Segment Transport Versus Acute Shortening In The Treatment of Tibial Pseudarthroses With Bone Loss

Sponsor
Bezmialem Vakif University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01246934
Collaborator
(none)
22
1
1
4
5.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

In this study the investigators are presenting the advantages as well as the disadvantages of ACUTE SHORTENING AND RELENGTHENINIG VS SEGMENT TRANSPORT methods.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: ASR METHOD
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
22 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2009
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2009
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2010

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
No Intervention: COMPLICATION

Other: ASR METHOD

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. TREATMENT PERIOD AND COMPLICATION RATE []

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
13 Years to 50 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All

Inclusion Criteria:TIBIA PSEUDOARTHROSES -

Exclusion Criteria:BONE LOSS GREATER THAN 10 CM

-

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Cengiz Sen Istanbul Turkey 34290

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Bezmialem Vakif University

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
, ,
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01246934
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • BVUORT001
First Posted:
Nov 24, 2010
Last Update Posted:
Nov 24, 2010
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2010
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Nov 24, 2010