FC-DM: The Usefulness of Flexible Cystoscopy for Preventing Double-J Stent Malposition After Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy

Sponsor
Sung Gu Kang (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03150446
Collaborator
Korea University Anam Hospital (Other)
50
1
1
74.9
0.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of flexible cystoscopy in preventing malpositioning of the ureteral stent after laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in male patients.

From April 2009 to June 2015, 97 male patients with stones >1.8 cm in the upper ureter underwent intracorporeal double-J stenting of the ureter after laparoscopic ureterolithotomy performed by four different surgeons. In the last 50 patients who underwent laparoscopic ureterolithotomy flexible cystoscopy was performed through the urethral route to confirm the position of the double-J stent, while in the first 47 correct positioning of the stent was confirmed through postoperative KUB.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: flexible cystoscopy
N/A

Detailed Description

The treatment of large upper ureteral stones is still controversial. The American Urological Association (AUA) and the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommend that laparoscopic stone removal may be considered in rare cases in which shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URS), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy fail or are unlikely to be successful. In a recent meta-analysis of treatment of large proximal ureteral stones, Torricelli et al. reported that the outcomes of laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LUL) for larger upper ureteral stones are favorable compared with those of URS, and LUL should be considered as a first-line option when flexible ureteroscopy is not available. After such surgery, many surgeons prefer placing a double-J stent, a ureteral catheter that is passed through the ureter from the kidney to the bladder. Although double-J stent placement after LUL remains controversial, many urologists believe that it may help prevent postoperative urinary leakage.

Intracorporeal double-J stenting is technically difficult, and malpositioning often occurs after surgery in clinical practice. However, the actual rate of malpositioning of stents has not been reported yet. Although clinicians use different ways to place double-J stents precisely, accurate stent placement before the closure of the ureteral incision might be difficult to confirm.

Upward malpositioning of the stent after surgery may necessitate removal of the stent using a ureteroscope. It is difficult to remove stents in the outpatient setting without anesthesia to reduce pain and discomfort, especially in male patients.

In this study, The investigators used flexible cystoscopy through the urethral route before closure of the ureteral incision to confirm that the double-J stent was placed correctly in the bladder of male patients. Upon identification of upward malpositioning of the ureteral stent, position adjustments were performed by intracorporeally manipulating the ureteral stent through the incision site of the ureter. The aim of this study was to determine the malpositioning rate and predicting factors associated with upward malpositioning of intracorporeal double-J stents after LUL and to evaluate the usefulness of flexible cystoscopy in preventing such malpositioning in male patients.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
50 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
From April 2009 to June 2015, 97 male patients with stones >1.8 cm in the upper ureter underwent intracorporeal double-J stenting of the ureter after laparoscopic ureterolithotomy performed by four different surgeons. The 50 participants was performed with flexible cystoscopy through the urethral route to confirm the position of the double-J stent.From April 2009 to June 2015, 97 male patients with stones >1.8 cm in the upper ureter underwent intracorporeal double-J stenting of the ureter after laparoscopic ureterolithotomy performed by four different surgeons. The 50 participants was performed with flexible cystoscopy through the urethral route to confirm the position of the double-J stent.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
The Usefulness of Flexible Cystoscopy for Preventing Double-J Stent Malposition After Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2009
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: The group using flexible cystoscopy

50 patients with large upper ureteral stones underwent laparoscopic ureterolithotomy with flexible cystoscopy to confirm the correct positioning of the double-J stent. After intracorporeal insertion of the double-J catheter, additional endoscopic monitoring with flexible cystoscopy was performed. The surgeon manipulating the double-J catheter used monitor A, while an assistant inserted a flexible cystoscope into the bladder through the urethral route and determined whether the double-J stent was correctly placed in the bladder using monitor B before suturing the site of ureterotomy.

Device: flexible cystoscopy
After intracorporeal insertion of the double-J catheter, additional endoscopic monitoring with flexible cystoscopy was performed. The surgeon manipulating the double-J catheter used monitor A, while an assistant inserted a flexible cystoscope into the bladder through the urethral route and determined whether the double-J stent was correctly placed in the bladder using monitor B before suturing the site of ureterotomy. If the stent was well-placed, the flexible cystoscope was withdrawn. If the double-J stent was not visualized in the bladder, the surgeon pushed the stent inferiorly using a laparoscopic instrument and monitor A until the stent came out through the ureteral orifice on monitor B.
Other Names:
  • Laparoscopic adjustment of double-J stent
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. upward malpositioning of ureteral stents [5 minutes]

      whether the double-J stent was correctly placed in the bladder

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    N/A and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Male
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • the patients with large stones (>1.8 cm in size) of the upper ureter

    • male patients

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • the patients planing to be treated with other treatment except laparoscopic ureterolithotomy about the upper ureter stone

    • female patients

    • non operable patients

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Department of Urology, Korea University College of Medicine Seoul Korea, Republic of 136-701

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Sung Gu Kang
    • Korea University Anam Hospital

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Sung Gu Kang, Professor, Department of Urology, Korea University College of Medicine

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Sung Gu Kang, Associate Professor, Korea University Anam Hospital
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03150446
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • FC-DM 1.0
    First Posted:
    May 12, 2017
    Last Update Posted:
    May 12, 2017
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2017
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Sung Gu Kang, Associate Professor, Korea University Anam Hospital
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of May 12, 2017