A Safety and Feasibility Study of IS-001 Injection in Patients Undergoing Robotic Colorectal Surgery

Sponsor
Intuitive Surgical (Industry)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05769257
Collaborator
(none)
12
1
1
6
2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the safety and feasibility of intravenous injection of IS-001 to aid in intraoperative ureter structure delineation

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Detailed Description

Injury to the ureter, the duct by which urine passes from the kidney into the bladder, is a well-known and serious complication of pelvic and abdominal surgery that frequently goes unrecognized intraoperatively. This study seeks to evaluate the safety and feasibility of intravenous IS-001 injection to improve surgeon ureter visualization during robotic-assisted surgery with the da Vinci® Surgical System and Firefly® imaging.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
12 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
A Phase 2 Multi-Center Safety and Feasibility Study of IS-001 Injection in Patients Undergoing Robotic-Assisted Colorectal Surgery Using the da Vinci® Surgical System With Firefly® Fluorescent Imaging
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Single Arm

Single Arm Safety and Feasibility Study of IS-001 with 20 mg in Multiple Injections

Drug: IS-001
Intravenous injection of IS-001 investigational drug

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Evaluate ureter visualization by Independent Reader [10 minutes after first IS-001 injection during surgery]

    Independent reader assessment of ureter visibility of a 5 second video segment of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a Five-point rating scale where 1 = Not Visible, 1 = Questionably Visible, 3 = Low Visibility, 4 = Visible, 5 = Clearly Visible

  2. Evaluate ureter visualization by Independent Reader [30 minutes after first IS-001 injection during surgery]

    Independent reader assessment of ureter visibility of a 5 second video segment of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a Five-point rating scale where 1 = Not Visible, 1 = Questionably Visible, 3 = Low Visibility, 4 = Visible, 5 = Clearly Visible

  3. Evaluate ureter visualization by Independent Reader [45 minutes after first IS-001 injection during surgery]

    Independent reader assessment of ureter visibility of a 5 second video segment of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a Five-point rating scale where 1 = Not Visible, 1 = Questionably Visible, 3 = Low Visibility, 4 = Visible, 5 = Clearly Visible

  4. Evaluate ureter visualization by Independent Reader [10 minutes after second IS-001 injection during surgery]

    Independent reader assessment of ureter visibility of a 5 second video segment of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a Five-point rating scale where 1 = Not Visible, 1 = Questionably Visible, 3 = Low Visibility, 4 = Visible, 5 = Clearly Visible

  5. Evaluate ureter visualization by Independent Reader [30 minutes after second IS-001 injection during surgery]

    Independent reader assessment of ureter visibility of a 5 second video segment of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a Five-point rating scale where 1 = Not Visible, 1 = Questionably Visible, 3 = Low Visibility, 4 = Visible, 5 = Clearly Visible

  6. Evaluate ureter visualization by Independent Reader [45 minutes after second IS-001 injection during surgery]

    Independent reader assessment of ureter visibility of a 5 second video segment of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a Five-point rating scale where 1 = Not Visible, 1 = Questionably Visible, 3 = Low Visibility, 4 = Visible, 5 = Clearly Visible

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Evaluate ureter visualization by Intra-operative surgeon [10 minutes after first IS-001 injection during surgery]

    Intra-operative surgeon assessment of ureter visibility in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a Five-point rating scale where 1 = Not Visible, 1 = Questionably Visible, 3 = Low Visibility, 4 = Visible, 5 = Clearly Visible

  2. Evaluate ureter visualization by Intra-operative surgeon [30 minutes after first IS-001 injection during surgery]

    Intra-operative surgeon assessment of ureter visibility in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a Five-point rating scale where 1 = Not Visible, 1 = Questionably Visible, 3 = Low Visibility, 4 = Visible, 5 = Clearly Visible

  3. Evaluate ureter visualization by Intra-operative surgeon [45 minutes after first IS-001 injection during surgery]

    Intra-operative surgeon assessment of ureter visibility in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a Five-point rating scale where 1 = Not Visible, 1 = Questionably Visible, 3 = Low Visibility, 4 = Visible, 5 = Clearly Visible

  4. Evaluate ureter visualization by Intra-operative surgeon [10 minutes after second IS-001 injection during surgery]

    Intra-operative surgeon assessment of ureter visibility in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a Five-point rating scale where 1 = Not Visible, 1 = Questionably Visible, 3 = Low Visibility, 4 = Visible, 5 = Clearly Visible

  5. Evaluate ureter visualization by Intra-operative surgeon [30 minutes after second IS-001 injection during surgery]

    Intra-operative surgeon assessment of ureter visibility in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a Five-point rating scale where 1 = Not Visible, 1 = Questionably Visible, 3 = Low Visibility, 4 = Visible, 5 = Clearly Visible

  6. Evaluate ureter visualization by Intra-operative surgeon [45 minutes after second IS-001 injection during surgery]

    Intra-operative surgeon assessment of ureter visibility in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode on a Five-point rating scale where 1 = Not Visible, 1 = Questionably Visible, 3 = Low Visibility, 4 = Visible, 5 = Clearly Visible

  7. Ureter Delineation Efficacy as Length of Line Drawn [10 minutes after first IS-001 injection during surgery]

    Independent reader assessment of ureter delineation on a still frame of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode. Length of line drawn on still frame where ureter is visible to independent reader is compared between imaging conditions.

  8. Ureter Delineation Efficacy as Length of Line Drawn [30 minutes after first IS-001 injection during surgery]

    Independent reader assessment of ureter delineation on a still frame of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode. Length of line drawn on still frame where ureter is visible to independent reader is compared between imaging conditions.

  9. Ureter Delineation Efficacy as Length of Line Drawn [45 minutes after first IS-001 injection during surgery]

    Independent reader assessment of ureter delineation on a still frame of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode. Length of line drawn on still frame where ureter is visible to independent reader is compared between imaging conditions.

  10. Ureter Delineation Efficacy as Length of Line Drawn [10 minutes after second IS-001 injection during surgery]

    Independent reader assessment of ureter delineation on a still frame of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode. Length of line drawn on still frame where ureter is visible to independent reader is compared between imaging conditions.

  11. Ureter Delineation Efficacy as Length of Line Drawn [30 minutes after second IS-001 injection during surgery]

    Independent reader assessment of ureter delineation on a still frame of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode. Length of line drawn on still frame where ureter is visible to independent reader is compared between imaging conditions.

  12. Ureter Delineation Efficacy as Length of Line Drawn [45 minutes after second IS-001 injection during surgery]

    Independent reader assessment of ureter delineation on a still frame of the surgical field in both Firefly® and standard white light comparator mode. Length of line drawn on still frame where ureter is visible to independent reader is compared between imaging conditions.

  13. Evaluate fluorescent intensity of ureter by signal to background analysis [10 minutes after first IS-001 injection during surgery]

    Fluorescent intensity of ureter evaluated as signal to background

  14. Evaluate fluorescent intensity of ureter by signal to background analysis [30 minutes after first IS-001 injection during surgery]

    Fluorescent intensity of ureter evaluated as signal to background

  15. Evaluate fluorescent intensity of ureter by signal to background analysis [45 minutes after first IS-001 injection during surgery]

    Fluorescent intensity of ureter evaluated as signal to background

  16. Evaluate fluorescent intensity of ureter by signal to background analysis [10 minutes after second IS-001 injection during surgery]

    Fluorescent intensity of ureter evaluated as signal to background

  17. Evaluate fluorescent intensity of ureter by signal to background analysis [30 minutes after second IS-001 injection during surgery]

    Fluorescent intensity of ureter evaluated as signal to background

  18. Evaluate fluorescent intensity of ureter by signal to background analysis [45 minutes after second IS-001 injection during surgery]

    Fluorescent intensity of ureter evaluated as signal to background

  19. Safety 12-Lead EKG Change from Baseline [6 hours after first IS-001 injection post surgery]

    12-Lead EKG change from baseline in QTc

  20. Incidence of abnormal blood work in tests results [24 hours after first IS-001 injection post surgery]

    Safety hematology complete blood count laboratory assessments Change from Baseline

  21. Incidence of abnormal blood work in tests results [24 hours after first IS-001 injection post surgery]

    Safety hematology comprehensive metabolic panel laboratory assessments Change from Baseline

  22. Incidence of abnormal blood work in tests results [14 days post surgery]

    Safety hematology complete blood count laboratory assessments Change from Baseline

  23. Incidence of abnormal blood work in tests results [14 days post surgery]

    Safety hematology comprehensive metabolic panel laboratory assessments Change from Baseline

  24. Incidence of abnormal urinalysis results [14 days post surgery]

    Routine urinalysis laboratory assessment change from baseline

  25. Safety Adverse Events Monitoring [14 days post surgery]

    Drug related adverse events monitoring through 14-days

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Male and female subjects between the ages of 18 and 75, inclusive

  2. Subject is scheduled to undergo robotic-assisted rectal, sigmoid, or left colon resection surgery using the da Vinci® X/Xi Surgical System with Firefly® Fluorescent Imaging

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Subject is pregnant or nursing

  2. Subject has known hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection

  3. Subject has any of the following screening laboratory values:

  4. eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2

  5. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase ≥ 2.5 × ULN

  6. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase ≥ 2.5 × ULN

  7. Subject is already enrolled in another investigational drug or device study receiving therapeutic agents within the past 6 months

  8. Subject has any other condition or personal circumstance that, in the judgment of the Investigator, might interfere with the collection of complete quality data or represents an unacceptable safety profile

  9. Subjects with known or suspected hypersensitivity to indocyanine green (ICG) or any components of the formulation used.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Intuitive Surgical Sunnyvale California United States 94086

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Intuitive Surgical

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thiru Lakshman, MD, St. David's North Austin Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Peter Caravella, MD, Valley Hospital Medical Center

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Intuitive Surgical
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05769257
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • ISI-124804-CR-2
First Posted:
Mar 15, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Mar 16, 2023
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 16, 2023