Solifenacin Succinate Versus Fesoterodine A Comparison Trial for Urgency Symptoms

Sponsor
Rambam Health Care Campus (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT01595152
Collaborator
(none)
60
5
2
12
12
1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Hypothesis:

Objective 1: To advance the investigators understanding on the effect of solifenacin succinate (10 mg OD) vs. fesoterodine (8mg OD) on urinary urgency using a validated Urgency Severity and Impact Questionnaire (USIQ).

Hypothesis 1.1: The severity of urgency symptoms as measured by USIQ will change differently in women with OAB following a 3 month treatment with solifenacin succinate (10 mg OD) vs. fesoterodine (8mg OD).

Hypothesis 2.1: Condition-specific quality of life (QOL) as measured by USIQ will change differently in women with OAB following a 3 month treatment with solifenacin succinate (10 mg OD) vs. fesoterodine (8mg OD).

Objective 2: To advance the investigators understanding on the adverse events (AE's) of solifenacin succinate (10 mg OD) vs. fesoterodine (8mg OD).

Hypothesis 1.1: The severity and rate of AE's in women with OAB following a 3 month of treatment with solifenacin succinate (10 mg OD) vs. fesoterodine (8mg OD) will be different.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
N/A

Detailed Description

The National Overactive Bladder Evaluation (NOBLE) Program estimated the prevalence of OAB in the US is nearly 17% affecting approximately 30 million adults. Sixty-one percent of adults with OAB also have urge urinary incontinence (UUI. Urinary urgency is a key symptom of OAB. Urgency may be more bothersome to patients than urinary frequency, although urinary frequency is often the primary focus of study in the field of OAB. This may be partially due to controversy surrounding how to define the term 'urinary urgency'. As currently defined, urgency is meant to describe an abnormal sensation that is distinguishable from the normal feeling of "urge to void," which occurs during a normal bladder-filling cycle. Attempts to measure urgency are confounded by difficulties in understanding this definition in the context of a normal "urge" to void. This controversy probably arises because of the overlap of the English words 'urge' and 'urgency' during clinical conversation, and apparently does not give rise to confusion in other languages. Recently a new validated questionnaire for the measurement of urgency symptoms was validated[5, 6]. The USIQ consists of two parts with an initial filter question, designated for self-administration. The first 5 items, known as USIQ- severity (USIQ-S), inquires about urgency symptoms and severity, while the second part USIQ- quality of life (USIQ-QOL) consists of 8 questions which inquire about bother and condition specific QOL such as: cooping behaviors, work, commuting and travel, sleep, physical activities, social activities, psychological well-being, relationships and sexual function. Items for each scale are summed and transformed to a score ranging from 0-100. Higher symptom bother scores indicate increasing symptom bother, and higher USIQ-QOL scores indicate worse health related quality of life. The main objective of this current study is to compare the effect of two different anticholinergic medications on symptoms of urinary urgency using a validated, subjective instruments designed specifically for this purpose.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Solifenacin Succinate vs. Fesoterodine A Comparison Trial for the Treatment of Bothersome Urgency Symptoms
Study Start Date :
May 1, 2012
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2013
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
May 1, 2013

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: solifenacin succinate (10 mg OD)

Drug: solifenacin succinate
8 mg once daily for 60 days
Other Names:
  • vesicare
  • Active Comparator: fesoterodine (8mg OD)

    Drug: fesoterodine
    8 mg, once daily for 60 dyas
    Other Names:
  • Toviaz
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Changes in urgency sensation [two months following treatment]

      The effect of two different antochloinergic treatment on urgency symptoms will be measured by comparing USIQ scores changes in the two study arms, before and after treatment. Changes in urgency sensation will be analysed by subsiding the USIQ scopre at 2 months (second visit) from the USIQ score at baseline. Independent student t- test will be used for Comparison between the changes in USIQ score of the two groups.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Adverse events [two months]

      Tolerability of both drugs will be monitored throughout the study based on reported AEs and discontinuations.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 80 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Female
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Are > 18 years old

    • Have a clinical diagnosis of OAB (wet or dry) with urinary urgency

    • Are seeking treatment for OAB

    • No contraindication to solifenacin succinate (10 mg OD) or fesoterodine (8mg OD)

    • Have a negative urine dipstick analysis

    • Are able to consent and fill out study documents and complete all study visits

    • Have not been treated with an anticholinergic medication in the past 1-month

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Have known neurologic disorder, e.g.: multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease, spinal cord injury, stroke

    • Are currently receiving treatment for OAB, including medications, physical and/or formal behavioral therapy, or electrical stimulation

    • Have an elevated post -void residual volume by ultrasound or straight catheterization (PVR>150 ml)

    • Were treated for a urinary tract infection in the last month

    • Have untreated narrow angle glaucoma

    • Are unable to comprehend and complete study tasks

    • Have an allergy to or had previously failed treatment with solifenacin succinate or fesoterodine

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Rambam Health Care Campus Haifa Israel
    2 Hadassah Jerusalem Israel
    3 Belinson Petach Tikva Israel
    4 Asaf harofeh Tel Aviv Israel
    5 Rebecca Ziv Zefat Israel

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Rambam Health Care Campus

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Anna Padoa, MD, Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center
    • Principal Investigator: Haim Krissi, MD, Belinson Medical center
    • Principal Investigator: David Shveiky, MD, Hadassa
    • Principal Investigator: Naama Marcus, MD, Rebecca ziv
    • Principal Investigator: Lior Lowenstein, MD, MS, Rambam Health Care Campus

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Lior Lowenstein, Head Of Urgoyncology Service, Rambam Health Care Campus
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01595152
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • RMB-0096-12
    • RMB-0096-12
    First Posted:
    May 9, 2012
    Last Update Posted:
    May 16, 2012
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2012
    Keywords provided by Lior Lowenstein, Head Of Urgoyncology Service, Rambam Health Care Campus
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of May 16, 2012