Telemedical Versus Conventional Emergency Care of Hypertensive Emergencies

Sponsor
RWTH Aachen University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02924805
Collaborator
(none)
331
1
33
10

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Comparison of telemedical prehospital emergency care and conventional on-scene physician based care of hypertensive emergencies and urgencies. The adherence to current Guidelines should be researched.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Telemedical care

Detailed Description

Telemedically guided cases of hypertensive emergencies (april 2014 - March 2015) and urgencies are compared with a historical control group of conventional emergency medical service physician care on-scene for these scenarios. The historical control group is a time period prior to implementation of the telemedicine system and after a research project with a precursor telemedicine system. No telemedical support but only conventional on-scene EMS physician care was available (November 2013 - March 2014).

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
331 participants
Observational Model:
Case-Control
Time Perspective:
Retrospective
Official Title:
Telemedical Versus Conventional Emergency Care of Hypertensive Emergencies and Urgencies
Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2016

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Telemedicine group

Cases of hypertensive emergencies and urgencies in which the prehospital emergency care was performed by on-scene paramedics, guided by a qualified physician in a teleconsultation center.

Other: Telemedical care
Telemedically guided care based on a standard operating procedure

Control group

Historical cases of of hypertensive emergencies and urgencies in which the prehospital emergency care was carried out by on-scene emergency medical service physicians (conventional care).

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Blood pressure difference between initial contact and emergency room handover [2 hours]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Difference of heart rate between initial contact and emergency room handover [2 hours]

  2. Magnitude of blood pressure reduction using categories [2 hours]

    To measure guideline adherence blood pressure (BP) reductions were evaluated with four categories: no BP reduction, reduction <= 25%, reduction >25-30%, reduction > 30% (BP difference between initial contact and emergency room handover)

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Analysis of administered antihypertensive agents [2 hours]

  2. context specific quality of medical history and documentation [2 hours]

    Analysis of medical history and vital parameter documentation completeness

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • prehospital diagnosis of hypertensive emergency of hypertensive urgency
Exclusion Criteria:
Prehospital diagnoses of:
  • pulmonary edema

  • aortic dissection

  • acute coronary syndrome

  • acute stroke

  • acute respiratory insufficiency

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University Hospital Aachen Aachen Germany 52074

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • RWTH Aachen University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jörg Ch Brokmann, Dr. med., University Hospital Aachen, Germany

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
RWTH Aachen University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02924805
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • TECH
First Posted:
Oct 5, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Oct 5, 2016
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2016
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 5, 2016