Placebo and Active Controlled Study of Rivoglitazone in Type 2 Diabetes
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a 6-month study to evaluate the effects of monotherapy with rivoglitazone, an insulin sensitizer, on glycemic control in newly identified type 2 diabetics or diabetics not adequately treated with other antidiabetic agents. The study tests rivoglitazone and uses a placebo and active treatment group for comparison.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 |
Study Design
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change in HbA1c []
Secondary Outcome Measures
- FPG, Lipids, hsCRP, Adiponectin []
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Type 2 diabetes in male or female patients
-
Between 18 and 75 years of age
-
With a HbA1c greater than or equal to 7.5% and less than 10.5% at randomization
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Type 1 diabetics or type 2 diabetics currently on insulin therapy
-
Patients unwilling or unable to discontinue their anti-diabetic medication(s)
-
History of ketoacidosis
-
History of therapy with rosiglitazone, troglitazone, pioglitazone
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Birmingham | Alabama | United States | ||
2 | Columbiana | Alabama | United States | ||
3 | Huntsville | Alabama | United States | ||
4 | Muscle Shoals | Alabama | United States | ||
5 | Hot Springs | Arkansas | United States | ||
6 | Jonesboro | Arkansas | United States | ||
7 | Little Rock | Arkansas | United States | ||
8 | Searcy | Arkansas | United States | ||
9 | Sherwood | Arkansas | United States | ||
10 | Los Angeles | California | United States | ||
11 | Moreno Valley | California | United States | ||
12 | Sacramento | California | United States | ||
13 | San Diego | California | United States | ||
14 | San Mateo | California | United States | ||
15 | Santa Monica | California | United States | ||
16 | Torrance | California | United States | ||
17 | Vista | California | United States | ||
18 | West Hills | California | United States | ||
19 | Newark | Delaware | United States | ||
20 | Clearwater | Florida | United States | ||
21 | Cocoa Beach | Florida | United States | ||
22 | Jupiter | Florida | United States | ||
23 | Largo | Florida | United States | ||
24 | Miami | Florida | United States | ||
25 | New Port Richey | Florida | United States | ||
26 | Palm Harbor | Florida | United States | ||
27 | Pembroke Pines | Florida | United States | ||
28 | Tampa | Florida | United States | ||
29 | West Palm Beach | Florida | United States | ||
30 | Warner Robins | Georgia | United States | ||
31 | Chicago | Illinois | United States | ||
32 | Gurnee | Illinois | United States | ||
33 | Evansville | Indiana | United States | ||
34 | Lexington | Kentucky | United States | ||
35 | New Orleans | Louisiana | United States | ||
36 | Detroit | Michigan | United States | ||
37 | Livonia | Michigan | United States | ||
38 | Kansas City | Missouri | United States | ||
39 | Saint Louis | Missouri | United States | ||
40 | Bozeman | Montana | United States | ||
41 | Butte | Montana | United States | ||
42 | Great Falls | Montana | United States | ||
43 | Voorhees | New Jersey | United States | ||
44 | Rochester | New York | United States | ||
45 | Charlotte | North Carolina | United States | ||
46 | Statesville | North Carolina | United States | ||
47 | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | United States | ||
48 | Cincinnati | Ohio | United States | ||
49 | Columbus | Ohio | United States | ||
50 | Marion | Ohio | United States | ||
51 | Clinton | Oklahoma | United States | ||
52 | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | United States | ||
53 | Tulsa | Oklahoma | United States | ||
54 | Medford | Oregon | United States | ||
55 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States | ||
56 | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | United States | ||
57 | Charleston | South Carolina | United States | ||
58 | Simpsonville | South Carolina | United States | ||
59 | Bristol | Tennessee | United States | ||
60 | Carrollton | Texas | United States | ||
61 | Conroe | Texas | United States | ||
62 | Houston | Texas | United States | ||
63 | Midland | Texas | United States | ||
64 | San Antonio | Texas | United States | ||
65 | Spring | Texas | United States | ||
66 | Sugar Land | Texas | United States | ||
67 | Norfolk | Virginia | United States | ||
68 | Richmond | Virginia | United States | ||
69 | Virginia Beach | Virginia | United States | ||
70 | Lakewood | Washington | United States | ||
71 | Olympia | Washington | United States | ||
72 | Renton | Washington | United States | ||
73 | Spokane | Washington | United States | ||
74 | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | United States |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- CS0011-203