Treatment of Latent TB Infection for Jailed Persons

Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00128206
Collaborator
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) (NIH)
364
1
2
58
6.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether an alternative drug, (rifampin) given daily, is better at treating tuberculosis (TB) and more tolerable than the usual drug treatment, isoniazid (INH). Study participants will include 972, TB infected, San Francisco Jail inmates, aged 18 or older. One group of volunteers will take INH two times a week for 9 months, and the other group will take rifampin daily for 4 months. Medication will be administered in jail and at the San Francisco TB Clinic if the volunteer is released from jail prior to completing the study. Participants will be seen daily for 4 months (rifampin group), and 2 times a week for 9 months (INH group) for directly observed therapy. Study procedures will include 5 symptom review visits and blood samples for lab testing. Follow-up will continue for each subject for five years after enrollment into the study.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Detailed Description

The purpose of this project is to evaluate the effect of two accepted regimens for treating latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in jail. Tuberculosis (TB) in incarcerated populations continues to be a serious problem, due to the large proportion of persons who are at high risk of both having latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and developing active disease. Completion of treatment of LTBI, while an important component of overall TB control efforts, has not been successful in jails. This is primarily because inmates are frequently released before finishing a 6-9 month course of standard therapy, and have low rates of completing therapy in the community. This study proposes to look at toxicity and adherence for this 4-month regimen compared to the nine-month regimen of to isoniazid (INH), and to examine costs, both cost of delivered care and the cost of TB disease prevented, with examination of reasons for completion or noncompletion of therapy. Short-course therapies for LTBI may address this problem but they are more expensive and have not been studied adequately to answer questions about side effects, completion rates, and overall cost. The investigators propose a randomized trial to test the effects of a short course therapy, rifampin (600 mg orally) given daily for 4 months, as compared to (INH) (900 mg orally) given twice weekly for 9 months. Both regimens are listed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the American Thoracic Society as acceptable treatments for persons with LTBI. The study participants will include 972 San Francisco Jail inmates, 18 years and older, enrolled over a 28-month period, for a sample of 486 in each study group. Subjects, followed in jail and after release, will be followed to test three hypotheses: the null hypothesis of a difference in toxicity of rifampin as compared to INH within a 95% confidence interval of (.4-1.87) and no difference by study group in adherence and in cost-effectiveness. A secondary aim is to describe reasons for completion or noncompletion of therapy. Toxicity is defined as complications leading to stopping drug. Adherence is defined as completion of care, or 120 doses taken within 6 months for the rifampin group and 76 doses of INH taken within 12 months for the INH group. Cost effectiveness will be calculated as the total cost of care (nursing, medical, laboratory, as well as facility costs), and measured against costs of TB cases prevented. All treatments will be administered by directly observed therapy (DOT) in jail, and by DOT after release at the San Francisco TB Clinic. Counseling on adherence (going to the TB Clinic if released before completing therapy) and on possible side effects will be given to all study subjects at enrollment and during follow-up clinic visits. All subjects will be routinely evaluated by study personnel every two weeks for the first 6 weeks, and thereafter to detect possible drug toxicity including hepatitis, peripheral neuropathy, arthralgias, rash, memory loss, and other clinical symptoms. All patients will undergo laboratory assessment at regular intervals according to a schedule which compares study group participation and the usual care in the jail. All blood test results, and new symptoms or changes in symptoms found at follow-up, will be added to the jail medical record. A final interview will be done with subjects at the time that they have completed or not completed this course of therapy for LTBI, to determine reasons (barriers and enablers). Follow-up will continue for each subject for five years after enrollment into the study, to measure study endpoint (completion of care, taken off drugs for toxicity or loss to follow-up) and to measure subsequent treatment for LTBI or development of active TB by record review.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
364 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Clinical Trial of Short Course Rifampin Versus INH for LTBI in Jail
Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2004
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2008
Actual Study Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2009

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: B

isoniazid (INH) (900 mg orally) given twice weekly for 9 months

Drug: Isoniazid
Isoniazid 900 mg twice weekly

Active Comparator: A

rifampin (600 mg orally) given daily for 4 months

Drug: Rifampin
Rifampin 600mg once per day

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test or Clinical Judgment Resulting in the Need to Stop Study Medication [up to one year]

    Liver function tests were taken at regular intervals and clinical symptoms were reviewed at regular intervals in both study groups. On the basis of these tests and examinations, physicians determined whether the study drug needed to be stopped.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Completion of Therapy [course of treatment]

  2. Cost Effectiveness [course of treatment]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:

The inclusion criteria for this study will be San Francisco Jail inmates, age 18 or older (the jail does not house juveniles) having evidence of M. tuberculosis infection by positive tuberculin skin test (a documented reactive tuberculin skin test to 0.1 mL containing 5 Tuberculin Units) who meet current national criteria for therapy for tuberculosis infection and can provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Ineligible for either therapy regimen for any of the following reasons:
  1. history of treatment-limiting reaction to isoniazid or rifamycins;

  2. pregnancy or breast feeding;

  3. active tuberculosis;

  4. an aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >3 times the upper limit of normal;

  5. bilirubin >2 times the upper limit of normal;

  6. platelets <150 K/mm3;

  7. taking protease inhibitors or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs);

  • Unable to communicate in English or Spanish;

  • Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent;

  • Not in the routine level of jail security for any reason (housed in "special security" areas);

  • Any condition that, in the best judgment of the investigator, would pose a risk to the subject during the study.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University of California San Francisco San Francisco California United States 94143-0608

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of California, San Francisco
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mary C White, PhD, University of California, San Francisco

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University of California, San Francisco
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00128206
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 03-135
  • U01AI051315
First Posted:
Aug 9, 2005
Last Update Posted:
Jul 21, 2020
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2020
Keywords provided by University of California, San Francisco
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details Inmates in the San Francisco City and County Jail diagnosed with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) at jail entry were recruited,consented and enrolled between 11/30/2004 and 9/24/2007.
Pre-assignment Detail Of 416 inmates with LTBI who consented to be enrolled, 52 were not randomized because of abnormal liver function tests (20), they were released before they could be assigned to a group (30), or they subsequently changed their mind and refused participation (2).
Arm/Group Title Isoniazid Rifampin
Arm/Group Description isoniazid (INH) (900 mg orally) given twice weekly for 9 months rifampin (600 mg orally) given daily for 4 months
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 184 180
COMPLETED 47 60
NOT COMPLETED 137 120

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Isoniazid Rifampin Total
Arm/Group Description isoniazid (INH) (900 mg orally) given twice weekly for 9 months rifampin (600 mg orally) given daily for 4 months Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 184 180 364
Age (Count of Participants)
<=18 years
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Between 18 and 65 years
183
99.5%
180
100%
363
99.7%
>=65 years
1
0.5%
0
0%
1
0.3%
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
30.34
(9.59)
31.51
(9.57)
30.9
(9.59)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
11
6%
14
7.8%
25
6.9%
Male
173
94%
166
92.2%
339
93.1%
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
United States
184
100%
180
100%
364
100%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test or Clinical Judgment Resulting in the Need to Stop Study Medication
Description Liver function tests were taken at regular intervals and clinical symptoms were reviewed at regular intervals in both study groups. On the basis of these tests and examinations, physicians determined whether the study drug needed to be stopped.
Time Frame up to one year

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The number of participants was determined by power calculations using estimates of toxicity from the literature. The analysis was intention to treat.
Arm/Group Title Isoniazid Rifampin
Arm/Group Description isoniazid (INH) (900 mg orally) given twice weekly for 9 months rifampin (600 mg orally) given daily for 4 months
Measure Participants 184 180
Number [participants]
6
3.3%
3
1.7%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Isoniazid, Rifampin
Comments The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference in toxicity by study group, and a sample of 360 participants (180 in each group)was estimated to have sufficient power to detect a difference.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value >.05
Comments
Method Chi-squared
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Risk Ratio (RR)
Estimated Value .51
Confidence Interval () 95%
.13 to 2.01
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Completion of Therapy
Description
Time Frame course of treatment

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Isoniazid Rifampin
Arm/Group Description isoniazid (INH) (900 mg orally) given twice weekly for 9 months rifampin (600 mg orally) given daily for 4 months
Measure Participants 184 180
Count of Participants [Participants]
47
25.5%
60
33.3%
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Cost Effectiveness
Description
Time Frame course of treatment

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Cost effectiveness data were not collected.
Arm/Group Title Isoniazid Rifampin
Arm/Group Description isoniazid (INH) (900 mg orally) given twice weekly for 9 months rifampin (600 mg orally) given daily for 4 months
Measure Participants 0 0

Adverse Events

Time Frame Adverse events were collected during the course of treatment for each participant, until treatment was completed or subject was lost or withdrawn from the study. This was up to 1 year for all participants.
Adverse Event Reporting Description Participants had routine blood tests for liver functions and clinical review for symptoms at regular intervals during receipt of the study medication. While they remained in jail, adverse events also were collected for all sick call visits to jail health personnel.
Arm/Group Title Isoniazid Rifampin
Arm/Group Description isoniazid (INH) (900 mg orally) given twice weekly for 9 months rifampin (600 mg orally) given daily for 4 months
All Cause Mortality
Isoniazid Rifampin
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
Serious Adverse Events
Isoniazid Rifampin
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 11/184 (6%) 3/180 (1.7%)
General disorders
allergic reaction 0/184 (0%) 0 1/180 (0.6%) 1
Hepatobiliary disorders
elevated liver function test 8/184 (4.3%) 8 1/180 (0.6%) 1
Psychiatric disorders
suicidal thoughts 1/184 (0.5%) 1 1/180 (0.6%) 1
Surgical and medical procedures
hospitalization for ankle surgery 1/184 (0.5%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0
hospitalization for appendectomy 1/184 (0.5%) 1 0/180 (0%) 0
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Isoniazid Rifampin
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 46/184 (25%) 45/180 (25%)
Gastrointestinal disorders
gastrointestinal symptoms 12/184 (6.5%) 10/180 (5.6%)
Hepatobiliary disorders
elevated liver function tests 12/184 (6.5%) 8/180 (4.4%)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
injury 9/184 (4.9%) 11/180 (6.1%)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
skin rash 13/184 (7.1%) 16/180 (8.9%)

Limitations/Caveats

Initial enrollment estimates were not met, from lower TB rates, increased deportation rates and fewer Jail personnel for LTBI testing. The complexity of treatment in the jail led to technical problems in the analytic plan.

More Information

Certain Agreements

All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Mary White
Organization University of California, San Francisco
Phone 415-476-5213
Email mary.white@nursing.ucsf.edu
Responsible Party:
University of California, San Francisco
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00128206
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 03-135
  • U01AI051315
First Posted:
Aug 9, 2005
Last Update Posted:
Jul 21, 2020
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2020