LoDoCA: Tolerability of Lopinavir Versus Dolutegravir for Children and Adolescents Living With HIV

Sponsor
Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05426421
Collaborator
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland (Other), University of Basel (Other), University of Zurich (Other), Baylor International Pediatric AIDS Initiative (Other), Lesotho Ministry of Health (Other), Baylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation (Other)
500
2
29.7
250
8.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy is set to be increasingly replace ritonavir-boosted lopinavir-based regimens for the treatment of paediatric HIV. This prospective cohort study aims to compare tolerability, adverse effects, and virological outcomes between the two regimen types using a before-after design. The study is conducted in Lesotho, southern Africa, and includes children and adolescents transitioning from ritonavir-boosted lopinavir-based to dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy. It aims to provide detailed information on treatment tolerability and to inform paediatric treatment programmes.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Detailed Description

    Dolutegravir, an antiretroviral drug to treat HIV, has recently been rolled out on a large scale across much of Africa. With paediatric formulations becoming increasingly available, dolutegravir is set to replace ritonavir-boosted lopinavir as the core agent in paediatric treatment regimens in many countries. While both drugs are well-studied and highly effective, they reportedly differ with regards to their tolerability at least in adults, with ritonavir-boosted lopinavir typically associated with gastrointestinal adverse effects and dolutegravir mostly associated with neuropsychiatric adverse effects including insomnia. Resistance patterns also differ between these two treatment options. However, studies focusing specifically on the tolerability of and adverse effects associated with either drug in children and adolescents are scarce.

    This prospective cohort study aims to i) compare treatment satisfaction, health-related quality of life, tolerability, and symptoms or side-effects associated with either drug option, ii) specifically compare sleep outcomes quantified through actigraphy with either drug option, and iii) provide observational evidence on virological outcomes in a resource-limited setting using a before-after design.

    The study is conducted at several sites in Lesotho, southern Africa. It enrols children and adolescents <18 years of age who are taking ritonavir-boosted lopinavir-based therapy at enrolment and routinely due to transition to dolutegravir-based therapy as per the national roll-out plan. On the day of transitioning to dolutegravir as well as four weeks thereafter, participants will complete questionnaires on treatment satisfaction, gastrointestinal symptoms, depressive symptoms, and sleep habits. A subset of participants fulfilling additional inclusion criteria will additionally use actigraphy sensors to monitor sleep duration and sleep fragmentation; these individuals will have study visits two weeks before transition to dolutegravir to initiate actigraphy, at transition, as well as two and four weeks after transition, with questionnaires at all but the pre-transition visit and actigraphy (target: at least seven nights with high-quality data) between all visits. For all participants, medical records will be assessed and additional clinical and sociodemographic data collected. A viral load test will be done on the day of transitioning to dolutegravir, and subsequent routine viral load test results (every six months as per national guidelines) will be assessed. Dried blood spots will be taken at all visits, barring the pre-transition visit for those with actigraphy.

    This study aims to inform the continued roll-out of dolutegravir replacing ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in paediatric antiretroviral therapy regimens, notably assessing the suitability of a one-size-fits-all approach and providing detailed information on tolerability and adverse effects of either regimen.

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Anticipated Enrollment :
    500 participants
    Observational Model:
    Cohort
    Time Perspective:
    Prospective
    Official Title:
    Tolerability of Lopinavir Versus Dolutegravir for Children and Adolescents Living With HIV (LoDoCA): a Prospective Cohort Study
    Actual Study Start Date :
    Jul 11, 2022
    Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
    Jan 1, 2023
    Anticipated Study Completion Date :
    Jan 1, 2025

    Arms and Interventions

    Arm Intervention/Treatment
    No actigraphy

    Participants will receive viral load testing at transition from LPV/r-based to DTG-based ART, and subsequent routine viral load data will be analysed. Questionnaires will be filled in and dried blood spots collected at transition and at four weeks. Medical history as well as clinical and socio-demographic data will be collected.

    With actigraphy

    Participants will receive viral load testing at transition from LPV/r-based to DTG-based ART, and subsequent routine viral load data will be analysed. Baseline actigraphy data will be collected for two weeks prior to transition (actigraphy period 1), and for four weeks after transition (actigraphy period 2 from 0-2 weeks after transition; actigraphy period 3 from 2-4 weeks after transition). Sleep diaries will be filled in during all actigraphy periods. Questionnaires will be filled in and dried blood spots taken at transition as well as two and four weeks after transition. Medical history as well as clinical and socio-demographic data will be collected.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Sleep duration during monitoring period 3 (2-4 weeks post-transition) versus monitoring period 1 (0-2 weeks pre-transition) [[2-4 weeks post-transition] vs [0-2 weeks pre-transition]]

      Sleep will be monitored using actigraphy sensors for a subset of participants. There will be three sleep monitoring periods: 0-2 weeks before transition from ritonavir-boosted lopinavir- to dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy (period 1), 0-2 weeks after transition, and 2-4 weeks after transition). We will conduct a before-after analysis.

    2. Change in treatment satisfaction, assessed using the HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) change version (HIVTSQ-c) [4 weeks post-transition]

      10-item scale with each item scored from -3 to +3 (overall range -30 to +30), with higher scores indicating increases in treatment satisfaction

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Viral suppression rate among those with virological data [6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after transition]

      Proportion of participants with a viral load <50 copies/mL among all participants with virological data

    2. Engagement in care with viral suppression [6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after transition]

      Proportion of participants with a viral load <50 copies/mL among all participants

    3. Sleep duration during monitoring period 2 (0-2 weeks post-transition) versus monitoring period 1 (0-2 weeks pre-transition) [[0-2 weeks post-transition] vs [0-2 weeks pre-transition]]

      Sleep will be monitored using actigraphy sensors for a subset of participants. There will be three sleep monitoring periods: 0-2 weeks before transition from ritonavir-boosted lopinavir- to dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy (period 1), 0-2 weeks after transition, and 2-4 weeks after transition). We will conduct a before-after analysis.

    4. Sleep fragmentation [[2-4 weeks post-transition] vs [0-2 weeks pre-transition], and [0-2 weeks post-transition] vs [0-2 weeks pre-transition]]

      Sleep will be monitored using actigraphy sensors for a subset of participants. There will be three sleep monitoring periods: 0-2 weeks before transition from ritonavir-boosted lopinavir- to dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy (period 1), 0-2 weeks after transition, and 2-4 weeks after transition). We will conduct a before-after analysis.

    5. Treatment satisfaction after vs before transition, assessed using the HIVTSQ status version (HIVTSQ-s) [4 weeks post-transition vs at transition]

      10-item scale with each item scored from 0 to 6 (overall range 0 to 60), with higher scores indicating higher treatment satisfaction. Two time points compared in a before-after analysis.

    6. Gastrointestinal symptoms after vs before transition, assessed using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale adapted for protease inhibitors (GSRS-PI) [4 weeks post-transition vs at transition]

      13-item scale with each item scored from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater discomfort. Two time points compared in a before-after analysis.

    7. Depressive symptoms after vs before transition, assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC) [4 weeks post-transition vs at transition]

      20-item scale with each item scored from 0 to 3 (overall range 0 to 60), with higher scores indicating higher depressive symptoms. Two time points compared in a before-after analysis.

    8. Sleep outcomes after vs before transition, assessed using the Child Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) or Adolescent Sleep Habits Questionnaire (ASHQ) [4 weeks post-transition vs at transition]

      33-item scale (2 items used in two subscales) with each item scored from 1 to 3, with higher scores indicating more sleep problems. Two time points compared in a before-after analysis.

    9. Health-related quality of life after vs before transition, assessed using the KINDL questionnaire [4 weeks post-transition vs at transition]

      24-item scale with each item scored from 1 to five, with higher scores indicating higher health-related quality of life

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Proportion of participants with drug resistance among participants with viraemia while taking dolutegravir [until 24 months after transition]

      Classified Stanford HIV drug resistance database (susceptible, potential low-level resistance, low-level resistance, intermediate resistance, high-level resistance) referring to each drug in the current ART regimen

    2. Impact of drug resistance at time of transition on subsequent viral suppression [until 24 months after transition]

      Assessment whether resistance at transition predicts subsequent routinely assessed viral load outcomes

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    N/A to 18 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Inclusion Criteria - general:
    • Currently taking ritonavir-boosted lopinavir-containing antiretroviral therapy

    • Eligible for dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy as per national roll-out/guidelines

    • Age < 18 years

    • Informed consent (as per consenting procedures)

    Exclusion Criteria - general:
    • No transition to dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy foreseen

    • Already enrolled in another study judged as non-compatible by the Principal Investigator or Local Principal Investigator

    Inclusion Criteria - actigraphy:
    • Enrolled into main cohort

    • Age ≥6 and <18 years

    • Taking ritonavir-boosted lopinavir-containing antiretroviral therapy for at least 12 weeks

    • Last viral load <50 copies/mL and taken within <36 weeks and while taking ritonavir-boosted lopinavir-containing antiretroviral therapy

    • Willingness to wear an actimetry sensor every night for at least 7 nights (daytime wearing optional)

    • Patient and/or caregiver judged to be able to fulfil requirements (wearing actimetry sensor; filling in sleep diary) by study team member conducting screening

    • Stated ability to attend all study visits

    • Informed consent (as per consenting procedures)

    Exclusion Criteria - actigraphy:
    • Intention to transfer out of the study site (and not into a different study site) within 6 weeks

    • No actimetry sensor available

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Baylor Center of Excellence Maseru Maseru Lesotho
    2 Baylor Satellite Center of Excellence Mohale's Hoek Mohale's Hoek Lesotho

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute
    • University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
    • University of Basel
    • University of Zurich
    • Baylor International Pediatric AIDS Initiative
    • Lesotho Ministry of Health
    • Baylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Jennifer Brown, PhD, University of Basel
    • Principal Investigator: Akash Devendra, MBChB, Baylor International Paediatric AIDS Initiative

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05426421
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • P001-22-1.0
    • ID37-2022
    • H-51472
    • 3ZX1422
    First Posted:
    Jun 22, 2022
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 28, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Jun 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Keywords provided by Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jul 28, 2022