ACOUSTIM: Cost-utility Analysis of Maintenance rTMS for Treatment-resistant Depression
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Treatment resistant depression (TRD) is a frequent, debilitating condition mostly treated by antidepressants. Repeated magnetic transcranial stimulation (rTMS) has proven adjuvant efficacy in TRD in the acute phase of treatment with a very good tolerance and acceptability. Maintenance rTMS (mTMS) is a strategy consisting in adding regular single TMS sessions after response to an acute course in order to keep the benefit of initial treatment over several month or years. Demonstrating that rTMS is efficient to improve long-term prognosis and decrease economic burden would have a tremendous impact in clinical practice in psychiatry. Thus the investigator's aim is to analyze the long term impact of mTMS treatment on costs, but also quality of life and clinical issues.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
TRD is associated with enormous social, economic, and personal costs. In literature, psychosocial and pharmacological interventions showed limited one year long-term efficacy in terms of relapse (only 10% of sustained remission at one-year follow-up actually) and quality of life due to refractoriness, observance and adverse effects. In the recent years the field of non-invasive brain stimulation became more mature with an increasing level of evidence reaching Level 1 for rTMS as curative treatment for depression in international guidelines. It is a safe and well tolerated treatment but with still high relapse rate at 6 month and one year (comparable to those former described for ECT). mTMS is a promising tool (as it was proven for ECT) to achieve sustained response several month after treatment in a significant proportion of patients. Little is known about its long-term economic and social benefit which is a crucial question given its time consuming nature. To date there is no large Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) assessing the long-term health economic interest or adjuvant mTMS compared to treatment as usual (TAU) alone in unipolar TRD . This study is a double-blind randomized controlled trial aiming at determining a 12 month cost-utility analysis, according to collective perspective, of two different modalities of rTMS (systematic mTMS or curative rTMS in case of relapse) for TRD compared to TAU alone. The secondary aims are to describe 24 month cost-utility, longitudinal clinical issues in terms of mood and quality of life, prognosis factors, as well as TAU actual strategies in that population.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Systematic maintenance rTMS (arm A) Active rTMS treatment followed, for responders, by systematic maintenance rTMS Depression usual medical treatment (psychosocial approach and/or pharmacotherapy and/or, ECT…) |
Device: Systematic maintenance rTMS
Same parameters as the initial course (session of 8,5 minutes, at 1 Hz, on the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) targeting with either neuronavigation or the Beam). The frequency is : 2 sessions / week during 1 month, then 1 session / week during 2 months and finally 1 session every 2 weeks during 8 months.
|
| Experimental: rTMS course in case of relapse (arm B) Active rTMS treatment followed, for responders, by additional rTMS courses, in case of relapse Depression usual medical treatment (psychosocial approach and/or pharmacotherapy and/or, ECT…) |
Device: rTMS course in case of relapse
Same parameters as the initial course. The frequency is the same as the initial course: one daily session on 5 consecutive working days from Monday to Friday for at least 20 to 30 sessions over 4 to 6 weeks.
|
| Sham Comparator: Sham rTMS (arm C) sham rTMS followed, for responders, by either systematic sham mTMS (50%) or additional sham rTMS course in case of relapse(50%) Depression usual medical treatment (psychosocial approach and/or pharmacotherapy and/or, ECT…) |
Device: sham rTMS
The sham stimulation consists of the identical rTMS procedure at the identical location using a commercial figure-eight sham coil. However, it does not produce the identical tactile sensation. A local electrical stimulation will be delivered with two disposable Electromyogram (EMG) electrodes using a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) Stimulator.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Cost-utility ratio, according to collective perspective of rTMS use in TRD compared to conventional therapeutic approaches without active rTMS. [12 months]
The utility will be measured by : Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALYs) as estimated from responses to the Euroqol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) health-related quality of life questionnaire. The questionnaire focuses on 5 dimensions: mobility, personal autonomy, current activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. For each of these dimensions, 3 answers are possible. The costs will be measured by the addition of the following costs: Drugs dispensing via Health insurance database "National system of information of the French health insurance" (SNIIRAM), hospitalizations, work stoppages and care consumption collected in a declarative patient questionnaire.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Cost-utility ratio, according to collective perspective of rTMS use in TRD compared to conventional therapeutic approaches without active rTMS. [24 months]
Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALYs) as estimated from responses to the Euroqol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) health-related quality of life questionnaire The costs will be measured by the additional of the following costs: Drugs dispensing via Health insurance database SNIIRAM, hospitalizations, work stoppages and care consumption collected in a declarative patient questionnaire
- Budget impact analysis of spreading the most efficient strategy for using rTMS (systematic mTMS or rTMS course in case of relapse). [5 years]
Comparison of intervention costs on the study sample and projection of these costs over 5 years, from the health insurance and hospital perspectives
- Major depressive disorder history [Baseline]
This outcome will be assessed by patient interview, with the following data (not exhaustive): date of initial symptoms, length of the current episode, family antecedents of mood disorders.
- Level of depression treatment-resistance [Baseline]
Maudsley Staging model score: a multidimensional tool to quantify treatment resistance in depression. It evaluates 5 dimensions: 1) length of the current depressive episode, 2) symptomatic intensity, 3) failure of the antidepressant drugs, 4) Increase treatment 5) use of Electro-convulsive therapy. The total score ranges from 3 to 15. 15 being the highest level of treatment resistance.
- professional status [Baseline,12 months and 24 months]
patient's professional status (active, unemployed, retired...)
- marital status [Baseline,12 months and 24 months]
patient's marital status (married, widow, single...)
- Response rate [12 months and 24 months]
Response is defined as follows: decrease of the MADRS score by at least 50% compared to baseline score. MADRS stands for Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. It is used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in patients with mood disorders. The questionnaire includes questions on the following symptoms 1. Apparent sadness 2. Reported sadness 3. Inner tension 4. Reduced sleep 5. Reduced appetite 6. Concentration difficulties 7. Lassitude 8. Inability to feel 9. Pessimistic thoughts 10. Suicidal thoughts and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60. A score from 0 to 6 being normal/symptom absent and a score >34 being severe depression.
- Remission rate [12 months and 24 months]
Remission is defined as follows: MADRS score ≤ 10 (see detailed description of MADRS in outcome 8)
- Relapse-free survival [12 months and 24 months]
Number of patients with no relapse. Relapse is defined as follows: MADRS ≥ 20 (see detailed description of MADRS in outcome 8)
- MADRS score [Baseline, 2 months, 6 months , 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months]
MADRS score (see detailed description of MADRS in outcome 8)
- Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score [Baseline, 2 months, 6 months , 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months]
The BDI is 13-item multiple-choice self-report inventory, for measuring the severity of depression. The global score is an addition of each item's score and ranges from 0 (minimal depression) to 39 (severe depression).
- Clinical Global Impression (CGI) score [Baseline, 2 months, 6 months , 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months]
The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) rating scales are measures of symptom severity, treatment response and the efficacy of treatments in treatment studies of patients with mental disorders. Each scale is rated from 0 to 7. 0 being the best level and 7 the worst level.
- Adverse events linked to the medical treatment for depression [24 months]
Number and types of adverse events linked to the medical treatment for depression
- Declarative drug compliance via the MARS (Medication Adherence Report Scale) [baseline, 12 months and 24 months]
MARS is the Medication Adherence Report Scale, including 10 questions, the global score ranges from 0 to 10, 0 corresponds to the worst drug compliance and 10 to an excellent drug compliance
- Declarative drug compliance via the CRS (Clinician Rating Scale) [baseline, 12 months and 24 months]
CRS is the Clinician Rating Scale , including 7 questions, the global score ranges from 1 to 7, 7 being the worst level of drug compliance.
- Treatment(s) switch(es) [Baseline, 2 months, 6 months , 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months]
Number of treatment switches per patient
- Treatment(s) dose increase [Baseline, 2 months, 6 months , 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months]
Number of drug(s) dose(s) increases prescribed to the patient
- Treatments combination(s) [Baseline, 2 months, 6 months , 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months]
List of drugs (name) prescribed to the patient
- Rate of suicide attempts and suicides [12 months and 24 months]
number of suicide attempts and suicides per patient
- Patient's quality of life [baseline,12 months and 24 months]
Short-Form 36 (SF 36) questionnaire: instrument used to assess multidimensional health-related quality of life, which measures 8 health related parameters: physical function, social function, physical role, emotional role, mental health, energy, pain, general health perceptions
- Response rate at the end of rTMS courses [1 month after each rTMS treatments]
Response is defined as follows: decrease of the MADRS score by at least 50% compared to baseline score (see detailed description of MADRS in outcome 8)
- Remission rate at the end of rTMS courses [1 month after each rTMS treatments]
Remission is defined as follows: MADRS score ≤ 10 (see detailed description of MADRS in outcome 8)
- Number of days between the successive rTMS courses [24 months]
Number of days between end of rTMS course X and beginning of course X+1, for each patient
- Total number of rTMS sessions [24 months]
total number of rTMS sessions per patient
- Time between relapses [24 months]
Number of days between relapses, per patient
- Compliance with rTMS [24 months]
number of missed sessions over the number of planned sessions, per patient
- Patient acceptability of the rTMS technique: Analog Visual Scale [24 months]
Analog Visual Scale of acceptability of the rTMS completed by the patient, ranging from 0 to 10. 0 being "not acceptable" and 10 being "totally acceptable"
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Major depressive disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) 5 MADRS >19
-
Episode duration: 12 weeks to 3 years.
-
2 to 4 unsuccessful treatment lines (including antidepressants, and potentialization agents lithium and quetiapine) despite adequate dosage and duration (6 weeks stable posology)
-
Ability to consent and express informed consent, to answer questionnaires and to go to follow-up visits.
-
Affiliation to social security
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Bipolar disorder
-
Schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders
-
Mental retardation or developmental disorder
-
Substance abuse or dependence
-
Depression symptoms better explained by medical conditions
-
Neurologic conditions (e.g.,previous epilepsy or unexplained seizures, stroke, trauma, infection, metabolic disease, severe migraines, multiple sclerosis, brain tumor)
-
Presence of at least one contra-indication to rTMS
-
Pregnancy/breast-feeding
-
Patient who previously received 5 lines or more pharmacological treatment for the current episode (excluding symptomatic psychotropic drugs, e.g. benzodiazepines and hypnotics)
-
Former use of electroconvulsive therapy or rTMS within the current episode.
-
Previous failure of adequate ECT (at least 12 well conducted sessions) or rTMS course (at least 20 well conducted sessions) in the medical history.
-
History of at least two courses of ECT, previous need for maintenance ECT.
-
Protection measure : maintenance of justice, tutelage, legal guardianship
-
Woman of childbearing age without effective contraception
-
Liberty deprivation (e.g. incarceration, therapeutic injunction)
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CHU d'Angers | Angers | France | 49100 | |
| 2 | CHRU de Besançon | Besançon | France | 25000 | |
| 3 | CH le Vinatier Lyon | Bron | France | ||
| 4 | CHU de Caen | Caen | France | ||
| 5 | CHU de Clermont-Ferrand | Clermont-Ferrand | France | ||
| 6 | CHU de Dijon | Dijon | France | ||
| 7 | Clinique de Vontes | Esvre-sur-Indre | France | ||
| 8 | EPSM de Lille | Lille | France | ||
| 9 | CH Esquirol - Limoges | Limoges | France | ||
| 10 | CHU de Montpellier | Montpellier | France | ||
| 11 | Nantes University Hospital | Nantes | France | 44000 | |
| 12 | EPS de Ville-Evrard | Neuilly-sur-Marne | France | ||
| 13 | GH PItié Salpétrière | Paris | France | ||
| 14 | GHU Psychiatrie Ste Anne | Paris | France | ||
| 15 | CH Henri Laborit (Poitiers) | Poitiers | France | 86000 | |
| 16 | Centre hospitalier Guillaume Regnier Rennes | Rennes | France | 35000 | |
| 17 | CH du Rouvray - Rouen | Rouen | France | ||
| 18 | CHU de Toulouse | Toulouse | France | ||
| 19 | CHU de Tours / CHRU de Tours | Tours | France | 37540 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Nantes University Hospital
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Samuel Bulteau, MD, Nantes University Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- RC17_0494