Use of a Ureteral Access Sheath During Ureteroscopy and Its Effect on Stone Free Rate
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Patients with upper ureteral or renal stones will be randomized to undergoing ureteroscopy with or without a ureteral access sheath. The sheath is designed to facilitate ureteroscope insertion and re-insertion, thus allowing fragments to be basketed out. Stone free rates at 3 months will be determined between the two groups.
The investigators hypothesize that the use of the ureteral access sheath with ureteroscopy will result in improved stone free rates at 3 months compared to ureteroscopy without use of a sheath.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 4 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: 1 ureteroscopy with ureteral access sheath |
Device: Navigator Ureteral Access Sheath
ureteral access sheath
Other Names:
|
No Intervention: 2 ureteroscopy without ureteral access sheath |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- The primary end point is the stone free rate at 3 months post ureteroscopy. [3 months post ureteroscopy]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Secondary end points include operative and surgical factors such as operative time, stone size, stone location, stone composition, patient sex and the presence of a ureteric stent post-op. [at time of intervention]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Upper ureteral (proximal to iliac vessels/iliac crest) calculi;
-
Renal calculi;
-
Normal renal function;
-
Any stone composition;
-
Single or multiple stones(planned treatment of all stones at this surgery);
-
Age > 18 years;
-
Able and willing to return treatment centre for follow-up visits; AND
-
Signed study consent
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Ureteric calculi distal to the level of the iliac vessels/iliac crest;
-
Failed ureteroscopy for same stone (i.e. has to be the first ureteroscopic procedure for this stone, however a prior failed extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is acceptable);
-
Bilateral ureteroscopy;
-
If an adjunctive procedure is planned post ureteroscopy (e.g. percutaneous nephrolithotomy, SWL) (i.e. it is known preoperatively that a ureteroscopic procedure will not render the patient stone free and that ancillary procedures will be necessary);
-
If in the investigators opinion, enrollment would be not be appropriate; OR
-
Pregnancy
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Edmonton Prostate and Urological Research Centre | Edmonton | Alberta | Canada | T5H 4B9 |
2 | The Prostate Centre at Vancouver General Hospital | Vancouver | British Columbia | Canada | V5Z 3J5 |
3 | Centre for Advanced Urological Research at Queen's University | Kingston | Ontario | Canada | M5B 1W8 |
4 | Urology at St. Joseph's Hospital, The University of Western Ontario | London | Ontario | Canada | N6A 4V2 |
5 | Kidney Stone Program at St. Michael's Hospital | Toronto | Ontario | Canada | M5B 1W8 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Lawson Health Research Institute
- Boston Scientific Corporation
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Hassan Razvi, MD, FRCSC, Urology, St. Joseph's Hospital, The University of Western Ontario
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- R-05-002