CST: A Closed Surgical Technique vs Papilla Preservation Techniques

Sponsor
Danae A. Apatzidou (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05754307
Collaborator
(none)
44
1
2
19
2.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

A pioneer periodontal surgical approach employing the closed surgical technique (CST) has been designed to gain access to isolated interdental periodontal defects and retain the soft-tissue architecture. This technique is based on a modified tunnelling technique to retract full-thickness gingival flaps from the osseous defect in a closed manner retaining intact the interproximal papilla thus, suturing is not required. A randomised controlled clinical trial will determine the efficacy of the CST versus the access flap employing papilla preservation techniques over a period of 6 months.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Access Flap
  • Procedure: Closed Surgical Technique
N/A

Detailed Description

This randomised controlled clinical trial will compare the CST over the access flap employing papilla preservation techniques to treat isolated interdental defects in terms of gain in clinical attachment levels, radiographic evidence of bone apposition and local reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines over a period of 6 months.

  1. First visit - initial examination - at least 3 months after initial non-surgical periodontal treatment (Step 1, 2) Update general and dental history Screening of subjects for suitability; Consent form; Randomization of suitable subjects Intra-oral photography Full-mouth charting: Probing pocket depth (PPD), Clinical Attachment Level (CAL), Plaque Index (PI), Bleeding on Probing (BoP), Gingival Recession (Rec) Oral hygiene instructions (soft toothbrush, modified Bass, interdental cleaning) Full mouth supragingival scaling

  2. Second visit - Baseline - T0 Collection of Gingival Crevice Fluid (GCF) using sterilized paper strips Radiographic examination of the site (Long-cone paralleling technique using a digital sensor attached to a custom-made silicone bite block for reproducible radiographs) Periodontal site-selected clinical assessment Periodontal surgery (control: access flap with papilla preservation techniques or test: the CST) under local anaesthesia Modification of oral hygiene instructions; post-operative instructions Intra-oral photography

  3. Third visit - T1 (2 weeks post-operatively) Suture removal (only in control group) Wound healing visual monitoring by the Early Healing Index (1-5) Oral hygiene instructions Intra-oral photography Questionnaire for subjective feelings and satisfaction

  4. Fourth visit - T2 (6 weeks post-operatively) Oral hygiene instructions Intra-oral photography

  5. Fifth visit - T3 - Re-evaluation (6 months post-operatively) GCF collection using sterilized paper strips Periodontal full-mouth charting Site-selected periodontal clinical assessment; Probing Pocket depth (PPD), Clinical Attachment Level (CAL), Plaque Index (PI), Bleeding on Probing (BoP), Gingival Recession (Rec Radiographic examination of the site Oral hygiene instructions Intra-oral photography

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
44 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Randomised controlled clinical trial having 2 parallel intervention arms for surgical treatment (step 3) of interproximal residual defects (PPD≥6mm and BoP)Randomised controlled clinical trial having 2 parallel intervention arms for surgical treatment (step 3) of interproximal residual defects (PPD≥6mm and BoP)
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Treatment is disclosed to the examiner after all data have been collected.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A "Closed" Surgical Technique for the Treatment of Residual Periodontal Pockets vs Access Flap Utilizing Papilla Preservation Techniques. A Randomized Controlled Trial
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 30, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Other: Group A

Intrasulcular incisions at the teeth adjacent to the defect, using the simplified papilla preservation technique (SPPT) or modified papilla preservation technique (MPPT). Granulation tissue is excised and debridement via hand and power-driven instruments follows. Flaps are repositioned and papilla are sutured with horizontal internal mattress doubled by a single interrupted interdental suture.

Procedure: Access Flap
Intrasulcular incisions at the teeth adjacent to the defect, using the simplified papilla preservation technique (SPPT) or modified papilla preservation technique (MPPT). Granulation tissue is excised and debridement via hand and power-driven instruments follows. Flaps are repositioned and papilla are sutured with horizontal internal mattress doubled by a single interrupted interdental suture.

Experimental: Group B

Strictly intrasulcular incisions are performed at the teeth adjacent to the defect (mid-buccal to mid-lingual) without incising the interdental papilla. Full thickness gingival flaps, at the base of the papilla, which is retained intact, are elevated in a "closed"-tunneling manner, granting access to the interdental osseous defect. Debridement is performed via power-driven tips and mini curettes, without intentional excising the granulation tissue that lines the osseous defect. Flaps are repositioned by gentle pressure and suturing is not required.

Procedure: Closed Surgical Technique
Strictly intrasulcular incisions are performed at the teeth adjacent to the defect (mid-buccal to mid-lingual) without incising the interdental papilla. Full thickness gingival flaps, at the base of the papilla, which is retained intact, are elevated in a "closed"-tunneling manner, granting access to the interdental osseous defect. Debridement is performed via power-driven tips and mini curettes, without intentionally excising the granulation tissue that lines the osseous defect. Flaps are repositioned by gentle pressure and suturing is not required.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Clinical Attachment Level [baseline to 6 months]

    Determined by a manual periodontal probe(Hu-Friedy XP-23/QW) by a single examiner at the nearest of 1mm

  2. Cementoenamel junction to Bottom of the defect [baseline to 6 months]

    Determined on standardised periapical radiographs obtained by the long cone parallel technique

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Probing Pocket Depth [baseline to 6 months]

    Determined by a manual periodontal probe

  2. Recession [baseline to 6 months]

    Determined by a manual periodontal probe

  3. Reduction of proinflammatory cytokines [baseline to 6 months]

    Determined by ELISA in GCF

  4. Bleeding on Probing [baseline to 6 months]

    Determined by a manual periodontal probe

  5. Patient satisfaction and perception [2 weeks following surery]

    Determined on questionnaires

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Systematically healthy subjects, not having consumed antibiotics 3 months before surgical periodontal treatment (baseline)

  • Smokers <5 cig/day, former smokers or no smokers

  • Periodontal patients fulfilling non surgical initial periodontal treatment at least 3 months before surgical periodontal treatment (baseline day) and presenting at least one residual pocket with PPD and CAL ≥6mm and bleeding on probing, located interproximally with intrerdental site ≥2mm.

  • Compliant patients presenting high standards of oral hygiene (full mouth Plaque Index <20%) strictly susceptible in Supportive Periodontal Treatment

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Untreated active periodontal inflammation

  • Poorly controlled systematic diseases

  • Disorders compromise wound healing

  • Bisphosphonate medications

  • Patients under radiotherapy or chemotherapy

  • Drug-indused gingival hyperplasia

  • Pregnancy or lactation

  • Poor compliance during steps 1 and 2 of cause-related periodontal treatment

  • Compromised oral hygiene (full mouth Plaque Index >30%), circumferential bone defect or narrow intrerdental site ≤2mm.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Dental School, Aristotle University, Dept of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Implant Biology Thessaloniki Greece 54124

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Danae A. Apatzidou

Investigators

  • Study Director: Danae Apatzidou, Associate Professor, School of Dentistry

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Danae A. Apatzidou, Associate Professor, Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05754307
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • AUTh 179/30-11-2022
First Posted:
Mar 3, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Mar 3, 2023
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Danae A. Apatzidou, Associate Professor, Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 3, 2023