Usability of the Software MacuFix for the Categorization of Metamorphopsia

Sponsor
Augenheilkunde Lindenthal (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04347564
Collaborator
(none)
45
1
4.9
9.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The usability of a novel test to categorize a distorted visual impression (metamorphopsia) is examined with the questionnaire "SUS"

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Detailed Description

    Introduction Diseases of the retinal centre (macula) can lead to a distorted visual impression (metamorphopsia). The usability of a novel on-screen test to categorize metamorphopsia is to be examined with the questionnaire "SUS" to determine how user-friendly the software is perceived.

    Purpose To examine the usability of the software for persons perceiving metamorphopsia employing the questionnaire SUS.

    Aim of the work Improvement of the software in terms of user-friendliness.

    Methods For this observational pilot study, 30 persons are to be recruited from the patient pool of a private practice.

    Primary endpoint: Score of the SUS questionnaire.

    Each participating person performs the test once with each eye wearing appropriate near correction. The test shows on a screen 4 square fields with a grid pattern of horizontal and vertical lines. All 4 fields have lines that are partially distorted. The task of the test person is to select the field with more distinctively distorted lines when viewed with one eye.This selection must be made at least 10 times per eye: an algorithm determines the smallest correctly named distortion difference. Afterwards each person answers the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire, SUS contains five positive and five negative statements on the usability of the system being evaluated. For each statement, the study participant gives his or her approval or rejection in the form of a scale ranging from 1= "strong approval" to 5= "strong rejection" of the statement. The results of the SUS questionnaire are used to calculate a numerical value (SUS score).

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Actual Enrollment :
    45 participants
    Observational Model:
    Case-Only
    Time Perspective:
    Cross-Sectional
    Official Title:
    Usability of the Software MacuFix for the Categorization of Metamorphopsia and Evaluation of Patient Adherence Compared to the Amsler Grid
    Actual Study Start Date :
    May 4, 2020
    Actual Primary Completion Date :
    Sep 30, 2020
    Actual Study Completion Date :
    Sep 30, 2020

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Score of System Usability Scale (SUS) Questionnaire [1 day]

      Patients filled out the SUS questionnaire immediately after completing the MacuFix test. SUS consists of ten statements each with five possible answers ranging from complete rejection to complete agreement. For each statement, the participant gives his or her approval or rejection in the form of a scale ranging from 1=strong approval to 5=strong rejection. The results of the SUS questionnaire are used to calculate a numerical value (SUS score).The results can have a value between 0 (worst application imaginable) and 100 (best application imaginable)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Median Time Interval (in Days) Between Two Self-test Measurements (MakuFix or Amsler Respectively) to Assess the Test Adherence [On the study day and 3 months after the study day, patients were asked how many days usually elapsed after a test with the method they chose until the next time they used this test method.]

      After a positive vote by the Ethics Committee of the North Rhine Medical Association (No. 2020057) 45 patients were included in the study from 4th May, 2020 - 30th June, 2020. Based on the amendment approval of the competent ethics committee (No. 600213225) participating persons were offered to use the App MacuFix® as a home test and to start a prospective, controlled study to examine the adherence using a self-test and evaluate the vison-related quality of life. On the study day and 3 months later each patient was asked about the frequency of use of the Amsler test. The time interval given by the patient between two Amsler Tests (Amsler group) or two MacuFix texts (MacuFix group) was assessed in days.

    2. Change of Vision-related Quality of Life (NEI VFQ-25, Subscale 7) After Use of the App MacuFix Versus Amsler Grid/no Test [The validated questionnaire "National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25" (NEI VFQ-25) was used at baseline and after 3 months.]

      The validated questionnaire "National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25" (NEI VFQ-25) was used to measure vision-related quality of life. The values in the questionnaire can take values from 0 to 100. High values in this questionnaire correspond to a better quality of life, low values to a poor quality of life. The 25 questions of this questionnaire can be assigned to 12 scales.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Distorted visual impression in at least one eye, detected with Amsler grid:

    2. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA): at least 20/200; age over 18 years; presence of a declaration of consent to participate in the study

    Exclusion Criteria:

    No distorted visual impression in both eyes; best corrected visual acuity under 0.1; age under 18 years

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Augenheilkunde Lindenthal Cologne Germany 50931

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Augenheilkunde Lindenthal

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Daniela Claessens, MD, Augenheilkunde Lindenthal

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Daniela Claessens, Daniela Claessens, Dr.med., M.Sc., Augenheilkunde Lindenthal
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04347564
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • metacat
    First Posted:
    Apr 15, 2020
    Last Update Posted:
    May 18, 2021
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2021
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Daniela Claessens, Daniela Claessens, Dr.med., M.Sc., Augenheilkunde Lindenthal
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details Of 75 patients questioned, 45 participated in the study.
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title Initial Population
    Arm/Group Description As part of a routine examination, each participating patient carried out the MacuFix test with each eye with adequate near correction once in the period 4th May, 2020 - 30th June, 2020. In addition, BCVA was measured, patients filled out the vision-related questionnaire NEI VFQ-25, patients were asked about the frequency of use of the Amsler test, a retinal examination and a spectral domain optical coherence tomography was performed. After performing the MacuFix® test all study patients filled out the questionnaire SUS. If they were interested, the patients were given a link for free use of MacuFix® as a home test or they could download the test as an app for use with an iPad or smartphone (MacuFix group). 3 months after the study day patients were asked whether they agreed to be interviewed about the frequency of using a home test and whether they were willing to answer the questionnaire NEI VFQ-25 once more.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 45
    COMPLETED 45
    NOT COMPLETED 0

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Initial Population
    Arm/Group Description As part of a routine examination, each participating patient carried out the MacuFix test with each eye with adequate near correction once in the period 4th May, 2020 - 30th June,2020. In addition, BCVA was measured, patients filled out the vision-related questionnaire NEI VFQ-25, patients were asked about the frequency of use of the Amsler test, a retinal examination and a spectral domain OCT was performed. After performing the MacuFix® test all study patients filled out the pseudonymised questionnaire SUS. If they were interested, the patients were given a link for free use of MacuFix® as a home test on a PC for future use of the test. Alternatively, the patients could download the test as an app for use with an iPad or smartphone. 3 months after the study day patients were asked whether they agreed to be interviewed about the frequency of using a home test and whether they were willing to answer the questionnaire NEI-VFQ-25 once more.
    Overall Participants 45
    Age (Count of Participants)
    <=18 years
    0
    0%
    Between 18 and 65 years
    12
    26.7%
    >=65 years
    33
    73.3%
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    18
    40%
    Male
    27
    60%
    Race and Ethnicity Not Collected (Count of Participants)
    Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants)
    Germany
    45
    100%
    BCVA (Snellen decimal) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [Snellen decimal]
    0.6
    (0.25)

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Score of System Usability Scale (SUS) Questionnaire
    Description Patients filled out the SUS questionnaire immediately after completing the MacuFix test. SUS consists of ten statements each with five possible answers ranging from complete rejection to complete agreement. For each statement, the participant gives his or her approval or rejection in the form of a scale ranging from 1=strong approval to 5=strong rejection. The results of the SUS questionnaire are used to calculate a numerical value (SUS score).The results can have a value between 0 (worst application imaginable) and 100 (best application imaginable)
    Time Frame 1 day

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    45 patients
    Arm/Group Title Initial Population
    Arm/Group Description As part of a routine examination, each participating patient carried out the MacuFix test with each eye with adequate near correction once in the period 4th May, 2020 - 30th June,2020. In addition, BCVA was measured, patients filled out the vision-related questionnaire NEI VFQ-25, patients were asked about the frequency of use of the Amsler test, a retinal examination and a spectral domain OCT was performed. After performing the MacuFix® test all study patients filled out the questionnaire SUS. If they were interested, the patients were given a link for free use of MacuFix® as a home test on a PC for future use of the test. Alternatively, the patients could download the test as an app for use with an iPad or smartphone. 3 months after the study day patients were asked whether they agreed to be interviewed about the frequency of using a home test and whether they were willing to answer the questionnaire NEI-VFQ-25 once more.
    Measure Participants 45
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
    76.7
    (15.5)
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Median Time Interval (in Days) Between Two Self-test Measurements (MakuFix or Amsler Respectively) to Assess the Test Adherence
    Description After a positive vote by the Ethics Committee of the North Rhine Medical Association (No. 2020057) 45 patients were included in the study from 4th May, 2020 - 30th June, 2020. Based on the amendment approval of the competent ethics committee (No. 600213225) participating persons were offered to use the App MacuFix® as a home test and to start a prospective, controlled study to examine the adherence using a self-test and evaluate the vison-related quality of life. On the study day and 3 months later each patient was asked about the frequency of use of the Amsler test. The time interval given by the patient between two Amsler Tests (Amsler group) or two MacuFix texts (MacuFix group) was assessed in days.
    Time Frame On the study day and 3 months after the study day, patients were asked how many days usually elapsed after a test with the method they chose until the next time they used this test method.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    difference in frequency of using the Amsler Grid or the app MacuFix® measured as the time interval (days) between two measurements to assess test adherence
    Arm/Group Title Initial Population
    Arm/Group Description As part of a routine examination, each participating patient carried out the MacuFix test with each eye with adequate near correction once in the period 4th May, 2020 - 30th June,2020. In addition, BCVA was measured, patients filled out the vision-related questionnaire NEI VFQ-25, patients were asked about the frequency of use of the Amsler test, a retinal examination and a spectral domain OCT was performed. After performing the MacuFix® test all study patients filled out the questionnaire SUS. If they were interested, the patients were given a link for free use of MacuFix® as a home test on a PC for future use of the test. Alternatively, the patients could download the test as an app for use with an iPad or smartphone. 3 months after the study day patients were asked whether they agreed to be interviewed about the frequency of using a home test and whether they were willing to answer the questionnaire NEI VFQ-25 once more.
    Measure Participants 45
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [days]
    13
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change of Vision-related Quality of Life (NEI VFQ-25, Subscale 7) After Use of the App MacuFix Versus Amsler Grid/no Test
    Description The validated questionnaire "National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25" (NEI VFQ-25) was used to measure vision-related quality of life. The values in the questionnaire can take values from 0 to 100. High values in this questionnaire correspond to a better quality of life, low values to a poor quality of life. The 25 questions of this questionnaire can be assigned to 12 scales.
    Time Frame The validated questionnaire "National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25" (NEI VFQ-25) was used at baseline and after 3 months.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Of 45 patients included in the study, 29 subjects completed the questionnaire-25 NEI VFQ-25 before the study day and after 3 months of app use ("app user" group: 20 subjects) or 3 months of non-use ("comparison group" group: 8 performed the Amsler test, 1 did not use a self-test).
    Arm/Group Title App-users Amsler Grid or no Home Test
    Arm/Group Description 12-14 weeks after the study day patients using MacuFix® as a home test were asked whether they agreed to be interviewed about the frequency of using a home test and whether they were willing to answer the questionnaire NEI-VFQ-25 once more. 12-14 weeks after the study day patients using the Amsler Grid as a home test or no home test were asked whether they agreed to be interviewed about the frequency of using a home test and whether they were willing to answer the questionnaire NEI-VFQ-25 once more.
    Measure Participants 20 9
    Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [score on a scale]
    20.31
    -3.47

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame 6 months
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Initial Population
    Arm/Group Description As part of a routine examination, each participating patient carried out the MacuFix test with each eye with adequate near correction once in the period 4th May, 2020 - 30th June,2020. In addition, BCVA was measured, patients filled out the vision-related questionnaire NEI VFQ-25, patients were asked about the frequency of use of the Amsler test, a retinal examination and a spectral domain OCT was performed. After performing the MacuFix® test all study patients filled out the pseudonymised questionnaire SUS. If they were interested, the patients were given a link for free use of MacuFix® as a home test on a PC for future use of the test. Alternatively, the patients could download the test as an app for use with an iPad or smartphone. 3 months after the study day patients were asked whether they agreed to be interviewed about the frequency of using a home test and whether they were willing to answer the questionnaire NEI-VFQ-25 once more.
    All Cause Mortality
    Initial Population
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/45 (0%)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Initial Population
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/45 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Initial Population
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/45 (0%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    Comparability of MacuFix® and the Amsler Grid, is to some extent limited, because MacuFix® tests the central 4° of the visual field whereas the Amsler Grid examines 10° when used in the intended distance.

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Daniela Claessens
    Organization Augenheilkunde Lindenthal
    Phone 017229227962
    Email daniela.claessens@gmx.de
    Responsible Party:
    Daniela Claessens, Daniela Claessens, Dr.med., M.Sc., Augenheilkunde Lindenthal
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04347564
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • metacat
    First Posted:
    Apr 15, 2020
    Last Update Posted:
    May 18, 2021
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2021