Study of Rivoglitazone in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a 26-week study in subjects with type 2 diabetes currently sub-optimally controlled by diet and exercise or with non-thiazolidinedione antihyperglycemic monotherapy. The total duration of a subject's participation will be approximately 30 weeks, including a 2-week placebo run-in period, a 26-week double-blind treatment period, and a 2-week post-treatment follow-up period.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Placebo Comparator: 1
|
Drug: Placebo
Rivoglitazone-matching placebo administered as a tablet orally, once daily or a pioglitazone-matching placebo administered as an over-encapsulated tablet orally, once daily capsule
|
Experimental: 2 Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg |
Drug: Rivoglitazone
1.0 mg tablet administered orally, once daily
|
Experimental: 3 Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg |
Drug: Rivoglitazone
1.5 mg tablet administered orally, once daily
|
Active Comparator: 4 Pioglitazone 45 mg |
Drug: Pioglitazone
45 mg over-encapsulated tablet administered orally, once daily
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Hemoglobin A1c at Baseline and Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Baseline up to week 26 post-dose]
Percentage of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels are reported.
- Change in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline Through Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Baseline up to 26 weeks post-dose]
Percent change in hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels are reported. Greater (negative) percent change indicates improvement.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline Through Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Baseline up to week 26 post-dose]
Normal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels are being reported. Normal FPG levels range from 70-110 mg/dL. Lower FPG values indicates better clinical outcome, ie. improvement in FPG.
- Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline Through Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Baseline up to 26 weeks post-dose]
The change in normal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels are being reported. A greater (negative) change from baseline indicates an improvement in FPG.
- Homeostasis Model Assessment Index for Insulin Resistance At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Baseline up to week 26 post-dose]
Homeostasis Model Assessment index for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated as: (fasting insulin concentration [μU/mL] x fasting glucose concentration [mmol/L])/22.5 Low HOMA-IR scores indicate high insulin sensitivity, whereas high HOMA-IR scores indicate low insulin sensitivity (insulin resistance). A normal HOMA-IR score is <2.60, HOMA-IR scores 2.60-3.80 are considered "borderline high", and HOMA-IR scores >3.80 are considered "high" and have correlations of insulin resistance. High HOMA-IR scores indicate worse outcome.
- Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment Index for Insulin Resistance At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Baseline up to 26 weeks post-dose]
The change in the Homeostasis Model Assessment index for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated as: (fasting insulin concentration [μU/mL] x fasting glucose concentration [mmol/L])/22.5 Low HOMA-IR scores indicate high insulin sensitivity, whereas high HOMA-IR scores indicate low insulin sensitivity (insulin resistance). A normal HOMA-IR score is <2.60, HOMA-IR scores 2.60-3.80 are considered "borderline high", and HOMA-IR scores >3.80 are considered "high" and have correlations of insulin resistance. A negative HOMA-IR score indicates an improvement in insulin sensitivity.
- Total Cholesterol At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Baseline up to week 26 post-dose]
Total cholesterol is a measure of the total amount of cholesterol in the blood, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) - the "bad" cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) - the "good" cholesterol, and triglycerides. The equation to calculate total cholesterol is: LDL + HDL + (triglycerides/5) = total cholesterol.
- Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Baseline up to 26 weeks post-dose]
Total cholesterol is a measure of the total amount of cholesterol in the blood, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) - the "bad" cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) - the "good" cholesterol, and triglycerides. The equation to calculate total cholesterol is: LDL + HDL + (triglycerides/5) = total cholesterol. Higher percent change in total cholesterol indicates better outcome, ie. improvement.
- Total Triglycerides At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Baseline up to Week 26 post-dose]
Total Triglycerides (TG) is a measure of the total amount of triglycerides in the blood. The equation to calculate total triglycerides is: (total cholesterol-Low-density Lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL- C) - High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL- C)) x 5 = Total Triglycerides. Normal triglyceride levels are below 150 mg/dL.
- Percent Change in Total Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Baseline up to 26 weeks post-dose]
Total Triglycerides (TG) is a measure of the total amount of triglycerides in the blood. The equation to calculate total triglycerides is: (total cholesterol-Low-density Lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL- C) - High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL- C)) x 5 = Total Triglycerides. A negative change means better outcome, ie. improvement.
- Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Baseline up to Week 26 post-dose]
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), "bad" cholesterol, is a measure of the total amount of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the blood. Normal LDL levels are <100 mg/dL.
- Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Baseline up to 26 weeks post-dose]
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), "bad" cholesterol, is a measure of the total amount of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the blood. A higher percent change indicates improvement.
- High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Baseline to Week 26 post-dose]
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), "good" cholesterol, is a measure of the total amount of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the blood. Normal HDL levels are >40 mg/dL.
- Percent Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Baseline to 26 weeks post-dose]
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), "good" cholesterol, is a measure of the total amount of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the blood. A higher percent change indicates improvement.
- Apolipoprotein A-I At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Baseline to Week 26 post-dose]
Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I levels, a measure of the total amount of Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I in the blood, are being reported. Normal Apo A-1 levels range from 120-140 mg/dL.
- Percent Change in Apolipoprotein A-I From Baseline to Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Baseline up to 26 weeks post-dose]
Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I is a measure of the total amount of Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I in the blood. Decreased ApoA-1 levels are associated with poor clinical outcome. A lower percent change in ApoA-1 levels indicates an improvement in clinical outcome.
- Apolipoprotein B At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Baseline to Week 26 post-dose]
Apolipoprotein (Apo) B, a measure of the total amount of Apo B in the blood, is being reported. Normal Apo B levels are <100 mg/dL.
- Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Baseline up to 26 weeks post-dose]
Apolipoprotein (Apo) B, a measure of the total amount of Apo B in the blood, is being reported. A greater (negative) percent change in ApoB levels indicated an improvement in clinical outcome.
- Hemoglobin A1c at Baseline and Week 52 Extension Period Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Baseline up to Week 52 post-dose]
Percentage of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels are reported.
- Change in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline Through Week 52 Extension Period Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Baseline up to 52 weeks post-dose]
Change in hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels are reported. Greater (negative) percent change indicates improvement.
- Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline Through Week 52 Extension Period Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Baseline up to Week 52 post-dose]
Normal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels are being reported. Normal FPG levels range from 70-110 mg/dL. Lower FPG values indicates better clinical outcome, ie. improvement in FPG.
- Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline Through Week 52 Extension Period Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Baseline up to 52 weeks post-dose]
The change in normal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels are being reported. A greater (negative) change from baseline indicates an improvement in FPG.
- Drug-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported by ≥1% Participants Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Week -2 up to Week 52 post-dose]
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first dose of double-blind study medication, and ongoing AEs that started prior to the first dose of double-blind study medication and increased in severity on or after the first dose of double-blind study medication.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes
-
Male or female at least 18 years of age
-
Hemoglobin A1C > 7% and less or equal to 8.5%
-
Non-fasting C-peptide > 0.5 ng/mL
-
Current monotherapy treatment with stable dose of approved non-Thiazolidinedione (TZD) antihyperglycemic medication for greater or equal to 3 months prior to screening or
-
Untreated with any antihyperglycemic agent during 2 months prior to screening
Exclusion Criteria:
-
History of type 1 diabetes or ketoacidosis
-
History of long-term therapy with insulin
-
Body Mass Index (BMI) > 45 kg/m^2
-
Known history of Congestive Heart Failure (CHF)
-
Impaired hepatic function
-
History of prior treatment failure with, or intolerance of, a TZD
-
Contraindication to treatment with pioglitazone
-
Treatment with fibrates
-
If untreated with oral antihyperglycemic, considered to have failed diet and exercise modification as the sole treatment for type 2 diabetes
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Anniston | Alabama | United States | ||
2 | Birmingham | Alabama | United States | ||
3 | Hoover | Alabama | United States | ||
4 | Muscle Shoals | Alabama | United States | ||
5 | Hot Springs | Arkansas | United States | ||
6 | Jonesboro | Arkansas | United States | ||
7 | Little Rock | Arkansas | United States | ||
8 | Buena Park | California | United States | ||
9 | Garden Grove | California | United States | ||
10 | Huntington Park | California | United States | ||
11 | Los Angeles | California | United States | ||
12 | Paramount | California | United States | ||
13 | Sacramento | California | United States | ||
14 | San Diego | California | United States | ||
15 | Walnut Creek | California | United States | ||
16 | West Covina | California | United States | ||
17 | West Hills | California | United States | ||
18 | Denver | Colorado | United States | ||
19 | Delray Beach | Florida | United States | ||
20 | Jacksonville | Florida | United States | ||
21 | Merritt Island | Florida | United States | ||
22 | Miami | Florida | United States | ||
23 | Pembroke Pines | Florida | United States | ||
24 | Tampa | Florida | United States | ||
25 | Honolulu | Hawaii | United States | ||
26 | Boise | Idaho | United States | ||
27 | Chicago | Illinois | United States | ||
28 | Evansville | Indiana | United States | ||
29 | Indianapolis | Indiana | United States | ||
30 | Wichita | Kansas | United States | ||
31 | Madisonville | Kentucky | United States | ||
32 | New Orleans | Louisiana | United States | ||
33 | Slidell | Louisiana | United States | ||
34 | Springfield | Massachusetts | United States | ||
35 | Portage | Michigan | United States | ||
36 | Southfield | Michigan | United States | ||
37 | Saint Louis | Missouri | United States | ||
38 | Voorhees | New Jersey | United States | ||
39 | Syracuse | New York | United States | ||
40 | Morehead City | North Carolina | United States | ||
41 | Salisbury | North Carolina | United States | ||
42 | Statesville | North Carolina | United States | ||
43 | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | United States | ||
44 | Cincinnati | Ohio | United States | ||
45 | Cleveland | Ohio | United States | ||
46 | Delaware | Ohio | United States | ||
47 | Lyndhurst | Ohio | United States | ||
48 | Marion | Ohio | United States | ||
49 | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | United States | ||
50 | Tulsa | Oklahoma | United States | ||
51 | Portland | Oregon | United States | ||
52 | Beaver | Pennsylvania | United States | ||
53 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States | ||
54 | Charleston | South Carolina | United States | ||
55 | Columbia | South Carolina | United States | ||
56 | Cleveland | Tennessee | United States | ||
57 | Kingsport | Tennessee | United States | ||
58 | New Tazewell | Tennessee | United States | ||
59 | Carrollton | Texas | United States | ||
60 | Conroe | Texas | United States | ||
61 | Corpus Christi | Texas | United States | ||
62 | Dallas | Texas | United States | ||
63 | El Paso | Texas | United States | ||
64 | Garland | Texas | United States | ||
65 | Irving | Texas | United States | ||
66 | Midland | Texas | United States | ||
67 | San Antonio | Texas | United States | ||
68 | Richmond | Virginia | United States | ||
69 | Olympia | Washington | United States | ||
70 | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | United States | ||
71 | Loma Verde | Buenos Aires | Argentina | ||
72 | Zarate | Buenos Aires | Argentina | ||
73 | San Vicente | Cordoba | Argentina | ||
74 | Feldkirch | Austria | |||
75 | Graz | Austria | |||
76 | Wien | Austria | |||
77 | Santiago | Providencia | Chile | ||
78 | Santiago | Chile | |||
79 | Temuco | Chile | |||
80 | Horní Město | Czechia | |||
81 | Karlovy Vary | Czechia | |||
82 | Prague | Czechia | |||
83 | Praha | Czechia | |||
84 | Usti nad Labem | Czechia | |||
85 | Vysoký Les | Czechia | |||
86 | Zlin | Czechia | |||
87 | Znojmo | Czechia | |||
88 | Aschaffenburg | Germany | |||
89 | Augsburg | Germany | |||
90 | Bad Oeynhausen | Germany | |||
91 | Berlin | Germany | |||
92 | Bosenheim | Germany | |||
93 | Dortmund | Germany | |||
94 | Dresden | Germany | |||
95 | Friedrichsthal | Germany | |||
96 | Giessen | Germany | |||
97 | Halle | Germany | |||
98 | Hamburg | Germany | |||
99 | Kippenheim | Germany | |||
100 | Mainz | Germany | |||
101 | Rehlingen | Germany | |||
102 | Riesa | Germany | |||
103 | Saarbrucken | Germany | |||
104 | Saarlouis | Germany | |||
105 | Siegen | Germany | |||
106 | Wiesbaden | Germany | |||
107 | Balatonfured | Hungary | |||
108 | Bekescsaba | Hungary | |||
109 | Budapest | Hungary | |||
110 | Debrecen | Hungary | |||
111 | Eger | Hungary | |||
112 | Gyula | Hungary | |||
113 | Kaposvar | Hungary | |||
114 | Szentes | Hungary | |||
115 | Hyderabad | Andhra Pradesh | India | ||
116 | Vijayawada | Andhra Pradesh | India | ||
117 | Visakhapatnam | Andhra Pradesh | India | ||
118 | Vasanth Nagar | Bangalore | India | ||
119 | Mylapore | Chennai | India | ||
120 | Shastri Nagar | Ghaziabad | India | ||
121 | Ahmedabad | Gujarat | India | ||
122 | Gandhinagar | Gujarat | India | ||
123 | Karnal | Haryana | India | ||
124 | Sarwa C. | Jaipur | India | ||
125 | Bangalore | Karnataka | India | ||
126 | Belgaum | Karnataka | India | ||
127 | Mangalore | Karnataka | India | ||
128 | Kochi | Kerala | India | ||
129 | Indore | Madhya Pradesh | India | ||
130 | Mumbai | Maharashtra | India | ||
131 | Dhantoli | Nagpur | India | ||
132 | Ramdaspeth | Nagpur | India | ||
133 | Jaipur | Rajasthan | India | ||
134 | Coimbatore | Tamil Nadu | India | ||
135 | Aligarh | Uttar Pradesh | India | ||
136 | Daugavpils | Latvia | |||
137 | Kuldiga | Latvia | |||
138 | Liepaja | Latvia | |||
139 | Riga | Latvia | |||
140 | Cuernavaca | Morelos | Mexico | ||
141 | Monterrey | Nuevo Leon | Mexico | ||
142 | Metepec | Toluca | Mexico | ||
143 | Merida | Yucatan | Mexico | ||
144 | Aguascalientes | Mexico | |||
145 | Durango | Mexico | |||
146 | Puebla | Mexico | |||
147 | La Victoria | Lima | Peru | ||
148 | Magdalena del Mar | Lima | Peru | ||
149 | San Juan de Miraflores | Lima | Peru | ||
150 | San Martin de Porres | Lima | Peru | ||
151 | Monterrico | Sucro Lima | Peru | ||
152 | Lima | Peru | |||
153 | Rio Piedras | Puerto Rico | |||
154 | San Juan | Puerto Rico | |||
155 | Villa Fontana | Puerto Rico | 00983 | ||
156 | Arad | Romania | |||
157 | Brasov | Romania | |||
158 | Bucharest | Romania | |||
159 | Satu Mare | Romania | |||
160 | Targu Mures | Romania | |||
161 | Belgrade | Serbia | |||
162 | Kragujevac | Serbia | |||
163 | Nis | Serbia | |||
164 | Subotica | Serbia | |||
165 | Zemun | Serbia | |||
166 | Bratislava | Slovakia | |||
167 | Lucenec | Slovakia | |||
168 | Moldava nad Bodvou | Slovakia | |||
169 | Nove Mesto nad Vahom | Slovakia | |||
170 | Považská Bystrica | Slovakia | |||
171 | Zilina | Slovakia | |||
172 | Johannesburg | South Africa | |||
173 | Port Elizabeth | South Africa | |||
174 | Dnipropetrovs'k | Ukraine | |||
175 | Kharkov | Ukraine | |||
176 | Kiev | Ukraine | |||
177 | Lviv | Ukraine | |||
178 | Simferopol | Ukraine | |||
179 | Edmonton | London | United Kingdom | ||
180 | Sunbury | Middlesex | United Kingdom | ||
181 | Addlestone | Surrey | United Kingdom | ||
182 | Wakefield | West Yorks | United Kingdom | ||
183 | Swindon | Wiltshire | United Kingdom | ||
184 | Chippenham | United Kingdom |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.
Investigators
- Study Director: Global Clinical Leader, Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- CS0011-A-U301
- 2006-005047-28
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | A total of 1,912 participants who met all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study at 254 sites in Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, and South America. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | During the 2-week stabilization/washout, single-blind, placebo run-in period, participants were to discontinue any previous therapy with oral anti-hyperglycemic agents and were to self-administer single-blind, double-dummy, placebo medication consisting of over-encapsulated pioglitazone-matching placebo tablets and rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablets once daily. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. Extension Period: Participants who received Placebo in the base study received Pioglitazone 45 mg once daily for 26-week cycles (Cycle 1 and 2) instead in the extension period. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. Extension Period: Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 week cycles (Cycle 1 and 2). | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. Extension Period: Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks cycles (Cycle 1 and 2). | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. Extension Period: Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 week cycles (Cycle 1 and Cycle 2). |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||||
STARTED | 137 | 274 | 750 | 751 |
COMPLETED | 96 | 208 | 599 | 579 |
NOT COMPLETED | 41 | 66 | 151 | 172 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 137 | 274 | 750 | 751 | 1912 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
55.4
(12.32)
|
55.0
(10.51)
|
55.1
(10.59)
|
55.0
(10.84)
|
55.0
(10.80)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||||
Female |
70
51.1%
|
142
51.8%
|
368
49.1%
|
353
47%
|
933
48.8%
|
Male |
67
48.9%
|
132
48.2%
|
382
50.9%
|
398
53%
|
979
51.2%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants) | |||||
Hispanic or Latino |
33
24.1%
|
59
21.5%
|
171
22.8%
|
151
20.1%
|
414
21.7%
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
104
75.9%
|
215
78.5%
|
579
77.2%
|
600
79.9%
|
1498
78.3%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants) | |||||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
2
1.5%
|
3
1.1%
|
11
1.5%
|
1
0.1%
|
17
0.9%
|
Asian |
42
30.7%
|
89
32.5%
|
245
32.7%
|
243
32.4%
|
619
32.4%
|
Black or African American |
2
1.5%
|
17
6.2%
|
33
4.4%
|
35
4.7%
|
87
4.6%
|
White |
80
58.4%
|
147
53.6%
|
406
54.1%
|
414
55.1%
|
1047
54.8%
|
Other |
11
8%
|
18
6.6%
|
55
7.3%
|
58
7.7%
|
142
7.4%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Hemoglobin A1c at Baseline and Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
---|---|
Description | Percentage of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels are reported. |
Time Frame | Baseline up to week 26 post-dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels were assessed using the Full Analysis Set. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 134 | 266 | 733 | 728 |
Baseline |
7.7
(0.55)
|
7.7
(0.54)
|
7.7
(0.57)
|
7.7
(0.58)
|
Week 26 |
8.0
(0.86)
|
7.3
(0.94)
|
7.1
(0.83)
|
7.2
(0.90)
|
Title | Change in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline Through Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
---|---|
Description | Percent change in hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels are reported. Greater (negative) percent change indicates improvement. |
Time Frame | Baseline up to 26 weeks post-dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels were assessed using the Full Analysis Set. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 134 | 266 | 733 | 728 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [percent change in HbA1c] |
0.3
(0.69)
|
-0.3
(0.75)
|
-0.6
(0.72)
|
-0.5
(0.77)
|
Title | Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline Through Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
---|---|
Description | Normal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels are being reported. Normal FPG levels range from 70-110 mg/dL. Lower FPG values indicates better clinical outcome, ie. improvement in FPG. |
Time Frame | Baseline up to week 26 post-dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Fasting plasma glucose levels were assessed in participants with available data in the Full Analysis Set. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 133 | 263 | 729 | 721 |
Baseline |
161.1
(44.28)
|
159.2
(42.33)
|
160.9
(40.24)
|
161.9
(42.96)
|
Week 26 |
167.5
(41.23)
|
136.5
(39.73)
|
128.6
(35.06)
|
132.3
(38.32)
|
Title | Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline Through Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
---|---|
Description | The change in normal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels are being reported. A greater (negative) change from baseline indicates an improvement in FPG. |
Time Frame | Baseline up to 26 weeks post-dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Change in fasting plasma glucose levels were assessed in participants with values at both baseline and study endpoint. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 133 | 263 | 729 | 721 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mg/dL] |
6.1
(39.61)
|
-22.1
(34.75)
|
-32.4
(38.48)
|
-29.5
(40.32)
|
Title | Homeostasis Model Assessment Index for Insulin Resistance At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
---|---|
Description | Homeostasis Model Assessment index for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated as: (fasting insulin concentration [μU/mL] x fasting glucose concentration [mmol/L])/22.5 Low HOMA-IR scores indicate high insulin sensitivity, whereas high HOMA-IR scores indicate low insulin sensitivity (insulin resistance). A normal HOMA-IR score is <2.60, HOMA-IR scores 2.60-3.80 are considered "borderline high", and HOMA-IR scores >3.80 are considered "high" and have correlations of insulin resistance. High HOMA-IR scores indicate worse outcome. |
Time Frame | Baseline up to week 26 post-dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Homeostasis Model Assessment Index was assessed in participants with available data in the Full Analysis Set. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 104 | 243 | 690 | 671 |
Baseline |
6.2
(6.98)
|
5.6
(4.64)
|
6.0
(6.65)
|
6.2
(6.92)
|
Week 26 |
6.8
(5.65)
|
4.0
(3.78)
|
3.7
(4.49)
|
4.1
(4.75)
|
Title | Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment Index for Insulin Resistance At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
---|---|
Description | The change in the Homeostasis Model Assessment index for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated as: (fasting insulin concentration [μU/mL] x fasting glucose concentration [mmol/L])/22.5 Low HOMA-IR scores indicate high insulin sensitivity, whereas high HOMA-IR scores indicate low insulin sensitivity (insulin resistance). A normal HOMA-IR score is <2.60, HOMA-IR scores 2.60-3.80 are considered "borderline high", and HOMA-IR scores >3.80 are considered "high" and have correlations of insulin resistance. A negative HOMA-IR score indicates an improvement in insulin sensitivity. |
Time Frame | Baseline up to 26 weeks post-dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment Index was assessed in participants with values for baseline and study endpoint. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 104 | 243 | 690 | 671 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
0.4
(7.56)
|
-1.5
(3.79)
|
-2.3
(5.15)
|
-2.2
(7.56)
|
Title | Total Cholesterol At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
---|---|
Description | Total cholesterol is a measure of the total amount of cholesterol in the blood, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) - the "bad" cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) - the "good" cholesterol, and triglycerides. The equation to calculate total cholesterol is: LDL + HDL + (triglycerides/5) = total cholesterol. |
Time Frame | Baseline up to week 26 post-dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Total cholesterol levels were assessed in participants with available data in the Full Analysis Set. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 106 | 246 | 694 | 678 |
Baseline |
190.1
(36.23)
|
193.4
(38.27)
|
191.6
(38.80)
|
189.8
(39.42)
|
Week 26 |
191.9
(39.60)
|
198.0
(40.39)
|
199.1
(43.14)
|
194.6
(41.84)
|
Title | Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
---|---|
Description | Total cholesterol is a measure of the total amount of cholesterol in the blood, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) - the "bad" cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) - the "good" cholesterol, and triglycerides. The equation to calculate total cholesterol is: LDL + HDL + (triglycerides/5) = total cholesterol. Higher percent change in total cholesterol indicates better outcome, ie. improvement. |
Time Frame | Baseline up to 26 weeks post-dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Percent change in total cholesterol levels were assessed in participants with values at baseline and study endpoint. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 106 | 246 | 694 | 678 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [percent change in total cholesterol] |
1.9
(13.01)
|
4.0
(17.81)
|
5.3
(17.49)
|
3.6
(16.31)
|
Title | Total Triglycerides At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
---|---|
Description | Total Triglycerides (TG) is a measure of the total amount of triglycerides in the blood. The equation to calculate total triglycerides is: (total cholesterol-Low-density Lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL- C) - High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL- C)) x 5 = Total Triglycerides. Normal triglyceride levels are below 150 mg/dL. |
Time Frame | Baseline up to Week 26 post-dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Total triglyceride levels were assessed in participants with available data in the Full Analysis Set. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 106 | 246 | 694 | 678 |
Baseline |
185.6
(111.25)
|
173.3
(104.90)
|
169.5
(101.27)
|
175.0
(96.75)
|
Week 26 |
170.5
(99.17)
|
148.0
(91.88)
|
141.0
(84.12)
|
152.1
(112.72)
|
Title | Percent Change in Total Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
---|---|
Description | Total Triglycerides (TG) is a measure of the total amount of triglycerides in the blood. The equation to calculate total triglycerides is: (total cholesterol-Low-density Lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL- C) - High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL- C)) x 5 = Total Triglycerides. A negative change means better outcome, ie. improvement. |
Time Frame | Baseline up to 26 weeks post-dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Percent change in total triglyceride levels were assessed in participants with values at baseline and study endpoint. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 106 | 246 | 694 | 678 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [percent change in total triglycerides] |
-1.8
(26.52)
|
-10.3
(32.84)
|
-11.7
(34.35)
|
-9.6
(45.84)
|
Title | Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
---|---|
Description | Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), "bad" cholesterol, is a measure of the total amount of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the blood. Normal LDL levels are <100 mg/dL. |
Time Frame | Baseline up to Week 26 post-dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were assessed in participants with available data in the Full Analysis Set. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 106 | 246 | 694 | 674 |
Baseline |
108.5
(29.68)
|
112.8
(32.37)
|
112.1
(32.35)
|
110.5
(33.60)
|
Week 26 |
111.8
(31.37)
|
118.0
(34.19)
|
118.7
(36.99)
|
115.0
(36.03)
|
Title | Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
---|---|
Description | Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), "bad" cholesterol, is a measure of the total amount of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the blood. A higher percent change indicates improvement. |
Time Frame | Baseline up to 26 weeks post-dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Percent change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was assessed in participants with values at baseline and study endpoint. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 106 | 246 | 694 | 674 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [percent change in LDL] |
3.4
(18.56)
|
9.3
(32.91)
|
9.6
(30.02)
|
7.3
(32.25)
|
Title | High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
---|---|
Description | High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), "good" cholesterol, is a measure of the total amount of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the blood. Normal HDL levels are >40 mg/dL. |
Time Frame | Baseline to Week 26 post-dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol was assessed in participants with available data in the Full Analysis Set. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 106 | 246 | 694 | 675 |
Baseline |
45.3
(11.73)
|
46.0
(12.49)
|
45.8
(11.46)
|
44.7
(10.25)
|
Week 26 |
45.6
(11.46)
|
50.4
(14.84)
|
52.0
(14.72)
|
49.7
(12.65)
|
Title | Percent Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
---|---|
Description | High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), "good" cholesterol, is a measure of the total amount of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the blood. A higher percent change indicates improvement. |
Time Frame | Baseline to 26 weeks post-dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Percent change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was assessed in participants with values at baseline and study endpoint. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 106 | 246 | 694 | 675 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [percent change] |
2.7
(14.30)
|
10.3
(18.15)
|
14.8
(22.65)
|
12.3
(21.97)
|
Title | Apolipoprotein A-I At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
---|---|
Description | Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I levels, a measure of the total amount of Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I in the blood, are being reported. Normal Apo A-1 levels range from 120-140 mg/dL. |
Time Frame | Baseline to Week 26 post-dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Apolipoprotein A-I was assessed in participants with available data in the Full Analysis Set. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 105 | 245 | 691 | 677 |
Baseline |
145.3
(25.11)
|
145.7
(27.60)
|
145.2
(24.31)
|
143.6
(22.88)
|
Week 26 |
146.2
(26.39)
|
146.4
(29.52)
|
145.9
(27.37)
|
143.9
(24.97)
|
Title | Percent Change in Apolipoprotein A-I From Baseline to Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
---|---|
Description | Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I is a measure of the total amount of Apolipoprotein (Apo) A-I in the blood. Decreased ApoA-1 levels are associated with poor clinical outcome. A lower percent change in ApoA-1 levels indicates an improvement in clinical outcome. |
Time Frame | Baseline up to 26 weeks post-dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Percent change in apolipoprotein A-I was assessed in participants with values at baseline and study endpoint. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 105 | 245 | 691 | 677 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [percent change] |
2.0
(12.22)
|
1.0
(12.88)
|
0.9
(13.18)
|
0.8
(13.09)
|
Title | Apolipoprotein B At Baseline To Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
---|---|
Description | Apolipoprotein (Apo) B, a measure of the total amount of Apo B in the blood, is being reported. Normal Apo B levels are <100 mg/dL. |
Time Frame | Baseline to Week 26 post-dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Apolipoprotein B was assessed in participants with available data in the Full Analysis Set. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 105 | 245 | 691 | 677 |
Baseline |
112.8
(25.24)
|
116.1
(26.49)
|
114.6
(26.88)
|
114.3
(27.33)
|
Week 26 |
115.3
(26.50)
|
113.6
(28.60)
|
111.5
(30.29)
|
110.3
(28.90)
|
Title | Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Week 26 Endpoint With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
---|---|
Description | Apolipoprotein (Apo) B, a measure of the total amount of Apo B in the blood, is being reported. A greater (negative) percent change in ApoB levels indicated an improvement in clinical outcome. |
Time Frame | Baseline up to 26 weeks post-dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Apolipoprotein B was assessed in participants with values at baseline and study endpoint. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 105 | 245 | 691 | 677 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [percent change] |
3.0
(14.83)
|
-0.4
(19.46)
|
-1.1
(21.24)
|
-2.5
(18.17)
|
Title | Hemoglobin A1c at Baseline and Week 52 Extension Period Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
---|---|
Description | Percentage of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels are reported. |
Time Frame | Baseline up to Week 52 post-dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Hemoglobin A1c levels were assessed using the Study Extension Set. |
Arm/Group Title | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg | Placebo/Pioglitazone 45 mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 66 | 200 | 194 | 27 |
Baseline |
7.5
(0.46)
|
7.6
(0.53)
|
7.6
(0.51)
|
7.4
(0.48)
|
Week 52 |
7.0
(0.72)
|
6.9
(0.60)
|
6.9
(0.58)
|
7.0
(0.75)
|
Title | Change in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline Through Week 52 Extension Period Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
---|---|
Description | Change in hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels are reported. Greater (negative) percent change indicates improvement. |
Time Frame | Baseline up to 52 weeks post-dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Hemoglobin A1c was assessed in participants with values at baseline and the extension visit at the end of Cycle 1. |
Arm/Group Title | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg | Placebo/ Pioglitazone 45 mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 27 | 65 | 54 | 11 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [percent change in HbA1c] |
-0.5
(0.69)
|
-0.7
(0.57)
|
-0.7
(0.67)
|
-0.4
(0.70)
|
Title | Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline Through Week 52 Extension Period Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
---|---|
Description | Normal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels are being reported. Normal FPG levels range from 70-110 mg/dL. Lower FPG values indicates better clinical outcome, ie. improvement in FPG. |
Time Frame | Baseline up to Week 52 post-dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels were assessed in participants with available data in the Study Extension Set. |
Arm/Group Title | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg | Placebo/ Pioglitazone 45 mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 64 | 200 | 193 | 27 |
Baseline |
147.4
(32.31)
|
152.8
(32.32)
|
149.0
(36.00)
|
142.5
(27.81)
|
Week 52 |
117.8
(27.93)
|
116.6
(24.12)
|
115.6
(19.04)
|
124.9
(36.92)
|
Title | Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline Through Week 52 Extension Period Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
---|---|
Description | The change in normal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels are being reported. A greater (negative) change from baseline indicates an improvement in FPG. |
Time Frame | Baseline up to 52 weeks post-dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was assessed in participants with values at baseline and the extension visit at the end of Cycle 1. Participants who did not have both baseline and Week 52 data were not included in this analysis (n=1 each for Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg and Pioglitazone 45 mg groups). |
Arm/Group Title | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg | Placebo/ Pioglitazone 45 mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 20 | 48 | 37 | 7 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mg/dL] |
-33.8
(41.48)
|
-34.2
(24.86)
|
-29.5
(31.39)
|
-35.9
(20.75)
|
Title | Drug-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported by ≥1% Participants Following Rivoglitazone or Pioglitazone Compared to Placebo as Monotherapy Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
---|---|
Description | Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first dose of double-blind study medication, and ongoing AEs that started prior to the first dose of double-blind study medication and increased in severity on or after the first dose of double-blind study medication. |
Time Frame | Week -2 up to Week 52 post-dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Drug-related TEAEs were assessed in the Safety Set which included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 post-baseline safety measurement. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 137 | 269 | 741 | 739 |
Participants with drug-related TEAEs |
15
10.9%
|
50
18.2%
|
144
19.2%
|
134
17.8%
|
Gastritis |
1
0.7%
|
3
1.1%
|
2
0.3%
|
7
0.9%
|
Edema |
0
0%
|
2
0.7%
|
5
0.7%
|
9
1.2%
|
Edema peripheral |
1
0.7%
|
14
5.1%
|
46
6.1%
|
46
6.1%
|
Pitting edema |
0
0%
|
6
2.2%
|
10
1.3%
|
13
1.7%
|
Weight increased |
0
0%
|
5
1.8%
|
23
3.1%
|
12
1.6%
|
Fluid retention |
0
0%
|
3
1.1%
|
2
0.3%
|
1
0.1%
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) data were assessed from the signing of the informed consent (Week -2) up to 52 weeks post-dose for the duration of the study period. | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first dose of double-blind (DB) study medication, and ongoing AEs that started prior to the first dose of DB study medication and increased in severity on or after the first dose of DB study medication. TEAEs were reported from the Safety Set which included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 post-baseline safety measurement. | |||||||
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg | ||||
Arm/Group Description | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone-matching placebo tablet or a Pioglitazone-matching placebo over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Rivoglitazone 1.5 mg tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were administered a Pioglitazone 45 mg over-encapsulated tablet once daily for 26 weeks. | ||||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||||
Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 2/739 (0.3%) | ||||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||||
Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 3/137 (2.2%) | 10/269 (3.7%) | 22/741 (3%) | 28/739 (3.8%) | ||||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||||||
Anemia | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Cardiac disorders | ||||||||
Angina unstable | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Atrioventricular block | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Cardiac failure | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Cardiac failure congestive | 0/137 (0%) | 1/269 (0.4%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 3/739 (0.4%) | ||||
Coronary artery disease | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 2/739 (0.3%) | ||||
Myocardial infarction | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 2/739 (0.3%) | ||||
Endocrine disorders | ||||||||
Basedow's disease | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Eye disorders | ||||||||
Cataract | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||||
Ascites | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Diarrhea | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Gastritis | 1/137 (0.7%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Gastroesophageal reflux disease | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Umbilical hernia | 0/137 (0%) | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/741 (0%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Umbilical hernia, obstructive | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
General disorders | ||||||||
Hernia obstructive | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Non-cardiac chest pain | 1/137 (0.7%) | 0/269 (0%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||||||
Bile duct obstruction | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Cholecystitis acute | 0/137 (0%) | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/741 (0%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Cholelithiasis | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Hepatitis acute | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Infections and infestations | ||||||||
Appendicitis | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Cystitis | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Dengue fever | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Enterocolitis infectious | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Gastroenteritis | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Hepatitis A | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Pneumonia | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Urinary tract infection | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||||||
Alcohol poisoning | 0/137 (0%) | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/741 (0%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Ankle fracture | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Concussion | 0/137 (0%) | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/741 (0%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Facial bones fracture | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Hand fracture | 1/137 (0.7%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Lower limb fracture | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Road traffic accident | 0/137 (0%) | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Spinal compression | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Traumatic brain injury | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||||||
Hypoglycemia | 1/137 (0.7%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||||||
Intervertebral disc disorder | 0/137 (0%) | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/741 (0%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Intervertebral disc protrusion | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||||||
Adenocarcinoma pancreas | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Bladder neoplasm | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Colon cancer | 0/137 (0%) | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/741 (0%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Endometrial cancer | 0/137 (0%) | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/741 (0%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Gastric cancer | 0/137 (0%) | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/741 (0%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Metastasis | 0/137 (0%) | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/741 (0%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Pancreatic carcinoma | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 2/739 (0.3%) | ||||
Thyroid neoplasm | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Nervous system disorders | ||||||||
Cerebral ischemia | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Cerebrovascular accident | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Ischemic stroke | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Status migrainous | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Syncope | 0/137 (0%) | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/741 (0%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Psychiatric disorders | ||||||||
Schizoaffective disorder | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Suicide attempt | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||||||
Nephrolithiasis | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Renal colic | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 2/741 (0.3%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Renal failure acute | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||||||||
Polycystic ovaries | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Uterine polyp | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 1/741 (0.1%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||||
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 2/741 (0.3%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Pulmonary embolism | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Pulmonary thrombosis | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Vascular disorders | ||||||||
Hypertension | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Varicose vein | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 0/741 (0%) | 1/739 (0.1%) | ||||
Venous thrombosis limb | 0/137 (0%) | 0/269 (0%) | 2/741 (0.3%) | 0/739 (0%) | ||||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||||
Placebo | Rivoglitazone 1.0 mg | Rivoglitazone 1.5mg | Pioglitazone 45 mg | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 56/137 (40.9%) | 131/269 (48.7%) | 408/741 (55.1%) | 374/739 (50.6%) | ||||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||||
Diarrhea | 2/137 (1.5%) | 1/269 (0.4%) | 14/741 (1.9%) | 17/739 (2.3%) | ||||
Gastritis | 3/137 (2.2%) | 5/269 (1.9%) | 10/741 (1.3%) | 9/739 (1.2%) | ||||
Influenza | 3/137 (2.2%) | 5/269 (1.9%) | 15/741 (2%) | 17/739 (2.3%) | ||||
General disorders | ||||||||
Edema peripheral | 3/137 (2.2%) | 18/269 (6.7%) | 54/741 (7.3%) | 56/739 (7.6%) | ||||
Pitting edema | 0/137 (0%) | 7/269 (2.6%) | 10/741 (1.3%) | 17/739 (2.3%) | ||||
Infections and infestations | ||||||||
Bronchitis | 4/137 (2.9%) | 5/269 (1.9%) | 24/741 (3.2%) | 20/739 (2.7%) | ||||
Gastroenteritis | 1/137 (0.7%) | 4/269 (1.5%) | 15/741 (2%) | 7/739 (0.9%) | ||||
Nasopharyngitis | 6/137 (4.4%) | 13/269 (4.8%) | 40/741 (5.4%) | 41/739 (5.5%) | ||||
Upper respiratory tract infection | 3/137 (2.2%) | 8/269 (3%) | 38/741 (5.1%) | 25/739 (3.4%) | ||||
Urinary tract infection | 6/137 (4.4%) | 19/269 (7.1%) | 34/741 (4.6%) | 30/739 (4.1%) | ||||
Investigations | ||||||||
Weight increased | 0/137 (0%) | 5/269 (1.9%) | 24/741 (3.2%) | 14/739 (1.9%) | ||||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||||||
Hypoglycemia | 3/137 (2.2%) | 1/269 (0.4%) | 7/741 (0.9%) | 3/739 (0.4%) | ||||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||||||
Arthralgia | 3/137 (2.2%) | 7/269 (2.6%) | 24/741 (3.2%) | 14/739 (1.9%) | ||||
Back pain | 2/137 (1.5%) | 6/269 (2.2%) | 19/741 (2.6%) | 22/739 (3%) | ||||
Pain in extremity | 5/137 (3.6%) | 4/269 (1.5%) | 13/741 (1.8%) | 20/739 (2.7%) | ||||
Nervous system disorders | ||||||||
Dizziness | 1/137 (0.7%) | 4/269 (1.5%) | 15/741 (2%) | 7/739 (0.9%) | ||||
Headache | 5/137 (3.6%) | 7/269 (2.6%) | 27/741 (3.6%) | 27/739 (3.7%) | ||||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||||
Cough | 2/137 (1.5%) | 8/269 (3%) | 7/741 (0.9%) | 10/739 (1.4%) | ||||
Vascular disorders | ||||||||
Hypertension | 4/137 (2.9%) | 4/269 (1.5%) | 18/741 (2.4%) | 18/739 (2.4%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Contact for Clinical Trial Information |
---|---|
Organization | Daiichi Sankyo |
Phone | 908-992-6400 |
CTRinfo@dsi.com |
- CS0011-A-U301
- 2006-005047-28