Safety Study of ExAblate for the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids

Sponsor
InSightec (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01142791
Collaborator
(none)
121
8
1
23
15.1
0.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The objective of this Phase IV study is to evaluate the safety of the ExAblate treatment of uterine fibroids using the enhanced sonication techniques, based on the current commercially-approved treatment guidelines. Treatment may include up to 100% of individual fibroid volume, within established serosal and sacral treatment margins.

The Enhanced sonication is one of the various sonication modes that may lead to increased thermal dose volume of each sonication without additional safety risks. This is an additional treatment tool available in the ExAblate system for the treatment of uterine fibroids.

The safety profile of the Enhanced Sonication was investigated under an FDA-regulated IDE study. FDA granted approval of Enhanced Sonication with the requirement to perform a post-approval study to collect additional safety data when treating up to 100% of individual fibroid volume.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: ExAblate
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
121 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Phase IV Clinical Study To Evaluate the Safety of MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound Treatment of Uterine Fibroids With Enhanced Sonication Techniques
Study Start Date :
May 1, 2010
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2012
Actual Study Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2012

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Other: ExAblate treatment

Device: ExAblate
Magnetic resonance image-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) for fibroid ablation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Percent Occurrence of Chronic Leg Pain [From treatment to 1-month post-treatment]

    The hypothesis was that over 90% of subjects would not experience chronic leg pain. A lower 95% Confidence Limit > 0.90 was considered statistically successful.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Women age 18 or older

  • Symptomatic uterine fibroids, defined as those resulting in scores of 21 or higher, based on patient responses to questions 1-8 of the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (UFS-QOL)

  • Women who have given written informed consent

  • Women who are able and willing to attend all study visits.

  • Patient is pre or peri-menopausal (within 12 months of last menstrual period).

  • Patient should be family complete.

  • Able to communicate sensations during the ExAblate procedure.

  • Uterine fibroids, which are device accessible (i.e., positioned in the uterus such that they can be accessed without being shielded by bowel or bone).

  • Fibroids(s) clearly visible on non-contrast MRI.

  • Fibroid enhances on MR contrast imaging.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Women who are pregnant, as confirmed by serum/urine test at time of screening, or urine pregnancy test on the day of treatment.

  • Patients who are breast-feeding.

  • Patients with active pelvic inflammatory disease (PID).

  • Patients with active local or systemic infection.

  • Patients experiencing chronic leg or lower back pain within the last 6 months.

  • Contraindication for MRI Scan:

  • Severe claustrophobia that would prevent completion of procedure in the MR unit

  • Weight greater than 250 lbs (113Kg)

  • Implanted ferromagnetic materials and/or devices contraindicated for MR scan

  • Known intolerance to MRI contrast agent (e.g. Gadolinium or Magnevist)

  • Any other contraindication for MRI Scan

  • Extensive abdominal scarring in the beam path (that cannot be avoided by redirection of the beam).

  • Dermoid cyst of the ovary anywhere in the treatment path.

  • Known or suspected pelvic carcinoma or pre-malignant conditions, including sarcoma and adenomatous hyperplasia.

  • Intrauterine device (IUD) anywhere in the treatment path.

  • Undiagnosed vaginal bleeding.

  • Pedunculated fibroids.

  • Uterine size >24 weeks.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 UCLA Los Angeles California United States 90095
2 UCSD Department of Radiology San Diego California United States 92103-8749
3 University of California San Francisco San Francisco California United States 94107
4 University Image Guided Therapy Boca Raton Florida United States 33431
5 Borgess Research Institute Kalamazoo Michigan United States 49048
6 Duke University Durham North Carolina United States 27705
7 The Methodist Hospital Research Institute Houston Texas United States 77030
8 University of Virginia Health System Charlottesville Virginia United States 22908

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • InSightec

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
InSightec
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01142791
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • UF033
First Posted:
Jun 11, 2010
Last Update Posted:
Mar 19, 2019
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2019
Keywords provided by InSightec
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail The protocol defined the primary analysis to include participants receiving more than 1 sonication, i.e., 115 in this case. The safety population was defined in the protocol as participants receiving any sonications which is 121. 6 subjects receiving only 1 sonication were in the safety population but not in the baseline or primary analysis.
Arm/Group Title ExAblate Treatment Additional Safety Population Particpants
Arm/Group Description ExAblate: Magnetic resonance image-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) for fibroid ablation. Phase IV enhanced sonication technique. Per protocol 6 participants receiving only 1 sonication were added to the 115 ExAblate treated subjects to compose the full safety analysis population of 121. These 6 were included in adverse event reporting only, not in baseline or efficacy analyses.
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 115 6
Safety 115 6
COMPLETED 108 0
NOT COMPLETED 7 6

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title ExAblate Treatment
Arm/Group Description ExAblate: Magnetic resonance image-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) for fibroid ablation
Overall Participants 115
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
44.6
(5.6)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
115
100%
Male
0
0%
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants)
European/Middle East (White)
84
73%
Hispanic
6
5.2%
Black
14
12.2%
Asian
8
7%
Other
3
2.6%
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
United States
115
100%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Percent Occurrence of Chronic Leg Pain
Description The hypothesis was that over 90% of subjects would not experience chronic leg pain. A lower 95% Confidence Limit > 0.90 was considered statistically successful.
Time Frame From treatment to 1-month post-treatment

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Per protocol the number of participants analyzed was the number of participants receiving more than one sonication. Six subjects receiving one sonication were excluded from the primary analysis but included in the safety population for a safety sample size n = 121.
Arm/Group Title ExAblate Treatment
Arm/Group Description ExAblate: Magnetic resonance image-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) for fibroid ablation. Phase IV enhanced sonication technique.
Measure Participants 115
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of subjects without leg pain]
97

Adverse Events

Time Frame 1 Month
Adverse Event Reporting Description Per protocol a predetermined sample size of 115 participants receiving more than one sonication were included in the primary analysis. An additional 6 subjects receiving a single sonication were excluded from the primary analysis but included in the adverse events analysis for a safety sample size of 121.
Arm/Group Title ExAblate Treatment
Arm/Group Description ExAblate: Magnetic resonance image-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) for fibroid ablation. Phase IV enhanced sonication technique.
All Cause Mortality
ExAblate Treatment
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/121 (0%)
Serious Adverse Events
ExAblate Treatment
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/121 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
ExAblate Treatment
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 105/121 (86.8%)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension 1/121 (0.8%) 1
Bloating abdomen 1/121 (0.8%) 1
Constipation 5/121 (4.1%) 5
Diarrhea 1/121 (0.8%) 1
GI upset 1/121 (0.8%) 1
Heartburn 2/121 (1.7%) 2
Nausea/vomiting 11/121 (9.1%) 12
General disorders
Cramping abdomen 2/121 (1.7%) 2
Cramping back/buttock/leg 1/121 (0.8%) 1
Tenderness abdomen 3/121 (2.5%) 3
Fatigue 1/121 (0.8%) 1
Fever 4/121 (3.3%) 4
Flu 1/121 (0.8%) 1
Medication error 1/121 (0.8%) 1
Insomnia 1/121 (0.8%) 1
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Mass - fat necrosis 1/121 (0.8%) 1
Cramping position related 1/121 (0.8%) 1
Cramping muscle leg 1/121 (0.8%) 1
Pain neck/shoulder position related 3/121 (2.5%) 4
Pubic bone soreness position related 1/121 (0.8%) 1
Cramping muscle inguinal 1/121 (0.8%) 1
Pain lower extremity position related 14/121 (11.6%) 15
Discomfort neck/shoulder position related 1/121 (0.8%) 1
Tenderness abdomen position related 1/121 (0.8%) 1
Nervous system disorders
Parasthesia 2/121 (1.7%) 2
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria 2/121 (1.7%) 2
Hematuria 2/121 (1.7%) 2
Infection bladder 1/121 (0.8%) 1
Urinary tract infection 3/121 (2.5%) 3
Cystitis 1/121 (0.8%) 1
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Edema/swelling abdome 3/121 (2.5%) 4
Amennorhia 1/121 (0.8%) 1
Cramping menstrual 6/121 (5%) 6
Vaginal discharge/bleeding 7/121 (5.8%) 7
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema abdomen 1/121 (0.8%) 1
Infection IV site 1/121 (0.8%) 1
Skin burn 5/121 (4.1%) 5
Surgical and medical procedures
Skin pain sonication relaed 54/121 (44.6%) 67
Cramping Sonication related 12/121 (9.9%) 12
Pain uterine sonication related 2/121 (1.7%) 2
Discomfort back/buttock/leg sonication related 1/121 (0.8%) 1
Pain abdomen sonication related 63/121 (52.1%) 78
Pain back/buttock/leg sonication related 70/121 (57.9%) 104
Vascular disorders
Increased blood pressure 1/121 (0.8%) 1

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Nadir Alikacem
Organization InSightec
Phone 214-630-2000
Email nadira@insightec.com
Responsible Party:
InSightec
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01142791
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • UF033
First Posted:
Jun 11, 2010
Last Update Posted:
Mar 19, 2019
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2019