Comparing an Inexpensive Handheld Ultrasound Machine and a Large Mobile Ultrasound System

Sponsor
Yale University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03764111
Collaborator
(none)
60
1
26.3
2.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

To assess the quality of images and diagnostic ability of a handheld device under two thousand dollars against those of a bigger and more expensive ultrasound machine.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Large Mobile Ultrasound System
  • Device: Handheld Ultrasound Machine

Detailed Description

Ultrasound technology is frequently used to obtain information, usually at patients bedside. The images obtained are used to guide procedure (i.e central line placement, epidural needle guidance) or to make diagnosis (i.e abnormal placentation, presence of pneumothorax). Given that the majority of this procedures and diagnosis are made at bedside, the ideal ultrasound machine should be portable, lightweight, and within an acceptable price range. Our current ultrasound machine (Sonosite - M turbo) has a price range from 15,000-20,000 dollars, not including the different probes that are needed to obtain images at different depths in the human body. Much of the cost is due to the ultrasound transducers, which have been traditionally based on piezoelectric technology. Such probes work by passing current through a piezoelectric crystal (typically quartz) that then vibrates rapidly and generates an ultrasound pulse. Creating crystal arrays is difficult and often requires hand-manufacturing. Furthermore, this technology is analog and requires downstream analog-to-digital processing hardware. Together, these characteristics increase device costs and restrict the broader dissemination of ultrasound technology.

Recently, the Butterfly iQ company created an ultrasound that is portable and at a price of slightly under two thousand dollars it allows the physician to obtain images for diagnostic and/or procedural guidance using a single probe. The company was able to significantly reduced the cost and the need for additional probes by utilizing Capacitive micro-machined ultrasound transducers (CMUTs). Essentially instead of relying on the use of specific piezoelectric crystals (current ultrasound technology), they are using a micro-chip technology to emit the vibrations that would be used to form an image. Butterfly Network has developed a CMUT imaging device that has been designed to be compliant with all applicable FDA safety regulations (see section II.C), while enabling increased portability and real-time smartphone-based image review due to the integrated circuit design. The Butterfly device was FDA-approved as of October 2017. The proposed study will compare the images acquired by the Butterfly iQ and our current Sonosite M-turbo US.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
60 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Ultrasound Image Quality Comparison Between an Inexpensive Handheld Ultrasound Machine and a Large Mobile Ultrasound System
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 23, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Nov 11, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 30, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
large mobile ultrasound system

the ultrasound transducer is based on piezoelectric technology.

Device: Large Mobile Ultrasound System
30 spine images, 15 Transverse abdominis muscle and 30 Obstetric images (i.e placenta, uterine blood flow, etc) images will be obtained using the large mobile ultrasound system.
Other Names:
  • Sonosite - M turbo
  • handheld ultrasound machine

    The handheld device utilizes Capacitive micro-machined ultrasound transducers (CMUTs) instead of piezoelectric technology

    Device: Handheld Ultrasound Machine
    30 spine images, 15 Transverse abdominis muscle and 30 Obstetric images (i.e placenta, uterine blood flow, etc) images will be obtained using the handheld device.
    Other Names:
  • Butterfly iQ device
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Ultrasound image quality-resolution [Prior to start of active labor or before elective cesarean delivery]

      Images will be rated on a 10-point Likert-type scale; higher scores indicate better image quality.

    2. Ultrasound image quality-details [Prior to start of active labor or before elective cesarean delivery]

      Images will be rated on a 10-point Likert-type scale; higher scores indicate better image quality.

    3. Ultrasound image quality-total image quality [Prior to start of active labor or before elective cesarean delivery]

      Images will be rated on a 10-point Likert-type scale; higher scores indicate better image quality.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 45 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Female
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Patients needing a routine obstetric scan or requesting a transverse abdominis block, labor epidural or spinal for cesarean delivery.
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Body Mass Index (BMI) > 45

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Yale University New Haven Connecticut United States 06510

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Yale University

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Antonio Gonzalez, MD, Yale University

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Yale University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03764111
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 2000024151
    First Posted:
    Dec 4, 2018
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 22, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    Yes
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    Yes

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jul 22, 2021