Efficacy of aPDT in Reducing Pain and Swelling Following Molar Extraction Surgery- Blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Sponsor
Universidade Federal Fluminense (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT03818906
Collaborator
(none)
40
1
4
24
1.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This project aims to evaluate the effect of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) on the reduction of swelling and postoperative pain in lower molar extraction procedures. This is a clinical study approved by the Research Ethics Committee, which will be performed in 40 patients between 20 and 60 years. Patients included in the study should have at least one lower molar (first or second molar) with indication of exodontia. Participants will follow the exclusion criteria: pregnant or breastfeeding women; patients with obesity (Body Mass Index - BMI); make use of any activity smokers and ex smoker to 6 months; diabetics; immunosuppressed; in osteoporosis; making use of antimicrobials in the last 3 months; making use of medications that interfere with bone remodeling; with cysts or tumors in place. Surgical procedures that exceeded the clinical time of 30 minutes and / or required opening of the flap or osteotomy were excluded from the study. After the sample calculation, forty patients will be involved in this project, where forty molars (first and second molars) will be extracted in the mandible, which will be randomly divided into 4 groups. The control group (C.G), will contain 10 patients, where 10 molars will be extracted in a conventional way, without any additional treatment to be done. Test group 1 (T.G1) will contain 10 patients where 10 molars will be extracted and immediately after extraction, the fresh sockets will receive in their inner portion a local application of aPDT. The test group 2 (T.G2) will present 10 patients, where 10 molars will be extracted that immediately after the exodontia, the fresh socket will receive local application of infrared in the outer vestibular portion. Finally, Test Group 3 (T.G3), will be composed of 10 patients, where 10 molars will be extracted, joining the approaches of the previous groups (aPDT + infrared). Pain intensity will be assessed through a visual analogue scale and swelling assessed by measuring a perimeter between the tragus, the base of the jaw and the commissure of the lips. The data will be collected in four moments: before the surgery, 72 hours, 7 days and 30 days postoperatively.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Molar extraction - Control Group
  • Procedure: aPDT + Molar Extraction - Test Group 1
  • Procedure: Infrared + Molar Extraction - Test Group 2
  • Procedure: aPDT + Infrared + Molar Extraction - Test Group 3
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
40 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Sequential Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Efficacy of aPDT in Reducing Pain and Swelling Following Molar Extraction Surgery- Blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 1, 2018
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2019
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Control Group

Patients with first or second molars where the extractions will be performed in a conventional way without any additional local treatment to be done in the alveolus. The analysis of the postoperative signs/symptoms will be performed by the visual analog pain scale at 1th, 2th, 3th, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th. Subjective evaluation of swelling in 48 hours and 7th day.

Procedure: Molar extraction - Control Group
The extra-oral measurements will be made for further comparison and assessment of swelling (48 hours and 7 days). Exodontia will be done in a conventional way and the evolution of the pain will be evaluated through the visual analog scale during the next 7 days.

Experimental: Test Group 1

Patients with first or second molars where the extractions will be performed in a conventional way and after extraction will be performed aPDT inside the alveolus.The analysis of the postoperative signs/symptoms will be performed by the visual analog pain scale at 1th, 2th, 3th, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th. Subjective evaluation of swelling in 48 hours and 7th day.

Procedure: aPDT + Molar Extraction - Test Group 1
The extra-oral measurements will be made for further comparison and assessment of swelling (48 hours and 7 days). Exodontia will be done in a conventional way and the evolution of the pain will be evaluated through the visual analog scale during the next 7 days.immediately after extraction, the fresh sockets will receive in their internal portion a local application of aPDT.

Experimental: Test Group 2

Patients with first or second molars where the extractions will be performed in a conventional way and immediately after the exodontia, the fresh socket will receive local application of infrared in the outer vestibular portion. The analysis of the postoperative signs/symptoms will be performed by the visual analog pain scale at 1th, 2th, 3th, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th. Subjective evaluation of swelling in 48 hours and 7th day.

Procedure: Infrared + Molar Extraction - Test Group 2
The extra-oral measurements will be made for further comparison and assessment of swelling (48 hours and 7 days). Exodontia will be done in a conventional way and the evolution of the pain will be evaluated through the visual analog scale during the next 7 days.immediately after extraction, the fresh sockets will receive local application of infrared in vestibular external portion

Experimental: Test Group 3

Patients with first or second molars where the extractions will be performed in a conventional way and immediately after the exodontia the approaches from the previous groups (Test Group 1 and 2 (aPDT + infrared) will be done. The analysis of the postoperative signs/symptoms will be performed by the visual analog pain scale at 1th, 2th, 3th, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th. Subjective evaluation of swelling in 48 hours and 7th day.

Procedure: aPDT + Infrared + Molar Extraction - Test Group 3
The extra-oral measurements will be made for further comparison and assessment of swelling (48 hours and 7 days). Exodontia will be done in a conventional way and the evolution of the pain will be evaluated through the visual analog scale during the next 7 days.immediately after extraction, the fresh sockets will receive in their internal portion a local application of aPDT and after that will receive local application of infrared in vestibular external portion.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. reduction of postoperative pain [Pain evaluation will be performed prior to the surgical procedure and 7 days after]

    Evaluate Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT)on the reduction of postoperative pain in lower molar extraction procedures. Pain intensity will be assessed through a visual analogue scale

  2. reduction of swelling [The data will be collected in four moments: before the surgery, 72 hours, 7 days and 30 days postoperatively.]

    Evaluate Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT)on the reduction of swelling. Swelling evaluated through the measurement of a perimeter between the tragus, the base of the mandible and the commissure of the lips

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
20 Years to 60 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • patients without systemic limitations that indicate surgical procedures with cooperative behavior

  • with full awareness and approval of the guidelines listed in the free and clarified term proposed by the research

  • present compromised posterior and inferior teeth requiring exodontia.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women

  • Patients with obesity (Body Mass Index - BMI)

  • Make use of any activity smokers and ex smoker to 6 months

  • Diabetics

  • Immunosuppressed

  • in osteoporosis

  • making use of antimicrobials in the last 3 months

  • making use of medications that interfere with bone remodeling

  • with cysts or tumors in place

  • Surgical procedures that exceeded the clinical time of 30 minutes and / or required opening of the flap or osteotomy

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Livia Antunes, PhD Nova Friburgo Rio De Janeiro Brazil 28625650

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Universidade Federal Fluminense

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Livia Azeredo Alves Antunes, Professor Lívia Azeredo Alves Antunes, Universidade Federal Fluminense
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03818906
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • PDTa and reducing pain
First Posted:
Jan 28, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Jan 28, 2019
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2018
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Livia Azeredo Alves Antunes, Professor Lívia Azeredo Alves Antunes, Universidade Federal Fluminense

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 28, 2019