Hs-Troponin T Kinetics in Patients Treated With MCO Membranes Compared to High-flux, Low-flux Membranes and HDF

Sponsor
Medical University of Graz (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05439681
Collaborator
(none)
24
1
4
7.6
3.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

In this study, 24 prevalent hemodialysis patients will undergo four regular hemodialysis sessions during which four different treatments will be performed.

  • Treatment 1: MCO membrane (=medium cut off)

  • Treatment 2: low flux membrane

  • Treatment 3: high flux membrane

  • Treatment 4: HDF(=hemodiafiltration) treatment with high flux membrane

So far, there is no data on cardiac bioenzyme levels during hemodialysis on the MCO membrane, thus, a acute elevation during hemodialysis might be mitigated by increased clearance.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Theranova 400
  • Device: FX 10
  • Device: FX CorDiax 800
  • Device: HDF
N/A

Detailed Description

Patients who are on hemodialysis will be included in this study. After obtaining informed consent, patients will be treated with four different hemodialysis sessions:

  • Treatment 1: MCO membrane (=medium cut off)

  • Treatment 2: low flux membrane

  • Treatment 3: high flux membrane

  • Treatment 4: HDF(=hemodiafiltration) treatment with high flux membrane The order of the treatment regimens with the different membranes will be randomized in four sequences (Williams design).

Sequence 1: MCO, low flux, HDF, high flux Sequence 2: low flux, high flux, MCO, HDF Sequence 3: high flux, HDF, low flux, MCO Sequence 4: HDF, MCO, high flux, low flux Dialysis treatment will be standardized according to our clinic standard. Dialysis fluid temperature will be set to 1.0°C below the patient's body temperature, which will be assessed by auricular thermometers, to achieve maximal hemodynamic stability. Dialysis fluid composition will be standardized to calcium of 1.25mmol/L, bicarbonate of 30mmol/L, and a variable potassium and sodium concentration, depending on the patients' plasma potassium and sodium concentration.

Ultrafiltration volume will be set according to the caretaking provider.

Membranes used in the study will be FX CorDiax 10, 800 (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg vor der Höhe, Germany) and Theranova 400 (Baxter, Deerfield, Illinois, USA). We will perform the analysis only in mid-week dialysis due to the following reasons: First, hemodynamic stability is most often compromised during the first treatment of the week, due to the need of large volumes of ultrafiltration and, second, because we assume that troponin T levels reach a steady state 48 hours after the last dialysis session.

Patients undergo their routine dialysis schedule, only the membrane will be changed.

In each session, blood samples will be taken at the start of dialysis, after 1 and after 4 hours.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
24 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Sequential Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Randomized controlled four-treatment, four-period crossover trialRandomized controlled four-treatment, four-period crossover trial
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
Hs-Troponin T Kinetics in Patients Treated With MCO Membranes Compared to High-flux, Low-flux Membranes and HDF
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 12, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 31, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 31, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: MCO - low flux - high flux - HDF

Patients who are on hemodialysis will be treated with four different hemodialysis sessions: Treatment 1: MCO membrane Treatment 2: low flux membrane Treatment 3: high flux membrane Treatment 4: HDF treatment with high flux membrane The order of the treatment regimens with the different membranes will be randomized.

Device: Theranova 400
medium cut off (MCO) membrane

Device: FX 10
low-flux membrane

Device: FX CorDiax 800
high-flux membrane

Device: HDF
hemodiafiltration

Experimental: low flux - high flux - MCO - HDF

Device: Theranova 400
medium cut off (MCO) membrane

Device: FX 10
low-flux membrane

Device: FX CorDiax 800
high-flux membrane

Device: HDF
hemodiafiltration

Experimental: high flux - HDF - low flux - MCO

Device: Theranova 400
medium cut off (MCO) membrane

Device: FX 10
low-flux membrane

Device: FX CorDiax 800
high-flux membrane

Device: HDF
hemodiafiltration

Experimental: HDF - MCO - high flux - low flux

Device: Theranova 400
medium cut off (MCO) membrane

Device: FX 10
low-flux membrane

Device: FX CorDiax 800
high-flux membrane

Device: HDF
hemodiafiltration

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Troponin T - relative - 1 hour [1 hour after start of hemodialysis]

    Relative change from baseline (pre-treatment) to after 1 hour of hemodialysis in high sensitivity cardiac troponin T, assessed by Roche Elycsys Assay.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Troponin T - relative - 4 hours [4 hours after start of hemodialysis]

    Relative change of high sensitivity cardiac troponin T from baseline to after completion of hemodialysis

  2. Troponin I - relative - 1 hour and 4 hours [1 hour and 4 hours after start of hemodialysis]

    relative change of high sensitivity cardiac troponin I from baseline to after 1 hour and after completion of hemodialysis

  3. Troponin T - absolute - 1 hour and 4 hours [1 hour and 4 hours after start of hemodialysis]

    absolute difference of high sensitivity cardiac troponin T from baseline to after 1 hour and after completion of hemodialysis

  4. Troponin I - absolute - 1 hour and 4 hours [1 hour and 4 hours after start of hemodialysis]

    absolute difference of high sensitivity cardiac troponin I from baseline to after 1 hour and after completion of hemodialysis

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • minimum 18 years of age

  • End stage kidney disease patient undergoing hemodialysis

  • Written consent of the participant after being informed

Exclusion Criteria:
  • No informed consent was obtained

  • Pregnancy

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Medical University of Graz Graz Austria

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Medical University of Graz

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alexander H Kirsch, MD, Medical University of Graz

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Medical University of Graz
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05439681
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • TropT-HD
First Posted:
Jun 30, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Aug 25, 2022
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Medical University of Graz

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 25, 2022