The Antidepressant Efficacy of the Anticholinergic Scopolamine

Sponsor
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) (NIH)
Overall Status
Terminated
CT.gov ID
NCT00369915
Collaborator
(none)
17
1
2
77
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

A previous study showed that the intravenous administration of scopolamine produces antidepressant effects. This study is designed to determine if other routes of administration of scopolamine produce antidepressant effects.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Detailed Description

Despite the availability of a wide range of antidepressant drugs, clinical trials indicate that 30% to 40% of patients with major depression fail to respond to first-line antidepressant treatment, despite adequate dosage, duration, and compliance. Moreover, in those patients who do experience symptomatic relief following conventional anti-depressant treatment, clinical improvement is not evident for 3-4 weeks. Thus, there is a clear need to develop novel and improved therapeutics for unipolar and bipolar depression.

The cholinergic system is one of the neurotransmitter systems implicated in the pathophysiology of mood disorders. Evidence suggests that during major depressive episodes, the cholinergic system is hypersensitive to acetylcholine. Agents that enhance muscarinic cholinergic receptor function increase depressive symptoms in depressed subjects, and can produce symptoms of depression in healthy individuals. The preclinical literature more specifically implicates the muscarinic receptors and indicates that the use of muscarinic antagonists, in the context of animal models of depression, results in improvement in the behavioral analogs of depression.

Preliminary results obtained under protocol 3-M-0108 provide strong evidence for the potential effectiveness of the anticholinergic scopolamine in rapidly producing clinically significant antidepressant effects. We observed large reductions in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores that occurred over hours/days following i.v. infusion of scopolamine, which stood in marked contrast to the 3-4 week period generally required for conventional therapies. Moreover, these improvements were observed in subjects who had been nonresponsive or incompletely responsive to conventional antidepressant therapies, highlighting the potential for this treatment to benefit a larger percentage of individuals with depression. The goal of this research project is to perform a clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of the muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonist scopolamine administered via transdermal patch on clinical symptoms of depression.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
17 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
The Antidepressant Efficacy of the Anticholinergic Scopolamine
Study Start Date :
Aug 1, 2006
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2013
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2013

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Plac/Scop

Placebo then scopolamine

Drug: Scopolamine

Experimental: Scop/Plac

Scopolamine then placebo

Drug: Scopolamine

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in Depression Severity [Outcome measures obtained at each of 12 sessions]

    The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) has a range of scores from 0 to 60 where the highest values indicate the most depression.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale [Each of 12 sessions.]

    The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) has a range of scores from 0 to 56 where the highest values indicate the most anxiety.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
  • INCLUSION CRITERIA:

Two groups of subjects will be recruited for studies under this protocol: unipolar depressives and bipolar depressives. Subjects with unipolar or bipolar depression appear to exhibit abnormal cholinergic function during the depressed phase, and no differences are hypothesized to exist between MDD and BD depressives herein. However, while BD subjects are more difficult to recruit, the evidence for cholinergic abnormalities has been particularly compelling for BD. Moreover, observations from our pilot study suggest that scopolamine will improve symptoms in both MDD and BD, a particularly persuasive observation given BD notoriously has been difficult to treat. Thus, the magnitude of this serious clinical problem justifies the inclusion of BD subjects. Therefore both groups will be recruited. However, BD Type I subjects will be included only if they are currently stable on lithium or valproate to reduce the risks associated with possible precipitation of mania.

The presence of inclusion and exclusion criteria will be established using both an unstructured clinical interview with a psychiatrist and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID). Family history of mental illness will be obtained from the subject using the Family Interview of Genetic Studies. We will recruit 24 subjects per group.

DEPRESSED SAMPLES: Subjects (ages 18-55) currently suffering from a major depressive episode falling into one of the following subgroups:

  1. . MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER (MDD): Subjects will be selected with primary MDD and are currently depressed as defined by DSM-IV criteria for recurrent MDD and current MADRS score in the moderately-to-severely depressed range (greater than or equal to 20). The duration of the index episode is greater than or equal to four weeks.

  2. . BIPOLAR DISORDER TYPE II (BD): Subjects will be selected who meet DSM-IV criteria for bipolar disorder Type I or II and are currently depressed, with MADRS score in the moderately-to-severely depressed range (greater than or equal to 20). The duration of the index episode is greater than or equal to four weeks.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

Subjects will be recruited who are drug-naive or who have not received psychotropic drugs for at least 3 weeks (8 weeks for fluoxetine) prior to screening. Subjects also will be excluded if they have: a) serious suicidal ideation or behavior, or current delusions or hallucinations, b) inability to provide informed consent, c) serious, unstable illnesses including hepatic, renal, gastroenterologic, respiratory, cardiovascular (including ischemic heart disease, endocrinologic, neurologic, immunologic, or hematologic disease, d) a history of drug or alcohol abuse within 6 months or alcohol or drug dependence in the last five years (DSM IV criteria), e) not using a medically accepted means of contraception and are a woman of childbearing potential, f) current pregnancy (documented by pregnancy testing prior to each brain scan to avoid exposing a fetus to radiation or to a research MRI scan that is not medically necessary), g) current breast feeding, h) history of ulcerative colitis or toxic megacolon, i) vision and/or hearing problems severe enough to interfere with testing, j) electrocardiographic evidence of ischemia, arrhythmia, conduction defect, or myocardial infarction, k) current blood pressure of greater than 160 mm Hg or less than 90 mm Hg systolic, or greater than 90 mm Hg diastolic, l) clinically significant cerebrovascular or cardiovascular disease, hypertension, congestive heart disease, angina pectoris, clinic evidence of cerebrovascular disease, gross neurological impairment, hyperthyroidism, known hypersensitivity or idiosyncracy to anticholinergic agents (e.g. skin rashes), glaucoma, renal or hepatic impairment, m) current nicotine use or nicotine dependence within last six months (due to the effects of nicotine on the cholinergic system) n) narrow angle glaucoma (due to the possibility of exacerbation of this condition by scopolamine) o) age greater than 55 years (to reduce the biological heterogeneity encompassed by the MDD and BD criteria, since subjects with a late age-at onset for depression have a far greater likelihood of having MRI correlates of cerebrovascular disease than age-matched, healthy controls or age-matched, early-onset depressives), p) exposure within two weeks to medications likely to affect mood or cognition or likely to interact with scopolamine (e.g. narcotics or anti-cholinergic agents)- as verified by history and urine drug screen, q) HIV positive status, r) history of gastric or intestinal obstructions, s) history of urinary retention or bladder obstruction. During the course of this study, participants will be unable to take some medications, including antidepressant or antianxiety agents, sleep aids, diphenhydramine (e.g. Benedryl) or cough/cold preparations that contain diphenhydramine or antihistamines. A detailed list of allowed and not allowed medications is provided in Appendix B in the protocol.

We are not excluding comorbid anxiety disorders. Exclusion of patients with comorbid anxiety disorders would affect the generalizability of our findings since a substantial percentage of patients with major depression have these comorbid diagnoses. Instead, we will exclude patients with this comorbid diagnosis only if it is believed to be of clinical significance. Allowing participation by patients with histories of comorbid anxiety disorders broadens the inclusion criteria to more closely approximate patients seen in real world settings.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike Bethesda Maryland United States 20892

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maura L Furey, Ph.D., National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00369915
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 060234
  • 06-M-0234
First Posted:
Aug 30, 2006
Last Update Posted:
Nov 10, 2016
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2016

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail
Arm/Group Title Plac/Scop Scop/Plac
Arm/Group Description 6 administrations of placebo patch at 4 to 5 day intervals; followed by 6 administrations of scopolamine patch at 4 to 5 day intervals 6 administrations of scopolamine patch at 4 to 5 day intervals; followed by 6 administrations of placebo patch at 4 to 5 day intervals
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 10 7
COMPLETED 4 4
NOT COMPLETED 6 3

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Plac/Scop Scop/Plac Total
Arm/Group Description 6 administrations of placebo patch at 4 to 5 day intervals; followed by 6 administrations of scopolamine patch at 4 to 5 day intervals 6 administrations of scopolamine patch at 4 to 5 day intervals; followed by 6 administrations of placebo patch at 4 to 5 day intervals Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 10 7 17
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
31
(6.6)
33
(10.4)
31.9
(8.2)
Age (Count of Participants)
<=18 years
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Between 18 and 65 years
10
100%
7
100%
17
100%
>=65 years
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
6
60%
6
85.7%
12
70.6%
Male
4
40%
1
14.3%
5
29.4%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Change in Depression Severity
Description The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) has a range of scores from 0 to 60 where the highest values indicate the most depression.
Time Frame Outcome measures obtained at each of 12 sessions

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Only participants who completed the trial were included in the analysis.
Arm/Group Title Plac/Scop Scop/Plac
Arm/Group Description 6 administrations of placebo patch at 4 to 5 day intervals; followed by 6 administrations of scopolamine patch at 4 to 5 day intervals 6 administrations of scopolamine patch at 4 to 5 day intervals; followed by 6 administrations of placebo patch at 4 to 5 day intervals
Measure Participants 4 4
Block 1 - Session 1
29.5
(2.5)
30.5
(4.2)
Block 1 - Session 2
26.5
(8.2)
29.8
(1.5)
Block 1 - Session 3
24.5
(3.7)
31.0
(2.9)
Block 1 - Session 4
19.5
(6.6)
27.0
(5.5)
Block 1 - Session 5
19.3
(7.4)
27.8
(5.6)
Block 1 - Session 6
20.8
(4.5)
28.5
(6.2)
Block 2 - Session 1
23.3
(3.7)
27.5
(7.9)
Block 2 - Session 2
18.0
(3.8)
23.8
(6.7)
Block 2 - Session 3
19.8
(8.3)
20.0
(6.5)
Block 2 - Session 4
18
(9.1)
17.3
(9.1)
Block 2 - Session 5
16.3
(7.9)
16.8
(9.7)
Block 2 - Session 6
15.5
(8.8)
20.3
(9.3)
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
Description The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) has a range of scores from 0 to 56 where the highest values indicate the most anxiety.
Time Frame Each of 12 sessions.

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Only study completers were analyzed.
Arm/Group Title Plac/Scop Scop/Plac
Arm/Group Description 6 administrations of placebo patch at 4 to 5 day intervals; followed by 6 administrations of scopolamine patch at 4 to 5 day intervals 6 administrations of scopolamine patch at 4 to 5 day intervals; followed by 6 administrations of placebo patch at 4 to 5 day intervals
Measure Participants 4 4
Block 1 - Session 1
17.0
(6.2)
20.3
(9.0)
Block 1 - Session 2
16.8
(6.2)
14.5
(2.7)
Block 1 - Session 3
14.5
(8.4)
14.3
(4.7)
Block 1 - Session 4
14.3
(6.5)
13.0
(2.8)
Block 1 - Session 5
12.8
(5.0)
12.0
(4.7)
Block 1 - Session 6
17.8
(7.1)
11.5
(5.3)
Block 2 - Session 1
14.8
(2.2)
13.5
(7.9)
Block 2 - Session 2
13.3
(3.8)
12.0
(7.6)
Block 2 - Session 3
14.3
(4.0)
13.3
(5.6)
Block 2 - Session 4
10.5
(2.7)
14.3
(9.0)
Block 2 - Session 5
9.8
(2.1)
10.3
(6.0)
Block 2 - Session 6
11.8
(3.2)
11.8
(6.9)

Adverse Events

Time Frame
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title Plac/Scop Scop/Plac
Arm/Group Description 6 administrations of placebo patch at 4 to 5 day intervals; followed by 6 administrations of scopolamine patch at 4 to 5 day intervals 6 administrations of scopolamine patch at 4 to 5 day intervals; followed by 6 administrations of placebo patch at 4 to 5 day intervals
All Cause Mortality
Plac/Scop Scop/Plac
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
Serious Adverse Events
Plac/Scop Scop/Plac
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/10 (0%) 0/7 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Plac/Scop Scop/Plac
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 2/10 (20%) 1/7 (14.3%)
Psychiatric disorders
mild confusion 1/10 (10%) 1 1/7 (14.3%) 1
dry mouth 2/10 (20%) 2 1/7 (14.3%) 1

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Maura Furey, PhD
Organization NIMH/NIH
Phone 301-594-7773
Email mfurey@mail.nih.gov
Responsible Party:
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00369915
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 060234
  • 06-M-0234
First Posted:
Aug 30, 2006
Last Update Posted:
Nov 10, 2016
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2016