Two Monitors for Measuring the Activated Clotting Time: A Comparison

Sponsor
Umeå University (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT03203148
Collaborator
(none)
20
1
6.5
3.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

In this observational study a comparison is made between two different monitors for measurement of the activated clotting time (ACT): mechanical versus biochemical techniques

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Diagnostic Test: Point-of-Care ACT

Detailed Description

The ACT is a functional test influenced by multiple factors, such as platelet function, coagulation factors, temperature and contact activation inhibitors. Results produced by different monitors are also prone to vary influenced by the specific method employed to perform the test.

The present clinical study aims to compare two types of ACT monitors: the Hemostatic Management System Plus (Medtronic) and i-STAT (Abbott) in 20 cardiac surgical patients by performing five intraoperative consecutive measurements using anti factor Xa as a reference for the actual heparin concentration.

Inclusion criteria comprised patients aged 20-80 years, scheduled for coronary bypass surgery.

Measurements: 1) before induction of anaesthesia 2 ) after heparin bolus 3) rewarming of the patient 4) weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass 5) after protamine administration.

The Hemostatic System Plus ACT monitor served as reference for dosing of heparin in all patients. The study protocol did not intervene with the standard protocol used for anticoagulation. No patient interventions were made.

It is hypothesised that the i-STAT ACT monitor has a better correlation with the actual heparin concentration than the Hemostatic Management System Plus

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
20 participants
Observational Model:
Case-Only
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Comparison of Two Point of Care Techniques Mechanical Versus Biochemical Activated Clotting Time
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 18, 2017
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2017
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
CABG Surgical Patients

Patients undergoing coronary bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass

Diagnostic Test: Point-of-Care ACT
Comparison between two point-of-care devices for measurement of the activated clotting time

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Activated Clotting time [Intraoperative]

    Coagulation Measure

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Anti-Factor Xa [Intraoperative]

    Reference for heparin plasma concentration

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
20 Years to 80 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No

Inclusion Criteria: Patients listed for coronary bypass surgery, -

Exclusion Criteria: Primary coagulation disorder, diabetes mellitus, ongoing anti-coagulation therapy, emergency, reduced kidney function, allergy for fish, sea food and protamine

-

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Heart Centre Umeå University Hospital Umeå Sweden S-901 85

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Umeå University

Investigators

  • Study Director: Magnus Hedström, MD, Heart Centre, Umeå University Hospital, Sweden

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Umeå University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03203148
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2017-HeartCentre-003
First Posted:
Jun 29, 2017
Last Update Posted:
Jun 29, 2017
Last Verified:
May 1, 2017
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Umeå University

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 29, 2017