The Use of Over-the-scope-clip for Prevention of Rebleeding in High Risk Peptic Ulcers
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Non-variceal acute gastrointestinal bleeding is a common and potentially life-threatening problem. The conventional treatment of this condition is for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) for haemostasis. Treatment methods include heater probe, clipping and injection of adrenaline. Recently, a new device called the Over-the-scope clip (OTSC) has been device to treat perforations and bleeding in the gastrointestinal tract. Therefore, the aim of the study is to compare between the treatment outcomes between OTSC and conventional endoscopic haemostatic methods in ulcers that are of high risk for rebleeding.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a common and potentially life-threatening condition. Non-variceal bleeding accounts for more than 80-90% of the cause with gastroduodenal peptic ulcer being the major cause. Endoscopic haemostasis has significantly improved the outcome of these patients. Recurrent bleeding remains one of the most important predictors of mortality. Previous studies have identified ulcers that are high risk for rebleeding.
Conventionally, endoscopic haemostasis is achieved by injection therapy, thermocoagulation or mechanical therapy such as haemostatic clips. However, there are limitations to thermo-coagulation and conventional haemostatic clips. Over the past few years, a novel endoscopic clipping device, the Over-The-Scope Clip (OTSC; Oversco Endoscopy AG, Tübingen, Germany) has become available. The device provides a robust and strong tissue apposition. The system was developed to close perforations and treat bleeding in the gastrointestinal tract. In chronic ulcers, an anchor device can be used to pull the ulcer base toward the aspiration cap to facilitate accurate clip application. With a larger jaw width and greater strength, the OTSC is expected to have superior haemostatic properties when compared to hemo-clips. Case series have been published on the clinical experience of OTSC on gastrointestinal bleeding with promising results.
Therefore, in this randomised controlled trial, we aim to compare the efficacy of the OTSC to standard endoscopic therapy in primary treatment of patients with peptic ulcer bleeding that are of high-risk for rebleeding. The hypothesis is that the use OTSC can significantly decrease the rebleeding rate in this group of patients.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Over-the-scope clip The patient would receive an esophagogastroduodenoscope to identify the bleeding source. The endoscopist can decided whether to pre inject the ulcer with adrenaline. Then the OTSC is used for haemostasis. |
Device: Over-the-scope clip (OTSC)
The device provides a robust and strong tissue apposition. The system was developed to close perforations and treat bleeding in the gastrointestinal tract. In chronic ulcers, an anchor device can be used to pull the ulcer base toward the aspiration cap to facilitate accurate clip application. Endoscopic haemostasis would be achieved with the use of this device and/or injection of adrenaline
|
| Active Comparator: Conventional endoscopic haemostasis The patient would receive an esophagogastroduodenoscope to identify the bleeding source. Haemostasis will be performed in the conventional way, either using heater probe, endoscopic clips and/or injection of adrenaline |
Device: Conventional Endoscopic Haemostasis
This includes the use of heater probe, endoscopic clipping and injection of adrenaline for endoscopic haemostasis
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- The number of cases that develop clinical rebleeding [Within 30 days of therapy]
Clinical rebleeding is defined as fresh hematemesis, fresh melena or hematochezia and signs of hypovolemic shock (systolic blood pressure of <90mmHg and pulse rate >110 per minute) and/or a drop in hemoglobin of > 2 g/dl per 24 hours despite adequate transfusion. Rebleeding would be confirmed by an immediate endoscopy showing fresh blood in stomach or active bleeding from a previously seen ulcer. A clinical rebleeding will be independently reviewed by an adjudication panel.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Number of cases that died [within 30 days of therapy]
Death from all causes within 30 days of therapy
- Number of units of blood transfusion required in each patient [within 30 days of therapy]
Number of units of blood transfusion required in each patient within 30 days of therapy
- Hospital stay [up to one year]
Hospital stay for the episode of bleeding
- Number of cases with failure of achieving primary haemostasis [Within 30 days of therapy]
The number of cases with failure of achieving primary haemostasis. Failure of primary haemostasis is defined by the inability to achieve haemostasis during the index endoscopy.
- The number of cases requiring further interventions such as repeat endoscopy, surgery or transarterial embolization [Within 30 days of therapy]
The number of cases requiring further interventions such as repeat endoscopy, surgery or transarterial embolization
- Hospital costs [Up to one year]
The total direct costs required for the hospital admission for the episode of bleeding measured in Hong Kong dollars
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Actively bleeding peptic ulcers (Forrest Ia, Ib), ulcers with non-bleeding visible vessel or Forrest IIa ulcer (defined as protuberant discoloration, or ulcers with an initial clot and upon irrigation shows a vessel) AND
-
Ulcer size ≥ 1.5 cm as determined by an opened biopsy forceps;
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Patients aged below 18
-
Peptic ulcer with concomitant perforation
-
Tumor bleeding
-
Variceal bleeding
-
Patients who are pregnant or lactating
-
Moribund patients or patients with terminal malignancy or end-stage non-malignant conditions, in whom life expectancy is less than 30 days
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Prince of Wales Hospital | Hong Kong | Hong Kong | 00000 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Chinese University of Hong Kong
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Shannon M Chan, MBCHB, FRCS, Chinese University of Hong Kong
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 2016.711-T