Treatment Effect of Saxagliptin Compared With Placebo in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Renal Impairment

Sponsor
AstraZeneca (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00614939
Collaborator
Bristol-Myers Squibb (Industry)
572
75
2
26
7.6
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Saxagliptin is a new investigational medication being developed for treatment of type 2 diabetes. This study is designed to test the efficacy of once daily saxagliptin in renally impaired patients.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
572 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Short-term 12-Week, Multi-centre, Randomized, Parallel-group, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Treatment Effect of Saxagliptin Compared With Placebo in Adult Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Renal Impairment (Moderate, Severe, and End-Stage) With an Additional 40-week, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Long-term Observational Period.
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2008
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2009
Actual Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2010

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Saxa

Saxagliptin

Drug: Saxagliptin
2.5 mg once daily oral dose
Other Names:
  • Onglyza
  • No Intervention: Placebo

    Placebo to match

    Drug: Placebo
    Placebo

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Absolute Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Level to Week 12 Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) [Baseline , Week 12 (LOCF)]

      Adjusted* mean change from baseline in HbA1c achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set). HbA1c is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 12 value minus the baseline value.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 12 (LOCF)- Moderate Renal Impairment Subgroup [Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)]

      Adjusted* mean change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set) for the moderate renal impairment subgroup. FPG is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 12 value minus the baseline value.

    2. Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 12 (LOCF) - Severe Renal Impairment Subgroup [Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)]

      Adjusted* mean change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set) for the severe renal impairment subgroup. FPG is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 12 value minus the baseline value.

    3. Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 12 (LOCF) - End-Stage Renal Impairment Subgroup [Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)]

      Adjusted* mean change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set) for the end-stage renal impairment subgroup. FPG is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 12 value minus the baseline value.

    4. Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 12 (LOCF) - Moderate Renal Impairment Subgroup [Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)]

      Adjusted* mean change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set) for the moderate renal impairment subgroup. FPG is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 12 value minus the baseline value.

    5. Absolute Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Level to Week 52 [Baseline , Week 52]

      Adjusted* mean change from baseline in HbA1c achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 52 (Full Analysis Set). HbA1c is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 52 value minus the baseline value.

    6. Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 52 - Moderate Renal Impairment Subgroup [Baseline, Week 52]

      Adjusted* mean change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 52 (Full Analysis Set) for the moderate renal impairment subgroup. FPG is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 52 value minus the baseline value.

    7. Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 52 - Severe Renal Impairment Subgroup [Baseline, Week 52]

      Adjusted* mean change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 52 (Full Analysis Set) for the severe renal impairment subgroup. FPG is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 52 value minus the baseline value.

    8. Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 52 - End-Stage Renal Impairment Subgroup [Baseline, Week 52]

      Adjusted* mean change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 52 (Full Analysis Set) for the end-stage renal impairment subgroup. FPG is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 52 value minus the baseline value.

    9. Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 52 - Moderate Renal Impairment Subgroup [Baseline, Week 52]

      Adjusted* mean change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 52 (Full Analysis Set) for the moderate renal impairment subgroup. FPG is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 52 value minus the baseline value

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes

    • Documented history of CrCl <50 ml/min within the 3 months prior to enrollment

    • HbA1c ≥7.0% and ≤11.0%

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Type 1 diabetes, history of diabetic ketoacidosis or hyposmolar non-ketonic coma

    • Previous or current treatment with any DPP-IV inhibitor and/or GLP-1 mimetic.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Research Site Concord California United States
    2 Research Site Sacramento California United States
    3 Research Site Denver Colorado United States
    4 Research Site Topeka Kansas United States
    5 Research Site Baltimore Maryland United States
    6 Research Site Great Falls Montana United States
    7 Research Site Greenville North Carolina United States
    8 Research Site Morehead City North Carolina United States
    9 Research Site Cincinnati Ohio United States
    10 Research Site Corpus Christi Texas United States
    11 Research Site Charleston West Virginia United States
    12 Research Site Brest Belarus
    13 Research Site Gomel Belarus
    14 Research Site Minsk Belarus
    15 Research Site Dimitrovgrad Bulgaria
    16 Research Site Sofia Bulgaria
    17 Research Site Veliko Tarnovo Bulgaria
    18 Research Site Karlovac Croatia
    19 Research Site Osijek Croatia
    20 Research Site Rijeka Croatia
    21 Research Site Split Croatia
    22 Research Site Zagreb Croatia
    23 Research Site Moravsky Krumlov Czech Republic
    24 Research Site Praha 10 Czech Republic
    25 Research Site Teplice Czech Republic
    26 Research Site Usti Nad Labem Czech Republic
    27 Research Site Znojmo Czech Republic
    28 Research Site Tallinn Estonia
    29 Research Site Dieburg Germany
    30 Research Site Dusseldorf Germany
    31 Research Site Hannover Germany
    32 Research Site Heidelberg Germany
    33 Research Site Mannheim Germany
    34 Research Site Debrecen Hungary
    35 Research Site Gyor Hungary
    36 Research Site Kalocsa Hungary
    37 Research Site Kecskemet Hungary
    38 Research Site Zalaegerszeg Hungary
    39 Research Site Riga Latvia
    40 Research Site Kaunas Lithuania
    41 Research Site Klaipeda Lithuania
    42 Research Site Panevezys Lithuania
    43 Research Site Vilnius Lithuania
    44 Research Site Lodz 90-153 Poland
    45 Research Site Bialystok Poland
    46 Research Site Ciechanow Poland
    47 Research Site Golub Dobrzyn Poland
    48 Research Site Grodzisk Mazowiecki Poland
    49 Research Site Katowice Poland
    50 Research Site Krakow Poland
    51 Research Site Makow Mazowiecki Poland
    52 Research Site Radom Poland
    53 Research Site Szczecin Poland
    54 Research Site Warszawa Poland
    55 Research Site Wroclaw Poland
    56 Research Site Zabrze Poland
    57 Research Site Satu-mare Satu Mare Romania
    58 Research Site Bacau Romania
    59 Research Site Brasov Romania
    60 Research Site Bucharest Romania
    61 Research Site Bucuresti Romania
    62 Research Site Sf Gheorghe Romania
    63 Research Site Chelyabinsk Russian Federation
    64 Research Site Moscow Russian Federation
    65 Research Site Ryazan Russian Federation
    66 Research Site St.petersburg Russian Federation
    67 Research Site Yaroslavl Russian Federation
    68 Research Site Dnipropetrovsk Ukraine
    69 Research Site Ivano-frankivsk Ukraine
    70 Research Site Kharkiv Ukraine
    71 Research Site Kyiv Ukraine
    72 Research Site Mykolayiv Ukraine
    73 Research Site Sumy Ukraine
    74 Research Site Ternopil Ukraine
    75 Research Site Zaporizhzhya Ukraine

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • AstraZeneca
    • Bristol-Myers Squibb

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Peter Ohman, MD, PhD, AstraZeneca
    • Study Chair: Deborah Price, MSc, AstraZeneca

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    , ,
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00614939
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • D1680C00007
    • EudraCT number 2007-004951-12
    First Posted:
    Feb 13, 2008
    Last Update Posted:
    May 19, 2011
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2011

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details
    Pre-assignment Detail A total of 572 participants were enrolled in the study; 561 entered the Lead-in period and 170 patients were randomized and treated.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Saxa
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily oral dose
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 85 85
    COMPLETED 50 42
    NOT COMPLETED 35 43

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Placebo Saxa Total
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily oral dose Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 85 85 170
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    66.2
    (9.08)
    66.8
    (8.27)
    66.5
    (8.66)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    44
    51.8%
    53
    62.4%
    97
    57.1%
    Male
    41
    48.2%
    32
    37.6%
    73
    42.9%
    Baseline Renal Impairment Category (Number) [Number]
    Moderate
    42
    49.4%
    48
    56.5%
    90
    52.9%
    Severe
    23
    27.1%
    18
    21.2%
    41
    24.1%
    End-Stage
    20
    23.5%
    19
    22.4%
    39
    22.9%
    Baseline Diabetes Therapy (participants) [Number]
    Diabetes Therapy
    84
    98.8%
    83
    97.6%
    167
    98.2%
    Insulin
    57
    67.1%
    71
    83.5%
    128
    75.3%
    Oral blood glucose lowering drug
    30
    35.3%
    23
    27.1%
    53
    31.2%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Absolute Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Level to Week 12 Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
    Description Adjusted* mean change from baseline in HbA1c achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set). HbA1c is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 12 value minus the baseline value.
    Time Frame Baseline , Week 12 (LOCF)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment. To be included in analysis: change from baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) for efficacy, subjects must have had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy measurement.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Saxa
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily oral dose
    Measure Participants 83 81
    Baseline
    8.09
    (0.119)
    8.45
    (0.135)
    Week 12
    7.80
    (0.137)
    7.63
    (0.132)
    Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline
    -0.44
    (0.109)
    -0.86
    (0.112)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Saxa
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.007
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments *Adjusted for baseline HbA1c
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -0.42
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -0.71 to -0.12
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 0.151
    Estimation Comments
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 12 (LOCF)- Moderate Renal Impairment Subgroup
    Description Adjusted* mean change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set) for the moderate renal impairment subgroup. FPG is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 12 value minus the baseline value.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment. To be included in analysis: change from baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) for efficacy, subjects must have had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy measurement.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Saxa
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily oral dose
    Measure Participants 40 44
    Baseline
    162.33
    (8.933)
    202.82
    (9.858)
    Week 12
    174.50
    (10.089)
    173.91
    (7.938)
    Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline
    -2.88
    (9.073)
    -15.22
    (8.630)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Saxa
    Comments Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: Due to a statistically significant treatment-by-baseline renal impairment interaction, fasting plasma glucose results were analyzed separately for each baseline renal impairment category.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.339
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments *Adjusted for baseline FPG
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -12.34
    Confidence Interval () 95%
    -37.91 to 13.22
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 12.847
    Estimation Comments
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 12 (LOCF) - Severe Renal Impairment Subgroup
    Description Adjusted* mean change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set) for the severe renal impairment subgroup. FPG is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 12 value minus the baseline value.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment. To be included in analysis: change from baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) for efficacy, subjects must have had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy measurement.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Saxa
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily oral dose
    Measure Participants 23 18
    Baseline
    173.48
    (11.630)
    165.50
    (19.909)
    Week 12
    141.52
    (14.276)
    133.83
    (11.371)
    Adjusted mean change
    -29.91
    (11.212)
    -34.28
    (12.677)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Saxa
    Comments Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: Due to a statistically significant treatment-by-baseline renal impairment interaction, fasting plasma glucose results were analyzed separately for each baseline renal impairment category.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.798
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments *Adjusted for baseline FPG
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -4.36
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -38.65 to 29.93
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 16.938
    Estimation Comments
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 12 (LOCF) - End-Stage Renal Impairment Subgroup
    Description Adjusted* mean change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set) for the end-stage renal impairment subgroup. FPG is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 12 value minus the baseline value.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment. To be included in analysis: change from baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) for efficacy, subjects must have had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy measurement.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Saxa
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily oral dose
    Measure Participants 18 15
    Baseline
    170.39
    (14.518)
    177.07
    (10.638)
    Week 12
    161.11
    (12.624)
    207.60
    (30.515)
    Adjusted mean change
    -11.18
    (20.752)
    32.82
    (22.737)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Saxa
    Comments Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: Due to a statistically significant treatment-by-baseline renal impairment interaction, fasting plasma glucose results were analyzed separately for each baseline renal impairment category.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.164
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments *Adjusted for baseline FPG
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 44.01
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -18.93 to 106.94
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 30.815
    Estimation Comments
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 12 (LOCF) - Moderate Renal Impairment Subgroup
    Description Adjusted* mean change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set) for the moderate renal impairment subgroup. FPG is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 12 value minus the baseline value.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment. To be included in analysis: change from baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) for efficacy, subjects must have had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy measurement.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Saxa
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily oral dose
    Measure Participants 40 44
    Baseline
    9.01
    (0.495)
    11.25
    (0.548)
    Week 12
    9.68
    (0.560)
    9.65
    (0.441)
    Absolute mean change
    -0.16
    (0.504)
    -0.84
    (0.479)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Saxa
    Comments Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: Due to a statistically significant treatment-by-baseline renal impairment interaction, fasting plasma glucose results were analyzed separately for each baseline renal impairment category.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -0.68
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -2.10 to 0.74
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 0.713
    Estimation Comments
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 12 (LOCF) - Severe Renal Impairment Subgroup
    Description Adjusted* mean change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set) for the severe renal impairment subgroup. FPG is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 12 value minus the baseline value.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment. To be included in analysis: change from baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) for efficacy, subjects must have had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy measurement.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Saxa
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily oral dose
    Measure Participants 23 18
    Baseline
    9.63
    (0.646)
    9.17
    (1.105)
    Week 12
    7.86
    (0.793)
    7.43
    (0.632)
    Adjusted mean change
    -1.66
    (0.623)
    -1.89
    (0.704)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Saxa
    Comments Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: Due to a statistically significant treatment-by-baseline renal impairment interaction, fasting plasma glucose results were analyzed separately for each baseline renal impairment category.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -0.24
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -2.14 to 1.67
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 0.941
    Estimation Comments
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 12 (LOCF) - End-Stage Renal Impairment Subgroup
    Description Adjusted* mean change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set) for the end-stage renal impairment subgroup. FPG is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 12 value minus the baseline value.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment. To be included in analysis: change from baseline to Week 12 (LOCF) for efficacy, subjects must have had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy measurement.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Saxa
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily oral dose
    Measure Participants 18 15
    Baseline
    9.46
    (0.807)
    9.83
    (0.591)
    Week 12
    8.94
    (0.700)
    11.52
    (1.692)
    Adjusted mean change
    -0.62
    (1.151)
    1.81
    (1.261)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Saxa
    Comments Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: Due to a statistically significant treatment-by-baseline renal impairment interaction, fasting plasma glucose results were analyzed separately for each baseline renal impairment category.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 2.44
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -1.05 to 5.93
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 1.709
    Estimation Comments
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title Absolute Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Level to Week 52
    Description Adjusted* mean change from baseline in HbA1c achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 52 (Full Analysis Set). HbA1c is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 52 value minus the baseline value.
    Time Frame Baseline , Week 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment. To be included in analysis: change from baseline to Week 52 for efficacy, subjects must have had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy measurement. Data were excluded after changes in oral blood glucose lowering drug or insulin.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Saxa
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily oral dose
    Measure Participants 82 78
    Baseline
    8.10
    (0.120)
    8.44
    (0.134)
    Week 52
    7.93
    (0.173)
    7.41
    (0.138)
    Adjusted mean change
    -0.53
    (0.154)
    -1.35
    (0.174)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Saxa
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -0.82
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -1.27 to -0.37
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 0.228
    Estimation Comments
    9. Secondary Outcome
    Title Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 52 - Moderate Renal Impairment Subgroup
    Description Adjusted* mean change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 52 (Full Analysis Set) for the moderate renal impairment subgroup. FPG is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 52 value minus the baseline value.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment. To be included in analysis: change from baseline to Week 52 for efficacy, subjects must have had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy measurement. Data were excluded after changes in oral blood glucose lowering drug or insulin.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Saxa
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily oral dose
    Measure Participants 40 44
    Baseline
    162.33
    (8.933)
    202.82
    (9.858)
    Week 52
    174.83
    (11.295)
    177.43
    (7.637)
    Adjusted mean change
    3.02
    (13.277)
    -14.96
    (12.873)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Saxa
    Comments Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: Due to a statistically significant treatment-by-baseline renal impairment interaction, fasting plasma glucose results were analyzed separately for each baseline renal impairment category.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -17.98
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -54.28 to 18.33
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 18.475
    Estimation Comments
    10. Secondary Outcome
    Title Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 52 - Severe Renal Impairment Subgroup
    Description Adjusted* mean change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 52 (Full Analysis Set) for the severe renal impairment subgroup. FPG is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 52 value minus the baseline value.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment. To be included in analysis: change from baseline to Week 52 for efficacy, subjects must have had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy measurement. Data were excluded after changes in oral blood glucose lowering drug or insulin.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Saxa
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily oral dose
    Measure Participants 23 18
    Baseline
    173.48
    (11.630)
    165.50
    (19.909)
    Week 52
    151.78
    (9.896)
    139.06
    (12.408)
    Adjusted mean change
    -24.59
    (14.510)
    -40.32
    (20.789)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Saxa
    Comments Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: Due to a statistically significant treatment-by-baseline renal impairment interaction, fasting plasma glucose results were analyzed separately for each baseline renal impairment category.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -15.73
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -65.77 to 34.30
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 25.326
    Estimation Comments
    11. Secondary Outcome
    Title Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 52 - End-Stage Renal Impairment Subgroup
    Description Adjusted* mean change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 52 (Full Analysis Set) for the end-stage renal impairment subgroup. FPG is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 52 value minus the baseline value.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment. To be included in analysis: change from baseline to Week 52 for efficacy, subjects must have had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy measurement. Data were excluded after changes in oral blood glucose lowering drug or insulin.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Saxa
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily oral dose
    Measure Participants 18 15
    Baseline
    170.39
    (14.518)
    177.07
    (10.638)
    Week 52
    161.94
    (13.097)
    214.27
    (31.740)
    Adjusted mean change
    -2.18
    (29.226)
    -40.28
    (45.470)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Saxa
    Comments Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: Due to a statistically significant treatment-by-baseline renal impairment interaction, fasting plasma glucose results were analyzed separately for each baseline renal impairment category.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -38.09
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -144.44 to 68.26
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 53.822
    Estimation Comments
    12. Secondary Outcome
    Title Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 52 - Moderate Renal Impairment Subgroup
    Description Adjusted* mean change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 52 (Full Analysis Set) for the moderate renal impairment subgroup. FPG is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 52 value minus the baseline value
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment. To be included in analysis: change from baseline to Week 52 for efficacy, subjects must have had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy measurement. Data were excluded after changes in oral blood glucose lowering drug or insulin.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Saxa
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily oral dose
    Measure Participants 40 44
    Baseline
    9.01
    (0.495)
    11.25
    (0.548)
    Week 52
    9.70
    (0.627)
    9.85
    (0.424)
    Adjusted mean change
    0.15
    (0.738)
    -0.82
    (0.715)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Saxa
    Comments Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: Due to a statistically significant treatment-by-baseline renal impairment interaction, fasting plasma glucose results were analyzed separately for each baseline renal impairment category.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -0.97
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -2.99 to 1.04
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 1.027
    Estimation Comments
    13. Secondary Outcome
    Title Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 52 - Severe Renal Impairment Subgroup
    Description Adjusted* mean change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 52 (Full Analysis Set) for the severe renal impairment subgroup. FPG is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 52 value minus the baseline value.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment. To be included in analysis: change from baseline to Week 52 for efficacy, subjects must have had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy measurement. Data were excluded after changes in oral blood glucose lowering drug or insulin.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Saxa
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily oral dose
    Measure Participants 23 18
    Baseline
    9.63
    (0.646)
    9.17
    (1.105)
    Week 52
    8.42
    (0.551)
    7.71
    (0.688)
    Adjusted mean change
    -1.37
    (0.805)
    -2.25
    (1.154)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Saxa
    Comments Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: Due to a statistically significant treatment-by-baseline renal impairment interaction, fasting plasma glucose results were analyzed separately for each baseline renal impairment category.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -0.89
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -3.66 to 1.89
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 1.405
    Estimation Comments
    14. Secondary Outcome
    Title Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 52 - End-Stage Renal Impairment Subgroup
    Description Adjusted* mean change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 52 (Full Analysis Set) for the end-stage renal impairment subgroup. FPG is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 52 value minus the baseline value.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 52

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment. To be included in analysis: change from baseline to Week 52 for efficacy, subjects must have had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy measurement. Data were excluded after changes in oral blood glucose lowering drug or insulin.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Saxa
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily oral dose
    Measure Participants 18 15
    Baseline
    9.46
    (0.807)
    9.83
    (0.591)
    Week 52
    8.99
    (0.728)
    11.89
    (1.760)
    Adjusted mean change
    -0.11
    (1.621)
    -2.25
    (2.522)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Saxa
    Comments Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: Due to a statistically significant treatment-by-baseline renal impairment interaction, fasting plasma glucose results were analyzed separately for each baseline renal impairment category.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value -2.14
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -8.04 to 3.76
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 2.985
    Estimation Comments

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Saxa
    Arm/Group Description Placebo Saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily oral dose
    All Cause Mortality
    Placebo Saxa
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Placebo Saxa
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 24/85 (28.2%) 23/85 (27.1%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Cardiac Failure Congestive 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Myocardial Infarction 1/85 (1.2%) 2/85 (2.4%)
    Acute Myocardial Infarction 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Cardiac Arrest 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Atrial Fibrillation 1/85 (1.2%) 0/85 (0%)
    Bifascicular Block 1/85 (1.2%) 0/85 (0%)
    Cardiac Failure 2/85 (2.4%) 0/85 (0%)
    Eye disorders
    Cataract 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Iridocyclitis 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Pseudoexfoliation Of Lens Capsule 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal Pain Upper 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Diarrhoea 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Pancreatitis 1/85 (1.2%) 0/85 (0%)
    Oedema 1/85 (1.2%) 0/85 (0%)
    General disorders
    Oedema Peripheral 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Sudden Death 2/85 (2.4%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Infections and infestations
    Cystitis 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Urinary Tract Infection 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Pyelonephritis Acute 1/85 (1.2%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Urosepsis 1/85 (1.2%) 0/85 (0%)
    Pneumonia 0/85 (0%) 2/85 (2.4%)
    Cellulitis 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Gangrene 1/85 (1.2%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Pyelonephritis 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Infected Skin Ulcer 1/85 (1.2%) 0/85 (0%)
    Lobar Pneumonia 1/85 (1.2%) 0/85 (0%)
    Osteomyelitis 1/85 (1.2%) 0/85 (0%)
    Sepsis 1/85 (1.2%) 0/85 (0%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Upper Limb Fracture 1/85 (1.2%) 0/85 (0%)
    Arteriovenous Fistula Thrombosis 1/85 (1.2%) 0/85 (0%)
    Wound 1/85 (1.2%) 0/85 (0%)
    Arteriovenous Fistula Operation 1/85 (1.2%) 0/85 (0%)
    Investigations
    Alanine Aminotransferase Increased 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Blood Glucose Increased 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Diabetes Mellitus 1/85 (1.2%) 0/85 (0%)
    Hypoglycaemia 2/85 (2.4%) 0/85 (0%)
    Diabetes Mellitus Inadequate Control 1/85 (1.2%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Hyperglycaemia 1/85 (1.2%) 0/85 (0%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Osteochondrosis 1/85 (1.2%) 0/85 (0%)
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Cauda Equina Syndrome 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Cerebrovascular Accident 1/85 (1.2%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Dizziness 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Cerebral Hypoperfusion 1/85 (1.2%) 0/85 (0%)
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Renal Impairment 1/85 (1.2%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Calculus Ureteric 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Renal Failure Chronic 1/85 (1.2%) 0/85 (0%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Dyspnoea 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Interstitial Lung Disease 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Orthopnoea 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Skin Ulcer 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Skin Disorder 1/85 (1.2%) 0/85 (0%)
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertension 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Poor Peripheral Circulation 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Hypertensive crisis 1/85 (1.2%) 0/85 (0%)
    Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease 1/85 (1.2%) 0/85 (0%)
    Arteriovenous Fistula 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Orthostatic Hypotension 0/85 (0%) 1/85 (1.2%)
    Arteriosclerosis 1/85 (1.2%) 0/85 (0%)
    Femoral Artery Occlusion 1/85 (1.2%) 0/85 (0%)
    Peripheral Ischaemia 1/85 (1.2%) 0/85 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Placebo Saxa
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 36/85 (42.4%) 38/85 (44.7%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Anaemia 7/85 (8.2%) 5/85 (5.9%)
    General disorders
    Oedema Peripheral 6/85 (7.1%) 2/85 (2.4%)
    Infections and infestations
    Urinary Tract Infection 3/85 (3.5%) 5/85 (5.9%)
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Hypoglycaemia 25/85 (29.4%) 24/85 (28.2%)
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertension 5/85 (5.9%) 5/85 (5.9%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Gerard Lynch
    Organization AstraZeneca
    Phone
    Email aztrial_results_posting@astrazeneca.com
    Responsible Party:
    , ,
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00614939
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • D1680C00007
    • EudraCT number 2007-004951-12
    First Posted:
    Feb 13, 2008
    Last Update Posted:
    May 19, 2011
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2011