Cardiac RADIoablation Versus Repeat Catheter Ablation: a Pivotal Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Safety and Efficacy for Patients With High-risk Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia (RADIATE-VT)

Sponsor
Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company (Industry)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05765175
Collaborator
(none)
380
2
86

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

RADIATE-VT is a pivotal, multicenter, randomized trial comparing safety and efficacy between cardiac radioablation (CRA) using the Varian CRA System and repeat catheter ablation (CA), for patients with high-risk refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) who have experienced VT recurrence after CA and are candidates for additional CA.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Varian Cardiac Radioablation (CRA)
  • Procedure: Catheter Ablation (CA)
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
380 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
The Varian CRA trial is a multicenter, international, pivotal, 2-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT). Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to CRA or repeat CA. Randomization will be stratified by (1) enrolling institution and (2) NYHA class I/II vs. III/IV. Blinding will not be used in this trial, as the different interventions cannot be blinded.The Varian CRA trial is a multicenter, international, pivotal, 2-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT). Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to CRA or repeat CA. Randomization will be stratified by (1) enrolling institution and (2) NYHA class I/II vs. III/IV. Blinding will not be used in this trial, as the different interventions cannot be blinded.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Cardiac RADIoablation Versus Repeat Catheter Ablation: a Pivotal Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Safety and Efficacy for Patients With High-risk Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia (RADIATE-VT)
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2026
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
May 1, 2030

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Repeat catheter ablation (CA)

Procedure: Catheter Ablation (CA)
Subjects randomized to the CA arm will be treated according to a uniform CA protocol.

Experimental: Varian Cardiac Radioablation (CRA)

Device: Varian Cardiac Radioablation (CRA)
Subjects randomized to CRA will be treated with the Varian CRA system according to a uniform CRA protocol. A dose of 25 Gy in a single fraction is prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV), and delivered using a stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) technique.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Co-primary safety endpoint: freedom from treatment-attributed (i.e., probably or definitely related) serious adverse events (SAEs) [Treatment through 12 months post-treatment]

    Freedom from treatment-attributed (i.e., probably or definitely related) serious adverse events (SAEs), evaluated from treatment through 12 months post-treatment.

  2. Co-primary efficacy endpoint: Freedom from death, and appropriate ICD shock, and VT storm. [Death will be counted from randomization through 12 months, and shock and storm will be counted starting after a 30-day period immediately post-randomization and continuing through 12 months post randomization]

    Freedom from death, and appropriate ICD shock, and VT storm, where death will be counted from randomization through 12 months, and shock and storm will be counted starting after a 30-day period immediately post-randomization and continuing through 12 months post randomization.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in quality of life at 6 weeks post treatment: [From baseline through 6 weeks post treatment]

    Change in quality of life at 6 weeks post treatment measured by the Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) Health Change Question. This item asks the subject to rate their health in general compared to one year ago in a 5-point scale of 1 (much better), 2 (somewhat better), 3 (about the same), 4 (somewhat worse), 5 (much worse).

  2. VT burden reduction [From 6 months before randomization through to a 6 month period starting after a 30-day period immediately post-randomization]

    VT burden reduction measured as a ≥75% reduction in appropriate ICD therapies (ATP, shock), comparing a 6-month period before randomization and a 6-month period starting after a 30-day period immediately post-randomization.

  3. Change in quality of life (Social Functioning) at 6 weeks post treatment [From baseline through 6 weeks post treatment]

    Change in quality of life (Social Functioning) measured by the Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) Social Functioning item (social activities in past 4 weeks). This item asks the subject to rate how much of the time their physical health or emotional problems interfered with their social activities in the past 4 weeks in a 5-point scale of 1 (All of the time), 2 (Most of the time), 3 (Some of the time), 4 (A little bit of the time), 5 (None of the time).

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. High-risk refractory VT, defined as:

  2. Ischemic and/or nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and

  3. Recurrent sustained monomorphic VT, defined as at least one of the following below, documented by ICD interrogation or ECG in the prior 6 months, and having occurred after the last VT ablation:

A: ≥3 episodes of monomorphic VT treated with anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) at least one of which is symptomatic

B: ≥1 appropriate ICD shock

C: ≥3 episodes of sustained monomorphic VT within 24 hours treated with ICD shock or ATP

D: sustained monomorphic VT below detection rate of ICD documented by ECG, and

  1. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% and

  2. Previously underwent at least one standard of care CA for VT.

  3. Presence of a clinical indication for a repeat CA procedure for scar-mediated VT in the judgement of the treating investigator.

  4. Has failed amiodarone therapy or is intolerant to amiodarone:

  • Failed amiodarone therapy is defined as: appropriate ICD therapy or sustained monomorphic VT having occurred while the patient was taking amiodarone (minimum cumulative dose of 10 g).

  • Intolerant to amiodarone is defined as: previously tried or taken amiodarone but stopped due to medication related side effects or toxicities.

  1. Deemed to be medically and technically a candidate for further CA by the electrophysiologist investigator.

  2. Presence of an ICD.

  3. At least 18 years of age (or meets local age of majority).

  4. Ability to understand and willingness to sign an IRB approved written informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Contraindication to a CA procedure for VT (e.g., presence of mobile LV thrombus, active systemic infection, active ischemic or other reversible causes of VT).

  2. Any prior radiation to the thorax region of the body.

  3. Known medical conditions associated with higher risk of radiotherapy complications in the judgement of the radiation oncologist (i.e., active connective tissue disorders, interstitial lung disease, etc.) that would preclude safe delivery of CRA.

  4. Current use of inotropes.

  5. Presence of a left-ventricular assist device (LVAD).

  6. Scheduled for LVAD or heart transplant procedures.

  7. Presence of a systemic illness likely to limit survival to < 1 year.

  8. VT ablation procedure performed within the prior 4 weeks.

  9. Polymorphic VT or ventricular fibrillation (VF) as the primary clinical heart rhythm, as indicated by 12-lead ECG and/or ICD interrogation.

  10. 3 distinct clinical monomorphic VT morphologies on ICD interrogation since the prior CA, or >5 induced monomorphic VT morphologies during NIPS testing.

  11. Incessant VT that is hemodynamically unstable.

  12. Bundle branch reentry (BBR) VT.

  13. Pregnant and/or breastfeeding. (Patient denial is sufficient for enrollment).

  14. Patients of childbearing potential who:

  • are not on a medically effective means of birth control at the time of screening or do not start a medically effective means of birth control prior to randomization; or

  • do not agree to continue medically effective means of birth control until they have completed their assigned therapy; or

  • do not agree to be on a medically effective means of birth control if they are treated with CRA after their index CA procedure.

  1. Patients enrolled in another clinical study the investigator believes to be in conflict with this clinical investigation.

  2. Patients enrolled or planned to be enrolled in another cardiac radioablation clinical study or registry.

  3. Patients with any other medical condition or laboratory value that would, at the discretion of the investigator, preclude the patient from participation in this clinical investigation.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05765175
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • VAR-2022-01
First Posted:
Mar 13, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Mar 13, 2023
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
Yes
Keywords provided by Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 13, 2023