DICI-VIH: Targeted Nurse-driven HIV Screening in Emergency Departments

Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02127424
Collaborator
ANRS, Emerging Infectious Diseases (Other)
148,327
1
2
18
8238.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

To reduce late HIV diagnosis that remains common in France, the national health agency has promoted non-targeted HIV screening in health care settings, including emergency departments (EDs). In our previous survey, non-targeted nurse-driven HIV screening by rapid tests was feasible, well-accepted but identified only a few new HIV diagnoses mostly among patients at high-risk. Our findings, consistent with results from other international groups, suggest that a targeted strategy could be feasible, efficient and cost-effective with fewer tests required. However, the feasibility and the efficacy of this strategy remain unknown in France.

The main aim of the present study is to compare the efficacy of 2 strategies: 1) the combination of the nurse-driven HIV targeted screening and the current practice (physician-directed HIV diagnostic testing) versus 2) the current practice alone.

The strategies will be compared during 2 randomly assigned periods (cluster randomization and cross-over) in 8 EDs of metropolitan Paris.

During targeted period, nurses will offer screening to all patients at EDs, aged 18-64 years old, identified as high-risk by a self-administered questionnaire, not know to be HIV positive, not being seen for post-exposure prophylaxis or unstable medical illness, and accepting to participate by providing an informed consent.

In case of confirmed reactive rapid test result, a follow-up visit with an on-site infectious disease specialist will be arranged within the following 48 hours.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Nurse-driven HIV targeted screening
  • Procedure: Current practice
N/A

Detailed Description

Background :

Despite easy and free access to HIV testing services and 5 million of tests per year performed, late diagnosis remains common in France with one-third of HIV infections diagnosed associated with AIDS or CD4 lymphocyte counts of less than 200/μL. To improve early detection, the national health agency has promoted non-targeted HIV screening in health care settings, including emergency departments (EDs), in addition to diagnostic testing routinely performed by physicians. In our previous survey conducted in 2009-2010 in 29 EDs of the metropolitan Paris area, non-targeted nurse-driven HIV screening by rapid tests was feasible, well-accepted but identified only a few new HIV diagnoses mostly among patients at high-risk. Our findings, consistent with results from other international groups, suggest that a targeted strategy could be feasible, efficient and cost-effective with fewer tests required. However, the feasibility and the efficacy of this strategy remain unknown in France.

Primary objective :

The aim of the present study is to compare the efficacy of two strategies: 1) the combination of the nurse-driven HIV targeted screening and the current practice (physician-directed HIV diagnostic testing) versus 2) the current practice alone (physician-directed HIV diagnostic testing).

The main outcome measure is the number of patients with newly identified HIV infection among the number of 18-64 years patients visited EDs (apart from being seen for prophylaxis after exposure to HIV) during the inclusion periods.

Secondary objectives :

The linkage into care of patients with newly diagnosed infection, the number of new HIV positive tests among the total number of tests, and the early detection will be compared.

The feasibility of the nurse-driven HIV screening (proportion of : filled-questionnaires, proposition of the nurse-driven HIV screening, acceptation by patients and HIV rapid tests done by nurses) and its acceptability caregivers in each ED will be evaluated as well as its cost-effectiveness.

Methods :

Multicenter trial with cluster randomization and cross-over The 2 strategies will be compared during 2 randomly assigned periods separated by a month (cluster randomization and cross-over). 8 750 patients per ED and per period are expected with 8 EDs (cf. statistical plan).

The study will be performed in 8 EDs of metropolitan Paris, an area in which half of France's new HIV patients are diagnosed. The centers will be selected based on the high proportion of patients at high risk visiting the EDs.

During targeted period, nurses will offer screening to all patients at EDs, aged 18-64 years old, identified as high-risk by a self-administered questionnaire, not know to be HIV positive, not being seen for post-exposure prophylaxis or unstable medical illness, and accepting to participate by providing an informed consent. The questionnaire was previously tested in one ED.

In case of reactive rapid test result, blood specimen will be collected for standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and western blot confirmation. A follow-up visit with an on-site infectious disease specialist will be arranged within the following 48 hours.

Perspective :

This project will allow defining the benefit of nurse-driven HIV targeted screening in EDs and its potential utility to improve HIV screening in France.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
148327 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Screening
Official Title:
Targeted Nurse-driven HIV Screening Using Rapid Tests in Emergency Departments in the Metropolitan Paris Region
Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Combination of the nurse-driven HIV targeted screening and the

Nurses will offer screening to all patients at EDs, aged 18-64 years old, identified as high-risk by a self-administered questionnaire, not know to be HIV positive, accepting to participate by providing an informed consent and not being seen at ED for post-exposure prophylaxis or unstable medical illness. The questionnaire was previously tested in one ED. In case of reactive rapid test result, blood specimen will be collected for standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blot confirmation. A follow-up visit with an on-site infectious disease specialist will be arranged within the following 48 hours.

Procedure: Nurse-driven HIV targeted screening

Active Comparator: Current practice (no intervention)

Physician-directed HIV diagnostic testing

Procedure: Current practice

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Number of patients with newly identified HIV infection among the number of 18-64 years patients visited EDs (apart from being seen at ED for prophylaxis after exposure to HIV) during the inclusion periods [At the end of the expected total duration of the inclusion periods : up to 9 months in each center]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Linkage into care of patients with newly diagnosed infection (Follow-up visit with an on-site infectious disease specialist) [In the 3 months after the HIV screening at the emergency department]

  2. Number of new HIV positive tests among the total number of tests [At the end of the expected total duration of the inclusion periods : up to 9 months in each center]

  3. Early detection of HIV (Proportion of patients with CD4>500/mm3, >350/mm3 and >200/mm3, and without HIV-related symptoms at presentation) [In the 3 months after the HIV screening at the emergency department]

  4. Feasibility of the nurse-driven HIV screening (Proportion of : filled-questionnaires, proposition of the nurse-driven HIV screening, acceptation by patients and HIV rapid tests done by nurses) [At the end of the expected total duration of the inclusion periods : up to 9 months in each center]

  5. Acceptability of the nurse-driven HIV screening by the caregivers (Interviews with nurses, nurse managers, physician doctors and hospital managers) [Before and after the expected total duration of the inclusion periods : up to 9 months in each center]

  6. Cost-effectiveness of the 2 compared strategies [At the end of the expected total duration of the inclusion periods : up to 9 months in each center]

  7. Acceptability of the nurse-driven HIV screening by the patients (additional questionnaire proposed to patients in 4 centers) [Questionnaire proposed at ED for each patient after the main study questionnaire during inclusion period. Analysis after the expected total duration of the inclusion periods : up to 9 months in each center]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 64 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients at EDs, aged 18-64 years old and not being seen at ED for post exposure prophylaxis

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Clinical Research Center (Centre de Recherche Clinique de l'Est Parisien, CRC-Est), Groupe Hospitalier des Hôpitaux Universitaires Est Parisien, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Paris France 75012

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
  • ANRS, Emerging Infectious Diseases

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02127424
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • K130601
First Posted:
Apr 30, 2014
Last Update Posted:
Jun 1, 2016
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2016
Keywords provided by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 1, 2016