Vaginal vs. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Sponsor
Medical University of Graz (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02059954
Collaborator
Austrian Urogynecology Working Group (AUWG) (Other)
100
3
2
44
33.3
0.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Hysterectomy for benign indication is one of the most common surgical procedures in women. Numerous reviews and guidelines recommend the vaginal approach for benign hysterectomy, but the proportion of laparoscopic (and robotic) hysterectomies is increasing.

This study will compare a range of clinical and subjective outcomes of vaginal vs. total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Outcomes include operating time, postoperative recovery, return to work as well as cosmesis, quality of life and sexual health.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Hysterectomy
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
100 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Vaginal Hysterectomy Versus Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2016
Actual Study Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Vaginal hysterectomy

Vaginal hysterectomy

Procedure: Hysterectomy

Active Comparator: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy

Laparoscopic hysterectomy

Procedure: Hysterectomy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Operating time (min.) [Surgery]

    Operating time (min.)

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Complications [6 weeks]

    Intraoperative and postoperative complications

  2. Anesthesia time (min.) [surgery]

  3. Quality of life [12 months]

  4. Sexual health [12 months]

  5. Return to work [3 months]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • benign indication for vaginal hysterectomy (e.g., abnormal uterine bleeding, fibroids, atypical endometrial hyperplasia)

  • clinical exam indicates vaginal hysterectomy is feasible

  • no major concomitant surgery

  • able to complete questionnaires in German

Exclusion Criteria:
  • uterine malignancy

  • major concomitant surgery (e.g., for incontinence or prolapse)

  • clinical exam indicating vaginal hysterectomy not feasible

  • contraindication for surgery or laparoscopy

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder, Abteilung Gynäkologie Graz Austria 8020
2 Medical University of Graz/Dept. OB/GYN Graz Austria 8036
3 LKH Leoben/Abteilung Gynäkologie Leoben Austria 8700

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Medical University of Graz
  • Austrian Urogynecology Working Group (AUWG)

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Karl F Tamussino, MD, Medical University of Graz
  • Principal Investigator: Rene W Laky, MD, Medical University of Graz

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Medical University of Graz
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02059954
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 26-122 ex 13/14
  • MUG 26-122 ex 13/14
First Posted:
Feb 11, 2014
Last Update Posted:
Apr 17, 2018
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2018
Keywords provided by Medical University of Graz
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 17, 2018