
|
10
83.3%
|
13
100%
|
9
69.2%
|
14
82.4%
|
58
86.6%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | ||||||
United States |
1
8.3%
|
1
8.3%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
2
11.8%
|
4
6%
|
Ukraine |
3
25%
|
1
8.3%
|
2
15.4%
|
1
7.7%
|
2
11.8%
|
9
13.4%
|
Georgia |
2
16.7%
|
1
8.3%
|
1
7.7%
|
1
7.7%
|
1
5.9%
|
6
9%
|
Belarus |
0
0%
|
1
8.3%
|
2
15.4%
|
2
15.4%
|
2
11.8%
|
7
10.4%
|
Bulgaria |
3
25%
|
2
16.7%
|
2
15.4%
|
7
53.8%
|
5
29.4%
|
19
28.4%
|
Russia |
3
25%
|
6
50%
|
6
46.2%
|
2
15.4%
|
5
29.4%
|
22
32.8%
|
Body mass index (kg/m^2) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||||
Full analysis set |
25.2
(5.1)
|
27.4
(8.0)
|
26.0
(5.1)
|
27.5
(4.7)
|
25.4
(6.8)
|
26.3
(6.0)
|
Pharmacodynamic analysis set |
25.2
(5.1)
|
28.8
(8.1)
|
26.0
(5.1)
|
27.5
(4.7)
|
25.5
(7.0)
|
26.5
(6.1)
|
Modified pharmacodynamic analysis set |
25.2
(5.1)
|
28.8
(8.1)
|
26.0
(5.1)
|
28.3
(5.4)
|
25.5
(7.0)
|
26.5
(6.2)
|
Disease history time from first Systemic Lupus Erythematosus symptoms (years) [Median (Full Range) ] | ||||||
Full analysis set |
3.7
|
8.2
|
6.7
|
4.6
|
7.9
|
6.0
|
Pharmacodynamic analysis set |
3.7
|
9.2
|
6.7
|
4.6
|
7.9
|
6.2
|
Modified pharmacodynamic analysis set |
3.7
|
9.2
|
6.7
|
3.2
|
7.9
|
6.2
|
Time from first Systemic Lupus Erythematosus diagnosis (years) [Median (Full Range) ] | ||||||
Full analysis set |
2.4
|
6.2
|
4.5
|
2.9
|
4.9
|
3.8
|
Pharmacodynamic analysis set |
2.4
|
5.8
|
4.5
|
2.9
|
5.0
|
3.6
|
Modified pharmacodynamic analysis set |
2.4
|
5.8
|
4.5
|
1.3
|
5.0
|
3.6
|
Number of American College of Rheumatology criteria ongoing at screening (Count of Participants) | ||||||
0 to 3 ACR criteria ongoing at screening |
5
41.7%
|
3
25%
|
5
38.5%
|
1
7.7%
|
6
35.3%
|
20
29.9%
|
4 to 11 ACR criteria ongoing at screening |
7
58.3%
|
9
75%
|
8
61.5%
|
12
92.3%
|
11
64.7%
|
47
70.1%
|
0 to 3 ACR criteria more than 6 months ago |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
4 to 11 ACR criteria more than 6 months ago |
12
100%
|
12
100%
|
13
100%
|
13
100%
|
17
100%
|
67
100%
|
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000, modified to exclude leucopenia (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||||
Full analysis set |
7.3
(3.3)
|
8.3
(3.7)
|
7.1
(2.3)
|
8.7
(3.1)
|
7.4
(3.3)
|
7.7
(3.1)
|
Pharmacodynamic analysis set |
7.3
(3.3)
|
7.0
(2.2)
|
7.1
(2.3)
|
8.7
(3.1)
|
7.3
(3.4)
|
7.5
(2.9)
|
Modified pharmacodynamic analysis set |
7.3
(3.3)
|
7.0
(2.2)
|
7.1
(2.3)
|
8.1
(2.5)
|
7.3
(3.4)
|
7.3
(2.8)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Change in Total Lymphocyte Count From Baseline to End-of-treatment (EOT) |
---|---|
Description | The primary objective of the clinical study was to asses whether cenerimod could reduce the number of circulating lymphocytes in the bloodstream of people with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The change was defined as: Total lymphocyte count at end-of-treatment (EOT) minus total lymphocyte count at baseline. A negative change over time indicates that the number of peripheral circulating lymphocytes has decreased. The reduction of the total lymphocyte count over a treatment period indicates a pharmacodynamic effect. The value at baseline was defined as the last non-missing value obtained from a sample taken prior to the first study treatment intake. End-of-treatment (EOT) was defined as the last post-baseline value with treatment for at least 21 days up to Week 12. |
Time Frame | Baseline to end-of-treatment (EOT) (up to 12 weeks) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Pharmacodynamics analysis (PD) set. The PD set includes all participants who received at least 21 days of study treatment, with lymphocyte count measurements at baseline and post-baseline. Last observation carried forward (using the Week 4 visit or later) was used for participants with a missing end-of-treatment (EOT) assessment. |
Arm/Group Title | Cenerimod 0.5 mg (Part A) | Cenerimod 1 mg (Part A) | Cenerimod 2 mg (Part A) | Cenerimod 4 mg (Part B) | Matching Placebo |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received cenerimod 0.5 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod 1 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod 2 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod 4 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod matching placebo capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 12 | 10 | 13 | 13 | 16 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [10^9 cells/L] |
-0.26
(0.48)
|
-0.96
(0.68)
|
-0.86
(0.61)
|
-0.87
(1.24)
|
-0.33
(0.72)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Cenerimod 0.5 mg (Part A), Matching Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.39 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -0.17 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.56 to 0.22 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 0.2 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Cenerimod 1 mg (Part A), Matching Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.02 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -0.5 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.91 to 0.09 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 0.2 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Cenerimod 2 mg (Part A), Matching Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.004 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -0.57 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.95 to -0.19 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 0.19 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Cenerimod 4 mg (Part B), Matching Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.06 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -0.37 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.75 to 0.02 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 0.19 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Change in Total Lymphocyte Count From Baseline to Each Post-baseline Assessment |
---|---|
Description | The primary objective of the clinical study was to assess whether cenerimod could reduce the number of circulating lymphocytes in the bloodstream of people with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The change was defined as: Total lymphocyte count at visit minus total lymphocyte count at baseline. A negative change over time indicates that the number of peripheral circulating lymphocytes has decreased. The reduction of the total lymphocyte count over a treatment period indicates a pharmacodynamic effect. The value at baseline was defined as the last non-missing value obtained from a sample taken prior to the first study treatment intake. End-of-treatment (EOT) was defined as the last post-baseline value with treatment for at least 21 days up to Week 12. |
Time Frame | Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, end-of-treatment Visit (up to 12 weeks) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Pharmacodynamics analysis (PD) set. The PD set includes all participants who received at least 21 days of study treatment, with lymphocyte count measurements at baseline and post-baseline. Last observation carried forward (using the Week 4 visit or later) was used for participants with a missing end-of-treatment (EOT) assessment. |
Arm/Group Title | Cenerimod 0.5 mg (Part A) | Cenerimod 1 mg (Part A) | Cenerimod 2 mg (Part A) | Cenerimod 4 mg (Part B) | Matching Placebo |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received cenerimod 0.5 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod 1 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod 2 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod 4 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod matching placebo capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 17 |
Baseline visit |
1.37
(0.52)
|
1.71
(0.82)
|
1.62
(0.75)
|
1.88
(0.77)
|
1.65
(0.88)
|
Week 2 visit |
-0.13
(0.56)
|
-0.48
(0.56)
|
-0.52
(1.03)
|
-1.09
(0.65)
|
-0.16
(0.75)
|
Week 4 visit |
-0.28
(0.42)
|
-0.69
(0.76)
|
-0.86
(0.63)
|
-0.68
(1.32)
|
-0.33
(0.69)
|
Week 8 Visit |
-0.28
(0.60)
|
-0.92
(0.60)
|
-0.89
(0.68)
|
-1.03
(1.12)
|
-0.09
(0.82)
|
Week 12 visit |
-0.26
(0.48)
|
-0.72
(1.03)
|
-0.86
(0.61)
|
-0.87
(1.24)
|
-0.29
(0.73)
|
End-of-treatment visit |
-0.26
(0.48)
|
-0.72
(1.03)
|
-0.86
(0.61)
|
-0.87
(1.24)
|
-0.30
(0.71)
|
Title | Change in Total Lymphocyte Count From Baseline to End-of-treatment (EOT) Based on Pharmacokinetic Cthrough Profiles |
---|---|
Description | The change was defined as: Total lymphocyte count at end-of-treatment (EOT) minus total lymphocyte count at baseline. A negative change over time indicates that the number of peripheral circulating lymphocytes has decreased. The value at baseline was defined as the last non-missing value obtained from a sample taken prior to the first study treatment intake. End-of-treatment (EOT) was defined as the last post-baseline value with treatment for at least 21 days up to Week 12. The modified pharmacodynamics analysis set includes all participants who: received at least 21 days of study treatment & with lymphocyte count measurements at baseline and post-baseline (namely, one sample taken at least 21 days after the first study treatment intake and no later than 7 days after the last study treatment intake with no treatment interruption documented in the first 21 days) & with cenerimod plasma concentrations at Week 4 consistent with expectations. |
Time Frame | Baseline to end-of-treatment (EOT) (up to 12 weeks) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Ctrough levels were discovered to be low, or below the lower limit of quantification (BLQ), in four patients randomized to the cenerimod 4 mg group, a finding incompatible with compliance with study treatment. These patients were excluded from the pharmacodynamic analysis set to form a modified pharmacodynamics analysis set. |
Arm/Group Title | Cenerimod 0.5 mg (Part A) | Cenerimod 1 mg (Part A) | Cenerimod 2 mg (Part A) | Cenerimod 4 mg (Part B) | Matching Placebo |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received cenerimod 0.5 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod 1 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod 2 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod 4 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod matching placebo capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 12 | 10 | 13 | 9 | 16 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [10^9 cells/L] |
-0.26
(0.48)
|
-0.96
(0.68)
|
-0.86
(0.61)
|
-1.48
(0.73)
|
-0.32
(0.72)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Cenerimod 0.5 mg (Part A), Matching Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.2837 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -0.145 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.413 to 0.123 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 0.134 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Cenerimod 1 mg (Part A), Matching Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0006 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -0.515 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.797 to -0.234 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 0.140 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Cenerimod 2 mg (Part A), Matching Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -0.565 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.825 to -0.305 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 0.130 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Cenerimod 4 mg (Part B), Matching Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -0.880 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -1.173 to -0.586 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 0.147 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Absolute Values of Total Lymphocyte Count at Each Analysis Visit |
---|---|
Description | The primary objective of the clinical study was to see whether cenerimod could reduce the number of circulating lymphocytes in the bloodstream of people with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The reduction of the total lymphocyte count over a treatment period indicates a pharmacodynamic effect. The modified pharmacodynamics analysis set includes all participants who: received at least 21 days of study treatment & with lymphocyte count measurements at baseline and post-baseline (namely, one sample taken at least 21 days after the first study treatment intake and no later than 7 days after the last study treatment intake with no treatment interruption documented in the first 21 days) & with cenerimod plasma concentrations at Week 4 consistent with expectations. |
Time Frame | Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, end-of-treatment (EOT - up to 12 weeks), end-of-study (6 weeks after EOT) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
All participants for which data was available. Ctrough levels were discovered to be low, or below the lower limit of quantification (BLQ), in four patients randomised to the cenerimod 4 mg group, a finding incompatible with compliance with study treatment. These patients were excluded from the PD set to form a modified pharmacodynamic analysis set. |
Arm/Group Title | Cenerimod 0.5 mg (Part A) | Cenerimod 1 mg (Part A) | Cenerimod 2 mg (Part A) | Cenerimod 4 mg (Part B) | Matching Placebo |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received cenerimod 0.5 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod 1 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod 2 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod 4 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod matching placebo capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 12 | 10 | 13 | 9 | 16 |
Baseline visit |
1.37
(0.52)
|
1.83
(0.79)
|
1.62
(0.75)
|
2.04
(0.80)
|
1.66
(0.91)
|
Week 2 visit |
1.24
(0.34)
|
1.38
(0.49)
|
1.19
(0.89)
|
0.79
(0.44)
|
1.44
(0.44)
|
Week 4 visit |
1.09
(0.27)
|
0.99
(0.38)
|
0.73
(0.39)
|
0.71
(0.49)
|
1.31
(0.5)
|
Week 8 visit |
1.08
(0.43)
|
0.91
(0.40)
|
0.73
(0.36)
|
0.51
(0.28)
|
1.49
(0.73)
|
Week 12 visit |
1.11
(0.37)
|
0.87
(0.34)
|
0.76
(0.44)
|
0.57
(0.21)
|
1.33
(0.54)
|
End-of-treatment visit |
1.11
(0.37)
|
0.87
(0.34)
|
0.76
(0.44)
|
0.57
(0.21)
|
1.34
(0.51)
|
End-of-study visit |
1.42
(0.37)
|
1.42
(0.58)
|
1.35
(0.45)
|
1.14
(0.52)
|
1.71
(0.86)
|
Title | Total Lymphocyte Count Percent Change From Baseline to End-of-treatment (EOT) |
---|---|
Description | Percentage change in total lymphocyte count from baseline to end-of-treatment (EOT). Percent change from baseline is defined as the absolute change from baseline divided by the baseline value (if the baseline value is > 0) and then multiplied by 100. A negative change over time indicates that the number of peripheral circulating lymphocytes has decreased. The reduction of the total lymphocyte count over a treatment period indicates a pharmacodynamic effect. The modified pharmacodynamics analysis set includes all participants who: received at least 21 days of study treatment & with lymphocyte count measurements at baseline and post-baseline (namely, one sample taken at least 21 days after the first study treatment intake and no later than 7 days after the last study treatment intake with no treatment interruption documented in the first 21 days) & with cenerimod plasma concentrations at Week 4 consistent with expectations. |
Time Frame | Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT) (up to 12 weeks) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Ctrough levels were discovered to be low, or below the lower limit of quantification (BLQ), in four patients randomized to the cenerimod 4 mg group, a finding incompatible with compliance with study treatment. These patients were excluded from the pharmacodynamic set to form a modified pharmacodynamic analysis set. |
Arm/Group Title | Cenerimod 0.5 mg (Part A) | Cenerimod 1 mg (Part A) | Cenerimod 2 mg (Part A) | Cenerimod 4 mg (Part B) | Matching Placebo |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received cenerimod 0.5 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod 1 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod 2 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod 4 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod matching placebo capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 12 | 10 | 13 | 9 | 16 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Percent change of total lymphocyte count] |
-12.23
(34.29)
|
-47.76
(20.37)
|
-51.52
(22.53)
|
-69.27
(13.68)
|
-5.04
(39.22)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Cenerimod 0.5 mg (Part A), Matching Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.1755 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -13.214 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -32.513 to 6.085 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 9.626 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Cenerimod 1 mg (Part A), Matching Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0003 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -39.311 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -59.552 to -19.069 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 10.096 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Cenerimod 2 mg (Part A), Matching Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -47.278 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -65.981 to -28.574 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 9.329 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Cenerimod 4 mg (Part B), Matching Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -56.452 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -77.585 to -35.320 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 10.541 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | All Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events that occurred after the intake of the first study treatment and up to 6 weeks after study treatment discontinuation are reported, assessed up to 18 weeks. | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||||||||
Arm/Group Title | Cenerimod 0.5 mg | Cenerimod 1 mg | Cenerimod 2 mg | Cenerimod 4 mg | Matching Placebo | |||||
Arm/Group Description | Participants received cenerimod 0.5 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod 1 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod 2 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod 4 mg capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | Participants received cenerimod matching placebo capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. | |||||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||||||
Cenerimod 0.5 mg | Cenerimod 1 mg | Cenerimod 2 mg | Cenerimod 4 mg | Matching Placebo | ||||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/12 (0%) | 0/12 (0%) | 0/13 (0%) | 0/13 (0%) | 0/17 (0%) | |||||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||||||
Cenerimod 0.5 mg | Cenerimod 1 mg | Cenerimod 2 mg | Cenerimod 4 mg | Matching Placebo | ||||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/12 (0%) | 0/12 (0%) | 0/13 (0%) | 0/13 (0%) | 1/17 (5.9%) | |||||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||||||
Pancreatitis chronic | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/17 (5.9%) | 2 |
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||||||||
Cholecystitis chronic | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/17 (5.9%) | 1 |
Post cholecystectomy syndrome | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/17 (5.9%) | 1 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||||||
Cenerimod 0.5 mg | Cenerimod 1 mg | Cenerimod 2 mg | Cenerimod 4 mg | Matching Placebo | ||||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 5/12 (41.7%) | 5/12 (41.7%) | 6/13 (46.2%) | 5/13 (38.5%) | 9/17 (52.9%) | |||||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||||||||
Anaemia | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/17 (5.9%) | 1 |
Lymphopenia | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 1/12 (8.3%) | 1 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Neutropenia | 2/12 (16.7%) | 2 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/17 (5.9%) | 2 |
Eye disorders | ||||||||||
Age-related macular degeneration | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/17 (5.9%) | 1 |
Cataract | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Dry age-related macular degeneration | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Visual acuity reduced | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/17 (5.9%) | 1 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||||||
Abdominal discomfort | 1/12 (8.3%) | 1 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Abdominal pain lower | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/17 (5.9%) | 1 |
Diarrhoea | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/17 (5.9%) | 2 |
Dyspepsia | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/17 (5.9%) | 1 |
Gastroduodenitis | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 1/12 (8.3%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Nausea | 1/12 (8.3%) | 1 | 1/12 (8.3%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||||||||
Chronic hepatitis | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Infections and infestations | ||||||||||
Asymptomatic bacteriuria | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/17 (5.9%) | 1 |
Erysipelas | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Nasopharyngitis | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 | 2/17 (11.8%) | 2 |
Periodontitis | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Respiratory tract infection | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Respiratory tract infection viral | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 1/12 (8.3%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/17 (5.9%) | 1 |
Rhinitis | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Tracheobronchitis | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Investigations | ||||||||||
Alanine aminotransferase increased | 2/12 (16.7%) | 2 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Aspartate aminotransferase increased | 1/12 (8.3%) | 1 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Bilirubin conjugated increased | 1/12 (8.3%) | 1 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Blood bilirubin increased | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Blood fibrinogen decreased | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/17 (5.9%) | 1 |
Blood potassium decreased | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Electrocardiogram T wave amplitude decreased | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 2 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Intraocular pressure increased | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Laboratory test abnormal | 1/12 (8.3%) | 1 | 1/12 (8.3%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Lymphocyte count decreased | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Neutrophil count decreased | 1/12 (8.3%) | 1 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/17 (5.9%) | 2 |
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||||||||
Hypokalaemia | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/17 (5.9%) | 1 |
Type 2 diabetes mellitus | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||||||||
Arthralgia | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 1/12 (8.3%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Joint swelling | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/17 (5.9%) | 1 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||||||||
Headache | 2/12 (16.7%) | 2 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/17 (5.9%) | 1 |
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||||||||
Nitrituria | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/17 (5.9%) | 1 |
Proteinuria | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/17 (5.9%) | 1 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||||||
Cough | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Epistaxis | 1/12 (8.3%) | 2 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Pneumonitis | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 1/12 (8.3%) | 1 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||||||||
Dermatitis contact | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/17 (5.9%) | 1 |
Nail dystrophy | 1/12 (8.3%) | 1 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Surgical and medical procedures | ||||||||||
Tooth extraction | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 0/13 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Clinical Trial Disclosure Desk |
---|---|
Organization | Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd |
Phone | +41 58 844 1977 |
clinical-trials-disclosure@idorsia.com |
- AC-064A201