Efficacy of Mirabegron Versus Tamsulosin Versus Solifenacin for Treatment of Ureteral Stents-Related Symptoms

Sponsor
Mansoura University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04325880
Collaborator
(none)
240
1
4
7
34.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this prospective, single-centre randomized controlled trial is to assess the efficacy of three different drugs in treatment of ureteral stents related symptoms (Beta 3 adrenergic receptor agonist; Mirabegron 50mg) vs. (Alpha 1 adrenergic receptor antagonist; Tamsulosin 0.4mg) vs. (Anticholinergic; Solifenacin 10 mg) using validated symptoms questionnaires.

In addition, adverse events of the utilized medications will be monitored during study period as a secondary objective.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Mirabegron 50 MG
  • Drug: Tamsulosin
  • Drug: Solifenacin Succinate 10 MG
  • Drug: Placebo oral tablet
Phase 3

Detailed Description

Indwelling ureteral stents are specialized catheters designed to alleviate obstruction by maintaining the patency of the ureteral lumen and to splint the ureter by acting as a scaffold to promote organized tissue healing. (1)

Common issues associated with contemporary ureteral stents include stent-related pain, hematuria, dysuria, urgency, infection, and encrustation (2). Majority of patients (80%) reported one or more urinary symptoms with over 80% of patients experience stent-related pain that affects daily activities, 58% report reduced work capacity, and 32%report sexual dysfunction (2). In addition, as many as 32% of patients had ureteral stents removed sooner than anticipated because of these complications (3).

Considering this high prevalence of ureteral stent related symptoms (uSRS) among patients and its potential impact on quality of life (QoL), adequate management of these bothering symptoms was the point of research over the last decades (4).

The exact mechanism involved in uSRS is not yet known; however, many authors report that such symptoms are associated with ureteral spasms, urinary reflux attributable to ureteral stent, or trigonal irritation (5).

Different novel types of stents have been developed and evaluated to reduce uSRS; however, there is still controversy regarding their clinical application (6). Conversely, pharmacological therapy, including anticholinergics and alpha-blockers, remains the most effective option to manage uSRS (7).

The role of a-blockers in reducing uSRS involves reduction of bladder outlet resistance to alleviate flank pain in male patients with preexisting bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). It has been proposed that relaxing the distal ureter and irritation of the trigone decreases bladder outlet resistance and voiding pressure, thereby potentially decreasing the incidence of renal reflux and subsequent flank pain (8) . Otherwise, anticholinergic agents may have an effect on involuntary contractions of the bladder induced by the distal end of ureteral stents with subsequent relief of uSRS (9).

The above-mentioned drugs, however, are not easy to apply to some patients with co-morbidities because of the potential side effects. The most common medication-related complications of a-blockers are dizziness and orthostatic hypotension. Depending on the type of medication, medication-related adverse events are reported at a rate of 5% to 20% (10). In addition, anticholinergic agents have various adverse effects that decrease treatment compliance, such as dry mouth, constipation, blurred vision and dyspepsia (11).

Beta-3 agonist mirabegron is believed to be responsible for the relaxation of the detrusor smooth muscle during the storage phase (12). It helps relax the detrusor smooth muscle, and results in increased bladder capacity without any changes in micturition pressure, post-void residual urine volume, or voiding contractions.

Considering the function of mirabegron as a therapeutic agent for overactive bladder (OAB), mirabegron is assumed to be effective for relieving voiding symptoms attributable to uSRS (13).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
240 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Care Provider)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Efficacy of Mirabegron Versus Tamsulosin Versus Solifenacin for Treatment of Ureteral Stents-Related Symptoms: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Dec 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo arm

Patients in this arm will receive a placebo formula

Drug: Placebo oral tablet
Patients in this arm will receive placebo oral tablet once daily

Active Comparator: Mirabegron arm

Patients in this arm will receive Mirabegrone 50 mg once daily

Drug: Mirabegron 50 MG
Patients in this arm will receive Mirabegrone 50 MG once daily

Active Comparator: Tamsulosin arm

Patients in this arm will receive tamsulosin o.4 mg once daily

Drug: Tamsulosin
Patients in this arm will receive Tamsulosin o.4 MG once daily

Active Comparator: Solifenacin arm

Patients in this arm will receive solifenacin 10 mg once daily

Drug: Solifenacin Succinate 10 MG
Patients in this arm will receive Solifenacin Succinate 10 MG once daily

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Improvement in stent related symptoms using ureteral stent symptoms questionnaire (USSQ) [4 weeks]

    The effect of the assigned treatment on improvement of stent related symptoms will be assessed at the time of stent removal using ureteral stent symptoms questionnaire (USSQ)

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Adverse event of medications [4 weeks]

    Side effects of the assigned treatment will be monitored

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Adult patients (aged 19-80 years)

  • Undergo unilateral uncomplicated retrograde rigid ureteroscopy (URS) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) with planned ureteral stent insertion.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients with neurogenic bladder, OAB syndrome, and neurological and psychiatric diseases

  • Residual ureteral or renal stones after the procedure

  • Preoperative febrile UTI

  • pregnancy or breastfeeding

  • Bilateral ureteroscopic surgery

  • Single kidney

  • Chronic kidney disease

  • Cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease

  • Hepatic dysfunction

  • History of pelvic surgery or irradiation

  • History of bladder or prostate surgery

  • Other acute medical conditions as acute gastroenteritis, osetoarthritis that might influence the patient QoL

  • Preoperative indwelling of ureteral stent for relief of stone-related pain or sepsis

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Urology and Nephrology Center Mansoura DK Egypt 35516

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Mansoura University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amr A Elsawy, Mansoura University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Amr Abdel-Lateif El-Sawy, Principal Investigator, Mansoura University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04325880
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • AE 24320
First Posted:
Mar 30, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Nov 23, 2021
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
No
Keywords provided by Amr Abdel-Lateif El-Sawy, Principal Investigator, Mansoura University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Nov 23, 2021