Efficacy of Retrograde Fill Vs Spontaneous Fill to Assess Voiding Function

Sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01091844
Collaborator
(none)
50
1
2
8
6.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine if two different methods of performing a postoperative voiding trial are equivalent in evaluating urinary retention after gynecologic surgery.

Participants: The participants in this study will be women who have undergone gynecologic surgery at UNC-Chapel Hill.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Voiding Trial
N/A

Detailed Description

Subjects will be enrolled in the study when presenting to the UNC gynecology outpatient clinic for surgical preoperative evaluation. After surgery, each woman will undergo a voiding trial to assess for urinary retention after surgery. This is currently performed on all patients undergoing surgery involving prolapse or incontinence. At UNC this is usually performed by allowing the bladder to spontaneously fill, then allowing the patient to void and afterward catheterizing the patient to check a postvoid residual ("spontaneous fill" technique). In this study, we will also assess bladder emptying separately by filling the bladder retrograde through the catheter already in place with 300 mL of saline and then removing the catheter and allowing the patient to void ("retrograde-fill" technique). We will determine postvoid residual indirectly by subtracting voided volume from the 300 mL infused volume. No catheterization will be performed with this technique. Both of these techniques will be performed. The order in which the two techniques will be performed will be randomized. We will then compare the outcomes of these two techniques of voiding trials to see if they are equivalent in assessing urinary retention. Of note, the retrograde fill technique is standard at other institutions and is not considered experimental.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
50 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
Efficacy of Retrograde Fill Vs Spontaneous FIll to Assess Voiding Function
Study Start Date :
Dec 1, 2009
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2010
Actual Study Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2010

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Spontaneous Fill Technique

We allow the bladder to spontaneously fill, then allow the patient to void and afterward catheterize the patient to check a postvoid residual ("spontaneous fill" technique").

Procedure: Voiding Trial
After surgery, each woman will undergo a voiding trial to assess for urinary retention after surgery. This is performed on all patients undergoing surgery involving prolapse or incontinence. There are two methods commonly used to perform a voiding trial: Spontaneous Fill and Retrograde Fill techniques. Both are considered standard of care. The goal of the study is to perform both on each patient to assess their equivalency. There are no experimental interventions taking place.

Active Comparator: Retrograde Fill Technique

We assess bladder emptying by filling the bladder retrograde through the catheter already in place with 300 mL of saline and then removing the catheter and allowing the patient to void ("retrograde-fill" technique). We will determine postvoid residual indirectly by subtracting voided volume from the 300 mL infused volume. No catheterization will be performed with this technique unless they void less than 200 mL.

Procedure: Voiding Trial
After surgery, each woman will undergo a voiding trial to assess for urinary retention after surgery. This is performed on all patients undergoing surgery involving prolapse or incontinence. There are two methods commonly used to perform a voiding trial: Spontaneous Fill and Retrograde Fill techniques. Both are considered standard of care. The goal of the study is to perform both on each patient to assess their equivalency. There are no experimental interventions taking place.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Presence of urinary retention [Postoperative Day 1]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Women undergoing surgical correction of pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence
Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Unwillingness to participate in the investigation.

  2. Inability to give informed consent.

  3. Known preoperative voiding dysfunction

  4. Plan for suprapubic catheter placement at time of surgery.

  5. Age less than 18

  6. Non-English speaking

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 UNC-Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina United States 27599

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kelly Hankins, MD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
, ,
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01091844
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 09-1286
First Posted:
Mar 24, 2010
Last Update Posted:
Oct 13, 2010
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2010

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 13, 2010