Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Reward-Based Eating Drive (RED) Scale

Sponsor
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05554250
Collaborator
(none)
500
1
11.9
42.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This research; The Turkish validity and reliability study of the "Reward-Based Eating Impulse Scale-13" developed by Ashley E. Mason was conducted to provide a new measurement tool for our country. At the same time, the study will provide a database for intervention studies to eliminate the effects of reward-based eating urge. Identifying reward-based eating in the middle and lower ranges of the eating disorder spectrum may contribute to halting the growing obesity epidemic. The Reward-Based Eating Impulse Scale will help researchers and clinicians to identify individuals who lack control over eating, cannot feel full, and are constantly preoccupied with eating.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Detailed Description

    Today, with the spread of Western-style nutrition, pleasure-based nutrition is increasing. Especially the easy access to delicious foods with high sugar, fat and salt content encourages individuals to have a diet based on pleasure rather than energy needs (Lowe, 2003). Reward-based eating behavior can occur in order to reinforce and strengthen positive emotions such as happiness and joy, or to suppress negative emotions such as stress and anxiety (Evers et al., 2013). If reward-based eating is repeated frequently in response to positive or negative emotions, it may underlie the development of eating pathology and binge eating disorder. Therefore, researchers working in the context of health behaviors, nutrition, and metabolic health triad evaluate reward-based eating before, during, and after interventions targeting changes in health behavior (Forman et al., 2013; Mason et al., 2016; Stevenson et al., 2018).

    Individuals' degree of reward-based eating is measured by evaluating behaviors such as uncontrolled eating, food craving, food addiction, restrictive eating, and binge eating. Each of the scales focuses on a different aspect of problematic eating behavior (Price et al., 2015; Vainik et al., 2015). For example, the Yale Scale of Eating Addiction considers eating behavior in terms of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria. Therefore, only when the problem becomes pathological can they evaluate reward-based eating. Similarly, the Binge Eating Scale evaluates when problematic eating behavior is severe. The Nutrient Power Scale and the Tasty Eating Motivation Scale, on the other hand, evaluate the causes of binge eating behavior and food choice in the environmental context and focus on a less problematic process than the others (Burgess et al., 2014; Davis, 2013; Gearhardt, 2016; Lowe et al., 2009) . Each developed scale better measures one aspect of reward-based eating behavior. For example, a scale that assesses the urge to eat may measure less uncontrolled eating. While the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire measures emotional eating better, it measures less uncontrolled eating and binge eating (Gormally et al., 1982). All sub-dimensions indicate the stages of the person's pathology of binge eating. For example, people with high impulsivity about eating use food to cope with emotions over time and eventually develop binge eating disorder. Theoretical and experimental evidence suggests that none of these scales comprehensively assess reward-based eating (Davis, 2013).

    In order to comprehensively evaluate this issue, the Reward-Based Eating Impulse Scale (RED-9) was developed by Epel et al., which aims to address all spectrums of reward-based eating (Epel et al., 2014). RED-9 is associated with body mass index (BMI) and also predicts changes in BMI over time. In a study of obese women, food craving was shown to be associated with higher RED-9 scores. Although RED-9 is short and simple to apply, it is unclear whether it assesses the full spectrum of reward-based eating (Mason et al., 2015; Mason et al., 2016). RED-13 assesses three dimensions of reward-based eating: lack of control over eating, inability to achieve satiety, and constant preoccupation with food. It has been shown that reduction in reward-based eating behavior may mediate the effect of obesity treatment on weight loss.

    This research; The Turkish validity and reliability study of the "Reward-Based Eating Impulse Scale-13" developed by Ashley E. Mason was conducted to provide a new measurement tool for our country. At the same time, the study will provide a database for intervention studies to eliminate the effects of reward-based eating urge. Identifying reward-based eating in the middle and lower ranges of the eating disorder spectrum may contribute to halting the growing obesity epidemic. The Reward-Based Eating Impulse Scale will help researchers and clinicians to identify individuals who lack control over eating, cannot feel full, and are constantly preoccupied with eating.

    Research Question Is the "Reward-based Eating Drive Scale (RED)" a valid and reliable measurement tool for Turkish society?

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Anticipated Enrollment :
    500 participants
    Observational Model:
    Other
    Time Perspective:
    Prospective
    Official Title:
    Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Reward-Based Eating Drive (RED) Scale
    Actual Study Start Date :
    Jan 1, 2022
    Actual Primary Completion Date :
    Jun 1, 2022
    Anticipated Study Completion Date :
    Dec 28, 2022

    Arms and Interventions

    Arm Intervention/Treatment
    Obese patients

    The population of the study consisted of individuals who applied to the Diet Polyclinic of a hospital, and the sample consisted of 500 individuals who applied to the Diet Polyclinic and met the research criteria.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Reward-based Eating Scale [30 minutes]

      The data of the research are obtained by "Personal Information Form" and "Reward-based Eating Drive Scale (RED-13)". High scores from the scale will help determine the risk group.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 60 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Persons who are at least 18 years old, have a body mass index of 30 kg/m2 and above, are at least primary school graduates, can communicate verbally and agree to participate in the research.
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Persons with psychiatric illness who could not communicate, who could not read and understand Turkish, and who did not have the skills to read and understand the questionnaire were excluded from the study.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Rize İslampasa Turkey 53100

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Recep Tayyip Erdogan University

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    CANAN ALTINSOY, Araştırma Görevlisi, Hacettepe University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05554250
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • RecepTayyipErdoganU
    First Posted:
    Sep 26, 2022
    Last Update Posted:
    Sep 26, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Sep 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by CANAN ALTINSOY, Araştırma Görevlisi, Hacettepe University
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Sep 26, 2022