MAGNETIC-VT: Comparison of VT Ablation Outcomes Using Remote MAGNETIC Navigation Versus Manual Approach in a Low LVEF Population

Sponsor
Stereotaxis (Industry)
Overall Status
Terminated
CT.gov ID
NCT02637947
Collaborator
(none)
182
16
2
73.5
11.4
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The study purpose is to demonstrate that ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation using the Niobe™ ES system results in superior outcomes compared to a manual approach in subjects with ischemic scar VT in a low ejection fraction population.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: catheter ablation using magnetic navigation
  • Device: catheter ablation using manual navigation
N/A

Detailed Description

This study is a randomized, single-blind, prospective, multi-center post market evaluation. Subjects will be screened for study eligibility and asked to complete written informed consent prior to any study specific testing assessments. After completing written informed consent, a total of 386 subjects will be randomized on a 1:1 basis to receive VT ablation treatment using either the Niobe ES or standard manual catheter ablation treatment using commercially available products. This will be the largest randomized VT study comparing outcomes from RMN to manually guided catheter ablation procedures. Subjects will be randomized according to a computer-generated randomization scheme. Randomization will be blocked at the study site level and subjects will be blinded to group assignment. Since quality of life measurements will be collected during follow-up, this study is single-blinded in order to mitigate patient bias. Clinical evaluations will not be masked to the treating physician.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
182 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Prospective, Multi-center, Post Market Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing VT Ablation Outcomes Using Remote MAGNETIC Navigation Guided Substrate Mapping and Ablation Versus Manual Approach in a Low LVEF Population
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Feb 15, 2022
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 15, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Magnetic navigation

Catheter ablation using magnetic navigation for ventricular tachycardia via remote magnetic navigation of a NaviStar RMT ThermoCool catheter, or other magnetically compatible catheter, via Stereotaxis's Niobe ES system.

Device: catheter ablation using magnetic navigation
elimination of cardiac arrhythmias through heating and destroying heart tissue with faulty electrical pathways through the use of Stereotaxis's Niobe ES System with the NaviStar RMT ThermoCool catheter or other magnetically compatible catheters.

Active Comparator: Manual navigation

Catheter ablation using manual navigation for ventricular tachycardia via a manually navigated Thermocool catheter, or equivalent catheter.

Device: catheter ablation using manual navigation
elimination of cardiac arrhythmias through heating and destroying heart tissue with faulty electrical pathways through the use of the NaviStar ThermoCool catheter or other manually navigated catheters.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. freedom from any VT in the overall cohort [12 months]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. acute success of procedure [at end of procedure (immediate)]

    non-inducibility of clinical VT and/or other monomorphic VT using typical stimulation protocol for induction

  2. freedom from VT in large scar subpopulation [12 months]

  3. major adverse events [48 hours post-procedure]

    death, cardiac tamponade, stroke, bleeding requiring surgical intervention, progressive heart failure related to VT/VF recurrence

  4. mortality rate [12 months]

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Total number of appropriate ICD defibrillator shocks [12 months]

  2. Total number of ICD applications of anti-tachycardia pacing [12 months]

  3. Total procedure time (skin to skin) [through end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours]

  4. Total fluoroscopy time [through end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours]

  5. Total fluoroscopy dose [through end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours]

  6. Total mapping time [through end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours]

  7. Total ablation time [through end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours]

  8. Total mapping points prior to ablation [through end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours]

  9. Total ablation energy delivery [through end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours]

    Watts X seconds / Total scar surface area

  10. Patient quality of life (SF-12) [12 months]

    Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Short-Form Health Survey

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • subject has had an ICD previously implanted

  • subject has drug-refractory monomorphic VT

  • subject is a candidate for ischemic VT RF ablation

  • subject has had a myocardial infarction

  • subject has a LVEF less than or equal to 35%

Exclusion Criteria:
  • subject has non-ischemic VT

  • subject has a history of stroke within 1 month prior to enrollment

  • subject has had an acute myocardial infarction within 30 days prior to enrollment

  • subject has unstable angina

  • subject has undergone cardiac surgery within 60 days prior to enrollment

  • subject is pregnant or nursing

  • subject has a limited life expectancy of 1 year or less (Subjects requiring LVAD/IABP intraprocedural support may be enrolled as long as life expectancy is at least 1 year following the ablation procedure.)

  • subject is unable or unwilling to cooperate with study procedures

  • subject has a known presence of intracardiac thrombi as determined by echocardiography

  • subject has a major contraindication to anticoagulation therapy or coagulation disorder

  • subject has had a previous pericarditis or cardiac tumor

  • subject has had previous thoracic radiation therapy

  • any other reason the investigator considers the subject ineligible

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Florida Hospital Orlando Florida United States 32803
2 Augusta University Augusta Georgia United States 30912
3 University of Chicago Medical Center Chicago Illinois United States 60637
4 Advocate Christ Medical Center Oak Lawn Illinois United States 60453
5 The University of Kansas Medical Center Kansas City Kansas United States 66160
6 Weill Cornell Medical New York New York United States 10065
7 Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation Austin Texas United States 78705
8 Intermountain Heart Institute Murray Utah United States 84107
9 Westmead Hospital Westmead New South Wales Australia 2145
10 AZ Sint-Jan Brugge West Flanders Belgium 8000
11 ZNA Middelheim Antwerpen Belgium
12 Na Homolce Hospital Praha Czechia 15030
13 Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark
14 Chu De Nancy - Hôpitaux De Brabois Nancy France
15 Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis (OLVG) Amsterdam Netherlands
16 Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam Netherlands

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Stereotaxis

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrea Natale, MD, Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Stereotaxis
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02637947
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • CLIN-021
First Posted:
Dec 22, 2015
Last Update Posted:
Jun 21, 2022
Last Verified:
May 1, 2022
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 21, 2022