LixiLan-O: Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine/ Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination Compared to Insulin Glargine Alone and Lixisenatide Alone on Top of Metformin in Patients With T2DM

Sponsor
Sanofi (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02058147
Collaborator
(none)
1,170
273
3
15.9
4.3
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Primary Objective:

To compare the insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed ratio combination to lixisenatide alone and to insulin glargine alone (on top of metformin treatment) in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) change from baseline to Week 30.

Secondary Objective:

To compare the overall efficacy and safety of insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed ratio combination (FRC) to insulin glargine alone and to lixisenatide alone (on top of metformin treatment) over a 30 week treatment period in participants with type 2 diabetes.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Insulin glargine/lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination
  • Drug: Insulin glargine (HOE901)
  • Drug: Lixisenatide (AVE0010)
  • Drug: Metformin
Phase 3

Detailed Description

Approximately 37 weeks including up to 6 weeks of screening, 30-week treatment period, and a 3 days follow-up period.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
1170 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomized, 30 Week, Active-controlled, Open-label, 3-treatment Arm, Parallel-group Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine/ Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination to Insulin Glargine Alone and to Lixisenatide Alone on Top of Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
Study Start Date :
Feb 1, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)

FRC once daily (QD) for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted.

Drug: Insulin glargine/lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination
Insulin glargine/Lixisenatide FRC was self-administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection in the morning within one hour before breakfast using one of the 2 prefilled disposable SoloStar® pen-injectors: Pen A containing 100 U/mL insulin glargine (Lantus, 100 U/mL) and 50 mcg/mL lixisenatide in a ratio of 2 U:1 mcg, used for administration of doses from 10 U to 40 U (10 U/5mcg to 40 U/20mcg). Pen B containing 100 U/mL insulin glargine (Lantus, 100 U/mL) and 33 mcg/mL lixisenatide in a ratio of 3 U:1 mcg, used to administer doses from 41 U to 60 U (41 U/13 mcg to 60 U/20 mcg). The starting dose was 10 U/5 mcg. Dose was then adjusted individually to reach and maintain fasting self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) of 80 mg/dL to 100 mg/dL (4.4 mmol/L to 5.6 mmol/L) while avoiding hypoglycemia.
Other Names:
  • (HOE901/AVE0010)
  • Drug: Metformin
    Pharmaceutical form: Tablet; Route of administration: Oral administration.

    Active Comparator: Insulin Glargine

    Insulin glargine QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted.

    Drug: Insulin glargine (HOE901)
    Insulin glargine (100 U/mL) was self-administered by SC injection at approximately the same time every day. Dose was adjusted individually to reach and maintain fasting SMPG of 80 mg/dL to 100 mg/dL (4.4 mmol/L to 5.6 mmol/L) while avoiding hypoglycemia.
    Other Names:
  • Lantus
  • Drug: Metformin
    Pharmaceutical form: Tablet; Route of administration: Oral administration.

    Active Comparator: Lixisenatide

    Lixisenatide 10 mcg QD for 2 weeks, then 20 mcg QD (maintenance dose).

    Drug: Lixisenatide (AVE0010)
    Lixisenatide was self-administered by SC injection within 0 to 60 minutes before breakfast or evening meal. If the maintenance dose of 20 mcg was not tolerated, dose could be reduced to 10 mcg.
    Other Names:
  • Lyxumia
  • Drug: Metformin
    Pharmaceutical form: Tablet; Route of administration: Oral administration.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 30 [Baseline, Week 30]

      Primary outcome was to test superiority of FRC versus Lixisenatide and non-inferiority versus Insulin glargine. Change in HbA1c was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 30 value.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <7.0% or ≤6.5% at Week 30 [Week 30]

      Participants without Week 30 value for HbA1c were counted as non-responders.

    2. Change in Plasma Glucose Excursion From Baseline to Week 30 [Baseline, Week 30]

      Plasma glucose excursion = 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) value minus plasma glucose value obtained 30 minutes prior to the start of meal and before investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration if IMP was injected before breakfast. Change in plasma glucose excursions were calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 30 value. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

    3. Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 30 [Baseline, Week 30]

      Change in body weight was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 30 value.

    4. Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 30 [Baseline, Week 30]

      Change in FPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 30 value.

    5. Mean Change in 7-point Self-monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profile From Baseline to Week 30 [Baseline, Week 30]

      Participants recorded a 7-point plasma glucose profile measured before and 2 hours after each meal and at bedtime two times in a week before baseline, before visit Week 12 and before visit Week 30 and the average value across the profiles performed in the week before a visit for the 7-time points was calculated. Change in average 7-point SMPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 30 value. The analysis included all scheduled measurements obtained during the study. The missing data was handled by mixed effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) approach.

    6. Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7.0% With No Body Weight Gain at Week 30 [Week 30]

    7. Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7.0% With No Body Weight Gain at Week 30 and No Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia (Plasma Glucose [PG] ≤ 70 mg/dL [3.9 mmol/L]) During 30-Week Treatment Period [Baseline up to Week 30]

      Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of ≤70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L).

    8. Average Daily Insulin Glargine Dose at Week 30 [Week 30]

      The analysis included scheduled measurements obtained up to the date of last injection of the IMP, including those obtained after introduction of rescue therapy.

    9. Change in 2-Hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) From Baseline to Week 30 [Baseline, Week 30]

      The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after eating a liquid standardized breakfast meal. Change in PPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 30 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF.

    10. Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7.0% at Week 30 With No Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia (PG ≤ 70 mg/dL [3.9 mmol/L]) During 30-Week Treatment Period [Baseline up to Week 30]

      Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of ≤70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L). The analysis included all HbA1c measurements at Week 30, including those obtained after the IMP discontinuation or the introduction of rescue medication.

    11. Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy During 30-Week Treatment Period [Baseline up to Week 30]

      Routine fasting SMPG and central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after Week 12) values were used to determine the requirement of rescue medication. If fasting SMPG value exceeded the specified limit for 3 consecutive days, the central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after Week 12) was performed. Threshold values - from Week 8 to Week 12: fasting SMPG/FPG >240 mg/dL (13.3 mmol/L), and from Week 12 to Week 30: fasting SMPG/FPG >200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) or HbA1c >8%.

    12. Number of Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia Events Per Subject-Year [First dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose administration (median treatment exposure: 211 days)]

      Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of ≤ 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L).

    13. Percentage of Participants With Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia [First dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose administration (median treatment exposure: 211 days)]

      Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of ≤ 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L).

    14. Percentage of Participants With Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia [First dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose administration (median treatment exposure: 211 days)]

      Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Plasma glucose measurements might not have been available during such an event, but neurological recovery attributable to the restoration of plasma glucose to normal was considered sufficient evidence that the event had been induced by a low plasma glucose concentration. Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia included all episodes in which neurological impairment was severe enough to prevent self-treatment, and which were thus thought to place participants at risk of injury to themselves or others.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion criteria:
    • Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosed for at least 1 year before the screening visit, treated for at least 3 months prior to visit 1 with metformin alone or metformin and a second oral anti-diabetic treatment that could be a sulfonylurea, a glinide, a sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor or a di-peptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, and who were not adequately controlled with this treatment.

    • Signed written informed consent.

    Exclusion criteria:
    • HbA1c at screening visit:

    • less than 7.5% or more than 10% for participants previously treated with metformin alone,

    • less than 7.0% or more than 9% for participants previously treated with metformin and a second oral anti-diabetic treatment.

    • Pregnancy or lactation, women of childbearing potential with no effective contraceptive method.

    • Use of oral glucose-lowering agents other than those stated in the inclusion criteria or any injectable glucose-lowering agents during the 3 months before screening.

    • Previous Treatment with insulin (except for short-term treatment due to intercurrent illness including gestational diabetes, at the discretion of the trial physician).

    • History of discontinuation of a previous treatment with a glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1) receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) due to safety/tolerability issue or lack of efficacy.

    • Participant who previously participated in any clinical trial with lixisenatide or the insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed ratio combination or had previously received lixisenatide.

    • Any contraindication to metformin use, according to local labeling.

    • Use of weight loss drugs within 3 months prior to screening visit.

    • Within the last 6 months prior to screening visit: history of stroke, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or heart failure requiring hospitalization. Planned coronary, carotid or peripheral artery revascularisation procedures to be performed during the study period.

    • History of pancreatitis (unless pancreatitis was related to gallstones and cholecystectomy was already performed), chronic pancreatitis, pancreatitis during a previous treatment with incretin therapies, pancreatectomy, stomach/gastric surgery.

    • Personal or immediate family history of medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) or genetic conditions that predispose to MTC (e.g, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes).

    • Uncontrolled or inadequately controlled hypertension (systolic blood pressure above 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure above 95 mmHg) at screening visit.

    • At screening visit, Body Mass Index (BMI) less than or equal to 20 or above 40 kg/m^2.

    • At screening visit amylase and/or lipase more than 3 times the upper limit of the normal (ULN) laboratory range.

    • At screening visit alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or alkaline phosphatase (AST) more than 3 ULN.

    • At screening visit calcitonin above or equal to 20 pg/mL (5.9 pmol/L).

    Exclusion Criteria for randomization at the end of the screening period:
    • HbA1c less than 7% or above 10%;

    • Fasting Plasma glucose above 250 mg/dL (13.9 mmol/L);

    • Metformin maximal tolerated dose less than 1500 mg/day;

    • Amylase and/or lipase more than 3 ULN.

    The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Investigational Site Number 840027 Phoenix Arizona United States 85028
    2 Investigational Site Number 840122 Phoenix Arizona United States 85032
    3 Investigational Site Number 840062 Tempe Arizona United States 85282
    4 Investigational Site Number 840023 Tempe Arizona United States
    5 Investigational Site Number 840084 Little Rock Arkansas United States 72205
    6 Investigational Site Number 840100 Anaheim California United States 92801
    7 Investigational Site Number 840065 Bell Gardens California United States 90201
    8 Investigational Site Number 840090 Chino California United States 91710
    9 Investigational Site Number 840002 Chula Vista California United States 91911
    10 Investigational Site Number 840013 Concord California United States 94520
    11 Investigational Site Number 840053 Fresno California United States 93720
    12 Investigational Site Number 840017 La Jolla California United States 92037
    13 Investigational Site Number 840070 Lancaster California United States 93534
    14 Investigational Site Number 840121 Long Beach California United States 90806
    15 Investigational Site Number 840126 Los Angeles California United States 90017
    16 Investigational Site Number 840044 Los Angeles California United States 90057
    17 Investigational Site Number 840101 Mission Hills California United States 91345
    18 Investigational Site Number 840086 Mission Viejo California United States 92691
    19 Investigational Site Number 840120 Mission Viejo California United States 92691
    20 Investigational Site Number 840005 Northridge California United States 91325
    21 Investigational Site Number 840034 Palm Springs California United States 92262
    22 Investigational Site Number 840074 Port Hueneme California United States 93041
    23 Investigational Site Number 840068 San Ramon California United States 94583
    24 Investigational Site Number 840067 Santa Ana California United States 92704
    25 Investigational Site Number 840029 Tarzana California United States 91356
    26 Investigational Site Number 840006 Temecula California United States 92591
    27 Investigational Site Number 840078 West Hills California United States 91345
    28 Investigational Site Number 840059 Aurora Colorado United States 80045
    29 Investigational Site Number 840038 Denver Colorado United States 80246
    30 Investigational Site Number 840104 Bradenton Florida United States 34208
    31 Investigational Site Number 840098 Miami Florida United States 33156-7563
    32 Investigational Site Number 840014 New Port Richey Florida United States 34652
    33 Investigational Site Number 840047 Ocoee Florida United States 34761
    34 Investigational Site Number 840056 Palm Harbor Florida United States 34684
    35 Investigational Site Number 840089 Atlanta Georgia United States 30322
    36 Investigational Site Number 840054 Lawrenceville Georgia United States 30046
    37 Investigational Site Number 840119 Woodstock Georgia United States 30189
    38 Investigational Site Number 840108 Idaho Falls Idaho United States 83404
    39 Investigational Site Number 840075 Arlington Heights Illinois United States 60005
    40 Investigational Site Number 840080 Chicago Illinois United States 60607
    41 Investigational Site Number 840026 Chicago Illinois United States 60612
    42 Investigational Site Number 840116 Chicago Illinois United States 60616
    43 Investigational Site Number 840050 Springfield Illinois United States 62704
    44 Investigational Site Number 840008 Avon Indiana United States 46123
    45 Investigational Site Number 840015 Avon Indiana United States 46123
    46 Investigational Site Number 840076 Avon Indiana United States 46123
    47 Investigational Site Number 840082 Evansville Indiana United States 47713
    48 Investigational Site Number 840031 Evansville Indiana United States 47714
    49 Investigational Site Number 840060 Evansville Indiana United States 47714
    50 Investigational Site Number 840048 Indianapolis Indiana United States 46202
    51 Investigational Site Number 840085 Indianapolis Indiana United States 46260
    52 Investigational Site Number 840012 Valparaiso Indiana United States
    53 Investigational Site Number 840025 Waterloo Iowa United States 50702
    54 Investigational Site Number 840022 Lexington Kentucky United States 40504
    55 Investigational Site Number 840007 Louisville Kentucky United States 40213
    56 Investigational Site Number 840081 New Orleans Louisiana United States 70112
    57 Investigational Site Number 840097 Auburn Maine United States 04210
    58 Investigational Site Number 840063 Rockville Maryland United States 20852
    59 Investigational Site Number 840028 Bloomfield Hills Michigan United States
    60 Investigational Site Number 840071 Chesterfield Michigan United States 48047
    61 Investigational Site Number 840001 Dearborn Michigan United States 48124
    62 Investigational Site Number 840091 Kalamazoo Michigan United States 49048
    63 Investigational Site Number 840009 Minneapolis Minnesota United States 55416
    64 Investigational Site Number 840024 Chesterfield Missouri United States 63017
    65 Investigational Site Number 840057 Butte Montana United States 59701
    66 Investigational Site Number 840042 Omaha Nebraska United States 68131
    67 Investigational Site Number 840109 Henderson Nevada United States 89052
    68 Investigational Site Number 840052 Las Vegas Nevada United States 89148
    69 Investigational Site Number 840069 Nashua New Hampshire United States 03063
    70 Investigational Site Number 840123 Morganville New Jersey United States 07751
    71 Investigational Site Number 840011 Albuquerque New Mexico United States 87131
    72 Investigational Site Number 840030 New Hyde Park New York United States 11042
    73 Investigational Site Number 840096 Syracuse New York United States 13214-2016
    74 Investigational Site Number 840039 Asheville North Carolina United States 28803
    75 Investigational Site Number 840021 Hickory North Carolina United States 28601
    76 Investigational Site Number 840046 Morehead City North Carolina United States 28557
    77 Investigational Site Number 840072 Morganton North Carolina United States 28655
    78 Investigational Site Number 840110 Salisbury North Carolina United States 28144
    79 Investigational Site Number 840095 Wilmington North Carolina United States 28401
    80 Investigational Site Number 840099 Winston-Salem North Carolina United States 27103
    81 Investigational Site Number 840004 Columbus Ohio United States 43213
    82 Investigational Site Number 840016 Maumee Ohio United States 43537
    83 Investigational Site Number 840103 Eugene Oregon United States 97404
    84 Investigational Site Number 840113 Portland Oregon United States 97201-3098
    85 Investigational Site Number 840036 Pittsburgh Pennsylvania United States 15473
    86 Investigational Site Number 840043 Tipton Pennsylvania United States 16684
    87 Investigational Site Number 840058 Anderson South Carolina United States 29621
    88 Investigational Site Number 840127 Charleston South Carolina United States 29407
    89 Investigational Site Number 840049 Greer South Carolina United States 29651
    90 Investigational Site Number 840114 Rapid City South Dakota United States 57701
    91 Investigational Site Number 840112 Bristol Tennessee United States 37620
    92 Investigational Site Number 840094 Knoxville Tennessee United States 37912
    93 Investigational Site Number 840051 Austin Texas United States 78758
    94 Investigational Site Number 840066 Corpus Christi Texas United States 78404
    95 Investigational Site Number 840111 Dallas Texas United States 75208
    96 Investigational Site Number 840020 Dallas Texas United States 75216
    97 Investigational Site Number 840064 Dallas Texas United States 75230
    98 Investigational Site Number 840003 Dallas Texas United States 75231
    99 Investigational Site Number 840088 Edinburg Texas United States 78539
    100 Investigational Site Number 840118 Fort Worth Texas United States 76132
    101 Investigational Site Number 840055 Houston Texas United States 77004
    102 Investigational Site Number 840087 Houston Texas United States 77030
    103 Investigational Site Number 840079 Hurst Texas United States 76054
    104 Investigational Site Number 840073 N Richland Hill Texas United States 76180
    105 Investigational Site Number 840019 San Antonio Texas United States 78229
    106 Investigational Site Number 840037 Draper Utah United States 84020
    107 Investigational Site Number 840093 Ogden Utah United States 84405
    108 Investigational Site Number 840061 Salt Lake City Utah United States 84102
    109 Investigational Site Number 840041 Salt Lake City Utah United States 84107
    110 Investigational Site Number 840040 Chesapeake Virginia United States 23321
    111 Investigational Site Number 840045 Norfolk Virginia United States 23510
    112 Investigational Site Number 840092 Norfolk Virginia United States 23510
    113 Investigational Site Number 840125 Richmond Virginia United States 23219
    114 Investigational Site Number 840115 Salem Virginia United States 24153
    115 Investigational Site Number 840010 Weber City Virginia United States 24290
    116 Investigational Site Number 840077 Federal Way Washington United States 98003
    117 Investigational Site Number 840102 Renton Washington United States 98055
    118 Investigational Site Number 840033 Milwaukee Wisconsin United States 53209-0996
    119 Investigational Site Number 036005 Box Hill Australia 3128
    120 Investigational Site Number 036001 Camperdown Australia 2050
    121 Investigational Site Number 036006 Kippa Ring Australia 4021
    122 Investigational Site Number 036007 Logan Central Australia 4114
    123 Investigational Site Number 056005 Brussels Belgium 1070
    124 Investigational Site Number 056006 Brussel Belgium 1090
    125 Investigational Site Number 056001 Leuven Belgium 3000
    126 Investigational Site Number 124004 Kelowna Canada V1Y 1Z9
    127 Investigational Site Number 124001 Toronto Canada M4G 3E8
    128 Investigational Site Number 124002 Vancouver Canada V5Z 1M9
    129 Investigational Site Number 152008 Osorno Chile 5311092
    130 Investigational Site Number 152015 Puerto Varas Chile
    131 Investigational Site Number 152004 Santiago Chile 7500010
    132 Investigational Site Number 152006 Santiago Chile 7500010
    133 Investigational Site Number 152001 Santiago Chile 7591047
    134 Investigational Site Number 152002 Santiago Chile 7980378
    135 Investigational Site Number 152012 Santiago Chile 8053095
    136 Investigational Site Number 152009 Santiago Chile 8330008
    137 Investigational Site Number 152011 Talagante Chile
    138 Investigational Site Number 152014 Temuco Chile 4781156
    139 Investigational Site Number 152003 Temuco Chile 4813299
    140 Investigational Site Number 203004 Beroun Czech Republic 26601
    141 Investigational Site Number 203008 Ceske Budejovice Czech Republic 370 01
    142 Investigational Site Number 203014 Horovice Czech Republic 26801
    143 Investigational Site Number 203012 Koprivnice Czech Republic 742 21
    144 Investigational Site Number 203001 Pardubice Czech Republic 53002
    145 Investigational Site Number 203005 Plzen Czech Republic 32600
    146 Investigational Site Number 203003 Praha 10 Czech Republic 100 00
    147 Investigational Site Number 203009 Praha 2 Czech Republic 12808
    148 Investigational Site Number 203007 Praha 5 Czech Republic 15000
    149 Investigational Site Number 203013 Praha 9 - Klanovice Czech Republic 19014
    150 Investigational Site Number 203006 Trutnov Czech Republic 54101
    151 Investigational Site Number 203016 Ujezd U Brna Czech Republic
    152 Investigational Site Number 203015 Vsetin Czech Republic 75501
    153 Investigational Site Number 208003 Aarhus C Denmark 8000
    154 Investigational Site Number 208009 Horsens Denmark 8700
    155 Investigational Site Number 208002 Kolding Denmark 6000
    156 Investigational Site Number 208001 København Nv Denmark 2400
    157 Investigational Site Number 208005 København S Denmark 2300
    158 Investigational Site Number 208004 Viborg Denmark 8800
    159 Investigational Site Number 233004 Paide Estonia 72713
    160 Investigational Site Number 233002 Pärnu Estonia 80018
    161 Investigational Site Number 233003 Tallinn Estonia 13415
    162 Investigational Site Number 233001 Viljandimaa Estonia 71024
    163 Investigational Site Number 250006 Corbeil Essonnes France 91109
    164 Investigational Site Number 250002 La Rochelle Cedex France 17019
    165 Investigational Site Number 250003 Pierre Benite France 69310
    166 Investigational Site Number 250001 Venissieux France 69200
    167 Investigational Site Number 276005 Berlin Germany 10115
    168 Investigational Site Number 276003 Berlin Germany 13125
    169 Investigational Site Number 276004 Dortmund Germany 44137
    170 Investigational Site Number 276007 Dresden Germany 01069
    171 Investigational Site Number 276001 Dresden Germany 01307
    172 Investigational Site Number 276006 Hamburg Germany 20253
    173 Investigational Site Number 276002 Neumünster Germany 24534
    174 Investigational Site Number 348003 Balatonfüred Hungary 8230
    175 Investigational Site Number 348007 Budapest Hungary 1036
    176 Investigational Site Number 348006 Budapest Hungary 1096
    177 Investigational Site Number 348002 Budapest Hungary 1138
    178 Investigational Site Number 348011 Komárom Hungary 2900
    179 Investigational Site Number 348008 Nagykanizsa Hungary 8800
    180 Investigational Site Number 348004 Szeged Hungary 6720
    181 Investigational Site Number 348010 Szekesfehervar Hungary 8000
    182 Investigational Site Number 348012 Sátoraljaújhely Hungary 3980
    183 Investigational Site Number 348001 Zalaegerszeg Hungary 8900
    184 Investigational Site Number 380002 Bologna Italy 40138
    185 Investigational Site Number 380006 Catanzaro Italy 88100
    186 Investigational Site Number 380001 Milano Italy 20132
    187 Investigational Site Number 380003 Napoli Italy 80131
    188 Investigational Site Number 380005 Roma Italy 00133
    189 Investigational Site Number 428002 Riga Latvia LV-1011
    190 Investigational Site Number 428003 Riga Latvia LV-1011
    191 Investigational Site Number 428004 Riga Latvia LV-1050
    192 Investigational Site Number 428001 Sigulda Latvia LV-2150
    193 Investigational Site Number 440003 Jonava Lithuania LT-55201
    194 Investigational Site Number 440002 Kaunas Lithuania LT-49456
    195 Investigational Site Number 440007 Kaunas Lithuania LT-50009
    196 Investigational Site Number 440004 Kedainiai Lithuania LT-57164
    197 Investigational Site Number 440006 Panevezys Lithuania LT-37355
    198 Investigational Site Number 440005 Utena Lithuania LT-28151
    199 Investigational Site Number 440001 Vilnius Lithuania LT-10323
    200 Investigational Site Number 484005 Aguascalientes Mexico 20230
    201 Investigational Site Number 484001 Cuernavaca Mexico 62250
    202 Investigational Site Number 484002 Guadalajara Mexico 44130
    203 Investigational Site Number 484004 Guadalajara Mexico 44210
    204 Investigational Site Number 484009 Guadalajara Mexico 44670
    205 Investigational Site Number 484007 Monterrey Mexico 64020
    206 Investigational Site Number 484006 Monterrey Mexico 64460
    207 Investigational Site Number 484010 Zapopan Mexico 45116
    208 Investigational Site Number 616002 Bialystok Poland 15-435
    209 Investigational Site Number 616005 Krakow Poland 31-261
    210 Investigational Site Number 616006 Krakow Poland 31-548
    211 Investigational Site Number 616007 Lodz Poland 94-074
    212 Investigational Site Number 616004 Szczecin Poland 70-506
    213 Investigational Site Number 616003 Warszawa Poland 01-518
    214 Investigational Site Number 616001 Warszawa Poland 02-507
    215 Investigational Site Number 616008 Zory Poland 44-240
    216 Investigational Site Number 642008 Bucharest Romania 010825
    217 Investigational Site Number 642007 Bucuresti Romania 020475
    218 Investigational Site Number 642009 Cluj Napoca Romania 400006
    219 Investigational Site Number 642006 Hunedoara Romania 331057
    220 Investigational Site Number 642005 Iasi Romania 700547
    221 Investigational Site Number 642002 Oradea Romania 410169
    222 Investigational Site Number 642001 Targu Mures Romania 540142
    223 Investigational Site Number 642004 Timisoara Romania 300133
    224 Investigational Site Number 642003 Timisoara Romania 300456
    225 Investigational Site Number 643006 Moscow Russian Federation 119991
    226 Investigational Site Number 643008 Penza Russian Federation 440026
    227 Investigational Site Number 643012 Petrozavodsk Russian Federation 185019
    228 Investigational Site Number 643001 Saint-Petersburg Russian Federation 190013
    229 Investigational Site Number 643014 Samara Russian Federation 443067
    230 Investigational Site Number 643009 Saratov Russian Federation 410026
    231 Investigational Site Number 643011 Saratov Russian Federation 410053
    232 Investigational Site Number 643005 St-Petersburg Russian Federation 190068
    233 Investigational Site Number 643007 St-Petersburg Russian Federation 194354
    234 Investigational Site Number 643002 St-Petersburg Russian Federation 195257
    235 Investigational Site Number 643003 St. Petersburg Russian Federation 194358
    236 Investigational Site Number 643016 Tomsk Russian Federation 634050
    237 Investigational Site Number 643004 Voronezh Russian Federation 394018
    238 Investigational Site Number 710002 Cap Town South Africa 7530
    239 Investigational Site Number 710003 Cape Town South Africa 7500
    240 Investigational Site Number 710005 Meyerspark South Africa 0184
    241 Investigational Site Number 710007 Port Elizabeth South Africa
    242 Investigational Site Number 710004 Pretoria South Africa 0122
    243 Investigational Site Number 710001 Somerset West South Africa 7130
    244 Investigational Site Number 710006 Soweto South Africa 4309
    245 Investigational Site Number 724012 Barcelona Spain 08003
    246 Investigational Site Number 724009 Granada Spain 18012
    247 Investigational Site Number 724004 Hostalets De Balenyà Spain 08550
    248 Investigational Site Number 724011 La Coruña Spain 15006
    249 Investigational Site Number 724007 Lugo Spain 27004
    250 Investigational Site Number 724008 Madrid Spain 28034
    251 Investigational Site Number 724005 Madrid Spain 28046
    252 Investigational Site Number 724013 Palma De Mallorca Spain 07010
    253 Investigational Site Number 724001 Quart De Poblet Spain 46930
    254 Investigational Site Number 724006 Sant Joan Despí Spain 08970
    255 Investigational Site Number 724003 Sevilla Spain 41010
    256 Investigational Site Number 752001 Ljungby Sweden 341 82
    257 Investigational Site Number 752003 Malmö Sweden 211 52
    258 Investigational Site Number 752004 Rättvik Sweden 79530
    259 Investigational Site Number 752005 Stockholm Sweden 11526
    260 Investigational Site Number 752002 Vällingby Sweden 16268
    261 Investigational Site Number 804002 Chernivtsi Ukraine 58022
    262 Investigational Site Number 804009 Ivano-Frankovsk Ukraine 76008
    263 Investigational Site Number 804010 Kyiv Ukraine 03049
    264 Investigational Site Number 804007 Kyiv Ukraine 04050
    265 Investigational Site Number 804006 Kyiv Ukraine
    266 Investigational Site Number 804012 Lviv Ukraine 79010
    267 Investigational Site Number 804011 Vinnytsya Ukraine 21001
    268 Investigational Site Number 804008 Vinnytsya Ukraine 21010
    269 Investigational Site Number 826001 Coventry United Kingdom CV2 2DX
    270 Investigational Site Number 826002 Dundee United Kingdom DD1 9SI
    271 Investigational Site Number 826006 Guildford United Kingdom GU2 7XX
    272 Investigational Site Number 826007 Leicester United Kingdom LE5 4PW
    273 Investigational Site Number 826003 Norwich United Kingdom NR1 3SR

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Sanofi

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Clinical Sciences & Operations, Sanofi

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Sanofi
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02058147
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • EFC12404
    • 2013-003131-30
    • U1111-1148-4334
    First Posted:
    Feb 7, 2014
    Last Update Posted:
    May 9, 2017
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2017

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details The study was conducted at 240 centers in 23 countries. A total of 2457 participants were screened between February 12, 2014 and September 16, 2014. 978 participants were not eligible for run-in mainly due to glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) value at screening visit being out of the protocol defined range.
    Pre-assignment Detail After 2 weeks screening period, 1479 participants underwent 4-week run-in period. 309 participants were run-in failures. A total of 1170 participants were randomized in 2:2:1 to insulin glargine/lixisenatide, insulin glargine and lixisenatide arms respectively in open-label treatment period.
    Arm/Group Title Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC) Insulin Glargine Lixisenatide
    Arm/Group Description FRC injected subcutaneously once daily (QD) for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Insulin glargine injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Lixisenatide 10 mcg injected subcutaneously QD for 2 weeks, then 20 mcg QD (maintenance dose).
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 469 467 234
    Treated 469 467 233
    COMPLETED 440 440 205
    NOT COMPLETED 29 27 29

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination Insulin Glargine Lixisenatide Total
    Arm/Group Description FRC injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Insulin glargine injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Lixisenatide 10 mcg injected subcutaneously QD for 2 weeks, then 20 mcg QD (maintenance dose). Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 469 467 234 1170
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    58.2
    (9.5)
    58.3
    (9.4)
    58.7
    (8.7)
    58.4
    (9.3)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    247
    52.7%
    230
    49.3%
    101
    43.2%
    578
    49.4%
    Male
    222
    47.3%
    237
    50.7%
    133
    56.8%
    592
    50.6%
    Race (Count of Participants)
    Caucasian
    417
    88.9%
    421
    90.1%
    216
    92.3%
    1054
    90.1%
    Black
    33
    7%
    33
    7.1%
    12
    5.1%
    78
    6.7%
    Asian/Oriental
    8
    1.7%
    7
    1.5%
    3
    1.3%
    18
    1.5%
    Other
    11
    2.3%
    6
    1.3%
    3
    1.3%
    20
    1.7%
    Ethnicity (Count of Participants)
    Hispanic
    85
    18.1%
    87
    18.6%
    51
    21.8%
    223
    19.1%
    Not Hispanic
    384
    81.9%
    380
    81.4%
    183
    78.2%
    947
    80.9%
    Second Oral Anti-diabetic Drug (OAD) Use (Count of Participants)
    Yes
    274
    58.4%
    270
    57.8%
    133
    56.8%
    677
    57.9%
    No
    195
    41.6%
    197
    42.2%
    101
    43.2%
    493
    42.1%
    Second OAD Use at Screening by Class (Count of Participants)
    Sulfonylurea
    259
    55.2%
    249
    53.3%
    123
    52.6%
    631
    53.9%
    Glinide
    3
    0.6%
    10
    2.1%
    5
    2.1%
    18
    1.5%
    Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor
    2
    0.4%
    2
    0.4%
    0
    0%
    4
    0.3%
    Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor
    12
    2.6%
    11
    2.4%
    5
    2.1%
    28
    2.4%
    None
    193
    41.2%
    195
    41.8%
    101
    43.2%
    489
    41.8%
    Body Mass Index (BMI) (kg/m^2) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [kg/m^2]
    31.64
    (4.4)
    31.66
    (4.51)
    31.99
    (4.39)
    31.72
    (4.44)
    Duration of Diabetes (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    8.89
    (5.51)
    8.66
    (5.59)
    8.89
    (6.26)
    8.80
    (5.69)
    Daily Dose of Metformin (mg) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [mg]
    2246.1
    (456.8)
    2244.7
    (444.7)
    2267.3
    (427.4)
    2249.8
    (445.9)
    HbA1c (percentage of HbA1c) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [percentage of HbA1c]
    8.08
    (0.71)
    8.08
    (0.69)
    8.13
    (0.72)
    8.09
    (0.70)
    Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) (mmol/L) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [mmol/L]
    9.87
    (2.35)
    9.75
    (2.32)
    9.75
    (2.19)
    9.80
    (2.31)

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 30
    Description Primary outcome was to test superiority of FRC versus Lixisenatide and non-inferiority versus Insulin glargine. Change in HbA1c was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 30 value.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 30

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population: all randomized participants who had both baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline HbA1c assessment during study period.
    Arm/Group Title Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination Insulin Glargine Lixisenatide
    Arm/Group Description FRC injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Insulin glargine injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Lixisenatide 10 mcg injected subcutaneously QD for 2 weeks, then 20 mcg QD (maintenance dose).
    Measure Participants 467 464 233
    Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [percentage of hemoglobin]
    -1.63
    (0.038)
    -1.34
    (0.039)
    -0.85
    (0.052)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination, Lixisenatide
    Comments Analysis was performed using Mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment groups, randomization strata of Week -1 HbA1c (<8.0, ≥8.0%), randomization strata of second OAD use at screening, visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and country as fixed effects and baseline HbA1c value-by-visit interaction as a covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments Threshold for significance ≤0.05.
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Least Square (LS) Mean Difference
    Estimated Value -0.78
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.898 to -0.665
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 0.059
    Estimation Comments Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Lixisenatide
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination, Insulin Glargine
    Comments Analysis was performed using MMRM model with treatment groups, randomization strata of Week -1 HbA1c (<8.0, ≥8.0%), randomization strata of second OAD use at screening, visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and country as fixed effects and baseline HbA1c value-by-visit interaction as a covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
    Comments Predefined non-inferiority margin of 0.3%.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
    Estimated Value -0.29
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.384 to -0.194
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 0.048
    Estimation Comments Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin glargine
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination, Insulin Glargine
    Comments Test of superiority was also performed as a secondary endpoint according to hierarchical testing procedure. Analysis was performed using MMRM model with treatment groups, randomization strata of Week -1 HbA1c (<8.0, ≥8.0%), randomization strata of second OAD use at screening, visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and country as fixed effects and baseline HbA1c value-by-visit interaction, as a covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments Threshold for significance ≤ 0.05.
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
    Estimated Value -0.29
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.384 to -0.194
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 0.048
    Estimation Comments Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin glargine
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <7.0% or ≤6.5% at Week 30
    Description Participants without Week 30 value for HbA1c were counted as non-responders.
    Time Frame Week 30

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT population.
    Arm/Group Title Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination Insulin Glargine Lixisenatide
    Arm/Group Description FRC injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Insulin glargine injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Lixisenatide 10 mcg injected subcutaneously QD for 2 weeks, then 20 mcg QD (maintenance dose).
    Measure Participants 468 466 233
    HbA1c <7.0%
    73.7
    15.7%
    59.4
    12.7%
    33
    14.1%
    HbA1c ≤6.5%
    55.8
    11.9%
    39.5
    8.5%
    19.3
    8.2%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination, Lixisenatide
    Comments HbA1c <7.0%: Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Lixisenatide. Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method stratified on randomization strata of Week -1 HbA1c (<8.0%, ≥8.0%) and randomization strata of second OAD use at screening. This analysis was out of testing order.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments Threshold for significance ≤0.05.
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in percentage
    Estimated Value 40.61
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    33.63 to 47.59
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments HbA1c <7.0%: Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Lixisenatide.
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination, Lixisenatide
    Comments HbA1c ≤6.5%: Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Lixisenatide. Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method stratified on randomization strata of Week -1 HbA1c (<8.0%, ≥8.0%) and randomization strata of second OAD use at screening. This analysis was out of testing order.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments Threshold for significance ≤ 0.05.
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in percentage
    Estimated Value 36.38
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    29.81 to 42.95
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments HbA1c ≤6.5%: Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Lixisenatide.
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination, Insulin Glargine
    Comments HbA1c <7.0%: Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin glargine. Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method stratified on randomization strata of Week -1 HbA1c (<8.0%, ≥8.0%) and randomization strata of second OAD use at screening. This analysis was out of testing order.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments Threshold for significance ≤ 0.05.
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in percentage
    Estimated Value 14.31
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    8.37 to 20.25
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments HbA1c <7.0%: Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin glargine.
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination, Insulin Glargine
    Comments HbA1c ≤6.5%: Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin glargine. Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method stratified on randomization strata of Week -1 HbA1c (<8.0%, ≥8.0%) and randomization strata of second OAD use at screening. This analysis was out of testing order.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments Threshold for significance ≤ 0.05.
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in percentage
    Estimated Value 16.35
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    10.13 to 22.58
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments HbA1c ≤6.5%: Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin glargine.
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Plasma Glucose Excursion From Baseline to Week 30
    Description Plasma glucose excursion = 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) value minus plasma glucose value obtained 30 minutes prior to the start of meal and before investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration if IMP was injected before breakfast. Change in plasma glucose excursions were calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 30 value. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 30

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT population. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline plasma glucose excursion assessment during study period.
    Arm/Group Title Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination Insulin Glargine Lixisenatide
    Arm/Group Description FRC injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Insulin glargine injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Lixisenatide 10 mcg injected subcutaneously QD for 2 weeks, then 20 mcg QD (maintenance dose).
    Measure Participants 428 425 192
    Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [mmol/L]
    -2.31
    (0.154)
    -0.18
    (0.157)
    -3.23
    (0.216)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination, Insulin Glargine
    Comments Analysis was performed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment groups, randomization strata of Week -1 HbA1c (<8.0,≥8.0%), randomization strata of second OAD use at screening & country as fixed effects & baseline plasma glucose excursion value as a covariate. Hierarchical testing procedure was used to control type I error and handle multiple secondary endpoint analyses. Testing was then performed sequentially per pre-specified order.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments Threshold for significance ≤0.05. The hierarchical testing continued only when primary hypotheses (superiority: FRC to lixisenatide; non-inferiority: FRC to insulin glargine for HbA1c) was statistically significant.
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
    Estimated Value -2.13
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -2.498 to -1.77
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 0.185
    Estimation Comments Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin glargine.
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 30
    Description Change in body weight was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 30 value.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 30

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT population. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline body weight assessment during study period.
    Arm/Group Title Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination Insulin Glargine Lixisenatide
    Arm/Group Description FRC injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Insulin glargine injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Lixisenatide 10 mcg injected subcutaneously QD for 2 weeks, then 20 mcg QD (maintenance dose).
    Measure Participants 467 465 233
    Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [kg]
    -0.29
    (0.182)
    1.11
    (0.183)
    -2.3
    (0.256)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination, Insulin Glargine
    Comments Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (continued only if previous endpoints were statistically significant). Analysis was performed using MMRM model with treatment groups, randomization strata of Week -1 HbA1c (<8.0, ≥8.0%), randomization strata of second OAD use at screening, visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and country as fixed effects and baseline body weight value-by-visit interaction as a covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments Threshold for significance ≤ 0.05.
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
    Estimated Value -1.4
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -1.891 to -0.91
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 0.25
    Estimation Comments Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin glargine
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 30
    Description Change in FPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 30 value.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 30

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT population. Here, number of participants analysed = participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline FPG assessment during study period.
    Arm/Group Title Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination Insulin Glargine Lixisenatide
    Arm/Group Description FRC injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Insulin glargine injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Lixisenatide 10 mcg injected subcutaneously QD for 2 weeks, then 20 mcg QD (maintenance dose).
    Measure Participants 465 465 232
    Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [mmol/L]
    -3.46
    (0.09)
    -3.27
    (0.091)
    -1.5
    (0.124)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination, Lixisenatide
    Comments Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (continued only if previous endpoints were statistically significant). Analysis was performed using MMRM model with treatment groups, randomization strata of Week -1 HbA1c (<8.0, ≥8.0%), randomization strata of second OAD use at screening, visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and country as fixed effects and baseline FPG value-by-visit interaction as a covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments Threshold for significance ≤ 0.05.
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
    Estimated Value -1.96
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -2.246 to -1.682
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 0.144
    Estimation Comments Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Lixisenatide
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Mean Change in 7-point Self-monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profile From Baseline to Week 30
    Description Participants recorded a 7-point plasma glucose profile measured before and 2 hours after each meal and at bedtime two times in a week before baseline, before visit Week 12 and before visit Week 30 and the average value across the profiles performed in the week before a visit for the 7-time points was calculated. Change in average 7-point SMPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 30 value. The analysis included all scheduled measurements obtained during the study. The missing data was handled by mixed effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) approach.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 30

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT population. Here,number of participants analyzed = participants with baseline and at least one post baseline 7-point SMPG assessment during study period.
    Arm/Group Title Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination Insulin Glargine Lixisenatide
    Arm/Group Description FRC injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Insulin glargine injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Lixisenatide 10 mcg injected subcutaneously QD for 2 weeks, then 20 mcg QD (maintenance dose).
    Measure Participants 421 411 204
    Least Squares Mean (Standard Deviation) [mmol/L]
    -3.35
    (0.081)
    -2.66
    (0.084)
    -1.95
    (0.111)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination, Lixisenatide
    Comments Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (continued only if previous endpoints were statistically significant). Analysis was performed using MMRM model with treatment groups, randomization strata of Week -1 HbA1c (<8.0, ≥8.0%), randomization strata of second OAD use at screening, visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and country as fixed effects and baseline 7-point SMPG value-by-visit interaction as a covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments Threshold for significance ≤ 0.05.
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
    Estimated Value -1.4
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -1.645 to -1.158
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 0.124
    Estimation Comments Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Lixisenatide
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination, Insulin Glargine
    Comments Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (continued only if previous endpoints were statistically significant). Analysis was performed using MMRM model with treatment groups, randomization strata of Week -1 HbA1c (<8.0, ≥8.0%), randomization strata of second OAD use at screening, visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and country as fixed effects and baseline 7-point SMPG value-by-visit interaction, as a covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments Threshold for significance ≤ 0.05.
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
    Estimated Value -0.69
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.892 to -0.495
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 0.101
    Estimation Comments Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin Glargine
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7.0% With No Body Weight Gain at Week 30
    Description
    Time Frame Week 30

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT population. Participants without any HbA1c and/or body weight value at Week 30 were counted as non-responders.
    Arm/Group Title Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination Insulin Glargine Lixisenatide
    Arm/Group Description FRC injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Insulin glargine injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Lixisenatide 10 mcg injected subcutaneously QD for 2 weeks, then 20 mcg QD (maintenance dose).
    Measure Participants 468 466 233
    Number [percentage of participants]
    43.2
    9.2%
    25.1
    5.4%
    27.9
    11.9%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination, Insulin Glargine
    Comments Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (continued only if previous endpoints were statistically significant). Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method stratified on randomization strata of Week -1 HbA1c (<8%, ≥8%) and randomization strata of second OAD use at screening.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments Threshold for significance ≤ 0.05.
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in percentage
    Estimated Value 18.08
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    12.15 to 24.01
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin glargine
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7.0% With No Body Weight Gain at Week 30 and No Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia (Plasma Glucose [PG] ≤ 70 mg/dL [3.9 mmol/L]) During 30-Week Treatment Period
    Description Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of ≤70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L).
    Time Frame Baseline up to Week 30

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT population. Participants without any HbA1c and/or body weight value at Week 30 were counted as non-responders.
    Arm/Group Title Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination Insulin Glargine Lixisenatide
    Arm/Group Description FRC injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Insulin glargine injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Lixisenatide 10 mcg injected subcutaneously QD for 2 weeks, then 20 mcg QD (maintenance dose).
    Measure Participants 468 466 233
    Number [percentage of participants]
    31.8
    6.8%
    18.9
    4%
    26.2
    11.2%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination, Insulin Glargine
    Comments Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (continued only if previous endpoints were statistically significant). Analysis was performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method stratified on randomization strata of Week -1 HbA1c (<8.0%, ≥8.0%) and randomization strata of second OAD use at screening.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value < 0.0001
    Comments Threshold for significance ≤ 0.05.
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in percentage
    Estimated Value 12.98
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    7.5 to 18.45
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin Glargine
    9. Secondary Outcome
    Title Average Daily Insulin Glargine Dose at Week 30
    Description The analysis included scheduled measurements obtained up to the date of last injection of the IMP, including those obtained after introduction of rescue therapy.
    Time Frame Week 30

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT population. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with insulin glargine dose assessment during study period. Data of this endpoint was planned to be analyzed for Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC and Insulin glargine arms only, not for lixisenatide arm.
    Arm/Group Title Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination Insulin Glargine
    Arm/Group Description FRC injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Insulin glargine injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted.
    Measure Participants 467 463
    Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Units (U)]
    39.77
    (0.699)
    40.46
    (0.701)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination, Insulin Glargine
    Comments Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (continued only if previous endpoints were statistically significant). Analysis was performed using MMRM model with treatment groups, randomization strata of Week -1 HbA1c (<8.0, ≥8.0%), randomization strata of second OAD use at screening, visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and country as fixed effects.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.4857
    Comments Threshold for significance ≤ 0.05.
    Method Mixed Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
    Estimated Value -0.69
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -2.632 to 1.252
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 0.99
    Estimation Comments Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin Glargine
    10. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in 2-Hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) From Baseline to Week 30
    Description The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after eating a liquid standardized breakfast meal. Change in PPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 30 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 30

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT population. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline 2-hour PPG assessment during study period.
    Arm/Group Title Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination Insulin Glargine Lixisenatide
    Arm/Group Description FRC injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Insulin glargine injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Lixisenatide 10 mcg injected subcutaneously QD for 2 weeks, then 20 mcg QD (maintenance dose).
    Measure Participants 430 430 196
    Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [mmol/L]
    -5.68
    (0.176)
    -3.31
    (0.178)
    -4.58
    (0.245)
    11. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7.0% at Week 30 With No Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia (PG ≤ 70 mg/dL [3.9 mmol/L]) During 30-Week Treatment Period
    Description Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of ≤70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L). The analysis included all HbA1c measurements at Week 30, including those obtained after the IMP discontinuation or the introduction of rescue medication.
    Time Frame Baseline up to Week 30

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT population. Participants without Week 30 value for HbA1c were counted as non-responders.
    Arm/Group Title Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination Insulin Glargine Lixisenatide
    Arm/Group Description FRC injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Insulin glargine injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Lixisenatide 10 mcg injected subcutaneously QD for 2 weeks, then 20 mcg QD (maintenance dose).
    Measure Participants 468 466 233
    Number [percentage of participants]
    53.6
    11.4%
    44.4
    9.5%
    30.5
    13%
    12. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy During 30-Week Treatment Period
    Description Routine fasting SMPG and central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after Week 12) values were used to determine the requirement of rescue medication. If fasting SMPG value exceeded the specified limit for 3 consecutive days, the central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after Week 12) was performed. Threshold values - from Week 8 to Week 12: fasting SMPG/FPG >240 mg/dL (13.3 mmol/L), and from Week 12 to Week 30: fasting SMPG/FPG >200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) or HbA1c >8%.
    Time Frame Baseline up to Week 30

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    mITT population.
    Arm/Group Title Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination Insulin Glargine Lixisenatide
    Arm/Group Description FRC injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Insulin glargine injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Lixisenatide 10 mcg injected subcutaneously QD for 2 weeks, then 20 mcg QD (maintenance dose).
    Measure Participants 468 466 233
    Number [percentage of participants]
    3.6
    0.8%
    3.4
    0.7%
    12.4
    5.3%
    13. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia Events Per Subject-Year
    Description Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of ≤ 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L).
    Time Frame First dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose administration (median treatment exposure: 211 days)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Analysis was performed on safety population defined as all randomized participants who received at least one dose of IMP regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
    Arm/Group Title Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination Insulin Glargine Lixisenatide
    Arm/Group Description FRC injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Insulin glargine injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Lixisenatide 10 mcg injected subcutaneously QD for 2 weeks, then 20 mcg QD (maintenance dose).
    Measure Participants 469 467 233
    Number [Events per subject-year]
    1.44
    1.22
    0.34
    14. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia
    Description Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of ≤ 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L).
    Time Frame First dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose administration (median treatment exposure: 211 days)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Safety population.
    Arm/Group Title Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination Insulin Glargine Lixisenatide
    Arm/Group Description FRC injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Insulin glargine injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Lixisenatide 10 mcg injected subcutaneously QD for 2 weeks, then 20 mcg QD (maintenance dose).
    Measure Participants 469 467 233
    Number [percentage of participants]
    25.6
    5.5%
    23.6
    5.1%
    6.4
    2.7%
    15. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia
    Description Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Plasma glucose measurements might not have been available during such an event, but neurological recovery attributable to the restoration of plasma glucose to normal was considered sufficient evidence that the event had been induced by a low plasma glucose concentration. Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia included all episodes in which neurological impairment was severe enough to prevent self-treatment, and which were thus thought to place participants at risk of injury to themselves or others.
    Time Frame First dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose administration (median treatment exposure: 211 days)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Safety population.
    Arm/Group Title Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination Insulin Glargine Lixisenatide
    Arm/Group Description FRC injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Insulin glargine injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. Lixisenatide 10 mcg injected subcutaneously QD for 2 weeks, then 20 mcg QD (maintenance dose).
    Measure Participants 469 467 233
    Number [percentage of participants]
    0
    0%
    0.2
    0%
    0
    0%

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame All Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Day 213) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
    Adverse Event Reporting Description Reported AEs are treatment-emergent that is AEs that developed/worsened during 'on-treatment period' (time from first injection of open-label IMP up to 3 days after the last injection of IMP regardless of the introduction of rescue therapy). Analysis was done on safety population.
    Arm/Group Title Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination Insulin Glargine Lixisenatide
    Arm/Group Description FRC injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted (median exposure: 211 days). Insulin glargine injected subcutaneously QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted (median exposure: 211 days). Lixisenatide 10 mcg injected subcutaneously QD for 2 weeks, then 20 mcg QD (maintenance dose) median exposure: 211 days).
    All Cause Mortality
    Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination Insulin Glargine Lixisenatide
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination Insulin Glargine Lixisenatide
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 18/469 (3.8%) 19/467 (4.1%) 9/233 (3.9%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Pancytopenia 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Cardiac failure congestive 1/469 (0.2%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Palpitations 1/469 (0.2%) 0/467 (0%) 0/233 (0%)
    Acute myocardial infarction 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Cardiac failure acute 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Cardiac failure chronic 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Coronary artery disease 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Myocardial infarction 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Oesophagitis 1/469 (0.2%) 0/467 (0%) 0/233 (0%)
    General disorders
    Death 0/469 (0%) 0/467 (0%) 1/233 (0.4%)
    Non-cardiac chest pain 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Cholecystitis chronic 1/469 (0.2%) 0/467 (0%) 0/233 (0%)
    Immune system disorders
    Anaphylactic reaction 0/469 (0%) 0/467 (0%) 1/233 (0.4%)
    Infections and infestations
    Urinary tract infection 2/469 (0.4%) 0/467 (0%) 0/233 (0%)
    Erysipelas 1/469 (0.2%) 0/467 (0%) 1/233 (0.4%)
    Febrile infection 1/469 (0.2%) 0/467 (0%) 0/233 (0%)
    Bronchitis 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Meningitis staphylococcal 0/469 (0%) 0/467 (0%) 1/233 (0.4%)
    Pneumonia 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Pyelonephritis acute 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Urosepsis 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Tendon rupture 1/469 (0.2%) 0/467 (0%) 0/233 (0%)
    Comminuted fracture 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Toxicity to various agents 0/469 (0%) 0/467 (0%) 1/233 (0.4%)
    Investigations
    Electrocardiogram ST-T segment abnormal 1/469 (0.2%) 0/467 (0%) 0/233 (0%)
    Lipase increased 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Diabetes mellitus inadequate control 0/469 (0%) 0/467 (0%) 1/233 (0.4%)
    Metabolic acidosis 0/469 (0%) 0/467 (0%) 1/233 (0.4%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Costochondritis 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Spinal osteoarthritis 0/469 (0%) 0/467 (0%) 1/233 (0.4%)
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Lung cancer metastatic 1/469 (0.2%) 0/467 (0%) 0/233 (0%)
    Squamous cell carcinoma of skin 1/469 (0.2%) 0/467 (0%) 0/233 (0%)
    Lung neoplasm malignant 0/469 (0%) 0/467 (0%) 1/233 (0.4%)
    Metastases to liver 0/469 (0%) 0/467 (0%) 1/233 (0.4%)
    Pancreatic carcinoma 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Prostate cancer recurrent 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Thyroid adenoma 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Transient ischaemic attack 1/469 (0.2%) 0/467 (0%) 1/233 (0.4%)
    Lacunar infarction 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Radiculopathy 0/469 (0%) 0/467 (0%) 1/233 (0.4%)
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Renal colic 1/469 (0.2%) 0/467 (0%) 0/233 (0%)
    Acute kidney injury 0/469 (0%) 0/467 (0%) 1/233 (0.4%)
    Bladder prolapse 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Calculus urinary 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Hydronephrosis 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Acquired phimosis 1/469 (0.2%) 0/467 (0%) 0/233 (0%)
    Cervical dysplasia 1/469 (0.2%) 0/467 (0%) 0/233 (0%)
    Metrorrhagia 1/469 (0.2%) 0/467 (0%) 0/233 (0%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Acute pulmonary oedema 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Dyspnoea 0/469 (0%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Respiratory failure 0/469 (0%) 0/467 (0%) 1/233 (0.4%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Angioedema 1/469 (0.2%) 0/467 (0%) 0/233 (0%)
    Urticaria 1/469 (0.2%) 0/467 (0%) 0/233 (0%)
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertension 1/469 (0.2%) 1/467 (0.2%) 0/233 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination Insulin Glargine Lixisenatide
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 138/469 (29.4%) 85/467 (18.2%) 98/233 (42.1%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Nausea 45/469 (9.6%) 17/467 (3.6%) 56/233 (24%)
    Diarrhoea 42/469 (9%) 20/467 (4.3%) 21/233 (9%)
    Vomiting 15/469 (3.2%) 7/467 (1.5%) 15/233 (6.4%)
    Infections and infestations
    Upper respiratory tract infection 33/469 (7%) 23/467 (4.9%) 12/233 (5.2%)
    Nasopharyngitis 26/469 (5.5%) 25/467 (5.4%) 15/233 (6.4%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache 24/469 (5.1%) 15/467 (3.2%) 18/233 (7.7%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    If no publication has occurred within 12 months of the completion of the study, the Investigator shall have the right to publish/present independently the results of the study. The Investigator shall provide the Sponsor with a copy of any such presentation/publication for comment at least 30 days before any presentation/submission for publication. If requested by the Sponsor, any presentation/submission shall be delayed up to 90 days, to allow the Sponsor to preserve its proprietary rights.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Trial Transparency Team
    Organization Sanofi
    Phone
    Email Contact-US@sanofi.com
    Responsible Party:
    Sanofi
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02058147
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • EFC12404
    • 2013-003131-30
    • U1111-1148-4334
    First Posted:
    Feb 7, 2014
    Last Update Posted:
    May 9, 2017
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2017