PROSCEED: Impact of an Intervention of Screening, Treatment Initiation and Referral to PROmote Smoking CEssation in Emergency Department Patients
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Smoking cessation assistance is one of the major issues in prevention policies because the prevalence of smoking remains high in France. With its numerous consultations, an emergency service seems to be an interesting place for setting up and helping with weaning, despite specific working conditions. The study, which is a pilot, is interested in the feasibility and efficacy of the implementation of a STIR (Screening, Treatment Intervention and Referral) protocol, which screening, brief intervention, nicotine replacement therapy and referral to a specialist in order to help the patients in smoking cessation.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Individual randomization as soon as the patient gives his consent and meets the inclusion - non-inclusion criteria.
Control group: delivery of the "tobacco-info-service" brochure titled "Why quit smoking? ", then phone call at 7 days and a month to collect tobacco consumption. Visit for 3 month. Intervention group: STIR protocol (screening, brief intervention, incentive to download the tobacco info service application, delivery of the "tobacco-info-service" brochure, initiation of a nicotine replacement therapy with nicotine patches made by a trained emergency nurse or doctor, then three consultations face-to-face or remotely with a member of the team addictionology at 7 days, 1 and 3 months.
In both groups: collection of the primary endpoint during the M3 visit. For patients who did not come (regardless of the group):
call for collection of the main judgment criterion
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Intervention group
|
Other: STIR PROTOCOL
Screening, STIR protocol (screening, brief intervention, incentive to download the tobacco info service application, delivery of the "tobacco-info-service" brochure, initiation of a nicotine patch made by the trained emergency nurse or doctor) then three consultations face-to-face or remotely with a member of the team addictionology at 7 days, 1 and 3 months.
|
| No Intervention: Control group
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Feasibility and efficacy of a smoking cessation intervention [3 months after emergency consultation]
Composite outcome: Proportion of patients who participated in follow-up consultations at 3 months after going to the emergency room and proportion of patients weaned from smoking at three months in the intervention group, compared to the control group. A patient is said to be weaned if he / she declares having stopped smoking for 7 days 3 months after his / her visit to the emergency room
Secondary Outcome Measures
- proportion of patients who participated in consultations at D7 and M1 [Day 7 and 1 month after emergency consultation]
Assessment of the patient circuit
- description of the procedure (duration of the inclusion) [4 months]
Description of the research circuit
- number of patients who refused to participate [4 months]
Description of the procedure's barriers
- Number of doctors/paramedics involved, and of staff who performed the follow-up [4 months]
Description of staff involved
- Feasibility of measuring exhaled carbon monoxide [3 months after emergency consultation]
Proportion of patients with a carbon monoxide measurement expired
- Correlation of the measurement of exhaled carbon monoxide and declaration of withdrawal [3 months after emergency consultation]
- Effectiveness of the smoking cessation intervention [Day 7 and 1 month after emergency consultation]
Proportion of patients weaned at 7 days and at 1 month assessed, declarative, collected by phone
- Number of smoked cigarettes [Day 7, 1 month and 3 month after emergency consultation]
Number of cigarettes smoked daily at 7 days, 1 and 3 months, declarative
- Patients' adherence to the intervention [3 month after emergency consultation]
- Questionnaire with Likert scale: In order to measure adherence to the intervention, 13 sentences in favor of the intervention : answers from 1. I strongly disagree to 5 . I completely agree. A higher score mean a better adherence (min: 13, max : 65). - Proportion of patients who completed follow-up consultations at 7 days and one month
- Emergency teams' adherence to the intervention [3 month after emergency consultation]
Questionnaire with Likert scale: In order to measure adherence to the intervention, 11 sentences in favor of the intervention : answers from 1. I strongly disagree to 5 . I completely agree. A higher score mean a better adherence (min: 11, max : 55).
- Patients ' adherence to the intervention, according to demographic criteria. [3 month after emergency]
Description of the population according to age, gender, socio-economic characteristics, grounds for appeal
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Age >= to 18 years old
-
Active smoker defined by having smoked at least 100 cigarettes in total in his life, associated with daily consumption or weekly
-
Free and informed consent signed by the patient
-
Patient with an understanding of the French language to participate in the intervention if necessary
-
Patient affiliated to a social security regimen
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Absolute vital emergency
-
Pregnant or breastfeeding women
-
Contraindication to taking nicotine
-
Taking nicotine by patch or gum or e-cigarette
-
Patient under AME (national medical insurance)
-
Patients under guardianship
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Emergency department Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière | Paris | France | 75013 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Anne Laure Philippon, MD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- APHP220066
- ID RCB 2021-A03003-38