Segment Transport Versus Acute Shortening In The Treatment of Tibial Pseudarthroses With Bone Loss
Sponsor
Bezmialem Vakif University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01246934
Collaborator
(none)
22
1
1
4
5.4
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
In this study the investigators are presenting the advantages as well as the disadvantages of ACUTE SHORTENING AND RELENGTHENINIG VS SEGMENT TRANSPORT methods.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment
:
22 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Study Start Date
:
Oct 1, 2009
Actual Primary Completion Date
:
Dec 1, 2009
Actual Study Completion Date
:
Feb 1, 2010
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: COMPLICATION
|
Other: ASR METHOD
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- TREATMENT PERIOD AND COMPLICATION RATE []
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study:
13 Years
to 50 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Inclusion Criteria:TIBIA PSEUDOARTHROSES -
Exclusion Criteria:BONE LOSS GREATER THAN 10 CM
-
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Cengiz Sen | Istanbul | Turkey | 34290 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Bezmialem Vakif University
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.Responsible Party:
,
,
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01246934
Other Study ID Numbers:
- BVUORT001
First Posted:
Nov 24, 2010
Last Update Posted:
Nov 24, 2010
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2010
Additional relevant MeSH terms: