Energy-Harvesting Mesofluidic Impulse Prosthesis: e-MIP

Sponsor
Orthocare Innovations, LLC (Industry)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT04157608
Collaborator
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) (NIH)
10
1
2
3
3.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this research is to validate the e-MIP design and function by testing the ability of e-MIP to harvest energy and return a sufficient amount of energy to assist the user during gait. The investigators will also evaluate whether prosthetic users are able to wear and use the e-MIP device long-term.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Habitual Prosthesis
  • Device: Energy-Harvesting Mesofluidic Impulse Prosthesis
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
10 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Crossover clinical trialCrossover clinical trial
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Device Feasibility
Official Title:
Evaluation of an Energy-Harvesting Mesofluidic Impulse Prosthesis (e-MIP) in Transtibial Prosthesis Users
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2020
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Habitual Prosthesis

Participant's existing baseline prescribed prosthesis

Device: Habitual Prosthesis
Habitual baseline prosthesis prescribed by participant's clinician.

Experimental: e-MIP

Experimental ankle-foot prosthesis

Device: Energy-Harvesting Mesofluidic Impulse Prosthesis
e-MIP is an experimental lower limb ankle-foot prosthesis.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Energy returned [After four weeks with Habitual Prosthesis]

    The amount of energy returned at the ankle joint, calculated from ankle torque and angle sensors with respect to time.

  2. Energy returned [After four weeks with e-MIP (system ON and system OFF)]

    The amount of energy returned at the ankle joint, calculated from ankle torque and angle sensors with respect to time.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Total Steps [After four weeks with Habitual Prosthesis]

    The number of steps taken by the participant will be recorded over four weeks with a step activity monitor.

  2. Total Steps [After four weeks with e-MIP (system ON and system OFF)]

    The number of steps taken by the participant will be recorded over four weeks with a step activity monitor.

  3. Step Rate [After four weeks with Habitual Prosthesis]

    The speed of steps taken by the participant will be recorded over four weeks with a step activity monitor.

  4. Step Rate [After four weeks with e-MIP (system ON and system OFF)]

    The speed of steps taken by the participant will be recorded over four weeks with a step activity monitor.

  5. Step Activity [After four weeks with Habitual Prosthesis]

    The number of continuous steps taken by the participant will be recorded over four weeks with a step activity monitor.

  6. Step Activity [After four weeks with e-MIP (system ON and system OFF)]

    The number of continuous steps taken by the participant will be recorded over four weeks with a step activity monitor.

  7. Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire [After four weeks with Habitual Prosthesis]

    Responses to the psychometrically validated scales of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire for persons with limb loss, in order to understand the participant's perception of the prosthesis. Questionnaire scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a better outcome.

  8. Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire [After four weeks with e-MIP (system ON and system OFF)]

    Responses to the psychometrically validated scales of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire for persons with limb loss, in order to understand the participant's perception of the prosthesis. Questionnaire scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a better outcome.

  9. Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters [After four weeks with Habitual Prosthesis]

    The spatio-temporal parameters of gait, such as walking speed, will be measured using motion analysis.

  10. Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters [After four weeks with e-MIP (system ON and system OFF)]

    The spatio-temporal parameters of gait, such as walking speed, will be measured using motion analysis.

  11. Kinematics during Gait [After four weeks with Habitual Prosthesis]

    Kinematics such as hip, knee, and ankle joint angles will be measured using motion analysis.

  12. Kinematics during Gait [After four weeks with e-MIP (system ON and system OFF)]

    Kinematics such as hip, knee, and ankle joint angles will be measured using motion analysis.

  13. Kinetics during Gait [After four weeks with Habitual Prosthesis]

    Kinetics such as hip, knee, and ankle joint torques will be measured using motion analysis.

  14. Kinetics during Gait [After four weeks with e-MIP (system ON and system OFF)]

    Kinetics such as hip, knee, and ankle joint torques will be measured using motion analysis.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
21 Years to 75 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Unilateral transtibial amputation

  • At least twelve months post-amputation

  • Currently walking on a prosthesis for at least one year

  • Uses modular endoskeletal prosthetic components

  • Has bilateral normal range of motion

  • Ability to walk independently and for an extended length of time (walking ability of each individual will be assessed by the principal investigator or study prosthetist during the recruitment period)

  • Ability to communicate individual perceptions

  • Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Confounding injury or musculoskeletal problem

  • Pregnancy

  • Lower limb peripheral neuropathy

  • Symptomatic cardiovascular disease or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

  • Not able to read and understand English

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Orthocare Innovations, LLC Edmonds Washington United States 98020

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Orthocare Innovations, LLC
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
David Boone, Chief Executive Officer, Orthocare Innovations, LLC
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04157608
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 0309-02
  • 2R44HD080309
First Posted:
Nov 8, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Mar 4, 2020
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
Yes

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 4, 2020