Cognitive Training for Nicotine Dependence
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This randomized clinical trial tested the effects of a computerized (web-based) cognitive training intervention on smoking cessation.
All participants received 8 weeks of standard nicotine patch therapy, smoking cessation counseling, and were randomized to 1 of 2 different training programs: cognitive training vs. control training.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Cognitive Training Participants in this arm received computerized cognitive training in addition to nicotine patch and smoking cessation counseling. |
Behavioral: Cognitive Training
The computerized cognitive training intervention is a 12-week standardized course of internet-based computerized cognitive exercises designed to enhance executive cognitive function.
|
Placebo Comparator: Control Training Participants in this arm received computerized control training in addition to nicotine patch and smoking cessation counseling |
Behavioral: Control training
The computerized control training intervention is a 12-week standardized course of internet-based deep breathing exercises which does not contain the cognitive exercises designed to enhance executive cognitive function.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Point-prevalence Abstinence at End of Treatment [End of treatment (Week 12)]
Daily smoking, from the Target Quit Date to End of Treatment (EOT), was assessed by a validated timeline follow-back measure. Based on guidelines for smoking cessation trials, the primary outcome was 7-day point prevalence abstinence at EOT, and abstinence was defined as no self-reported smoking (even a puff) for at least 7 days, with in-person verification by carbon monoxide breath levels (CO <8ppm). Following standard convention, participants who withdrew or were lost to follow-up were considered smokers.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Point-prevalence Abstinence at 6-month Follow-up [6 month follow-up]
Daily smoking from the Target Quit Date to 6 month follow-up was assessed by a validated timeline follow-back measure. Based on guidelines for smoking cessation trials, the secondary outcome was 7-day point prevalence abstinence at the 6 month follow-up, and abstinence was defined as no self-reported smoking (even a puff) for at least 7 days, with in-person verification by carbon monoxide breath levels (CO <8ppm). Following standard convention, participants who withdrew or were lost to follow-up were considered smokers.
- Cognitive Performance (Working Memory) [Baseline and Week 12 (EOT)]
Change in performance on the Digit Span Forward task (working memory) between Baseline and End of Treatment (Week 12). In this task, participants are presented with a series of digits on the computer screen at one second intervals. Participants are then required to enter the digits in order. The number of digits in each series ranges from 3 to 7, and the maximum recall span is the length of the largest series entered correctly. The outcome measure is the change score (calculated by subtracting the Baseline score from the end of treatment score). Change scores can range from -4 to 4. Negative numbers indicate worse performance at EOT; positive numbers indicate better performance at EOT; and 0 indicates no change.
- Cognitive Performance (Response Inhibition) [Baseline and Week 12 (EOT)]
Change in performance on the Go/No-Go Task (response inhibition) between Baseline and End of Treatment (Week 12). In this task, participants are presented with a series of stimuli (the word "PRESS" in either green or red). Participants are instructed to respond by pressing the spacebar when the stimulus is green, and to withhold a response when the stimulus is red. The outcome is the change in number of commission errors (failure to withhold a response to a red stimulus) from EOT minus baseline. The potential range for the change score is -42 to 42. Negative numbers indicate a decrease in the number of commission errors (improved performance) from baseline to EOT; positive numbers indicate an increase in commission errors (worse performance); 0 indicates no change.
- Cognitive Performance (Attention) [Baseline and Week 12 (EOT)]
Change in performance on the Continuous Performance Task (attention) between Baseline and End of Treatment (Week 12). In this task, participants are presented with a series of letters at 2.5s intervals and are instructed to respond by pressing the space bar if the same letter appears twice in a row. The outcome is the change in the number of commission errors (the number of times the participant responded to a non-target at EOT minus baseline). There are a total of 125 trials, with 20 target trials (response required) and 85 non-target trials (no response required); therefore the possible range for the change score is -85 to 85. Negative numbers indicate a decrease in commission errors (better performance at EOT compared to baseline); positive numbers indicate an increase in commission errors (worse performance at EOT compared to baseline); and 0 indicates no change.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion:
-
Healthy male and female treatment-seeking smokers who are between 18 and 65 years of age and self-report smoking at least 5 cigarettes (menthol and/or non-menthol) per day for at least the last 6 months
-
Plan to live in the area for at least the next 8 months
-
Capable of giving written informed consent, which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the combined consent and HIPAA form
-
Able to communicate fluently in English (speaking, writing, and reading)
-
Have uninterrupted access to a home computer with sound capabilities, keyboard, mouse, and active Internet connection
-
Provide a Carbon Monoxide (CO) breath test reading greater than or equal to 8 parts per million (ppm) at Intake Visit
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Center for Interdiscplinary Research on Nicotine Addiction, University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States | 19104 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Pennsylvania
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Caryn Lerman, PhD, University of Pennsylvania
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 812429
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Recruitment for this clinical trial began in March 2011. Study accrual was completed in September 2015, with a final sample of N=213 in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | Five hundred and fifty-seven participants provided consent and 213 were randomized. Reasons for exclusion from randomization included no home computer or internet access and failure to meet final eligibility criteria at the Intake Visit. |
Arm/Group Title | Cognitive Training | Control Training |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The Cognitive Training intervention is a 12-week standardized course of internet-based computerized cognitive exercises designed to enhance executive cognitive function. Participants also receive nicotine patch and smoking cessation counseling. | The Control Training intervention is a 12-week standardized course of internet-based deep breathing exercises which does not contain the cognitive exercises designed to enhance executive cognitive function. Participants also receive nicotine patch and smoking cessation counseling. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 108 | 105 |
COMPLETED | 85 | 92 |
NOT COMPLETED | 23 | 13 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Cognitive Training | Control Training | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The Cognitive Training intervention is a 12-week standardized course of internet-based computerized cognitive exercises designed to enhance executive cognitive function. Participants also receive nicotine patch and smoking cessation counseling. | The Control Training intervention is a 12-week standardized course of internet-based deep breathing exercises which does not contain the cognitive exercises designed to enhance executive cognitive function. Participants also receive nicotine patch and smoking cessation counseling. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 108 | 105 | 213 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
43.18
(12.62)
|
43.39
(12.38)
|
43.28
(12.48)
|
Gender (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
53
49.1%
|
54
51.4%
|
107
50.2%
|
Male |
55
50.9%
|
51
48.6%
|
106
49.8%
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
Hispanic or Latino |
1
0.9%
|
5
4.8%
|
6
2.8%
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
107
99.1%
|
100
95.2%
|
207
97.2%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
1
0.9%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.5%
|
Asian |
4
3.7%
|
2
1.9%
|
6
2.8%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
38
35.2%
|
42
40%
|
80
37.6%
|
White |
61
56.5%
|
54
51.4%
|
115
54%
|
More than one race |
3
2.8%
|
4
3.8%
|
7
3.3%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
1
0.9%
|
3
2.9%
|
4
1.9%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
United States |
108
100%
|
105
100%
|
213
100%
|
Cigarettes Per Day (cigarettes smoked per day) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [cigarettes smoked per day] |
16.42
(6.14)
|
15.73
(5.23)
|
16.08
(5.70)
|
Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence Score (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
4.82
(2.11)
|
4.65
(1.74)
|
4.74
(1.94)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Point-prevalence Abstinence at End of Treatment |
---|---|
Description | Daily smoking, from the Target Quit Date to End of Treatment (EOT), was assessed by a validated timeline follow-back measure. Based on guidelines for smoking cessation trials, the primary outcome was 7-day point prevalence abstinence at EOT, and abstinence was defined as no self-reported smoking (even a puff) for at least 7 days, with in-person verification by carbon monoxide breath levels (CO <8ppm). Following standard convention, participants who withdrew or were lost to follow-up were considered smokers. |
Time Frame | End of treatment (Week 12) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Cognitive Training | Control Training |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The Cognitive Training intervention is a 12-week standardized course of internet-based computerized cognitive exercises designed to enhance executive cognitive function. Participants also receive nicotine patch and smoking cessation counseling. | The Control Training intervention is a 12-week standardized course of internet-based deep breathing exercises which does not contain the cognitive exercises designed to enhance executive cognitive function. Participants also receive nicotine patch and smoking cessation counseling. |
Measure Participants | 108 | 105 |
Number [Percentage of participants] |
38
35.2%
|
43
41%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Cognitive Training, Control Training |
---|---|---|
Comments | Longitudinal logistic regression with fitted generalized estimating equations (GEE) was used to estimate an overall treatment effect odds ratio including both the EOT and 6-month time points and relevant covariates (e.g., baseline smoking rate, age, Shipley IQ score). The study (n=213) had 80% power to detect small to medium effects on quit rates (corresponding to Cohen's one-sample d=0.38). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.14 |
Comments | ||
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Odds Ratio (OR) |
Estimated Value | 0.69 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.42 to 1.13 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Point-prevalence Abstinence at 6-month Follow-up |
---|---|
Description | Daily smoking from the Target Quit Date to 6 month follow-up was assessed by a validated timeline follow-back measure. Based on guidelines for smoking cessation trials, the secondary outcome was 7-day point prevalence abstinence at the 6 month follow-up, and abstinence was defined as no self-reported smoking (even a puff) for at least 7 days, with in-person verification by carbon monoxide breath levels (CO <8ppm). Following standard convention, participants who withdrew or were lost to follow-up were considered smokers. |
Time Frame | 6 month follow-up |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Cognitive Training | Control Training |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The Cognitive Training intervention is a 12-week standardized course of internet-based computerized cognitive exercises designed to enhance executive cognitive function. Participants also receive nicotine patch and smoking cessation counseling. | The Control Training intervention is a 12-week standardized course of internet-based deep breathing exercises which does not contain the cognitive exercises designed to enhance executive cognitive function. Participants also receive nicotine patch and smoking cessation counseling. |
Measure Participants | 108 | 105 |
Number [Percentage of participants] |
15
13.9%
|
25
23.8%
|
Title | Cognitive Performance (Working Memory) |
---|---|
Description | Change in performance on the Digit Span Forward task (working memory) between Baseline and End of Treatment (Week 12). In this task, participants are presented with a series of digits on the computer screen at one second intervals. Participants are then required to enter the digits in order. The number of digits in each series ranges from 3 to 7, and the maximum recall span is the length of the largest series entered correctly. The outcome measure is the change score (calculated by subtracting the Baseline score from the end of treatment score). Change scores can range from -4 to 4. Negative numbers indicate worse performance at EOT; positive numbers indicate better performance at EOT; and 0 indicates no change. |
Time Frame | Baseline and Week 12 (EOT) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants with performance >3SD from the mean at baseline were excluded as outliers. |
Arm/Group Title | Cognitive Training | Control Training |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The Cognitive Training intervention is a 12-week standardized course of internet-based computerized cognitive exercises designed to enhance executive cognitive function. Participants also receive nicotine patch and smoking cessation counseling. | The Control Training intervention is a 12-week standardized course of internet-based deep breathing exercises which does not contain the cognitive exercises designed to enhance executive cognitive function. Participants also receive nicotine patch and smoking cessation counseling. |
Measure Participants | 82 | 92 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Change in maximum recall span] |
0.22
(1.2)
|
0.03
(1.1)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Cognitive Training, Control Training |
---|---|---|
Comments | Multiple regression models were used to estimate effects of treatment on change in cognitive performance. Age, Shipley IQ score, number of cigarettes smoked per day at baseline, and EOT smoking status were included as covariates. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.30 |
Comments | ||
Method | Regression, Linear | |
Comments |
Title | Cognitive Performance (Response Inhibition) |
---|---|
Description | Change in performance on the Go/No-Go Task (response inhibition) between Baseline and End of Treatment (Week 12). In this task, participants are presented with a series of stimuli (the word "PRESS" in either green or red). Participants are instructed to respond by pressing the spacebar when the stimulus is green, and to withhold a response when the stimulus is red. The outcome is the change in number of commission errors (failure to withhold a response to a red stimulus) from EOT minus baseline. The potential range for the change score is -42 to 42. Negative numbers indicate a decrease in the number of commission errors (improved performance) from baseline to EOT; positive numbers indicate an increase in commission errors (worse performance); 0 indicates no change. |
Time Frame | Baseline and Week 12 (EOT) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants with performance >3SD from the mean at baseline were excluded as outliers. |
Arm/Group Title | Cognitive Training | Control Training |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The computerized cognitive training intervention is a 12-week standardized course of internet-based computerized cognitive exercises designed to enhance executive cognitive function. | The computerized control training intervention is a 12-week standardized course of internet-based deep breathing exercises which does not contain the cognitive exercises designed to enhance executive cognitive function. |
Measure Participants | 82 | 92 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Change in number of commission errors] |
-0.84
(2.5)
|
-0.49
(2.5)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Cognitive Training, Control Training |
---|---|---|
Comments | Multiple regression models were used to estimate effects of treatment on change in cognitive performance. Age, Shipley IQ score, number of cigarettes smoked per day at baseline, and EOT smoking status were included as covariates. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.30 |
Comments | ||
Method | Regression, Linear | |
Comments |
Title | Cognitive Performance (Attention) |
---|---|
Description | Change in performance on the Continuous Performance Task (attention) between Baseline and End of Treatment (Week 12). In this task, participants are presented with a series of letters at 2.5s intervals and are instructed to respond by pressing the space bar if the same letter appears twice in a row. The outcome is the change in the number of commission errors (the number of times the participant responded to a non-target at EOT minus baseline). There are a total of 125 trials, with 20 target trials (response required) and 85 non-target trials (no response required); therefore the possible range for the change score is -85 to 85. Negative numbers indicate a decrease in commission errors (better performance at EOT compared to baseline); positive numbers indicate an increase in commission errors (worse performance at EOT compared to baseline); and 0 indicates no change. |
Time Frame | Baseline and Week 12 (EOT) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants with performance >3SD from the mean at Baseline were excluded as outliers. |
Arm/Group Title | Cognitive Training | Control Training |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The Cognitive Training intervention is a 12-week standardized course of internet-based computerized cognitive exercises designed to enhance executive cognitive function. Participants also receive nicotine patch and smoking cessation counseling. | The Control Training intervention is a 12-week standardized course of internet-based deep breathing exercises which does not contain the cognitive exercises designed to enhance executive cognitive function. Participants also receive nicotine patch and smoking cessation counseling. |
Measure Participants | 82 | 92 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Change in number of commission errors] |
-0.27
(1.3)
|
0.54
(1.6)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Cognitive Training, Control Training |
---|---|---|
Comments | Multiple regression models were used to estimate effects of treatment on change in cognitive performance. Age, Shipley IQ score, number of cigarettes smoked per day at baseline, and EOT smoking status were included as covariates. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.033 |
Comments | Results would not survive correction for multiple hypothesis testing. | |
Method | Regression, Linear | |
Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | AE and SAE data were collected from enrollment through follow up (~31 weeks). | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Participants (PPTs) completed an anticipated side effects questionnaire (transdermal nicotine) at Pre-Quit (baseline measure) and at every subsequent in-person visit during the treatment period (systematic assessment). AE and SAE information was collected via spontaneous report from enrollment through follow up as a non-systematic assessment (n=213). | |||
Arm/Group Title | Cognitive Training | Control Training | ||
Arm/Group Description | ||||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Cognitive Training | Control Training | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Cognitive Training | Control Training | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 6/108 (5.6%) | 3/105 (2.9%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Bowel Blockage | 1/108 (0.9%) | 1 | 0/105 (0%) | 0 |
General disorders | ||||
Pancreatitis | 1/108 (0.9%) | 1 | 0/105 (0%) | 0 |
Infections and infestations | ||||
Infection | 1/108 (0.9%) | 1 | 0/105 (0%) | 0 |
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||||
Breast Cancer | 0/108 (0%) | 0 | 1/105 (1%) | 1 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Collapsed Lung | 1/108 (0.9%) | 1 | 0/105 (0%) | 0 |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Squamous Cell Carcinoma | 1/108 (0.9%) | 1 | 0/105 (0%) | 0 |
Surgical and medical procedures | ||||
Emergency Procedure | 1/108 (0.9%) | 1 | 0/105 (0%) | 0 |
Surgery (Gastric Bypass) | 0/108 (0%) | 0 | 2/105 (1.9%) | 2 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Cognitive Training | Control Training | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 42/108 (38.9%) | 54/105 (51.4%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Nausea | 6/108 (5.6%) | 6 | 6/105 (5.7%) | 6 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Headache | 10/108 (9.3%) | 11 | 12/105 (11.4%) | 12 |
Psychiatric disorders | ||||
Insomnia | 22/108 (20.4%) | 35 | 37/105 (35.2%) | 59 |
Disturbing Dreams | 10/108 (9.3%) | 10 | 12/105 (11.4%) | 13 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Shortness of Breath | 4/108 (3.7%) | 5 | 7/105 (6.7%) | 7 |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Skin Irritation | 8/108 (7.4%) | 11 | 13/105 (12.4%) | 13 |
Sweating | 5/108 (4.6%) | 9 | 7/105 (6.7%) | 7 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Benjamin Albelda (Project Manager) |
---|---|
Organization | University of Pennsylvania (Perelman School of Medicine) |
Phone | 2157467173 |
albeldab@mail.med.upenn.edu |
- 812429