Compare-TAVI: Comparison of Eligible TAVI-valves - Cohort B

Sponsor
Aarhus University Hospital Skejby (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04443023
Collaborator
Odense University Hospital (Other), Aalborg University Hospital (Other)
1,062
1
2
150.5
7.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The study performs head-to-head comparison of two TAVI-valves: Sapien and Myval.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: chosen TAVI valve
N/A

Detailed Description

The purpose of the present study is to ensure a continuous comparison of the TAVI-valves implanted, and to monitor long-term valve performances.

Purpose: To randomize between two TAVI-valve types in patients who according to a heart team conference is found eligible for treatment with more than one valve.

Hypotheses:
  1. There is no difference in the combined endpoint (death, stroke, moderate/severe para-valvular leakage, moderate/severe device stenosis) between the two valves to be compared.

  2. There is no difference between valves in secondary endpoints: death, stroke, moderate/major paravalvular leakage, moderate/severe aortic device stenosis, new pacemaker implantation, readmission for congestive heart failure, 6-minute walk test, and degeneration of the valve as evaluated by computerized tomography (HCT), transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), or MRI.

Design: Randomized controlled trial with clinical national registry follow-up.

Centers eligible for inclusion: Scandinavian and European centers who fulfill the above mentioned criteria.

Randomization:

Before randomizing patients, the center decides which two valves the patient is found eligible for, and enters these valves in the electronic randomization form (TrialPartner). Randomization is then performed between these two valves. A patient is only randomized if a dedicated technical TAVI conference has found the patient eligible for treatment with both valves.

Consecutive cohorts are established.

In the current study we plan to initiate the following cohorts:

Cohort B: Patients randomized to the Sapien or the Myval TAVI valve.

Operator requirements:

Any procedure requires that the physician has performed at least 15 implantations with the valve in use. Otherwise the procedure is performed according to the routine of the institution.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
1062 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Randomized Comparison of Eligible TAVI-valves - Cohort B (Sapien Versus Myval)
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 15, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 15, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2032

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Sapien

Patients randomized to treatment

Device: chosen TAVI valve
chosen TAVI valve

Active Comparator: Myval

Patients randomized to treatment

Device: chosen TAVI valve
chosen TAVI valve

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Percentage of patients with MACE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events) [1 year]

    Mortality, stroke, moderate/major PVL, moderate/severe aortic device stenosis at 1 year, using VARC-3 criteria

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Percentage of patients with MACE [30 day, 3-year, 5-year and 10-year]

    Mortality, stroke, moderate/major paravalvular leakage (PVL), moderate/severe aortic device stenosis at 1 year, using VARC-3 criteria

  2. Percentage death [30-day, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year]

    Mortality

  3. Percentage of patients with stroke [During admission, 30-day, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year]

    According to Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 criteria

  4. Percentage of patients with moderate or severe paravalvular leakage [30-day, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year]

    Moderate or severe paravalvular leakage according to VARC-3 criteria

  5. Percentage of patients with moderate/major aortic stenosis [30-day, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year]

    According to VARC-3 criteria

  6. Percentage of patients with new pacemaker [During admission, 30-day, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year]

    New Pacemaker after TAVI-procedure

  7. Percentage of patients with major bleeding [30-day, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year]

    Major bleeding according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 criteria, resulting in either a drop in Hbg>=1.86 mmol/l or >=2 units of blood transfusion

  8. Distance in meters during 6-minute walk test [30-day, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year]

    6-minute walk test

  9. Percentage of patients with other TAVI-related complications [During TAVI-procedure]

    conversion to open surgery during implantation, unplanned use of cardiopulmonary support (CPS), coronary artery obstruction, ventricular septal perforation, mitral valve apparatus damage or dysfunction, cardiac tamponade, valve thrombosis, valve embolization, valve migration, need for TAVI-in-TAVI deployment, using VARC-3 criteria

  10. Percentage of patients with endocarditis [30-day, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year]

    Endocarditis

  11. Proportion with successful implantation of the chosen valve. [During procedure]

    This means no need for more than 1 TAVI valve, no change to another valve than planned during the procedure because it was impossible to implant the valve planned, and no conversion to surgery or procedure-related death.

  12. Percentage of patients with major vascular access site and access-related complications [During admission and 30-day]

    According to VARC-3 criteria

  13. Percentage of patients with valve thrombosis or severe stenosis [30-day, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year]

    Valve thrombosis or severe stenosis confirmed by Echo or HCT

  14. Percentage of patients with readmission with congestive heart failure [30-day, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year]

    Readmission with congestive heart failure

  15. Percentage of patients with increase in creatinin level of 100% or more, or dialysis [during admission and within 30 days]

    Increase in renal creatinine level more than to >=200% (AKIN stage 2-3, VARC-3 criteria) or dialysis

  16. Percentage of patients with moderate/severe PVL stratified according to level of annular calcium on HCT in three groups [30-day]

    Severity of PVL stratified according to level of annular calcium on HCT (low/medium/high)

  17. Mean Gradient (AO) stratified according to level of annular calcium on HCT in three groups [30-day]

    Gradient (AO) stratified according to level of annular calcium on HCT (low/medium/high)

  18. Percentage of patients with prosthesis-patient mismatch [30-day, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year]

    Prosthesis-patient mismatch (EOA/body surface area). Severe PPM≤0.65 cm2/m2. Moderate PPM≤0.85 cm2/m2 according to VARC-3 criteria

  19. Mean effective orifice area measured by MRI [30-day]

    Effective orifice area measured by MRI in patients participating in MRI-substudy

  20. Percentage of patients with leaflet thickening (hypoattenuated leaflet thickening = HALT) or reduced leaflet motion or thrombus assessed by HCT [30-day and 1-year]

    Leaflet thickening (hypoattenuated leaflet thickening = HALT) or reduced leaflet motion or thrombus assessed by HCT in patients participating in HCT-substudy

  21. Mean volume of aortic regurgitation measured by MRI [30-day]

    Volume of aortic regurgitation measured by MRI in patients participating in MRI-substudy

  22. Other tavi-related complications [30-day]

    Anulus rupture or aortic rupture

  23. AMI [30-day, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year and 10-year]

    Acute Myocardial Infarction

  24. PCI og CABG [30-day, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year and 10-year]

    Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting

  25. Reopeation [30-day, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year and 10-year]

    Reopeation with TAVI, Surgical ortic valve replacement (SAVR) or BAV (Balloon aortic valvuloplasty) according to VARC-3 criteria

  26. Afib [30-day, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year and 10-year.]

    Newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation according to VARC-3 criteria

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Patient more than 18 years of age.

  2. Patient eligible for at least 2 valves being implanted routinely at the participating center, according to a TAVI heart team conference.

  3. The center experience for each of the valves considered should be more than 15 cases a year, and at least 15 valves implanted before a valve can be used in the trial.

  4. The center volume should be more than 75 cases a year.

  5. The patient has given signed informed consent.

  6. TAVI performed via the femoral artery.

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Not able to give written inform consent

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark 8200

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
  • Odense University Hospital
  • Aalborg University Hospital

Investigators

  • Study Chair: henrik nissen, PhD, odense univeristy hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Christian Juhl Terkelsen, Principal investigator, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04443023
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Compare-TAVI
First Posted:
Jun 23, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Jul 27, 2022
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 27, 2022