Evaluating the Change of Overactive Bladder Symptoms in Women Post Pubovaginal Sling Procedure for Stress Incontinence
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Pubovaginal sling (PVS) procedures are designed to curtail bladder leakage brought about by strenuous events such as child birth. A common purported side effect of PVS is urgency, the feeling of a compelling need to void with little warning. Other overactive bladder (OAB) adverse effects that some claim to develop post-op include further leakage (incontinence), frequency and nocturia (night time leakage). Anecdotal evidence from our clinic however, suggests that such de novo OAB symptoms are rarely induced by PVS, and may in fact be alleviated by said procedure. It is our aim to investigate this relationship in our clinic.
As a prospective member of this study, you will be asked to complete five surveys. The first survey will be administered prior to your pubovaginal sling. This will be used to establish your baseline experience of OAB. Over the course of the next year, you will be asked to complete the four remaining surveys at regularly scheduled check-ups.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 4 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Pubovaginal sling procedure Patients undergoing pubovaginal slings for stress urinary incontinence. |
Device: Pubovaginal sling procedure
The procedure involves placing a band of sling material directly under the bladder neck (ie, proximal urethra) or mid-urethra, which acts as a physical support to prevent bladder neck and urethral descent during physical activity. The sling also may augment the resting urethral closure pressure with increases in intra-abdominal pressure.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change in OAB Symptoms Post Pubovaginal Sling Operation [Baseline to final follow-up.]
Measured through the administration of five overactive bladder questionnaires. Difference from baseline to follow-up evaluated using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria.
-
Post-pubovaginal sling patient.
-
Complete agreement and signing of Informed Consent Form.
Exclusion Criteria.
-
Currently taking antimuscarinics or α1 blockers.
-
Patients with urinary retention, dependent on dialysis, gastroparesis or narrow angle glaucoma.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Barrie Urology Associates - The Male/Female Health and Research Centre | Barrie | Ontario | Canada | L4M 7G1 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Barrie Urology Associates
- Astellas Pharma Canada, Inc.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Joseph A Zadra, MD CM FRCSC, Barrie Urology Associates - The Male/Female Health and Research Centre
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Chapple CR, Fianu-Jonsson A, Indig M, Khullar V, Rosa J, Scarpa RM, Mistry A, Wright DM, Bolodeoku J; STAR study group. Treatment outcomes in the STAR study: a subanalysis of solifenacin 5 mg and tolterodine ER 4 mg. Eur Urol. 2007 Oct;52(4):1195-203. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
- Karram MM, Toglia MR, Serels SR, Andoh M, Fakhoury A, Forero-Schwanhaeuser S. Treatment with solifenacin increases warning time and improves symptoms of overactive bladder: results from VENUS, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Urology. 2009 Jan;73(1):14-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.485. Epub 2008 Nov 8.
- Koch YK, Zimmern P. A critical overview of the evidence base for the contemporary surgical management of stress incontinence. Curr Opin Urol. 2008 Jul;18(4):370-6. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282fdf8d5. Review.
- Toglia MR, Ostergard DR, Appell RA, Andoh M, Fakhoury A, Hussain IF. Solifenacin for overactive bladder: secondary analysis of data from VENUS based on baseline continence status. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Jul;21(7):847-54. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1120-6. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
- Toledo LG, Korkes F, Romero FR, Fernandes RC, Oliveira C, Perez MD. Bladder outlet obstruction after pubovaginal fascial sling. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Feb;20(2):201-5. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0759-8. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
- ARC-2010-04
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Recruitment occurred over the course of one year (October 2010 - October 2011). Patients requiring pubovaginal sling procedures for stress incontinence were invited to participate if they possessed limited comorbidities. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | No significant pres-assignment measures were taken. |
Arm/Group Title | Pubovaginal Sling Procedure |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients undergoing pubovaginal slings for stress urinary incontinence. |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 132 |
COMPLETED | 115 |
NOT COMPLETED | 17 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Pubovaginal Sling Procedure |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients undergoing pubovaginal slings for stress urinary incontinence. |
Overall Participants | 132 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
118
89.4%
|
>=65 years |
14
10.6%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
51.35
(11.28)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
132
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |
Canada |
132
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Change in OAB Symptoms Post Pubovaginal Sling Operation |
---|---|
Description | Measured through the administration of five overactive bladder questionnaires. Difference from baseline to follow-up evaluated using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test. |
Time Frame | Baseline to final follow-up. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
All patients enrolled in the study were analyzed, except for those currently being treated with antimuscarinic therapy. |
Arm/Group Title | Pubovaginal Sling Procedure |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients undergoing pubovaginal slings for stress urinary incontinence. |
Measure Participants | 88 |
Patients with improved OAB |
63
47.7%
|
Patients with stable OAB |
21
15.9%
|
Patients with worsening OAB |
4
3%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Pubovaginal Sling Procedure |
---|---|---|
Comments | Null hypothesis: No significant difference from baseline to final follow-up. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |
Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Adverse event data was collected for the duration of the study. | |
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||
Arm/Group Title | Pubovaginal Sling Procedure | |
Arm/Group Description | Patients undergoing pubovaginal slings for stress urinary incontinence. | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
Pubovaginal Sling Procedure | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
Pubovaginal Sling Procedure | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/132 (0%) | |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
Pubovaginal Sling Procedure | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/132 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Joseph A Zadra, MD CM FRCSC |
---|---|
Organization | Barrie Urology Associates - The Male/Female Health and Research Centre |
Phone | 705-727-0551 |
joezadra@rogers.com |
- ARC-2010-04