The Feasibility and Effectiveness Study for Tele-ultrasonography

Sponsor
Hanyang University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02271048
Collaborator
(none)
12
1
2
3.9
3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Purpose

  • The investigators aim to evaluate the feasibility of remote interpretation for ultrasound images using a smartphone based realtime image transmission system.

Methods

A total of 100 echocardiography examinations; 50 showed the ejection fraction above 50% and remaining 50 cases showed the ejection fraction under 50%, and 100 abdominal ultrasound images; 50 had signs of acute appendicitis and the other 50 had no findings of appendicitis will be consecutively selected. The 12 raters review these original images using an LCD monitor of the ultrasound machine and also an iPhone which is connected to the ultrasound machine via remote image transmission system (CubeView, Alpinion medical system, Seoul, Korea), evaluating left ventricular systolic function (for echocardiography) by measuring the ejection fraction and grading the probability of presence of acute appendicitis on each examination by a five Likert scale.

The sensitivity and specificity between two devices will be compared and the diagnostic performance between two devices will be also compared. The image quality between two devices will be measured using the double stimulation impairment scale (DSIS)

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Remote ultrasonography interpretation using the smartphone
N/A

Detailed Description

The 12 raters are randomly divided into two groups

The raters in group one review the echocardiographies examinations numbered from one to 50 using LCD monitor of ultrasound machine and review the remaining 50 examinations numbered from 51 to 100 using iPhone with CubeView at their first visit The other group firstly review echocardiography numbered from one to 50 using iPhone with CubeView and 51 to 100 with the LCD monitor.

They visit twice with an interval of four weeks and review the echocardiography examinations using revered devices at each session. They also review abdominal ultrasound images on the same plan as reviewing echocardiography.

When they review the echocardiography, the raters measure the ejection fraction by visual estimation (1=obviously normal EF, 2 = probably normal EF, 3 = unsure, 4 = probably reduced EF, 5 = obviously reduced EF). In cate of d the abdominal ultrasound, they are instructed to rate the likelihood of the presence or absence of appendicitis in each case using a five-Likert scale (1 = obvious no appendicitis, 2 = unlikely appendicitis, 3 = unsure, 4 = likely appendicitis, 5 = obvious appendicitis).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
12 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
The Feasibility and Effectiveness Study for Clinical Application of Realtime Tele-ultrasonography Using the Smartphone
Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Group I

The raters in this group one firstly review ultrasound images numbered from one to 50 using LCD monitor of ultrasound machine and after mandatory rests of 20 minutes, review the remaining ultrasound examinations numbered from 51 to 100 using iPhone display with CubeView at their first visit.(Remote ultrasonography interpretation using the smartphone) They visited twice with an interval of four weeks and reviewed the ultrasound images using revered devices at each session.

Device: Remote ultrasonography interpretation using the smartphone
The reviewers interpreted the ultrasonography images on the smartphone transmitted from the ultrasound machine in real time
Other Names:
  • Smartphone (A1530, iPhone 5S, USA)
  • Experimental: Group II

    The raters in this group II firstly review the ultrasound images numbered from one to 50 using iPhone with CubeView (Remote ultrasonography interpretation using the smartphone) and 51 to 100 with the LCD monitor. They visited twice with an interval of four weeks and reviewed the ultrasound images using revered devices at each session.

    Device: Remote ultrasonography interpretation using the smartphone
    The reviewers interpreted the ultrasonography images on the smartphone transmitted from the ultrasound machine in real time
    Other Names:
  • Smartphone (A1530, iPhone 5S, USA)
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Diagnostic performance between iPhone and LCD monitor [within one day]

      Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method with RSCORE and semi-parametric estimation of ROC indices by using the DMB-MRMC software (version 2.3, available at http://perception.radiology.uiowa.edu) 95% confidence interval The reviewers and cases are taken as random factors

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    33 Years to 45 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Male
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Board certified emergency physicians with a ultrasound experience of 4 years and over.
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Corrected eyesight < 20/30

    • Color weakness or blindness

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Hanyang university guri hospital, Department of emergency medicine Guri GyeongGido Korea, Republic of 471-701

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Hanyang University

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Bo Seung Kang, MD, Hanyang University

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Changsun Kim, Clinical assistant professor, Hanyang University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02271048
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 2014-03
    First Posted:
    Oct 22, 2014
    Last Update Posted:
    Apr 17, 2015
    Last Verified:
    Apr 1, 2015
    Keywords provided by Changsun Kim, Clinical assistant professor, Hanyang University

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Apr 17, 2015