Two Bed SPECT/CT Versus Planar Bone Scintigraphy in Detection of Osseous Metastases in Patients With Genitourinary Malignancies
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The study aims to compare the diagnostic performance of planar bone scan and two bed SPECT/CT in detection of bone metastases in patients with urogenital cancer.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
Genitourinary malignancies represent a heterogeneous group of diseases linked by anatomical and physiological function. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC); urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, ureter, and renal pelvis, and prostate adenocarcinoma (PC) are the most commonly encountered histological subtypes within this group. Planar bone scintigraphy (PBS) with di-phosphonate compounds is widely used, cost-effective and sensitive imaging modality for detecting osseous metastases especially in prostate cancer. However, it suffers from low specificity as well as low sensitivity in purely osteolytic lesions. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is a three-dimensional acquisition method that has demonstrated greater sensitivity and specificity compared to planar images, especially for detecting vertebral metastases. The introduction of SPECT/CT images improves the lesion-to-background ratio, allows anatomic lesion localization, removes the superimposition of anatomical structures, such as urinary bladder activity, and provides anatomical data, thereby increasing the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of bone scan. As the technology advances, current SPECT/CT machines have become capable of sequentially covering, and accurately merging, more than one field of view (FOV) in a reasonable time. In this study, we aim to compare the diagnostic performance of two-bed SPECT/CT images and planar bone scintigraphy in detection of bone metastases in genitourinary malignancies.
Study Design
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Comparison of diagnostic performance indices between two-bed SPECT/CT images and planar bone scans. [through study completion, an average of 2 years]
Analysis and comparison of diagnostic performance indices between two-bed SPECT/CT images and planar bone scans for the detection of osseous metastases in genitourinary malignancies.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Identification of patients' subgroups who might be best assessed upfront by two-bed SPECT/CT. [through study completion, an average of 2 years]
- Identification of anatomical site which may be best assessed by SPECT/CT. [through study completion, an average of 2 years]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients with urogenital cancer referred for bone scan.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Patients with claustrophobia.
-
Patients refuse to do the scan.
-
Patients with relative or absolute contraindications to do the scan (eg. pregnancy).
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Assiut University
Investigators
- Study Chair: Samir S Mohamed, Professor, Assiut University
- Study Director: HebatAllah A Askar, Lecturer, Assiut University
- Study Director: Rehab M Helmy, Lecturer, Assiut University
- Principal Investigator: Maram M Shafeek, Resident, Assiut University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Costa WH, Jabboure G Netto, Cunha IW. Urological cancer related to familial syndromes. Int Braz J Urol. 2017 Mar-Apr;43(2):192-201. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0125.
- de Leiris N, Leenhardt J, Boussat B, Montemagno C, Seiller A, Phan Sy O, Roux J, Laramas M, Verry C, Iriart C, Fiard G, Long JA, Descotes JL, Vuillez JP, Riou L, Djaileb L. Does whole-body bone SPECT/CT provide additional diagnostic information over [18F]-FCH PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases in the setting of prostate cancer biochemical recurrence? Cancer Imaging. 2020 Aug 12;20(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40644-020-00333-y.
- Rager O, Nkoulou R, Exquis N, Garibotto V, Tabouret-Viaud C, Zaidi H, Amzalag G, Lee-Felker SA, Zilli T, Ratib O. Whole-Body SPECT/CT versus Planar Bone Scan with Targeted SPECT/CT for Metastatic Workup. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:7039406. doi: 10.1155/2017/7039406. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
- Shen G, Deng H, Hu S, Jia Z. Comparison of choline-PET/CT, MRI, SPECT, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol. 2014 Nov;43(11):1503-13. doi: 10.1007/s00256-014-1903-9. Epub 2014 May 20.
- Umer M, Mohib Y, Atif M, Nazim M. Skeletal metastasis in renal cell carcinoma: A review. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2018 Jan 31;27:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2018.01.002. eCollection 2018 Mar.
- Van den Wyngaert T, Strobel K, Kampen WU, Kuwert T, van der Bruggen W, Mohan HK, Gnanasegaran G, Delgado-Bolton R, Weber WA, Beheshti M, Langsteger W, Giammarile F, Mottaghy FM, Paycha F; EANM Bone & Joint Committee and the Oncology Committee. The EANM practice guidelines for bone scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Aug;43(9):1723-38. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3415-4. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
- Zacho HD, Manresa JAB, Aleksyniene R, Ejlersen JA, Fledelius J, Bertelsen H, Petersen LJ. Three-minute SPECT/CT is sufficient for the assessment of bone metastasis as add-on to planar bone scintigraphy: prospective head-to-head comparison to 11-min SPECT/CT. EJNMMI Res. 2017 Dec;7(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13550-016-0252-1. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
- Zarrabi K, Paroya A, Wu S. Emerging therapeutic agents for genitourinary cancers. J Hematol Oncol. 2019 Sep 4;12(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0780-z.
- Tc-99m MDP bone scintigraphy