Is Diverting Loop Ileostomy Necessary in Completion Proctectomy With Ileal Pouch Anal- Anastomosis: A Multicentre, Randomized Study of the GETAID Chirurgie Group. IDEAL Trial

Sponsor
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03872271
Collaborator
(none)
194
1
2
52
3.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Defunctioning ileostomy has demonstrated its benefits (rate and seriousness of anastomotic leakage) in cancer for low colorectal and coloanal anastomoses, whereas there are no such good quality evidences in case of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) performed for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, most surgical teams do protect systematically IPAA by an ileostomy.

Total proctocolectomy with IPAA is the gold standard for surgical management of ulcerative colitis (UC). This demanding procedure is often performed in 2 or 3 stages, namely subtotal colectomy, completion proctectomy with IPAA and defunctioning ileostomy closure. Subtotal colectomy with double stoma is first performed to allow nutritional support, reduce inflammation and stop immunosuppressive agents. Completion proctectomy with IPAA is then performed on a healthier patient. Hence, the need for a systematic defunctioning ileostomy is questioned. No study addressed specifically the question of completion proctectomy, whereas it concerns 36% to 42% of patients undergoing IPAA. Globally, the overall 6-month morbidity rate is 55% in case of stoma creation vs. 30% otherwise in IPAA.

Moreover, defunctioning ileostomy has several drawbacks including an additional surgical procedure (stoma closure), a worse quality of life before closure, and the risk of dehydration that may require readmission. Following stoma closure, the risk of anastomotic leakage is around 4%. Overall, during the stoma period, 8% of patients will require reoperation. Finally, the risk of incisional hernia is 15-20% at the ex-ileostomy site.

Therefore, the aim of this trial is to assess the need for a systematic defunctioning ileostomy after completion proctectomy with IPAA.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with diverting loop ileastomy
  • Procedure: ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with diverting loop ileastomy
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
194 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Is Diverting Loop Ileostomy Necessary in Completion Proctectomy With Ileal Pouch Anal- Anastomosis: A Multicentre, Randomized Study of the GETAID Chirurgie Group. IDEAL Trial
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Aug 31, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Experimental

ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without diverting loop ileostomy

Procedure: ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with diverting loop ileastomy
Defunctioning ileostomy has demonstrated its benefits (rate and seriousness of anastomotic leakage) in cancer for low colorectal and coloanal anastomoses, whereas there are no such good quality evidences in case of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) performed for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, most surgical teams do protect systematically IPAA by an ileostomy.

Active Comparator: Control

ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy

Procedure: ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with diverting loop ileastomy
Defunctioning ileostomy has demonstrated its benefits (rate and seriousness of anastomotic leakage) in cancer for low colorectal and coloanal anastomoses, whereas there are no such good quality evidences in case of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) performed for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, most surgical teams do protect systematically IPAA by an ileostomy.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. 6-month global postoperative morbidity [6 months]

    Number and qualification of surgical and medical complications that may require redmission during the 6 months following the operative procedure: SBO ileostomy prolapse parastomial hernia dehydration skin erosions, that may require readmission anastomotic leakage incisional hernia.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • patients aged ≥ 18 years,

  • patients presenting with ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis requiring completion proctectomy

  • patients who have given informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:
  • indication for total proctocolectomy in one-stage or traditional 2-stage fashion

  • Crohn's disease,

  • pelvic radiotherapy,

  • indication for total mésorectum excision

  • vulnerable patient under the French laws

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille Marseille France 13354

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille

Investigators

  • Study Director: EMILIE GARRIDO PRADALIE, AP-HM

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03872271
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2019-04
  • 2019-A00687-50
First Posted:
Mar 13, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Mar 13, 2019
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 13, 2019