Distraction vs Interposition Arthroplasty for Basilar Thumb Osteoarthritis

Sponsor
Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04155853
Collaborator
(none)
22
1
2
43.5
0.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Surgical management for osteoarthritis of the thumb is indicated when conservative measures have failed, and numerous techniques have been proposed. Distraction arthroplasty has been the gold standard due to lack of high quality evidence, which renders the benefits or harms of other techniques uncertain. The other treatment alternatives share at least partial excision of the trapezium, and include ligament reconstruction alone or with tendon interposition, allograft interposition arthroplasty, prosthetic implants and arthrodesis. A recent promising technique is the pillow technique, a type of interposition arthroplasty, which utilizes a fascia lata allograft as interposition material and stabilization with a K-wire.

In view of the low quality evidence regarding the use of interposition material versus distraction arthroplasty alone, the investigators will compare the two methods in a prospective randomized study design. Hypothesis of the study is that interposition arthroplasty using the pillow technique yields better results in terms of functional improvement and grip strength when compared to the hematoma and distraction technique. The confirmation of the hypothesis is going to justify the use of the fascia lata in the procedure. On the contrary, if the pillow technique fails to yield clinically meaningful results, the recommendation of the hematoma and distraction technique will account for reducing the overall cost of the procedure, rendering the allograft redundant.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Interposition Arthroplasty
  • Procedure: Hematoma and Distraction Arthroplasty
N/A

Detailed Description

Osteoarthritis is a degenerative disease of the joints, mostly known for the hip and the knee. Osteoarthritis of the thumb carpometacarpal joint is a common cause for pain, stiffness and grip weakness of the hand, affecting one of three females and one of eight males. Surgical management is indicated when conservative measures have failed, and numerous techniques have been proposed. Distraction arthroplasty has been the gold standard due to lack of high quality evidence, which renders the benefits or harms of other techniques uncertain. A recent Cochrane review was unable to demonstrate whether any technique confers a benefit over distraction arthroplasty and noted that the quality of evidence was low.

Hematoma arthroplasty includes trapeziectomy without interposition of any material or ligament reconstruction. Later, the same technique with the addition of a temporary K-wire stabilization of the first metacarpal has been described it as hematoma and distraction arthroplasty. They immobilized the metacarpal in an overcorrected position to avoid postoperative weakness, assuming the causative factor was the subsidence of the metacarpal into the trapezial void, and they reported improved outcomes. The other treatment alternatives share at least partial excision of the trapezium, and include ligament reconstruction alone or with tendon interposition, allograft interposition arthroplasty, prosthetic implants and arthrodesis. A recent promising technique is the pillow technique, a type of interposition arthroplasty, which utilizes a fascia lata allograft as interposition material and stabilization with a K-wire. The technique showed promising results in a long-term follow-up study, and proved to be a viable alternative to distraction arthroplasty with no donor site morbidity and better preservation of the height of the metacarpal. However, there is no robust evidence that retaining the joint space affects the functional results or the grip strength of the patients.

Aim of the study In view of the low quality evidence regarding the use of interposition material versus distraction arthroplasty alone, the investigators will compare the two methods in a prospective randomized study design. Hypothesis of the study is that interposition arthroplasty using the pillow technique yields better results in terms of functional improvement and grip strength when compared to the hematoma and distraction technique. The confirmation of the hypothesis is going to justify the use of the fascia lata in the procedure, which is one option widely utilized. On the contrary, if the pillow technique fails to yield clinically meaningful results, the recommendation of the hematoma and distraction technique will account for reducing the overall cost of the procedure, rendering the allograft redundant.

The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Guidelines on Good Clinical Practice.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
22 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Distraction Versus Interposition Arthroplasty for Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 16, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Interposition Arthroplasty

Fascia lata interposition arthroplasty for the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis

Procedure: Interposition Arthroplasty
A typical Wagner incision will be used at the thenar skin one centimeter distal to the radial styloid. The interval between the abductor pollicis longus and the extensor pollicis brevis will be developed, while protecting the dorsal sensory branches of the radial nerve. A longitudinal capsulotomy will be performed and after identifying the carpometacarpal and scaphotrapeziotrapezoid joints, the trapezium will be excised. Then, the empty space will be filled with a roll of fascia lata and fixed with a K-wire. The 1.4 millimeter K-wire will be introduced two centimeters distally to the metacarpal base and into the body of the trapezium. In case of scaphotrapeziotrapezoid joint arthritis, debridement and osteophyte excision of the scaphotrapezoid joint will be performed. In the end of the procedure, the capsule and the skin will be sutured, and a thumb spica will be placed to all patients.

Active Comparator: Hematoma and Distraction Arthroplasty

Hematoma and Distraction Arthroplasty for the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis

Procedure: Hematoma and Distraction Arthroplasty
A typical Wagner incision will be used at the thenar skin one centimeter distal to the radial styloid. The interval between the abductor pollicis longus and the extensor pollicis brevis will be developed, while protecting the dorsal sensory branches of the radial nerve. A longitudinal capsulotomy will be performed and after identifying the carpometacarpal and scaphotrapeziotrapezoid joints, the trapezium will be excised. Then, the empty space will be stabilized with a K-wire without interposition of any material. The 1.4 millimeter K-wire will be introduced two centimeters distally to the metacarpal base and into the body of the trapezium. In case of scaphotrapeziotrapezoid joint arthritis, debridement and osteophyte excision of the scaphotrapezoid joint will be performed. In the end of the procedure, the capsule and the skin will be sutured, and a thumb spica will be placed to all patients.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. "Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand" (QuickDASH) functional score [six months]

    Comparison of the Quick DASH score between the groups. Minimum 0, Maximum 100, higher scores mean a worse outcome.

  2. "Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand" (QuickDASH) functional score [one year]

    Comparison of the Quick DASH score between the groups. Minimum 0, Maximum 100, higher scores mean a worse outcome.

  3. "Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand" (QuickDASH) functional score [two years]

    Comparison of the Quick DASH score between the groups. Minimum 0, Maximum 100, higher scores mean a worse outcome.

  4. "Visual Analog Scale" (VAS) for pain relief [six months]

    Comparison of the VAS for pain between the groups. Minimum 0, Maximum 100, higher scores mean a worse outcome.

  5. "Visual Analog Scale" (VAS) for pain relief [one year]

    Comparison of the VAS for pain between the groups. Minimum 0, Maximum 100, higher scores mean a worse outcome.

  6. "Visual Analog Scale" (VAS) for pain relief [two years]

    Comparison of the VAS for pain between the groups. Minimum 0, Maximum 100, higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Thumb range of motion (ROM) [six months]

    Comparison of thumb ROM between the groups. Flexion, extension, and abduction will be measured for thumb carpometacarpal and interphalangeal joints using a goniometer.

  2. Thumb range of motion (ROM) [one year]

    Comparison of thumb ROM between the groups. Flexion, extension, and abduction will be measured for thumb carpometacarpal and interphalangeal joints using a goniometer.

  3. Thumb range of motion (ROM) [two years]

    Comparison of thumb ROM between the groups. Flexion, extension, and abduction will be measured for thumb carpometacarpal and interphalangeal joints using a goniometer.

  4. Kapandji score for thumb opposition [six months]

    Comparison of the Kapandji score between the groups. Minimum 0, Maximum 10, higher scores mean a better outcome

  5. Kapandji score for thumb opposition [one year]

    Comparison of the Kapandji score between the groups. Minimum 0, Maximum 10, higher scores mean a better outcome

  6. Kapandji score for thumb opposition [two years]

    Comparison of the Kapandji score between the groups. Minimum 0, Maximum 10, higher scores mean a better outcome

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Rate of complications [Up to two years postoperatively]

    All complications will be documented and rates will be compared between the groups.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis Stage III and IV according to the Eaton and Littler classification

  • At least one month history of pain refractory to nonoperative treatment (rest, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medicine, splint, hand therapy, a maximum of three corticosteroid injections)

  • Patient willing to participate to the study

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Previous operation to the affected area

  • Pregnant patient

  • Chronic systemic illnesses

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 "George Papanikolaou" Hospital Thessaloniki Exohi Greece 55210

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki

Investigators

  • Study Director: Panagiotis Givissis, Professor, Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Dimitrios Kitridis, Principal Investigator, Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04155853
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 597/2019
First Posted:
Nov 7, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Mar 8, 2022
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Dimitrios Kitridis, Principal Investigator, Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 8, 2022