Syndesmotic Injury and Fixation in Supination-External (SE) Ankle Fractures

Sponsor
University of Oulu (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01234493
Collaborator
(none)
140
1
2
38
3.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of our study was to determine whether transfixation of unstable syndesmosis is necessary in supination-external rotation type ankle fractures. Our hypothesis was that syndesmotic ligaments heal at the proper length after malleolar reduction and that syndesmotic transfixation is not needed in supination-external rotation fracture types.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: fixation
  • Procedure: no fixation
N/A

Detailed Description

A prospective randomized study comparing syndesmotic transfixation to no fixation in AO/OTA Weber B-type ankle fractures was designed. To show a clinically significant difference (Olerud-Molander ankle score 20%, standard deviation (SD) 24 points, from our previous study) between the groups, the sample size was estimated (α=0.05, β=0.2, 20% drop out) to be 30 patients per group.

All skeletally mature patients (≥16 years old) with a unilateral Lauge-Hansen supination-external rotation type 4 ankle fractures treated within one week after injury at our hospital were considered eligible for the present study. Exclusion criteria were bilateral ankle fractures, pathologic fractures, concomitant tibial shaft fractures, previous significant injury or a fracture of either ankle, significant peripheral neuropathy, soft tissue infection in the region on either injured ankle, or inability to complete the study protocol.

After bony fixation, the 7.5-Nm standardized external rotation (ER) stress test for both ankles was performed under fluoroscopy. A positive stress examination was defined as a difference of more than 2 mm side-to-side in the tibiotalar or tibiofibular clear spaces on mortise radiographs. If the stress test was positive, the patient was randomized to either syndesmotic transfixation with 3.5-mm tricortical screws or no syndesmotic fixation.

Clinical outcome was assessed using the Olerud-Molander scoring system, RAND 36-Item Health Survey, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to measure pain and function after a minimum 1-year of follow-up.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
140 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Syndesmotic Injury and Fixation in SE Ankle Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study
Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2007
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2010
Actual Study Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2010

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: fixation

Syndesmosis fixation with one 3.5mm fully threaded screw

Procedure: fixation
Syndesmosis fixation with one 3.5mm fully threaded three cortical screw

Active Comparator: no fixation

No syndesmosis fixation

Procedure: no fixation
No syndesmosis fixation.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Olerud-Molander score [minimum one year]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
16 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • All skeletally mature patients (≥16 years old) with a unilateral Lauge-Hansen supination-external rotation type 4 ankle fractures treated within one week after injury at our hospital
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Bilateral ankle fractures, pathologic fractures, concomitant tibial shaft fractures, previous significant injury or a fracture of either ankle, significant peripheral neuropathy, soft tissue infection in the region on either injured ankle, or inability to complete the study protocol.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Oulu University Hospital Oulu Finland 90650

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Oulu

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Harri J Pakarinen, MD, Oulu University Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Harri Pakarinen, Orthopedic surgeon, University of Oulu
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01234493
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • SE4rand1
First Posted:
Nov 4, 2010
Last Update Posted:
May 16, 2016
Last Verified:
May 1, 2016
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Keywords provided by Harri Pakarinen, Orthopedic surgeon, University of Oulu
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 16, 2016