Reducing Inequities in Care of Hypertension, Lifestyle Improvement for Everyone (RICH LIFE Project)

Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02674464
Collaborator
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (NIH), Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (Other)
1,820
1
2
53.9
33.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The RICH LIFE Project is a two-armed, cluster-randomized trial, comparing the effectiveness of an enhanced standard of care arm, "Standard of Care Plus" (SCP), to a multi-level intervention, "Collaborative Care/Stepped Care" (CC/SC), in improving blood pressure control, patient activation and reducing disparities in blood pressure control among 1,890 adult patients with uncontrolled hypertension and cardiovascular disease risk factors at thirty primary care practices in Maryland and Pennsylvania. Fifteen practices randomized to the SCP arm receive standardized blood pressure measurement training, and audit and feedback of blood pressure control rates at the practice provider level. Fifteen practices in the CC/SC arm receive all the SCP interventions plus the implementation of the collaborative care model with additional stepped-care components of community health worker referrals and subspecialist curbside consults and an on-going virtual workshop for organizational leaders in quality improvement and disparities reduction. The primary clinical outcomes are the percent of patients with blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg and change from baseline in mean systolic blood pressure at 12 months. The primary patient reported outcome is change from baseline in self-reported patient activation at 12 months.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Provider Audit-Feedback, Stratified by Race and Ethnicity
  • Behavioral: Blood Pressure Measurement Standardization
  • Behavioral: System Level Leadership Intervention
  • Behavioral: Collaborative Care Team Intervention
  • Behavioral: Community Health Worker Referral
  • Behavioral: Specialist Care Consultation
N/A

Detailed Description

The investigators refined research aim is to determine if a clinic-based collaborative care team, including a community health worker (CHW) to deliver community-based contextualized care, reduces disparities in blood pressure control rates, lowers cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, and improves outcomes among patients with hypertension and other common comorbid conditions when compared to standard of care health system approaches to CVD risk management, including audit and feedback and staff and provider training.

Collaborative care includes care coordination and care management; regular and proactive monitoring and treatment to target specific patient needs using validated clinical tools and rating scales; and regular systematic caseload reviews by the care team and consultation with experts for patients who do not show clinical improvement. A typical collaborative care team includes the primary care provider, nurse care manager or coordinator, and other members of the clinic staff involved in patient care.

Intervention protocols are designed to address common comorbidities (diabetes, hyperlipidemia, depression and coronary heart disease), lifestyle factors (dietary intake, physical activity, and smoking) and medication adherence. The intensive intervention treats the "whole" patient, driven by individual patient goals and priorities, as opposed to the standard of care, which typically focuses on individual conditions. This proposed study responds directly to patient desires to feel more equipped to be involved in their care and manage multiple conditions that contribute to CVD. The investigators have worked successfully in the past with a broad range of stakeholders, including community members, patients, providers, and payors, and will continue to engage them through the research and dissemination process.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
1820 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparative Effectiveness of Health System vs. Multilevel Interventions to Reduce Hypertension Disparities
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Feb 28, 2022
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 28, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard of Care Plus

The standard of care plus arm will include audit and feedback of blood pressure control rates at the provider level along with web-based training about: 1) barriers to blood pressure and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors management in at-risk patient populations; 2) strategies to address healthcare disparities in clinical settings; and 3) appropriate blood pressure (BP) measurement techniques for all clinical staff. The Hopkins research team will help clinics develop audit and feedback mechanisms if they are lacking and will provide all blood pressure measurement and web-based training.

Behavioral: Provider Audit-Feedback, Stratified by Race and Ethnicity
Transparent and timely access to and review of clinical performance data are among the key elements of successful improvement activities. The RICH LIFE Project provides the health systems with the logic to build practice and provider level hypertension (HTN) dashboards, support in building the dashboard, and education in utilizing the dashboard. The practice dashboard provides a display of the percentage of patients achieving BP control, defined as <140/90 mm Hg for the overall practice, while the provider dashboard provides a display of the percentage of patients achieving BP control for each provider's patient panel. Both the practice and provider Dashboards stratify hypertension performance data by race (White, non-Hispanic; Black, non-Hispanic; and All Hispanic) to help practice administration and clinicians evaluate differences between races and ethnicities in BP control rates. New reports are generated at least quarterly and will display data from the previous 3 months.
Other Names:
  • Stratified Hypertension Dashboard
  • Behavioral: Blood Pressure Measurement Standardization
    All adult medicine staff at participating study practices receive standardized, evidence-based, best practices BP measurement training. Aspects of the training include proper patient preparation and positioning, how use of an automated BP measurement device, and executing a "screen and confirm" protocol when measuring patients' blood pressures.

    Experimental: Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC)

    The CC/SC arm includes: -BP training -Audit and feedback dashboard, data stratified by race, ethnicity, payor status -A 4 hour workshop for organizational leaders in quality improvement and disparities reduction, with follow up meetings for problem-solving and support, and web-based, patient-centered communication skills training program for providers and staff -Support and guidance in establishing collaborative care model (CCM): team-based care targeting health behaviors and medication adherence. The primary care provider (PCP), care manager, CHW, and specialists in: medication management, psychosocial/behavioral, and self-management will make up the CCM team -Community health workers (CHW) working on contextualized patient interactions focused on problem-solving skills and patient self-management. CHWs will visit their patients in their homes and communities -Provider access to on-call specialists for help with patients who do not achieve BP control under the CC/SC

    Behavioral: Provider Audit-Feedback, Stratified by Race and Ethnicity
    Transparent and timely access to and review of clinical performance data are among the key elements of successful improvement activities. The RICH LIFE Project provides the health systems with the logic to build practice and provider level hypertension (HTN) dashboards, support in building the dashboard, and education in utilizing the dashboard. The practice dashboard provides a display of the percentage of patients achieving BP control, defined as <140/90 mm Hg for the overall practice, while the provider dashboard provides a display of the percentage of patients achieving BP control for each provider's patient panel. Both the practice and provider Dashboards stratify hypertension performance data by race (White, non-Hispanic; Black, non-Hispanic; and All Hispanic) to help practice administration and clinicians evaluate differences between races and ethnicities in BP control rates. New reports are generated at least quarterly and will display data from the previous 3 months.
    Other Names:
  • Stratified Hypertension Dashboard
  • Behavioral: Blood Pressure Measurement Standardization
    All adult medicine staff at participating study practices receive standardized, evidence-based, best practices BP measurement training. Aspects of the training include proper patient preparation and positioning, how use of an automated BP measurement device, and executing a "screen and confirm" protocol when measuring patients' blood pressures.

    Behavioral: System Level Leadership Intervention
    This System-Level Leadership intervention aims to create a learning network through an inter-organizational approach to promote health equity and reduce CVD disparities. Elements of the system-level leadership intervention, then, include: 1) an introductory session during the kick-off event (baseline); 2) a quarterly 1 hour "content call" with a presentation on leading for equity and discussion among system-level leaders, community organization leaders, and interested practice champions in the CC/Stepped care arm conducted via conference call/webinar; and 3) monthly "coaching calls" for the system and practice level leaders, CMs, and CHWs in the CC/stepped care arm to discuss the interventions, while they are actively engaged in the intervention phase.

    Behavioral: Collaborative Care Team Intervention
    The collaborative care intervention creates a collaborative care team that, at a minimum, consists of PCP, nurse, or social worker care manager, and community health worker. The collaborative care team develops the medical management plan in partnership with patients; 2) uses care coordination to maximize interaction of the patients' PCPs with other care providers addressing medication management, patient self-management, and psychosocial support on a regular, consistent basis; and 3) determines patient access to CHW support and subspecialty consultations.
    Other Names:
  • Collaborative Care Model
  • Behavioral: Community Health Worker Referral
    As a "stepped up" component of the Collaborative Care Team Intervention for patients needing support in overcoming a variety of social determinants

    Behavioral: Specialist Care Consultation
    As a "stepped up" component of the Collaborative Care Team Intervention for patients with complex medical conditions and/or patients that may not typically have access to specialist care

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Number of Participants With Controlled Blood Pressure [12 months]

      Number of participants with Controlled Blood Pressure (<140/90 mm Hg).

    2. Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) [Baseline, 12 months]

      The Patient Activation Measure assesses knowledge, skills, and confidence in the management of one's health. It is comprised of 13 items and each item is on a 1-5 scale. Insignia health scores on a standardized overall score of 0-100 where higher scores indicate a better outcome.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Mean Systolic Blood Pressure [Baseline, 12 months]

      Mean Systolic Blood Pressure in mm Hg at baseline and 12 months.

    2. Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure [Baseline, 12 months]

      Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure in mm Hg at baseline and 12 months.

    3. Change in Global Framingham Risk Score [Baseline, 12, 24 months]

      Clinical Outcome

    4. Change in Mean Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) [Baseline, 12, 24 months]

      Clinical Outcome

    5. Change in Mean LDL-C (mg/dL) [Baseline, 12, 24 months]

      Clinical Outcome

    6. Change in Mean HDL (mg/dL) [Baseline, 12, 24 months]

      Clinical Outcome

    7. % With Controlled Total Cholesterol [Baseline]

      Clinical Outcome

    8. % With Controlled Total Cholesterol [12 months]

      Clinical Outcome

    9. % With Controlled Total Cholesterol [24 months]

      Clinical Outcome

    10. Change in Mean Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Hemoglobin A1c) [Baseline, 12, 24 months]

      Clinical Outcome

    11. % With Hemoglobin A1c< 7.0 [Baseline]

      Clinical Outcome

    12. % With Hemoglobin A1c< 7.0 [12 months]

      Clinical Outcome

    13. % With Hemoglobin A1c< 7.0 [24 months]

      Clinical Outcome

    14. Change in Patient Assessment of Care for Chronic Conditions (PACIC-Plus) [Baseline, 12, 24 months]

      Patient Reported Outcome

    15. % With BP <140/90 mmHg [24 months]

      Clinical Outcome

    16. % With BP <130/80 mmHg [12 months]

      Clinical Outcome

    17. % With BP <130/80 mmHg [24 months]

      Clinical Outcome

    18. % With BP <120/80 mmHg [12 months]

      Clinical Outcome

    19. % With BP <120/80 mmHg [24 months]

      Clinical Outcome

    20. Change in Medication Adherence 4-Item Scale [Baseline, 12, 24 months]

      Patient Reported Outcome

    21. Change in Depressive Symptoms Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) 8 Score [Baseline 12, 24 months]

      Patient Reported Outcome

    22. Change in Patient Ratings of Trust [Baseline, 12, 24 months]

      Patient Reported Outcome

    23. Change in Hypertension Knowledge and Attitudes [Baseline, 12, 24 months]

      Patient Reported Outcome

    24. Change in Health Related Quality of Life (PROMIS Global Scale) [Baseline, 12, 24 months]

      Patient Reported Outcome

    25. Change in Patient Attainment of Self-Defined Goals [Baseline, 12, 24 months]

      Patient Reported Outcome

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    21 Years to 100 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Adult patients (≥21 years of age) obtaining primary care from a provider at a participating practice

    2. A diagnosis of hypertension or SBP≥140mmHg or DBP≥90mmHg twice in the past year or on antihypertensive medications plus at least one of the following CVD risk factors:

    • Diabetes mellitus (fasting blood sugar> 125mg/dl or hemoglobin A1c>6.5 or on a hypoglycemic medication);

    • Dyslipidemia (LDL >130 mg/dl, HDL<40 or total cholesterol >200 or on a lipid lowering agent);

    • Coronary heart disease

    • Current tobacco smokers

    • Depression by International Classification of Disease, 9th edition (ICD-9), codes or Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) score >9

    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. Cardiovascular event (unstable angina, myocardial infarction) within the past 6 months

    2. Serious medical condition which either limits life expectancy or requires active management (e.g., certain cancers)

    3. Condition which interferes with outcome measurement (e.g., dialysis)

    4. Pregnant or planning a pregnancy during study period. Nursing mothers would need approval from physician.

    5. Alcohol or substance use disorder if not sober/abstinent for ≥30 days

    6. Planning to leave clinic within 6 months or move out of geographic area within 18 months

    7. Individuals with cognitive impairment or other condition which makes them unable to participate in the intervention

    8. Participating in another lifestyle modification, weight reduction, or treatment trial

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland United States 21205

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Johns Hopkins University
    • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
    • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Lisa Cooper, MD, MPH, Johns Hopkins University
    • Principal Investigator: Jill Marsteller, PhD, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Johns Hopkins University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02674464
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • IRB00085630
    • UH3HL130688
    First Posted:
    Feb 4, 2016
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 1, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Jun 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details Using eligibility criteria, the study biostatistician screened participating health systems' electronic medical record (EMR) data to identify potentially eligible patients. Only patients seen within 6 months prior to the recruitment data pull were assessed for eligibility. Trained study staff recruited participants between August 1, 2017, and October 31, 2019. The baseline blood pressure measurement was included in the recruitment data.
    Pre-assignment Detail Participants were considered enrolled upon completing the baseline survey. Whenever possible, trained study staff administered the baseline survey immediately after obtaining consent to participate.
    Arm/Group Title Standard of Care Plus Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC)
    Arm/Group Description Practices in the Standard of Care Plus (SCP) comparator group received interventions designed to reinforce and standardize evidence-based hypertension care best practices across both intervention and comparator practices. The "plus" in the standard care arm included integration of proper BP measurement techniques, hypertension care best practices, and audit and feedback of hypertension control performance, as "usual care" at each practice. Additionally, health-system- and practice-level leaders at SCP practices participated in a system-level leadership engagement intervention consisting of quarterly, one-hour calls. The intensive Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC) arm includes all components of the SCP arm and plus the establishment of a practice-based collaborative care team with a stepped-care approach; quarterly hypertension dashboard education and training; and twice quarterly "coaching calls" for system- and practice-level leaders, care managers (CM), and community health workers (CHWs) the CC/SC arm to discuss the interventions during their active intervention phase. In the CC/SC approach, treatment for patients with prolonged uncontrolled hypertension is enhanced by adding a care manager and a community health worker (CHW) to deliver community-based contextualized care, or consultation with a panel of sub-specialists, or both, as necessary, to improve patient-centered outcomes and reduce disparities in hypertension control.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 927 893
    6 Month Follow-up 771 806
    COMPLETED 790 733
    NOT COMPLETED 137 160

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Standard of Care Plus (SCP) Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC) Total
    Arm/Group Description Practices in the Standard of Care Plus (SCP) comparator group received interventions designed to reinforce and standardize evidence-based hypertension care best practices across both intervention and comparator practices. The "plus" in the standard care arm included integration of proper BP measurement techniques, hypertension care best practices, and audit and feedback of hypertension control performance, as "usual care" at each practice. Additionally, health-system- and practice-level leaders at SCP practices participated in a system-level leadership engagement intervention consisting of quarterly, one-hour calls. The intensive Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC) arm includes all components of the SCP arm and plus the establishment of a practice-based collaborative care team with a stepped-care approach; quarterly hypertension dashboard education and training; and twice quarterly "coaching calls" for system- and practice-level leaders, care managers (CM), and community health workers (CHWs) the CC/SC arm to discuss the interventions during their active intervention phase. In the CC/SC approach, treatment for patients with prolonged uncontrolled hypertension is enhanced by adding a care manager and a community health worker (CHW) to deliver community-based contextualized care, or consultation with a panel of sub-specialists, or both, as necessary, to improve patient-centered outcomes and reduce disparities in hypertension control. Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 927 893 1820
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    60.7
    (12.1)
    59.9
    (11.7)
    60.3
    (11.9)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    534
    57.6%
    547
    61.3%
    1081
    59.4%
    Male
    393
    42.4%
    346
    38.7%
    739
    40.6%
    Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
    Hispanic or Latino
    130
    14%
    42
    4.7%
    172
    9.5%
    Not Hispanic or Latino
    797
    86%
    851
    95.3%
    1648
    90.5%
    Unknown or Not Reported
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
    American Indian or Alaska Native
    0
    0%
    4
    0.4%
    4
    0.2%
    Asian
    1
    0.1%
    0
    0%
    1
    0.1%
    Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Black or African American
    463
    49.9%
    566
    63.4%
    1029
    56.5%
    White
    359
    38.7%
    279
    31.2%
    638
    35.1%
    More than one race
    30
    3.2%
    25
    2.8%
    55
    3%
    Unknown or Not Reported
    74
    8%
    19
    2.1%
    93
    5.1%
    Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants)
    United States
    927
    100%
    893
    100%
    1820
    100%
    Education, highest degree (Count of Participants)
    Less than high school diploma
    156
    16.8%
    177
    19.8%
    333
    18.3%
    High school diploma/GED
    434
    46.8%
    428
    47.9%
    862
    47.4%
    Some college
    113
    12.2%
    105
    11.8%
    218
    12%
    Bachelor's degree
    115
    12.4%
    103
    11.5%
    218
    12%
    Graduate degree
    105
    11.3%
    77
    8.6%
    182
    10%
    Missing (refused)
    4
    0.4%
    3
    0.3%
    7
    0.4%
    Medicaid (Count of Participants)
    Yes
    218
    23.5%
    264
    29.6%
    482
    26.5%
    No
    703
    75.8%
    624
    69.9%
    1327
    72.9%
    Missing
    6
    0.6%
    5
    0.6%
    11
    0.6%
    Systolic Blood Pressure (mm Hg) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [mm Hg]
    151.9
    (11.7)
    152.7
    (12.9)
    152.3
    (12.1)
    Diastolic Blood Pressure (mm Hg) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [mm Hg]
    84.4
    (11.7)
    86.6
    (12.9)
    85.5
    (12.3)
    Diabetes (Count of Participants)
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    429
    46.3%
    392
    43.9%
    821
    45.1%
    Hyperlipidemia (Count of Participants)
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    700
    75.5%
    646
    72.3%
    1346
    74%
    Coronary heart disease (Count of Participants)
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    149
    16.1%
    110
    12.3%
    259
    14.2%
    Depression (Count of Participants)
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    263
    28.4%
    256
    28.7%
    519
    28.5%
    Smoker (Count of Participants)
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    267
    28.8%
    280
    31.4%
    547
    30.1%
    Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) (score on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
    65.4
    (16.2)
    66.7
    (15.9)
    66.0
    (16.1)

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Controlled Blood Pressure
    Description Number of participants with Controlled Blood Pressure (<140/90 mm Hg).
    Time Frame 12 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    We received BP data on 750 patients in the SCP arm and on 754 patients in the CC/SC arm from EMR's.
    Arm/Group Title Standard of Care Plus (SCP) Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC)
    Arm/Group Description Practices in the Standard of Care Plus (SCP) comparator group received interventions designed to reinforce and standardize evidence-based hypertension care best practices across both intervention and comparator practices. The "plus" in the standard care arm included integration of proper BP measurement techniques, hypertension care best practices, and audit and feedback of hypertension control performance, as "usual care" at each practice. Additionally, health-system- and practice-level leaders at SCP practices participated in a system-level leadership engagement intervention consisting of quarterly, one-hour calls. The intensive Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC) arm includes all components of the SCP arm and plus the establishment of a practice-based collaborative care team with a stepped-care approach; quarterly hypertension dashboard education and training; and twice quarterly "coaching calls" for system- and practice-level leaders, care managers (CM), and community health workers (CHWs) the CC/SC arm to discuss the interventions during their active intervention phase. In the CC/SC approach, treatment for patients with prolonged uncontrolled hypertension is enhanced by adding a care manager and a community health worker (CHW) to deliver community-based contextualized care, or consultation with a panel of sub-specialists, or both, as necessary, to improve patient-centered outcomes and reduce disparities in hypertension control.
    Measure Participants 750 754
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    462
    49.8%
    442
    49.5%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Standard of Care Plus (SCP), Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC)
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.68
    Comments The a priori threshold for statistical significance was <0.05.
    Method Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE)
    Comments Assuming an exchangeable correlation structure
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
    Estimated Value 0.90
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.62 to 1.30
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments CC/SC arm compared to the SCP arm.
    2. Primary Outcome
    Title Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13)
    Description The Patient Activation Measure assesses knowledge, skills, and confidence in the management of one's health. It is comprised of 13 items and each item is on a 1-5 scale. Insignia health scores on a standardized overall score of 0-100 where higher scores indicate a better outcome.
    Time Frame Baseline, 12 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    790 patients in the SCP arm completed the follow-up survey at 12-months, but 1 patient did not complete the PAM-13 (primary patient-reported outcome) questions in the survey resulting in 789 patients in the sample. 733 patients in the CC/SC arm competed the follow-up survey at 12-months, but 2 patients did not complete the PAM-13 (primary patient-reported outcome) questions in the survey resulting in 731 patients in the sample.
    Arm/Group Title Standard of Care Plus (SCP) Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC)
    Arm/Group Description Practices in the Standard of Care Plus (SCP) comparator group received interventions designed to reinforce and standardize evidence-based hypertension care best practices across both intervention and comparator practices. The "plus" in the standard care arm included integration of proper BP measurement techniques, hypertension care best practices, and audit and feedback of hypertension control performance, as "usual care" at each practice. Additionally, health-system- and practice-level leaders at SCP practices participated in a system-level leadership engagement intervention consisting of quarterly, one-hour calls. The intensive Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC) arm includes all components of the SCP arm and plus the establishment of a practice-based collaborative care team with a stepped-care approach; quarterly hypertension dashboard education and training; and twice quarterly "coaching calls" for system- and practice-level leaders, care managers (CM), and community health workers (CHWs) the CC/SC arm to discuss the interventions during their active intervention phase. In the CC/SC approach, treatment for patients with prolonged uncontrolled hypertension is enhanced by adding a care manager and a community health worker (CHW) to deliver community-based contextualized care, or consultation with a panel of sub-specialists, or both, as necessary, to improve patient-centered outcomes and reduce disparities in hypertension control.
    Measure Participants 789 731
    Baseline
    65.4
    66.1
    12 months
    66.7
    67.9
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Standard of Care Plus (SCP), Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC)
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.60
    Comments The a priori threshold for statistical significance was <0.05.
    Method Mixed Effects Regression
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
    Estimated Value 0.49
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -1.32 to 2.30
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments CC/SC arm was compared to the SCP arm.
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Mean Systolic Blood Pressure
    Description Mean Systolic Blood Pressure in mm Hg at baseline and 12 months.
    Time Frame Baseline, 12 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    We received BP data on 750 patients in the SCP arm and on 754 patients in the CC/SC arm from EMR's.
    Arm/Group Title Standard of Care Plus (SCP) Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC)
    Arm/Group Description Practices in the Standard of Care Plus (SCP) comparator group received interventions designed to reinforce and standardize evidence-based hypertension care best practices across both intervention and comparator practices. The "plus" in the standard care arm included integration of proper BP measurement techniques, hypertension care best practices, and audit and feedback of hypertension control performance, as "usual care" at each practice. Additionally, health-system- and practice-level leaders at SCP practices participated in a system-level leadership engagement intervention consisting of quarterly, one-hour calls. The intensive Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC) arm includes all components of the SCP arm and plus the establishment of a practice-based collaborative care team with a stepped-care approach; quarterly hypertension dashboard education and training; and twice quarterly "coaching calls" for system- and practice-level leaders, care managers (CM), and community health workers (CHWs) the CC/SC arm to discuss the interventions during their active intervention phase. In the CC/SC approach, treatment for patients with prolonged uncontrolled hypertension is enhanced by adding a care manager and a community health worker (CHW) to deliver community-based contextualized care, or consultation with a panel of sub-specialists, or both, as necessary, to improve patient-centered outcomes and reduce disparities in hypertension control.
    Measure Participants 750 754
    Baseline
    151.8
    152.5
    12 months
    137.1
    138.7
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Standard of Care Plus (SCP), Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC)
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.38
    Comments The a priori threshold for statistical significance was <0.05.
    Method Mixed Effects Regression
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
    Estimated Value 0.83
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -1.04 to 2.71
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure
    Description Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure in mm Hg at baseline and 12 months.
    Time Frame Baseline, 12 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    We received BP data on 750 patients in the SCP arm and on 754 patients in the CC/SC arm from EMR's.
    Arm/Group Title Standard of Care Plus (SCP) Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC)
    Arm/Group Description Practices in the Standard of Care Plus (SCP) comparator group received interventions designed to reinforce and standardize evidence-based hypertension care best practices across both intervention and comparator practices. The "plus" in the standard care arm included integration of proper BP measurement techniques, hypertension care best practices, and audit and feedback of hypertension control performance, as "usual care" at each practice. Additionally, health-system- and practice-level leaders at SCP practices participated in a system-level leadership engagement intervention consisting of quarterly, one-hour calls. The intensive Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC) arm includes all components of the SCP arm and plus the establishment of a practice-based collaborative care team with a stepped-care approach; quarterly hypertension dashboard education and training; and twice quarterly "coaching calls" for system- and practice-level leaders, care managers (CM), and community health workers (CHWs) the CC/SC arm to discuss the interventions during their active intervention phase. In the CC/SC approach, treatment for patients with prolonged uncontrolled hypertension is enhanced by adding a care manager and a community health worker (CHW) to deliver community-based contextualized care, or consultation with a panel of sub-specialists, or both, as necessary, to improve patient-centered outcomes and reduce disparities in hypertension control.
    Measure Participants 750 754
    Baseline
    84.7
    86.7
    12 months
    78.9
    79.8
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Standard of Care Plus (SCP), Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC)
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.05
    Comments The a priori threshold for statistical significance was <0.05.
    Method Mixed Effects Regression
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
    Estimated Value -1.2
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -2.43 to 0.01
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments CC/SC arm compared to SCP arm.
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Global Framingham Risk Score
    Description Clinical Outcome
    Time Frame Baseline, 12, 24 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Mean Total Cholesterol (mg/dL)
    Description Clinical Outcome
    Time Frame Baseline, 12, 24 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Mean LDL-C (mg/dL)
    Description Clinical Outcome
    Time Frame Baseline, 12, 24 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Mean HDL (mg/dL)
    Description Clinical Outcome
    Time Frame Baseline, 12, 24 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description
    9. Secondary Outcome
    Title % With Controlled Total Cholesterol
    Description Clinical Outcome
    Time Frame Baseline

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description
    10. Secondary Outcome
    Title % With Controlled Total Cholesterol
    Description Clinical Outcome
    Time Frame 12 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description
    11. Secondary Outcome
    Title % With Controlled Total Cholesterol
    Description Clinical Outcome
    Time Frame 24 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description
    12. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Mean Glycosylated Hemoglobin (Hemoglobin A1c)
    Description Clinical Outcome
    Time Frame Baseline, 12, 24 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description
    13. Secondary Outcome
    Title % With Hemoglobin A1c< 7.0
    Description Clinical Outcome
    Time Frame Baseline

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description
    14. Secondary Outcome
    Title % With Hemoglobin A1c< 7.0
    Description Clinical Outcome
    Time Frame 12 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description
    15. Secondary Outcome
    Title % With Hemoglobin A1c< 7.0
    Description Clinical Outcome
    Time Frame 24 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description
    16. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Patient Assessment of Care for Chronic Conditions (PACIC-Plus)
    Description Patient Reported Outcome
    Time Frame Baseline, 12, 24 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description
    17. Secondary Outcome
    Title % With BP <140/90 mmHg
    Description Clinical Outcome
    Time Frame 24 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description
    18. Secondary Outcome
    Title % With BP <130/80 mmHg
    Description Clinical Outcome
    Time Frame 12 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description
    19. Secondary Outcome
    Title % With BP <130/80 mmHg
    Description Clinical Outcome
    Time Frame 24 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description
    20. Secondary Outcome
    Title % With BP <120/80 mmHg
    Description Clinical Outcome
    Time Frame 12 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description
    21. Secondary Outcome
    Title % With BP <120/80 mmHg
    Description Clinical Outcome
    Time Frame 24 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description
    22. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Medication Adherence 4-Item Scale
    Description Patient Reported Outcome
    Time Frame Baseline, 12, 24 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description
    23. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Depressive Symptoms Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) 8 Score
    Description Patient Reported Outcome
    Time Frame Baseline 12, 24 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description
    24. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Patient Ratings of Trust
    Description Patient Reported Outcome
    Time Frame Baseline, 12, 24 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description
    25. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Hypertension Knowledge and Attitudes
    Description Patient Reported Outcome
    Time Frame Baseline, 12, 24 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description
    26. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Health Related Quality of Life (PROMIS Global Scale)
    Description Patient Reported Outcome
    Time Frame Baseline, 12, 24 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description
    27. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Patient Attainment of Self-Defined Goals
    Description Patient Reported Outcome
    Time Frame Baseline, 12, 24 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title
    Arm/Group Description

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame Adverse events data were collected up to 1 year.
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Standard of Care Plus (SCP) Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC)
    Arm/Group Description Practices in the Standard of Care Plus (SCP) comparator group received interventions designed to reinforce and standardize evidence-based hypertension care best practices across both intervention and comparator practices. The "plus" in the standard care arm included integration of proper BP measurement techniques, hypertension care best practices, and audit and feedback of hypertension control performance, as "usual care" at each practice. Additionally, health-system- and practice-level leaders at SCP practices participated in a system-level leadership engagement intervention consisting of quarterly, one-hour calls. The intensive Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC) arm includes all components of the SCP arm and plus the establishment of a practice-based collaborative care team with a stepped-care approach; quarterly hypertension dashboard education and training; and twice quarterly "coaching calls" for system- and practice-level leaders, care managers (CM), and community health workers (CHWs) the CC/SC arm to discuss the interventions during their active intervention phase. In the CC/SC approach, treatment for patients with prolonged uncontrolled hypertension is enhanced by adding a care manager and a community health worker (CHW) to deliver community-based contextualized care, or consultation with a panel of sub-specialists, or both, as necessary, to improve patient-centered outcomes and reduce disparities in hypertension control.
    All Cause Mortality
    Standard of Care Plus (SCP) Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC)
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 21/927 (2.3%) 34/893 (3.8%)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Standard of Care Plus (SCP) Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC)
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/927 (0%) 0/893 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Standard of Care Plus (SCP) Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC)
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 515/927 (55.6%) 499/893 (55.9%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Self-reported stroke 22/875 (2.5%) 24/835 (2.9%)
    Myocardial infarction 9/875 (1%) 19/835 (2.3%)
    Hypotension 197/873 (22.6%) 186/842 (22.1%)
    Hypertension 147/873 (16.8%) 150/842 (17.8%)
    Bradycardia 3/873 (0.3%) 0/842 (0%)
    General disorders
    Fall precipitating medical treatment 84/875 (9.6%) 82/835 (9.8%)
    Hospitalizations 227/875 (25.9%) 212/835 (25.4%)
    Hyponatremia 6/927 (0.6%) 12/893 (1.3%)
    Hypernatremia 1/927 (0.1%) 2/893 (0.2%)
    Hypokalemia 6/927 (0.6%) 8/893 (0.9%)
    Hyperkalemia 21/927 (2.3%) 29/893 (3.2%)
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Serum creatinine increase by at least 50% since previous measure 9/927 (1%) 15/893 (1.7%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Dr. Lisa Cooper, Principal Investigator
    Organization Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
    Phone 4106143659
    Email lisa.cooper@jhmi.edu
    Responsible Party:
    Johns Hopkins University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02674464
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • IRB00085630
    • UH3HL130688
    First Posted:
    Feb 4, 2016
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 1, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Jun 1, 2022