LDHF-Nigeria: Simulation-based Low-dose High Frequency (LDHF) Plus Mobile Mentoring (m-Mentoring) Study in Nigeria

Sponsor
Jhpiego (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03269240
Collaborator
(none)
299
2
14.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and cost of a simulation-based low dose high frequency (LDHF) plus m-Mentoring training versus the traditional group-based training approaches in improving knowledge and skill in maternal and newborn care and to determine trainees' satisfaction with the approaches in Ebonyi and Kogi states.

The specific objectives are to:
  1. Compare knowledge and skill learning outcomes between the two groups of birth attendants trained through the simulation-based LDHF/m-Mentoring versus group-based training approaches in Kogi and Ebonyi states over 12-months.

  2. Assess the trainees' satisfaction with a simulation-based LDHF/m-Mentoring and group-based training approaches in improving skills of birth attendants in the selected facilities in Kogi and Ebonyi state over 12-months.

  3. Determine the cost and cost-effectiveness of LDHF/m-Mentoring and group-based training approaches in improving skills of birth attendants in the selected facilities in Kogi and Ebonyi state over 12-months.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Acquisition of Knowledge and clinical skills
  • Other: Onsite training
  • Other: Off-site training
N/A

Detailed Description

Simulation-based low dose high frequency (LDHF) training has emerged as a new strategy for delivering key content and improving the competencies of health workers. In facility-based driven simulation-based LDHF trainings, providers are not removed from clinical practice for the extended periods of time, and a heavy emphasis is placed on simulation with practice and feedback.

The Maternal and Child Survival Program (MCSP) in Nigeria is working in selected health facilities in Ebonyi and Kogi States to improve the quality of care received by mothers and newborns on the day of birth using high-impact evidence-based lifesaving interventions. The simulation-based LDHF/m-Mentoring evaluation comparing it to the traditional group-based training will contribute to the body of knowledge on this approach.

The study design is cluster randomized control trial. Sixty (60) health facilities will be selected from the list of 120 facilities which are supported by MCSP and randomized to intervention and control group. Selection will be based on caseload, level of service delivery, and ownership. Thereafter, these will be randomly assigned to simulation-based LDHF/m-Mentoring Group (intervention arm) or Group-Based Training Group (control arm).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
299 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Cluster randomized control trialCluster randomized control trial
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
The assessors will blinded with respect to which study arm the participants (health care workers) were assigned to.
Primary Purpose:
Health Services Research
Official Title:
A Comparative Study of Simulation-based Low-dose High Frequency (LDHF) Plus Mobile Mentoring (m-Mentoring) Versus Traditional Group-based Training Approaches Among Maternal and Newborn Healthcare Providers in Ebonyi and Kogi States, Nigeria
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 17, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Mar 24, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date :
Nov 29, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: LDHF plus m-Mentoring

Participants will undergo pre-training assessment comprising multiple-choice questions and objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) using manikins. Training is divided into two 4-day "low-dose" sessions at the health facility or onsite training. Pre-training and immediate post-training assessments results will be compared. A score of ≥80% is acceptable competence (pass). During the one-month intervals between training sessions, participants practice using manikins to reinforce their competencies through simulation-based practices, facilitated by facility-based trained Peer Practice Coordinators (PPCs). The PPCs will also receive structured, monthly half-hour mentoring calls that will provide remote support, answering questions, providing guidance and reinforcing key messages. Acquisition of knowledge and clinical skills is measured.

Behavioral: Acquisition of Knowledge and clinical skills
LDHF is a novel training approach that is being compared to the traditional training approach

Other: Onsite training
Participants are training at their health facilities

Active Comparator: Traditional training

The health providers will receive the same content of training in eight days, Off-site training, the way it's currently done in Nigeria. Both theoretical and practical through use of manikins - simulation. No reinforcement and further practice will take place once the participants are back in their work stations. Acquisition of knowledge and clinical skills is measured.

Behavioral: Acquisition of Knowledge and clinical skills
LDHF is a novel training approach that is being compared to the traditional training approach

Other: Off-site training
Participants from different health facilities are gathered together in a central location for training, away from their workplaces

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Percent change in competency in basic obstetric and emergency care between the groups [3 months]

    Proportion of competent providers who retain clinical competency skills 3 months post-training

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Comparison of retention of skills between the two study arms [12 months]

    Proportion of service providers who retain clinical competency skills after 12 months

  2. Level of satisfaction of service providers [12 months]

    Proportion of service providers who are satisfied with the training approach

  3. Comparison of cost-effectiveness of the two approaches [12 months]

    Cost-effectiveness of LDHF/m-Mentoring compared to group-based training approaches in improving skills of birth attendants in the selected facilities in Kogi and Ebonyi states.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Must give informed consent to participate in the study;

  2. Must have spent at least six months in maternal and/or newborn care services;

  3. Must be providing services related to maternal and newborn health in selected health facilities at the time of the interview;

  4. Must be available to participate in the training from the beginning to the end; and

  5. Must have had pre-service training not incorporating simulation-based LDHF approach from accredited medical schools, schools of nursing/midwifery or health technology.

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Decides to opt out / declines to participate.

  2. Has had prior training using the simulation-based LDHF approach.

  3. Provides services related to maternal and newborn health more than one health facility selected as part of intervention or comparison group.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Jhpiego

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Emmanuel Otolorin, Jhpiego

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Jhpiego
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03269240
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • IRB00007196
First Posted:
Aug 31, 2017
Last Update Posted:
Aug 10, 2018
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2018
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 10, 2018