Trauma Expectation Factor Trauma Outcome Measure

Sponsor
AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing Documentation (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01126398
Collaborator
(none)
204
5
36
40.8
1.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study is designed as a prediction trial. That is, our primary purpose is to develop a model that can be applied clinically as a user-friendly "baseline" questionnaire that is capable of predicting "success" or "failure" based on a patient's pre-surgical expectations of their final outcome. In the process, a secondary goal is to develop an outcomes measure.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: ankle or distal tibia surgery

Detailed Description

Aims:
  1. To develop a novel, psychometrically sound, trauma patient expectation instrument that:
  1. demonstrates content validity; b) considers patient and surgeon expectations; c) predicts orthopedic outcomes; d) is reliable; e) is patient friendly; and f) is easy to score and interpret. This will be known as the Trauma Expectation Factor (TEF).
  1. To develop a novel, psychometrically sound, trauma patient outcomes instrument that: a) demonstrates content validity; b) measures current condition in the same domains as the expectation instrument; c) demonstrates construct validity; d) demonstrates criterion validity; e) is reliable; f) is patient friendly; and g) is easy to score and interpret. This will be known as the Trauma Outcomes Measure (TOM).
Hypotheses:

H#1. A simple pre-surgical questionnaire that measures patient expectations (i.e., Trauma Expectation Factor) after an ankle fracture requiring surgery will predict an "expected" score on a standardized disease-specific ankle instrument (i.e., AAOS Foot and Ankle Core Score).

H#2. A similar instrument that is reworded to assess current condition (i.e., Trauma Outcomes Measure) instead of expectations, is a valid, reliable, and responsive measure of a traumatic patient's condition.

H#3. Patient and surgeon expectations of final outcome status are different; however, the differences get smaller over time.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
204 participants
Observational Model:
Case-Only
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
The Role of Patient Expectations in Traumatic Orthopedic Outcomes: the Development of the Trauma Expectation Factor Trauma Outcome Measure (TEFTOM)
Study Start Date :
Feb 1, 2007
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2010
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2010

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Ankle / dist. tibia fracture fixation

Procedure: ankle or distal tibia surgery
internal fixation for ankle or distal tibia fracture

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. patient reported outcomes [12 months post-op]

    The patient reported outcome includes the Trauma Outcome Measure (TOM), the AAOS Foot and Ankle Core Score, the Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS), a 10mm visual analogue scale (VAS), and the SF-36.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Clinician based outcomes [12 months post-op]

    Bony union was assessed using X-Rays.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Isolated ankle or distal tibia fracture

  • Scheduled for and undergoing surgery for their fracture

  • 18 years of age or older

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Subject has previously undergone internal fixation surgery for this ankle fracture

  • Subject has disease entity, or condition that precludes likelihood of bony union (eg, metastatic cancer, metabolic bone disease)

  • Subject has severe dementia or other severe mental health problem that may preclude him/her from completing study questionnaires

  • Subject is participating in other competing clinical research that may interfere with participation in this research

  • Subject is unlikely to attend study related follow-up visits

  • Subject has polytrauma (more than one organ system compromised)

  • Subject has fracture(s) other than ankle fracture

  • Subject is a prisoner

  • Fracture occurred more than 4 weeks ago

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Orthopedic Trauma Service, University of Florida - Shands Jacksonville Jacksonville Florida United States 32207
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York New York New York United States 10021
3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York New York New York United States 10021
4 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ribeirao Preto Medical School - University of Sao Paulo Ribeirao Preto Sao Paulo Brazil 3900
5 Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada T2N2T9

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing Documentation

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Suk, Professor, Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Universitiy of Florida - Shands Jacksonville

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing Documentation
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01126398
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • TEFTOM
First Posted:
May 19, 2010
Last Update Posted:
Jul 22, 2021
Last Verified:
May 1, 2010
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 22, 2021