Validation of RealAmp Method for the Diagnosis of Malaria in Endemic Areas of Brazil

Sponsor
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S. Fed)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02371395
Collaborator
Evandro Chagas Institute of Clinical Research (Other)
1,000
1
5
201.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Worldwide, approximately 2 billion people live in areas at risk for malaria with morbidity surpassing 250 million cases, with approximately 800,000 deaths, per year. Of the four species of malaria parasites that cause human infection, P. falciparum is responsible for the majority of severe malaria cases followed by P. vivax. Early and accurate diagnosis is essential for prompt and correct treatment, which can reduce the death rate and interrupt transmission. Currently, conventional methods for the diagnosis of malaria include microscopic examination of thin and thick blood smears and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). Light microscopy in practice typically detects parasitemia as low as 100 parasites/µl and it can differentiate species. The advantage of microscopy includes the ability to estimate parasitemia, the possibility to identify parasite stages, including gametocytes, and its low cost. However, this method is labor intensive, difficult to standardize, and requires well-trained microscopists. The majority of RDTs are based on detection of P. falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP-2) antigen and do not detect all malaria species. RDTs that detect lactose dehydrogenase (LDH) and aldolase generally broadly react with all four species of malaria parasites and therefore cannot differentiate among the species although efforts are underway to improve their performance for species detection. In settings where multiple malaria species co-circulate, molecular methods may be more reliable than microscopy and RDTs in accurately diagnosing the species of malaria parasites with low parasitemias. However, conventional molecular methods, such as nested polymerase chain reaction (nested PCR) or real-time PCR, are technically challenging and resource intensive and are generally restricted to reference laboratories due to the need for well-equipped laboratories. Recently, new molecular methods that can be used in field settings have been developed and this opens up new opportunities for exploring molecular tools for malaria diagnosis in endemic countries. With the objective of facilitating use of molecular tools for malaria control programs, the malaria laboratory at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta, USA developed a simple isothermal molecular method called Real-Time Fluorescence Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (RealAmp) for the diagnosis of malaria. Currently, RealAmp primers exist for detecting the Plasmodium genus and the detection of P. falciparum and P. vivax species. The RealAmp method has great potential as a molecular tool for the diagnosis of malaria in the field (and other infections of major public health impact, such as HIV and tuberculosis). It can provide an alternative to conventional PCR-based diagnostic methods for field use in clinical and operational programs. The objective of this proposal is to validate the sensitivity of RealAmp for detection of malaria parasites in blood spots from patients with clinical diagnosis of malaria in two endemic states of Brazil with co-circulation of P. falciparum and P. vivax. In this evaluation, RealAmp and microscopic examination will be compared to a real-time PCR method as a reference test.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Realtime amplification (RealAmp)

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
1000 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Cross-Sectional
Official Title:
Validation of RealAmp Method for the Diagnosis of Malaria in Endemic Areas of Brazil
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2015

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Malaria Diagnosis Using RealAmp and Microscopy. [12 months]

    These are the results of the different tests used in the evaluation.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
7 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Age 7 years

  • Signed informed consent for patients 18 years and older

  • Signed parental/guardian consent form and assent from the patient (for those less than 18 years)

  • Documented fever (auxiliary temperature greater than 37.5C) or self-reported fever in previous 24 hours in the absence of another obvious cause of fever

  • First visit for current illness at the diagnostic post

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Absence of fever or no history of fever

  • Follow-up visit for the current illness

  • No consent/assent to participate

  • Antimalarial treatment use in previous 30 days

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Hospital do Jurua Cruzeiro do Sul Brazil

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Evandro Chagas Institute of Clinical Research

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alexandre Macedo de Oliveira, MD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02371395
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 6619
First Posted:
Feb 25, 2015
Last Update Posted:
Oct 23, 2018
Last Verified:
May 1, 2015
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail
Arm/Group Title Patients With Suspected Malaria (Fever)
Arm/Group Description This was a study of enrolling patients with fever or history of fever for malaria testing. A total of 1,000 samples were collected from patients in Cruzeiro do Sul, Acre state from January to June, 2015.
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 1000
COMPLETED 1000
NOT COMPLETED 0

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Single Arm
Arm/Group Description This was a study of enrolling patients with fever or history of fever for malaria testing. A total of 1,000 samples were collected from patients in Cruzeiro do Sul, Acre state from January to June, 2015.
Overall Participants 1000
Age (years) [Median (Full Range) ]
Median (Full Range) [years]
29.5
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
551
55.1%
Male
449
44.9%
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected (Count of Participants)
Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants)
Brazil
1000
100%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Malaria Diagnosis Using RealAmp and Microscopy.
Description These are the results of the different tests used in the evaluation.
Time Frame 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Those were patients presenting with suspected malaria.
Arm/Group Title Single Arm
Arm/Group Description This was a study of enrolling patients with fever or history of fever for malaria testing. A total of 1,000 samples were collected from patients in Cruzeiro do Sul, Acre state from January to June, 2015.
Measure Participants 1000
P. falciparum
42
4.2%
P. vivax
153
15.3%
Mixed infection
0
0%
Species unidentified
1
0.1%
Negative
804
80.4%
P. falciparum
56
5.6%
P. vivax
169
16.9%
Mixed infection
1
0.1%
Species unidentified
0
0%
Negative
774
77.4%
P. falciparum
55
5.5%
P. vivax
181
18.1%
Mixed infection
0
0%
Species unidentified
3
0.3%
Negative
761
76.1%
P. falciparum
48
4.8%
P. vivax
152
15.2%
Mixed infection
20
2%
Species unidentified
0
0%
Negative
780
78%

Adverse Events

Time Frame
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title Single Arm
Arm/Group Description This was a study of enrolling patients with fever or history of fever for malaria testing. A total of 1,000 samples were collected from patients in Cruzeiro do Sul, Acre state from January to June, 2015.
All Cause Mortality
Single Arm
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total / (NaN)
Serious Adverse Events
Single Arm
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/1000 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Single Arm
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/1000 (0%)

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Alexandre Macedo de Oliveira
Organization CDC
Phone 404 718 4751
Email acq7@cdc.gov
Responsible Party:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02371395
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 6619
First Posted:
Feb 25, 2015
Last Update Posted:
Oct 23, 2018
Last Verified:
May 1, 2015