Acthar for the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) in Patients With a History of Persistently Active Disease

Sponsor
Mallinckrodt (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01753401
Collaborator
(none)
38
22
4
33
1.7
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This Phase 4 study is being performed to examine the effects of Acthar for the indicated use of treatment of SLE. This study will enroll patients with steroid-dependent, persistently active SLE with arthritic and/or cutaneous involvement.

The study will involve two periods: an 8-week double-blind period, to provide placebo-controlled safety, efficacy, and pharmacodynamic data, and an optional open-label period, to examine the prolonged effects of Acthar maintenance.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 4

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
38 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Two-part Study Exploring the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacodynamics of Acthar in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients With a History of Persistently Active Disease
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Period 2: Placebo/Acthar

Participants receive Placebo in Part 1, but after completion of Week 8 in the double-blind phase, patients who received Placebo may choose to participate in the optional open-label phase where they will receive an Acthar maintenance regimen for 44 weeks. The initial Acthar regimen will be assigned based on the study medication regimen the patient received at the completion of the double-blind phase (Visit 6, Week 8). Acthar regimen during Part 2 may be adjusted based on the Investigator's judgment with the goal of achieving a stable Acthar regimen no later than Week 28. Once the stable Acthar regimen is achieved, the Investigator should consider tapering the steroid regimen to a low daily dose or completely discontinue.

Drug: Acthar
Acthar is given by subcutaneous (SC) injection (shot under the skin), at a dose of 40 units daily or 80 units every other day
Other Names:
  • H.P. Acthar Gel
  • Repository Corticotropin Injection
  • Drug: Placebo
    Placebo contains the same inactive ingredients as Acthar, and is given by SC injection
    Other Names:
  • Matching Placebo
  • Drug: Steroid Drug
    The patient's steroid regimen 7.5 to 30 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent, chronic/stable within the 4 weeks prior to screening.
    Other Names:
  • Prednisone or equivalent
  • Experimental: Period 2: Acthar/Acthar

    After completion of Week 8 in the double-blind phase, patients who received Acthar may choose to participate in the optional open-label phase where they will receive an Acthar maintenance regimen for 44 weeks. The initial Acthar regimen will be assigned based on the study medication regimen the patient received at the completion of the double-blind phase (Visit 6, Week 8). Acthar regimen may be adjusted based on the Investigator's judgment with the goal of achieving a stable Acthar regimen no later than Week 28. Once the stable Acthar regimen is achieved, the Investigator should consider tapering the steroid regimen to a low daily dose or completely discontinue.

    Drug: Acthar
    Acthar is given by subcutaneous (SC) injection (shot under the skin), at a dose of 40 units daily or 80 units every other day
    Other Names:
  • H.P. Acthar Gel
  • Repository Corticotropin Injection
  • Drug: Steroid Drug
    The patient's steroid regimen 7.5 to 30 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent, chronic/stable within the 4 weeks prior to screening.
    Other Names:
  • Prednisone or equivalent
  • Placebo Comparator: Period 1: Placebo

    Participants receive matching placebo (in 0.5 mL daily or in 1 mL every other day) for 4 weeks. In Weeks 5-8, they will taper the study medication. Participants will continue on their stable steroid regimen during this phase of the study. After completion of Week 8 in the double-blind phase, they may choose to participate in the optional open-label phase. Participants will continue on their stable steroid regimen during this phase of the study.

    Drug: Placebo
    Placebo contains the same inactive ingredients as Acthar, and is given by SC injection
    Other Names:
  • Matching Placebo
  • Drug: Steroid Drug
    The patient's steroid regimen 7.5 to 30 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent, chronic/stable within the 4 weeks prior to screening.
    Other Names:
  • Prednisone or equivalent
  • Experimental: Period 1: Acthar

    Participants receive Acthar (40 units in 0.5 mL daily or 80 units in 1 mL every other day) for 4 weeks. In Weeks 5-8, they will taper the study medication. Participants will continue on their stable steroid regimen during this phase of the study. After completion of Week 8 in the double-blind phase, they may choose to participate in the optional open-label phase. Participants will continue on their stable steroid regimen during this phase of the study.

    Drug: Acthar
    Acthar is given by subcutaneous (SC) injection (shot under the skin), at a dose of 40 units daily or 80 units every other day
    Other Names:
  • H.P. Acthar Gel
  • Repository Corticotropin Injection
  • Drug: Steroid Drug
    The patient's steroid regimen 7.5 to 30 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent, chronic/stable within the 4 weeks prior to screening.
    Other Names:
  • Prednisone or equivalent
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Number of Participants Who Meet the Definition of a Responder Within 4 Weeks [within 4 weeks]

      Participants are counted as responders based on two SLE indices: the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index amended by the SELENA group (SELENA-SLEDAI) and the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Index. decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI score from 4 to 0 for the arthritis descriptor (highest possible score is 4) and no worsening in other organ systems based on BILAG OR decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI score from 2 to 0 for rash (highest possible score is 2) and no worsening in other organ systems based on BILAG The BILAG is a transitional index that captures changing severity of clinical manifestations. It has an ordinal scale scoring system by design that produces an overview of disease activity across eight systems. The individual system scores were not intended to be summated into a global score.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Number of Participants Who Meet the Definition of a Responder Within 8 Weeks [within 8 weeks]

      Participants are counted as responders based on: decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI score from 4 to 0 for arthritis and no worsening in other organ systems based on BILAG OR decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI score from 2 to 0 for rash and no worsening in other organ systems based on BILAG

    2. Score on the SELENA-SLEDAI Within 8 Weeks [within 8 weeks]

      SLEDAI was modeled on the basis of clinician global judgment. A participant's SELENA-SLEDAI total score is the sum of all marked SLE-related descriptors on a checklist developed by the SELENA Group (also referred to as hybrid SLEDAI). The scores of the descriptors range from 0 to 8. A total score can fall between 0 and 105, with a higher score representing a more significant degree of disease activity. Rows: Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8

    3. BILAG Total Score Within 8 Weeks [within 8 weeks]

      The BILAG is a transitional index that captures changing severity of clinical manifestations that produces an overview of disease activity across eight systems. The 8 systems are scored on a scale from 0=not present to 4=worse, for the 4 week period before the assessment. The lowest possible score is 0, and the highest possible score is 32. A higher score means the symptoms are worse. Rows: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8

    4. Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Severity at Baseline [at Baseline]

      PGA of disease severity on a 100 mm visual analogue scale are categorized to the following: 0 point (none) = 0 mm; 1 point (mild) = >0 - 33.33 mm; 2 points (moderate) = >33.33 - 66.67 mm; and 3 points (severe) = >66.67 - 100 mm. The count of participants in each category is reported.

    5. Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Severity at Week 4 [at Week 4]

      PGA of disease severity on a 100 mm visual analogue scale are categorized to the following: 0 point (none) = 0 mm; 1 point (mild) = >0 - 33.33 mm; 2 points (moderate) = >33.33 - 66.67 mm; and 3 points (severe) = >66.67 - 100 mm. The count of participants in each category is reported.

    6. Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Severity at Week 8 [at Week 8]

      PGA of disease severity on a 100 mm visual analogue scale are categorized to the following: 0 point (none) = 0 mm; 1 point (mild) = >0 - 33.33 mm; 2 points (moderate) = >33.33 - 66.67 mm; and 3 points (severe) = >66.67 - 100 mm. The count of participants in each category is reported.

    7. Number of Tender or Swollen Joints Within 8 Weeks [at Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8 (within 8 weeks)]

      The doctor counted the number of tender or swollen joints at Baseline, at Week 4, and at Week 8

    8. Cutaneous Lupus Activity as Measured by the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Within 8 Weeks [at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 (within 8 weeks)]

      The CLASI consists of two scores the first summarizes the activity of the disease while the second is a measure of the damage done by the disease. Activity is scored on the basis of erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss and non-scarring alopecia. The CLASI score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease. Rows: at Baseline, at Week 4, at Week 8

    9. Krupp Fatigue Severity Score (FSS) Within 8 Weeks [at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 (within 8 weeks)]

      The Krupp FSS is a scale to rate disability-related fatigue. Respondents use a scale ranging from 1 ("completely disagree") to 7 ("completely agree") to indicate their agreement with nine statements about fatigue. A visual analogue scale is also included with the scale; respondents are asked to denote the severity of their fatigue over the past 2 weeks by placing a mark on a line extending from "no fatigue" to "fatigue as bad as could be." Higher scores on the scale are indicative of more severe fatigue. This validated fatigue severity scale measures impact of fatigue with a 9-item questionnaire, with a 7-point Likert scale for each question. Total score ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 63 (worst possible fatigue). Rows: at Baseline, at Week 4, at Week 8

    10. Mean Score on the Physical Component Scale (PCS) of the Short Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire (SF-36) Within 8 Weeks [at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 (within 8 weeks)]

      The SF-36 determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Higher scores indicate improvement. Rows: at Baseline, at Week 4, at Week 8

    11. Mean Score on the Mental Component Scale (MCS) of the Short Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire (SF-36) Within 8 Weeks [at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 (within 8 weeks)]

      The SF-36 determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Higher scores indicate improvement.

    12. Number of Participants Who Meet the Definition of a Responder at Week 52 [at Week 52]

      Participants are counted as responders based on: decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI score from 4 to 0 for arthritis and no worsening in other organ systems based on BILAG OR decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI score from 2 to 0 for rash and no worsening in other organ systems based on BILAG

    13. Score on the SELENA-SLEDAI at Week 52 [at Week 52]

      SLEDAI was modeled on the basis of clinician global judgment. A participant's SELENA-SLEDAI total score is the sum of all marked SLE-related descriptors on a checklist developed by the SELENA Group (also referred to as hybrid SLEDAI). The scores of the descriptors range from 0 to 8. A total score can fall between 0 and 105, with a higher score representing a more significant degree of disease activity.

    14. Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Severity at Week 52 [at Week 52]

      PGA of disease severity on a 100 mm visual analogue scale are categorized to the following: 0 point (none) = 0 mm; 1 point (mild) = >0 - 33.33 mm; 2 points (moderate) = >33.33 - 66.67 mm; and 3 points (severe) = >66.67 - 100 mm. The count of participants in each category is reported.

    15. Number of Tender or Swollen Joints at Week 52 [at Week 52]

      The doctor counted the number of tender or swollen joints at Week 52.

    16. Cutaneous Lupus Activity as Measured by the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) at Week 52 [at Week 52]

      The CLASI consists of two scores the first summarizes the activity of the disease while the second is a measure of the damage done by the disease. Activity is scored on the basis of erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss and non-scarring alopecia. The CLASI score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease.

    17. Krupp Fatigue Severity Score (FSS) at Week 52 [at Week 52]

      The Krupp FSS is a scale to rate disability-related fatigue. Respondents use a scale ranging from 1 ("completely disagree") to 7 ("completely agree") to indicate their agreement with nine statements about fatigue. A visual analogue scale is also included with the scale; respondents are asked to denote the severity of their fatigue over the past 2 weeks by placing a mark on a line extending from "no fatigue" to "fatigue as bad as could be." Higher scores on the scale are indicative of more severe fatigue. This validated fatigue severity scale measures impact of fatigue with a 9-item questionnaire, with a 7-point Likert scale for each question. Total score ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 63 (worst possible fatigue).

    18. Mean Score on the Physical Component Scale (PCS) of the Short Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire (SF-36) at Week 52 [at Week 52]

      The SF-36 determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Higher scores indicate improvement.

    19. Mean Score on the Mental Component Scale (PCS) of the Short Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire (SF-36) at Week 52 [at Week 52]

      The SF-36 determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Higher scores indicate improvement.

    20. Number of Participants With a Relapse Within 52 Weeks [within 52 weeks]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Male or female ≥ 18 years of age at screening who are able to provide informed consent

    • Diagnosis of SLE according to the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria (fulfilled ≥ 4 criteria)

    • Active SLE with arthritic and/or cutaneous involvement as demonstrated by a SELENA-SLEDAI score ≥ 2 (clinical manifestation must include rash and/or arthritis)

    • Moderate to severe rash and/or arthritis as demonstrated by BILAG score A or B in the mucocutaneous and/or musculoskeletal body systems

    • Documented history of autoantibodies to at least one of the following: anti-dsDNA, anti-Smith, or anti-cardiolipin

    • Documented history of positive antinuclear antibody (ANA)

    • Currently on a stable dose of prednisone (7.5 to 30 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent within the 4 weeks prior to screening). The prednisone regimen must remain stable through the double-blind phase and until the stable Acthar regimen is attained in the open-label phase.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Patients with a recent history (≤ 2 months prior to screening) of starting prednisone (or equivalent) use

    • Patients with active nephritis defined as serum creatinine > 2.5 mg/dL or protein creatinine ratio (PCR) > 1.5 g/g, or patients that required hemodialysis within 3 months prior to screening

    • Active central nervous system (CNS) lupus (including seizures, psychosis, organic brain syndrome, cerebrovascular accident, cerebritis, or CNS vasculitis), requiring therapeutic intervention within 3 months prior to screening

    • Type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (history of gestational diabetes mellitus is not an exclusion), or patients currently taking hypoglycemic medication

    • History of using certain medications prior to screening:

    1. oral prednisone (or equivalent) > 30 mg/day, any steroid injection, cyclosporine, or non-biologic investigational drug within 3 months prior to screening

    2. intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or plasmapheresis within 4 months prior to screening

    3. cyclophosphamide within 6 months prior to screening; and/or

    4. B-cell targeted therapy, abatacept, or any biologic investigational agent within 12 months prior to screening

    • Contraindication per Acthar Prescribing Information: scleroderma, osteoporosis, systemic fungal infections, ocular herpes simplex, recent surgery, history of or the presence of peptic ulcer, congestive heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension, primary adrenocortical insufficiency, or adrenal cortical hyperfunction
    1. For the purposes of this study, osteoporosis is defined as evidence of vertebral or long bone fracture or vertebral T-score > 2.0

    2. For the purposes of this study, history of peptic ulcer is defined as ≤ 6 months prior to screening

    3. For the purposes of this study, congestive heart failure is defined as New York Heart Association Functional Class III-IV

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Mallinckrodt Investigational Site Jonesboro Arkansas United States 72401
    2 Mallinckrodt Investigational Site La Jolla California United States 92037
    3 Mallinckrodt Investigational Site La Palma California United States 90623
    4 Mallinckrodt Investigational Site Long Beach California United States 90806
    5 Mallinckrodt Investigational Site Upland California United States 91786
    6 Mallinckrodt Investigational Site Brandon Florida United States 33511
    7 Mallinckrodt Investigational Site Clearwater Florida United States 33765
    8 Mallinckrodt Investigational Site Miami Lakes Florida United States 33014
    9 Mallinckrodt Investigational Site Orlando Florida United States 32806
    10 Mallinckrodt Investigational Site Tampa Florida United States 33614
    11 Mallinckrodt Investigational Site Granger Indiana United States 46530
    12 Mallinckrodt Investigational Site Baton Rouge Louisiana United States 70809
    13 Mallinckrodt Investigational Site Lansing Michigan United States 48910
    14 Mallinckrodt Investigational Site Lansing Michigan United States 48917
    15 Mallinckrodt Investigational Site Brooklyn New York United States 11201
    16 Mallinckrodt Investigational Site Great Neck New York United States 11020
    17 Mallinckrodt Investigational Site New York New York United States 10016
    18 Mallinckrodt Investigational Site Charlotte North Carolina United States 28210
    19 Mallinckrodt Investigational Site Hershey Pennsylvania United States 17033
    20 Mallinckrodt Investigational Site Wyomissing Pennsylvania United States 19610
    21 Mallinckrodt Investigational Site Houston Texas United States 77004
    22 Mallinckrodt Investigational Site Houston Texas United States 77034

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Mallinckrodt

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Global Clinical Leader, Mallinckrodt

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Mallinckrodt
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01753401
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • QSC01-SLE-01
    First Posted:
    Dec 20, 2012
    Last Update Posted:
    Feb 27, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2017
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Keywords provided by Mallinckrodt
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details 38 enrolled participants were randomized 2:1:2:1 into four treatment groups, to receive Acthar 0.5 mL daily: Placebo 0.5 mL daily: Acthar 1 mL every other day: Placebo 1 mL every other day, during the double-blind period, along with their stable dose of steroids.
    Pre-assignment Detail All participants were to receive their stable steroid regimen in addition to the study drug throughout the double-blind period (Period 1). If they completed Period 1, they were invited to participate in an open label period (Period 2). Those who received Placebo went into Placebo/Acthar, and those who received Acthar went into Acthar/Acthar.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Acthar Placebo/Acthar Acthar/Acthar
    Arm/Group Description Participants receive their randomized regimen of placebo during the double-blind period Participants receive their randomized regimen of Acthar during the double-blind period Participants who receive Placebo in Part 1, but Acthar in Part 2 Participants who receive Acthar in both Parts 1 and 2
    Period Title: Double-blind Period (8 Weeks)
    STARTED 12 26 0 0
    Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) 11 25 0 0
    COMPLETED 11 22 0 0
    NOT COMPLETED 1 4 0 0
    Period Title: Double-blind Period (8 Weeks)
    STARTED 0 0 11 22
    mITT 0 0 11 22
    Safety Analysis Set 0 0 11 22
    COMPLETED 0 0 7 13
    NOT COMPLETED 0 0 4 9

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Placebo Acthar Total
    Arm/Group Description Participants who were randomized to receive Placebo in Period 1 Participants who were randomized to receive Acthar in Period 1 Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 11 25 36
    Age (years) [Median (Full Range) ]
    Median (Full Range) [years]
    39
    43
    41.5
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    10
    90.9%
    24
    96%
    34
    94.4%
    Male
    1
    9.1%
    1
    4%
    2
    5.6%
    Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants)
    White or Caucasian
    5
    45.5%
    6
    24%
    11
    30.6%
    Black or African American
    6
    54.5%
    18
    72%
    24
    66.7%
    Other
    0
    0%
    1
    4%
    1
    2.8%
    Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity
    0
    0%
    6
    24%
    6
    16.7%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    United States
    11
    100%
    25
    100%
    36
    100%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants Who Meet the Definition of a Responder Within 4 Weeks
    Description Participants are counted as responders based on two SLE indices: the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index amended by the SELENA group (SELENA-SLEDAI) and the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Index. decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI score from 4 to 0 for the arthritis descriptor (highest possible score is 4) and no worsening in other organ systems based on BILAG OR decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI score from 2 to 0 for rash (highest possible score is 2) and no worsening in other organ systems based on BILAG The BILAG is a transitional index that captures changing severity of clinical manifestations. It has an ordinal scale scoring system by design that produces an overview of disease activity across eight systems. The individual system scores were not intended to be summated into a global score.
    Time Frame within 4 weeks

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Acthar
    Arm/Group Description Participants who receive Placebo in Period 1 Participants who receive Acthar in Period 1
    Measure Participants 11 25
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    3
    27.3%
    4
    16%
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants Who Meet the Definition of a Responder Within 8 Weeks
    Description Participants are counted as responders based on: decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI score from 4 to 0 for arthritis and no worsening in other organ systems based on BILAG OR decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI score from 2 to 0 for rash and no worsening in other organ systems based on BILAG
    Time Frame within 8 weeks

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Acthar
    Arm/Group Description Participants who receive Placebo in Period 1 Participants who receive Acthar in Period 1
    Measure Participants 11 25
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    3
    27.3%
    11
    44%
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Score on the SELENA-SLEDAI Within 8 Weeks
    Description SLEDAI was modeled on the basis of clinician global judgment. A participant's SELENA-SLEDAI total score is the sum of all marked SLE-related descriptors on a checklist developed by the SELENA Group (also referred to as hybrid SLEDAI). The scores of the descriptors range from 0 to 8. A total score can fall between 0 and 105, with a higher score representing a more significant degree of disease activity. Rows: Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8
    Time Frame within 8 weeks

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Acthar
    Arm/Group Description Participants who receive Placebo in Period 1 Participants who receive Acthar in Period 1
    Measure Participants 11 25
    Week 2
    10.0
    8.0
    Week 4
    9.0
    8.0
    Week 6
    8.0
    6.0
    Week 8
    9.0
    6.0
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title BILAG Total Score Within 8 Weeks
    Description The BILAG is a transitional index that captures changing severity of clinical manifestations that produces an overview of disease activity across eight systems. The 8 systems are scored on a scale from 0=not present to 4=worse, for the 4 week period before the assessment. The lowest possible score is 0, and the highest possible score is 32. A higher score means the symptoms are worse. Rows: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
    Time Frame within 8 weeks

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Acthar
    Arm/Group Description Participants who receive Placebo in Period 1 Participants who receive Acthar in Period 1
    Measure Participants 11 25
    at Baseline
    15.4
    (9.55)
    15.7
    (5.93)
    at Week 4
    10.3
    (7.80)
    9.2
    (5.36)
    at Week 8
    13.5
    (8.82)
    6.8
    (4.31)
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Severity at Baseline
    Description PGA of disease severity on a 100 mm visual analogue scale are categorized to the following: 0 point (none) = 0 mm; 1 point (mild) = >0 - 33.33 mm; 2 points (moderate) = >33.33 - 66.67 mm; and 3 points (severe) = >66.67 - 100 mm. The count of participants in each category is reported.
    Time Frame at Baseline

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Acthar
    Arm/Group Description Participants who receive Placebo in Period 1 Participants who receive Acthar in Period 1
    Measure Participants 11 25
    None
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Mild
    1
    9.1%
    2
    8%
    Moderate
    8
    72.7%
    19
    76%
    Severe
    2
    18.2%
    4
    16%
    Missing
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Severity at Week 4
    Description PGA of disease severity on a 100 mm visual analogue scale are categorized to the following: 0 point (none) = 0 mm; 1 point (mild) = >0 - 33.33 mm; 2 points (moderate) = >33.33 - 66.67 mm; and 3 points (severe) = >66.67 - 100 mm. The count of participants in each category is reported.
    Time Frame at Week 4

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Acthar
    Arm/Group Description Participants who receive Placebo in Period 1 Participants who receive Acthar in Period 1
    Measure Participants 11 25
    None
    0
    0%
    1
    4%
    Mild
    5
    45.5%
    9
    36%
    Moderate
    3
    27.3%
    11
    44%
    Severe
    2
    18.2%
    1
    4%
    Missing
    1
    9.1%
    3
    12%
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Severity at Week 8
    Description PGA of disease severity on a 100 mm visual analogue scale are categorized to the following: 0 point (none) = 0 mm; 1 point (mild) = >0 - 33.33 mm; 2 points (moderate) = >33.33 - 66.67 mm; and 3 points (severe) = >66.67 - 100 mm. The count of participants in each category is reported.
    Time Frame at Week 8

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Acthar
    Arm/Group Description Participants who receive Placebo in Period 1 Participants who receive Acthar in Period 1
    Measure Participants 11 25
    None
    0
    0%
    2
    8%
    Mild
    5
    45.5%
    12
    48%
    Moderate
    3
    27.3%
    7
    28%
    Severe
    3
    27.3%
    1
    4%
    Missing
    0
    0%
    3
    12%
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Tender or Swollen Joints Within 8 Weeks
    Description The doctor counted the number of tender or swollen joints at Baseline, at Week 4, and at Week 8
    Time Frame at Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8 (within 8 weeks)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Acthar
    Arm/Group Description Participants who receive Placebo in Period 1 Participants who receive Acthar in Period 1
    Measure Participants 11 25
    at Baseline
    6.2
    (5.40)
    9.6
    (6.90)
    at Week 4
    3.8
    (4.34)
    4.5
    (4.94)
    at Week 8
    4.0
    (6.18)
    3.5
    (5.89)
    9. Secondary Outcome
    Title Cutaneous Lupus Activity as Measured by the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Within 8 Weeks
    Description The CLASI consists of two scores the first summarizes the activity of the disease while the second is a measure of the damage done by the disease. Activity is scored on the basis of erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss and non-scarring alopecia. The CLASI score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease. Rows: at Baseline, at Week 4, at Week 8
    Time Frame at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 (within 8 weeks)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Acthar
    Arm/Group Description Participants who receive Placebo in Period 1 Participants who receive Acthar in Period 1
    Measure Participants 11 25
    at Baseline
    6.1
    (6.63)
    6.4
    (6.33)
    at Week 4
    6.3
    (4.60)
    4.8
    (4.08)
    at Week 8
    5.7
    (6.87)
    3.7
    (4.24)
    10. Secondary Outcome
    Title Krupp Fatigue Severity Score (FSS) Within 8 Weeks
    Description The Krupp FSS is a scale to rate disability-related fatigue. Respondents use a scale ranging from 1 ("completely disagree") to 7 ("completely agree") to indicate their agreement with nine statements about fatigue. A visual analogue scale is also included with the scale; respondents are asked to denote the severity of their fatigue over the past 2 weeks by placing a mark on a line extending from "no fatigue" to "fatigue as bad as could be." Higher scores on the scale are indicative of more severe fatigue. This validated fatigue severity scale measures impact of fatigue with a 9-item questionnaire, with a 7-point Likert scale for each question. Total score ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 63 (worst possible fatigue). Rows: at Baseline, at Week 4, at Week 8
    Time Frame at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 (within 8 weeks)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Acthar
    Arm/Group Description Participants who receive Placebo in Period 1 Participants who receive Acthar in Period 1
    Measure Participants 11 25
    at Baseline
    5.374
    (0.9840)
    5.648
    (1.3091)
    at Week 4
    5.379
    (1.0697)
    5.298
    (1.5401)
    at Week 8
    5.404
    (1.1699)
    5.152
    (1.7858)
    11. Secondary Outcome
    Title Mean Score on the Physical Component Scale (PCS) of the Short Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire (SF-36) Within 8 Weeks
    Description The SF-36 determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Higher scores indicate improvement. Rows: at Baseline, at Week 4, at Week 8
    Time Frame at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 (within 8 weeks)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Acthar
    Arm/Group Description Participants who receive Placebo in Period 1 Participants who receive Acthar in Period 1
    Measure Participants 11 25
    at Baseline
    32.927
    (12.3561)
    31.526
    (11.7065)
    at Week 4
    32.831
    (13.5390)
    35.318
    (12.5159)
    at Week 8
    33.310
    (12.9760)
    35.701
    (11.8032)
    12. Secondary Outcome
    Title Mean Score on the Mental Component Scale (MCS) of the Short Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire (SF-36) Within 8 Weeks
    Description The SF-36 determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Higher scores indicate improvement.
    Time Frame at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 (within 8 weeks)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Acthar
    Arm/Group Description Participants who receive Placebo in Period 1 Participants who receive Acthar in Period 1
    Measure Participants 11 25
    at Baseline
    41.304
    (11.8440)
    38.406
    (14.6618)
    at Week 4
    38.744
    (16.8434)
    40.280
    (13.0274)
    at Week 8
    39.256
    (18.4576)
    40.408
    (15.8738)
    13. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants Who Meet the Definition of a Responder at Week 52
    Description Participants are counted as responders based on: decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI score from 4 to 0 for arthritis and no worsening in other organ systems based on BILAG OR decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI score from 2 to 0 for rash and no worsening in other organ systems based on BILAG
    Time Frame at Week 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT with necessary data at Week 52
    Arm/Group Title Placebo/Acthar Acthar/Acthar
    Arm/Group Description Participants who receive Placebo in Part 1, but Acthar in Part 2 Participants who receive Acthar in both Parts 1 and 2
    Measure Participants 7 13
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    4
    36.4%
    3
    12%
    14. Secondary Outcome
    Title Score on the SELENA-SLEDAI at Week 52
    Description SLEDAI was modeled on the basis of clinician global judgment. A participant's SELENA-SLEDAI total score is the sum of all marked SLE-related descriptors on a checklist developed by the SELENA Group (also referred to as hybrid SLEDAI). The scores of the descriptors range from 0 to 8. A total score can fall between 0 and 105, with a higher score representing a more significant degree of disease activity.
    Time Frame at Week 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT with necessary data at Week 52
    Arm/Group Title Placebo/Acthar Acthar/Acthar
    Arm/Group Description Participants who receive Placebo in Part 1, but Acthar in Part 2 Participants who receive Acthar in both Parts 1 and 2
    Measure Participants 7 13
    Median (Full Range) [score on a scale]
    3
    4
    15. Secondary Outcome
    Title Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Severity at Week 52
    Description PGA of disease severity on a 100 mm visual analogue scale are categorized to the following: 0 point (none) = 0 mm; 1 point (mild) = >0 - 33.33 mm; 2 points (moderate) = >33.33 - 66.67 mm; and 3 points (severe) = >66.67 - 100 mm. The count of participants in each category is reported.
    Time Frame at Week 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT with necessary data at Week 52
    Arm/Group Title Placebo/Acthar Acthar/Acthar
    Arm/Group Description Participants who receive Placebo in Part 1, but Acthar in Part 2 Participants who receive Acthar in both Parts 1 and 2
    Measure Participants 11 22
    None
    0
    0%
    4
    16%
    Mild
    7
    63.6%
    7
    28%
    Moderate
    0
    0%
    2
    8%
    Severe
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Missing
    4
    36.4%
    9
    36%
    16. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Tender or Swollen Joints at Week 52
    Description The doctor counted the number of tender or swollen joints at Week 52.
    Time Frame at Week 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT with necessary data at Week 52
    Arm/Group Title Placebo/Acthar Acthar/Acthar
    Arm/Group Description Participants who receive Placebo in Part 1, but Acthar in Part 2 Participants who receive Acthar in both Parts 1 and 2
    Measure Participants 7 13
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [Tender or Swollen Joints]
    1.1
    (2.27)
    0.7
    (2.21)
    17. Secondary Outcome
    Title Cutaneous Lupus Activity as Measured by the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) at Week 52
    Description The CLASI consists of two scores the first summarizes the activity of the disease while the second is a measure of the damage done by the disease. Activity is scored on the basis of erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss and non-scarring alopecia. The CLASI score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease.
    Time Frame at Week 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT with necessary data at Week 52
    Arm/Group Title Placebo/Acthar Acthar/Acthar
    Arm/Group Description Participants who receive Placebo in Part 1, but Acthar in Part 2 Participants who receive Acthar in both Parts 1 and 2
    Measure Participants 7 13
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
    0.4
    (0.79)
    1.3
    (1.55)
    18. Secondary Outcome
    Title Krupp Fatigue Severity Score (FSS) at Week 52
    Description The Krupp FSS is a scale to rate disability-related fatigue. Respondents use a scale ranging from 1 ("completely disagree") to 7 ("completely agree") to indicate their agreement with nine statements about fatigue. A visual analogue scale is also included with the scale; respondents are asked to denote the severity of their fatigue over the past 2 weeks by placing a mark on a line extending from "no fatigue" to "fatigue as bad as could be." Higher scores on the scale are indicative of more severe fatigue. This validated fatigue severity scale measures impact of fatigue with a 9-item questionnaire, with a 7-point Likert scale for each question. Total score ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 63 (worst possible fatigue).
    Time Frame at Week 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT with necessary data at Week 52
    Arm/Group Title Placebo/Acthar Acthar/Acthar
    Arm/Group Description Participants who receive Placebo in Part 1, but Acthar in Part 2 Participants who receive Acthar in both Parts 1 and 2
    Measure Participants 7 13
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
    4.523
    (1.5491)
    4.743
    (2.0428)
    19. Secondary Outcome
    Title Mean Score on the Physical Component Scale (PCS) of the Short Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire (SF-36) at Week 52
    Description The SF-36 determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Higher scores indicate improvement.
    Time Frame at Week 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT with necessary data at Week 52
    Arm/Group Title Placebo/Acthar Acthar/Acthar
    Arm/Group Description Participants who receive Placebo in Part 1, but Acthar in Part 2 Participants who receive Acthar in both Parts 1 and 2
    Measure Participants 6 13
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
    43.618
    (11.9596)
    39.710
    (10.8066)
    20. Secondary Outcome
    Title Mean Score on the Mental Component Scale (PCS) of the Short Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire (SF-36) at Week 52
    Description The SF-36 determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Higher scores indicate improvement.
    Time Frame at Week 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT with necessary data at Week 52
    Arm/Group Title Placebo/Acthar Acthar/Acthar
    Arm/Group Description Participants who receive Placebo in Part 1, but Acthar in Part 2 Participants who receive Acthar in both Parts 1 and 2
    Measure Participants 6 13
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
    45.272
    (12.6597)
    39.700
    (16.3027)
    21. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With a Relapse Within 52 Weeks
    Description
    Time Frame within 52 weeks

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT with necessary data at Week 52
    Arm/Group Title Placebo/Acthar Acthar/Acthar
    Arm/Group Description Participants who receive Placebo in Part 1, but Acthar in Part 2 Participants who receive Acthar in both Parts 1 and 2
    Measure Participants 5 19
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    1
    9.1%
    6
    24%

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame Period 1: within 8 Weeks of double-blind period, Period 2: within 44 Weeks of open-label period
    Adverse Event Reporting Description All treatment-emergent adverse events are listed in the non-serious AE module. Participants are counted only once per term.
    Arm/Group Title Period 1: Placebo Period 1: Acthar Period 2: Placebo/Acthar Period 2: Acthar/Acthar
    Arm/Group Description Participants who receive Placebo in Period 1 Participants who receive Acthar in Period 1 Participants who receive Placebo in Period 1, but Acthar in Period 2 Participants who receive Acthar in both Periods 1 and 2
    All Cause Mortality
    Period 1: Placebo Period 1: Acthar Period 2: Placebo/Acthar Period 2: Acthar/Acthar
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Period 1: Placebo Period 1: Acthar Period 2: Placebo/Acthar Period 2: Acthar/Acthar
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/11 (0%) 3/25 (12%) 4/11 (36.4%) 2/22 (9.1%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Gastrooesophageal reflux disease 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Abdominal pain lower 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    General disorders
    Chest discomfort 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Multi-organ failure 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Non-cardiac chest pain 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 1/11 (9.1%) 0/22 (0%)
    Infections and infestations
    Klebsiella sepsis 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Necrotising fasciitis 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Viral infection 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 1/11 (9.1%) 0/22 (0%)
    Pelvic abscess 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Pelvic infection 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Pyelonephritis 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 1/11 (9.1%) 0/22 (0%)
    Investigations
    Liver function test abnormal 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Systemic lupus erythematosus 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 1/11 (9.1%) 0/22 (0%)
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Haemorrhagic ovarian cyst 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Period 1: Placebo Period 1: Acthar Period 2: Placebo/Acthar Period 2: Acthar/Acthar
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 9/11 (81.8%) 19/25 (76%) 8/11 (72.7%) 19/22 (86.4%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Anaemia 1/11 (9.1%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Leukopenia 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Iron deficiency anaemia 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Microcytic anaemia 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Tachycardia 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 1/11 (9.1%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Ear and labyrinth disorders
    Ear haemorrhage 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Eye disorders
    Conjunctivitis 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Diplopia 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Keratitis 1/11 (9.1%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Dry eye 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 1/11 (9.1%) 0/22 (0%)
    Retinal degeneration 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Ulcerative keratitis 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 1/11 (9.1%) 0/22 (0%)
    Vision blurred 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Visual impairment 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal pain 0/11 (0%) 2/25 (8%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Diarrhoea 0/11 (0%) 2/25 (8%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Dyspepsia 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Gastrooesophageal reflux disease 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 1/11 (9.1%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Glossodynia 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Nausea 1/11 (9.1%) 0/25 (0%) 1/11 (9.1%) 0/22 (0%)
    Swollen tongue 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Vomiting 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Abdominal pain lower 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Rectal haemorrhage 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Rectal prolapse 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    General disorders
    Asthenia 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Chest discomfort 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Fatigue 0/11 (0%) 2/25 (8%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Injection site haematoma 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Irritability 0/11 (0%) 2/25 (8%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Multi-organ failure 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Non-cardiac chest pain 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 1/11 (9.1%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Oedema peripheral 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 1/11 (9.1%) 3/22 (13.6%)
    Thirst 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Injection site pain 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Nodule 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Infections and infestations
    Ear infection 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Gastroenteritis 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Influenza 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Klebsiella sepsis 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Necrotising fasciitis 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Sinusitis 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Upper respiratory tract infection 1/11 (9.1%) 0/25 (0%) 1/11 (9.1%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Viral infection 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 1/11 (9.1%) 0/22 (0%)
    Viral upper respiratory tract infection 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 1/11 (9.1%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Vulvovaginal mycotic infection 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Bronchitis 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 1/11 (9.1%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Gastroenteritis viral 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 1/11 (9.1%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Nasopharyngitis 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Oral candidiasis 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 2/11 (18.2%) 0/22 (0%)
    Oral herpes 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Pelvic abscess 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Pelvic infection 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Pneumonia 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 1/11 (9.1%) 0/22 (0%)
    Pyelonephritis 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 1/11 (9.1%) 0/22 (0%)
    Urinary tract infection 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 2/11 (18.2%) 3/22 (13.6%)
    Urinary tract infection bacterial 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Urinary tract infection staphylococcal 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Vaginitis bacterial 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Burns first degree 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Femur fracture 1/11 (9.1%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Arthropod bite 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Foot fracture 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Laceration 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 2/22 (9.1%)
    Ligament sprain 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Procedural pain 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Investigations
    Blood potassium decreased 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 2/22 (9.1%)
    Blood pressure diastolic increased 1/11 (9.1%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Blood pressure increased 1/11 (9.1%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    False positive investigation result 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    International normalised ratio increased 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Liver function test abnormal 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Occult blood positive 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Weight increased 2/11 (18.2%) 5/25 (20%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Blood creatinine increased 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 1/11 (9.1%) 0/22 (0%)
    Blood phosphorus decreased 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Computerised tomogram thorax abnormal 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Glycosylated haemoglobin increased 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Haematocrit decreased 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Percussion test abnormal 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 1/11 (9.1%) 0/22 (0%)
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Fluid retention 0/11 (0%) 2/25 (8%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Glucose tolerance impaired 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Hypokalaemia 1/11 (9.1%) 1/25 (4%) 1/11 (9.1%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Back pain 0/11 (0%) 2/25 (8%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Arthralgia 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 3/22 (13.6%)
    Flank pain 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Joint swelling 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Myalgia 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Osteopenia 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Pain in extremity 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Synovitis 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Systemic lupus erythematosus 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 1/11 (9.1%) 0/22 (0%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Dizziness 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Headache 2/11 (18.2%) 1/25 (4%) 1/11 (9.1%) 2/22 (9.1%)
    Sciatica 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Dysgeusia 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Hypoaesthesia 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Lethargy 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Migraine 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Polyneuropathy 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Tremor 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Psychiatric disorders
    Anxiety 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Mood swings 0/11 (0%) 2/25 (8%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Nervousness 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Abnormal behaviour 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Insomnia 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Dysuria 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Nephrolithiasis 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 2/22 (9.1%)
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Vulvovaginal discomfort 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Haemorrhagic ovarian cyst 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 1/11 (9.1%) 0/22 (0%)
    Cough 1/11 (9.1%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Pharyngeal erythema 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Pleural rub 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 1/11 (9.1%) 0/22 (0%)
    Pleuritic pain 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 2/11 (18.2%) 2/22 (9.1%)
    Oropharyngeal pain 0/11 (0%) 2/25 (8%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Increased tendency to bruise 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Pruritus 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Rash 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Blister 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Hypertrichosis 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Photosensitivity reaction 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Rash papular 0/11 (0%) 1/25 (4%) 0/11 (0%) 0/22 (0%)
    Vascular disorders
    Extremity necrosis 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 1/11 (9.1%) 0/22 (0%)
    Hypertension 1/11 (9.1%) 0/25 (0%) 1/11 (9.1%) 1/22 (4.5%)
    Phlebitis 0/11 (0%) 0/25 (0%) 1/11 (9.1%) 0/22 (0%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    Non-serious adverse events (AEs) were not tabulated separately for these legacy results, so all treatment emergent adverse events are listed, and serious adverse events might be included.

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Medical Information Call Center
    Organization Mallinckrodt
    Phone 800-556-3314
    Email clinicaltrials@mnk.com
    Responsible Party:
    Mallinckrodt
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01753401
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • QSC01-SLE-01
    First Posted:
    Dec 20, 2012
    Last Update Posted:
    Feb 27, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2017