Effectiveness of Circular Muscle Exercise (Paula Method) Versus Kegel Exercise for Urinary Stress Incontinence

Sponsor

Hadassah Medical Organization (Other)

Overall Status

Completed

CT.gov ID

NCT00197314

Collaborator

(none)

200

Enrollment

Location

Duration (Months)

9.5

Patients Per Site Per Month

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a randomized controlled trial comparing two methods of exercise for the treatment of stress incontinence ( loss of urine after physical exertion) in women. We are comparing the Paula method of circular muscle exercise, in which circular muscles controlling sphincters of the body (such as the eyes, mouth and rectum) are exercised, with pelvic floor training (Kegel exercises) in women in the community. The study hypothesis is that the effectiveness of circular muscle exercises is equivalent to pelvic floor training among women with this disorder.

Condition or Disease	Intervention/Treatment	Phase
Urinary Stress Incontinence (SI)	Behavioral: circular muscle exercises versus pelvic floor exercises	Phase 3

Detailed Description

Background: Urinary stress incontinence(SI) is defined as involuntary urinary loss which appears during increased intra-abdominal pressure which can be measured objectively. It is an important social and hygienic problem. Its prevalence varies fron 12-55% depending on age, and geography. The economic costs of this condition were estimated to reach 24 billion dollars in the US in 1995. The objectives of this study are to evaluate two non-invasive methods of treatment of stress incontinence.

Methods: 200 women who chosen from the community and suffering from SI will enter the study and will be randomized to one of two arms. The first arm is the Paula method of circular muscle exercises: these women will receive private lessons from a registered Paula instructor. The system is based on activating circular muscles in the body. The second arm will receive instruction in pelvic floor muscle training by a physiotherapist.

The clinical trial will compare the efficacy of the methods for the treatment of SI. The candidates for inclusion in the trial will undergo a gynecological exam and a "Pad Test". The efficacy will be measured in terms of changes in the Pad test (quantity of urinary leakage) and subjective reports of the participants on leakage, quality of life and sexual function.

Study Design

Study Type:

Interventional

Allocation:

Randomized

Intervention Model:

Parallel Assignment

Masking:

Single

Primary Purpose:

Treatment

Official Title:

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Circular Muscle Exercises (Paula Method) vs. Pelvic Floor Training (Kegel Exercises) for Urinary Stress Incontinence in Women

Study Start Date :

Jun 1, 2004

Study Completion Date :

Mar 1, 2006

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

Mean change in grams of urinary leakage as measured by Pad test []

Secondary Outcome Measures

Quality of life as measured by IQOL scale, sexuality as measured by questionnaire, subjective assessment of SI and general health []

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:

20 Years to 65 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study:

Female

Accepts Healthy Volunteers:

Inclusion Criteria:ambulatory women, aged 20-65, living in Jerusalem area, able to understand instruction in Hebrew or English, suffering from urinary stress incontinence with a positive Pad test of at least 1 gm -

Exclusion Criteria:pregnant,within 12 weeks of delivery,6 weeks since abortion,breastfeeding, illnesses which limit physical activity (cardiac, respiratory, psychiatric and neurological), Pad test < 1gm,pelvic surgery within last 6 months, genital prolapse Grade 3 or higher, previous surgery for urinary incontinence, previous pelvic radiation therapy